even if it wasn t going on. if you anticipated it, but it was going on. then if you destroy records with the intent trying to obstruct an investigation, and if any of those records had anything this to do with benghazi, then would you have obstruction of justice as well as 10001. you might have quid pro quo if there are clinton foundation the speaking fee to bill clinton whether she intervened on ubs behalf. that s another specific statute that makes it a crime to interfere in an internal revenue service investigation. her call to the irs was described as unusual. then clinton got 1.2 million. let s assume that the fbi completes its investigation and they discover that there is enough evidence to indict and they bring this information to the attorney general and the obama administration, loretta lynch.
has expanded its probe of hillary clinton s e-mails with agents exploring whether there are violations of 18 usc 10001. the same statute in 2004 got martha stewart in trouble with insider trading. martha stewart was having a conversation with an fbi agent and her lawyer in the fbi agent s office. she was not sworn to tell the truth. she was asked about certain activities and she lied about them. as a result of those lies, she was prosecuted and convicted under this very statute. 18 usc code 1001 pertains to materially false statements given to a third party orally or in writing. legal experts say section 1001 could apply if clinton, her aides or attorney were not forthcoming with fbi agents about her personal server as well as the destruction of
hillary clinton s e-mails with agents exploring whether there are violations of 18 usc 10001. the same statute in 2004 got martha stewart in trouble with insider trading. martha stewart was having a conversation with an fbi agent and her lawyer in the fbi agent s office. she was not sworn to tell the truth. she was asked about certain activities and she lied about them. as a result of those lies, she was prosecuted and convicted under this very statute. 18 usc code 1001 pertains to materially false statements given to a third party orally or in writing. legal experts say section 1001 could apply if clinton, her aides or attorney were not forthcoming with fbi agents about her personal server as well as the destruction of
again they dispute them but because of the reports they knew so many years ago, over a decade ago and then hid and destroyed evidence i think probably the best remedy overall is going to be coming out congress had hearings and they actually ordered the justice department to start a criminal investigation. when i was i.g. i found that an effective tool for particularly blij rant perpetrators. if you won t respond to the civic responsibility to keep people safe i think that the threat of this criminal investigation this is very important because that s part and parcel what we do. we prosecute people who ve done something criminal. and i think the opening of the criminal investigation is also going to be very important. and if they do find intentional wrongdoing and false statements to the government 18 united states code section 10001, really easy to prosecute, i think that should be applied if appropriate and if there s probable cause to go forward. we re talking about takata big name
1,0001 dollar bills as erode down an escalator. he was arrested and given a ticket. he says he was just trying to do something good. we won t hear him say it, but i swear that s what he said. the money fell down to a floor, and a group was singing let it snow at a concert below. speaks of holiday shopping. turns out it would cost you more than $114,000 to buy all of the items mentioned in the classic twelve days of christmas. that s up almost 8% from last year. the 30 year average has just been under 3%. and here is when you really get skrujs, the nine lady ooze