might ve floated above, wreckage of the titanic, or instead might ve floated above, then - wreckage of the titanic, or instead might ve floated above, then rightj might ve floated above, then right nearby? might ve floated above, then right nearby? se might ve floated above, then right nearb ? , ., , nearby? so the question was, is there any nearby? so the question was, is there any question nearby? so the question was, is there any question as nearby? so the question was, is there any question as to - nearby? so the question was, is| there any question as to whether nearby? so the question was, is - there any question as to whether or not the sub collided with the titanic, orwhether not the sub collided with the titanic, or whether it imploded above and debris field was created from that? so the location of the titan submersible was in an area that was approximately 1600 feet from the wreck of the titanic. i have an expert here that is familiar with the area and can talk a
ahead fully map out what s down there. go ahead. 50 fully map out what s down there. go ahead. ,, ., fully map out what s down there. go ahead. ., ,, ,, ., , , ahead. so the oppressions dummett auestion ahead. so the oppressions dummett question was ahead. so the oppressions dummett question was - ahead. so the oppressions dummett question was - i m ahead. so the oppressions dummett question was - i m restating - ahead. so the oppressions dummett question was - i m restating the - question was i m restating the question was i m restating the question here as it s sometimes hard to hear the question. 0ne question here as it s sometimes hard to hear the question. one of the prospects of recovering the crew members? this is an incredibly unforgiving environment down there on the sea floor, and the debris is consistent with the catastrophic implosion of the vessel. and so, we will continue to work and continue to search the area down there, but i don t have an answer for our
in a way that he saw fit and as opposed to what he knew in hindsight in defending the culture of work in downing street and those who support them saying, he made his case very strongly in new be ridiculous for this committee to find that he deliberately misled mps similarly in mps or their suspicions about boris johnson and questioning his account of events, they have not been convinced by what they ve heard. it s convinced by what they ve heard. it s going to be very difficult decision for this committee to judge exactly what that intention, the question of intention is key here. so, it will be very tricky balancing act will be interesting to see what the balance ofjudgment is and whether it can be a unanimous verdict in some weeks now to come up with their verdict of whether he was reckless or intentional or unintentional in his misleading of parliament and then, if he is found to have done it deliberately, would sanction they recommend. it is a long way to go still and i think we l
at strathclyde university. so, former prime minister done enoughin so, former prime minister done enough in order to convince that he wasn t to being reckless, that this wasn t to being reckless, that this was not intentional, it wasn t deliberate when he misled parliament? i deliberate when he misled parliament? deliberate when he misled arliament? ~ ., , deliberate when he misled arliament? ~ . , ., parliament? i think the answer that auestion is parliament? i think the answer that question is maybe parliament? i think the answer that question is maybe not. parliament? i think the answer that question is maybe not. it s - parliament? i think the answer that question is maybe not. it s of- parliament? i think the answer that question is maybe not. it s of the l question is maybe not. it s of the two criteria. 0ne question is maybe not. it s of the two criteria. one of which it is to do with intentionally misleading the house. the other is to do with it recklessly doing so. if tha
others did not believe it was necessary or possible to have a two metre or one metre electrified force field around every human being and indeed, that is emphatically not with the guidance prescribes. borisjohnson says he was given repeated assurances no rules were broken and that nobody gave any advice to the contrary . i was trying to run the country during a pandemic on the evening in question, the 30th of november 2021, as dealing with the emergence of the omicron variant and the growing clamourfor omicron variant and the growing clamour for restrictions on another christmas. i could not drop but i was doing, get up and institute a personal investigation into its unelected daily mirror try on and on on an event does almost a year old. i had to rely on and was fully entitled to rely on what i was told by my senior trusted advisers. and here mrjohnson insisted