shameless hypocrite. as covid-relief benefits roll out, you will find republicans trying to take credit for something they, all, voted against. velshi, starts now. good morning, i m ali velshi. it s saturday, march 13th. just over 50 days have passed since joe biden was inaugurated as president of the united states. and now, he has successfully ushered, through congress, his most pressing priority. his $1.9 trillion american-rescue plan. the president promised, help is on the way. and today, help has arrived. help has arrived, for the workers who lost their jobs. help has arrived, for the students, who have been stuck at home. help has arrived, for the families that have struggled to put food on their table. and for the small businesses, that have struggled to keep their doors open, help has arrived, america. for the first time, in a long time, this bill puts working people, in this nation, first. it s not hyperbole. it s a fact. it is, indeed, a fact. and for tangi
trump started 2022 before any of the indictments came down $101 million for his joint political action committee. now e same pac at this moment based on the filing that arrived last night, less than $4 million in the bank. the campaign is spending more than it s inging in, even though its various fundraising arms for the former president brought in $53illion in donations, the first six mompbts of the year it has spent when you look at the entirety of its committee finance consolation more than $53 million. in fact, you add in the super pac spent more than $100 million in the first six months of the year. also trump s leadership pac spent about $21 million on legal fees. the president and its associates the first six months. if you look at what that means, more than 70% of the total distributions through the first six months of the year. now, trump s fundraisi entities are trying toov the costs in any way they can and this is by far the most fascinating dynamic of this fec fing and the
to look up some of the facts. i have not seen it yet but essentially it is talking about human trafficking and one person s effort to combat it. a fiscal budget of $101 million to combat human trafficking. expanding it to another $14 million with an estimate of about 1 million adults and children trafficked every single gear. what are they talking about this movie being about fake facts? this is june 2023 for our own department of state. it is real. that s why i m confused why any publication would want to bring up. i do think the language used is particularly telling. they say that there is a link. not so much that they are upset, but perhaps who the actor is linked to. the studios come at the studio
so this movie. i haven t seen it yet, but i do plan to see it. essentially it is about talking about human trafficking and one person s effort to try and combat some of it. biden s d.o.j. has a fiscal budget of $101 million to combat human trafficking. in fact, they just signed legislation to expand that to another $14 million, with an estimate of about 1, million adults and children trafficked every single year. what are they talking about that this movie is about fake? effects so this is just the trafficking in persons report for june 2023 from our own department of state. it is real , which is why i m confused about why this is the hill that any publication would want to die on or or even bring up. i do think the language used in some of these headlines is particularly telling they call the film qanon adjacent. they say there s a link and i think it s not so much that they re upset about qanon, but perhaps who the actor is linked to the actor christian, the catholic church, the stud
i have not seen it yet but essentially it is talking about human trafficking and one person s effort to combat it. a fiscal budget of $101 million to combat human trafficking. expanding it to another $14 million with an estimate of about 1 million adults and children trafficked every single gear. what are they talking about this movie being about fake facts? this is june 2023 for our own department of state. it is real. that s why i m confused why any publication would want to bring up. i do think the language used is particularly telling. they say that there is a link. not so much that they are upset, but perhaps who the actor is linked to. the studios come at the studio