congressman. and serial fabulist, george santos, surrendering himself into federal custody. congressman santos, on bail, and has been charged with 13 felonies. it is facing up to 20 years in prison. that is for the most serious felonies. what is the most serious felony, if you ask? congressman santos had so many scandals, it has been genuinely difficult to talk about which ones are talking about here. this is what mr. santos voting his entire resume. it is not even about him pretending that he produced a broadway show, spider-man, turn off the dark. that was, let s say what it was, a weird lie. it s not even about him pretending that he was a champion college volleyball player, which was also a weird lie. or, that his mother was in the south tower on 9/11. it s not even about congressman santos, allegedly, stealing $3,000 from a disabled homeless veterans dying dogs gofundme. although the fbi is, reportedly, looking into that as well. no, today s charges are about how congres
television with people speaking the truth. thank you. good job, buddy. thank you for joining us this hour. this morning, new york congressman, and serial fabulist, george santos, surrendering himself into federal custody. congressman santos, on bail, and has been charged with 13 felonies. it is facing up to 20 years in prison. that is for the most serious felonies. what is the most serious felony, if you ask? congressman santos had so many scandals, it has been genuinely difficult to talk about which ones are talking about here. this is what mr. santos voting his entire resume. it is not even about him pretending that he produced a broadway show, spider-man, turn off the dark. that was, let s say what it was, a weird lie. it s not even about him pretending that he was a champion college volleyball player, which was also a weird lie. or, that his mother was in the south tower on 9/11. it s not even about congressman santos, allegedly, stealing $3,000 from a disabled homele
always gonna have to prove intent. so, one of the reasons that it could ve been put out there this way is to demonstrate at least schaffer did not believe he had the intent to violate the law. but, again, i think there are some key differences here. the case and hawaii that the whole legal theory is based on, there was an active court order recount going on, which is what created the uncertainty. we did not have that in georgia. the election was certified seven days before the electors gathered. the other thing is that it was only a difference of less than 200 votes. here in 2020, we re talking about almost 11,000 11,780. exactly. just for people who aren t following along, there are some leaks and all of this. the idea that these republican electors had to had these they had to make these contingent electors decision is
whole legal theory is based on, there was an active court order recount going on, which is what created the uncertainty. we did not have that in georgia. the election was certified seven days before the electors gathered. the other thing is that it was only a difference of less than 200 votes. here in 2020, we re talking about almost 11,000 11,780. exactly. just for people who aren t following along, there are some leaks and all of this. the idea that these republican electors had to had these they had to make these contingent electors decision is because they were saying, in case this goes trump s way, we need to basically have our ducks in a row, because in hawaii, in 1960, a similar situation played out. they did not. and look what happened. right. but you re saying that there s a huge difference huge differences between what happened in hawaii in 1960 and what went down in georgia in 2020. exactly. and two of the other key