we ll see what happens with that. he may have a plausible case for getting it removed. it s interesting, he wants to get out of state court and fly back to the safety of the federalist society packed federal courts. in any event, i believe it s in the 11th circuit where the court is considering another rico action, which is, donald trump s rico lawsuit against hillary clinton. which was thrown out of the district court level, now being considered by the 11th court. we re getting so much of donald trump litigation and prosecution, whereas other than the defendant or the plaintiffs, he might have to argue different sides on the same legal issue in different cases that are appearing in various circuits. he s in one main crime for wave. he s gonna be his own law school seminar one day. one of the other things i want to ask you about, i know you all dealt with this as well, this is trump s speech on the ellipse on january 6th.
in other words who is not acting as a campaign volunteer after hours on a lincolns, but rather was executing the orders of don trump. so we will see what happens, he may have a plausible case for getting it removed. it is interesting that he once to get out of state court and fly back to the safety of the federalist society packed federal courts. in any event, i believed in the 11th circuit where the court is considering another rico action, which was donald trump s rico lawsuit against hillary clinton, which was thrown out of the district court level, which is now being considered by the 11th court. but we are getting so much donald trump litigation and prosecution where he has other defendant, the plaintiffs might argue different sides on the same legal issue in different cases that are appearing in
trying to block congress from having access to presidential records regarding january 6th and the insurrection on the capitol. but it s kind of like a formality who you address it to, depending on who is in charge. it is super interesting. and trump s lawyers are arguing that the 11th court lacked jurisdiction to review the special master order. how unusual is that? jose, it strikes as being very unusual, particularly in a case like this. usually if there was a question of jurisdiction or standing, that s something that would be raised in front of the court that you re saying doesn t have the standing to begin with. it s odd they will have already pled these things and argued these things and never previously made this a significant issue. but yet then turn around to the supreme court and say, well even though we basically responded to the brief and did not make this argument in the past, we are now
condition, but i don t like to take the decision away from the judges without the sensitivity of what they go through. and in the case of the defendant changing dramgt cli from the time of the arrest, and it is like you don t recognize him as the same person. i foe tissed that as we were watching this evening awaiting the ver dishgts and watching the the show preceding this on anderson anderson s show and the difference and wondered if it impacted. kimberly, you were in court today for the closing, and the last testimony and the closing statements, and it was very powerful and as they showed some of the video, you could not help but notice how different he looked. that is true, but this jury, and remember that the prosecution s mental health experts went so far as to say that routh not only was not mentally ill, but that he faked the mental illness, so i am not
juror 11? yes. juror 12? yes, your honor. this completes your service, and i will receive this verdict and have it filed with the clerk with the papers of the court at this time. all right. mr. routh, if you please stand again. having received and accepted the jury s verdict this in this matter by statute, i will impose sentence at this moment for confinement of life in the texas department of corrections without the possibility of parole. that is the verdict of this court, and i will enter the judgment accordingly, and you may be seated at this time again. andly continue mr. st. john as your attorney in regard to your rights to appeal, and that is a