no sense. reporter: this is an executive officer of the company and the manager of the plant. so this company doesn t believe that chloropreen causes cancer? correct. reporter: this sum, he asked the epa for a correction. commissioned a study which argued the chloropreen classification should be changed to likely scarcinogenic to possibly carcinogenic. and .2 should be 31.2, more than 150 times the epa s risk. you look at the study and how they came up with that .2 and we have found gaps in the science of it. reporter: the epa stands by its findings. and despite its skepticism, the company promised the state to install control technologies at the plant to reduce chloropreen emissions. that includes four projects that reducinged our emissions. we re investing $20 million on this projects. it s going to be hundreds of thousands of dollars of operating expenses when those are in.
i want to get for it to expose to zero as it possibly can. artificially targeting number that you cannot enforce makes no sense. this company does not believe that chloroprene causes cancer. and at .2 should be 31.2. more than 150 times the epa s cancer risk recommend dationrec. we found gap in the science of it. epa stands by its findings and despite its skepticism. a company reducing chloroprene
to artificially target a number that you can t legally enforce, it absolutely makes no sense. jorge is an executive officer of the company and the manager of the plant. so, this company doesn t believe that chloroprene causes cancer. that s correct. this summer denka argued for a classification to be changed from likely carcinogenic to humans to possibly carcinogenic and that .2 should be 31.2, more than 150 times the epa s cancer risk recommendation. we have looked at the study they did and how they came up with the .2 and we have found gaps in the science of it. the epa stands by its findings. and despite its skepticism, the company promised the state to install control technologies at the plant to reduce chloroprene emissions. that includes four projects that reduce our emissions by 85%.
questions, curious how we do, they did better than i thought they would. give many of the basic things you remember about the first amendment. freedom of speech, you are entitled to your opinion. can you name any of the protections of the first amendment? i studied law 31/2 years. freedom of speech, freedom to be able to say what you want to say in our beautiful country. beautifully done. first amendment protects the right to bear arms. freedom of speech. the first amendment. freedom of speech. freedom of speech, freedom to practice religion, all that fun stuff. there are three branches of the federal government. can you tell me what they are? the executive branch, the
my mind is blank now. executive. legislative. judicial. that is a little tricky. defense? you are doing a great job. in law school. i studied law for 31/2 years. judiciary, legislative and executive. judicial, that is right. we are all friends. the california school system, i got an excuse. heather: branches of government, in terms of first amendment rights, if you don t know take a look, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly