comparemela.com

022 1374 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

PTAB s secondary considerations analysis in an IPR Final Written Decision

Appellant Yita sought inter parts review of two patents sharing a specification, both of which are directed to the vehicle floor tray. In one IPR, the Board determined that claims of one patent, the 186 patent were not unpatentable for obviousness.

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.