Latest Breaking News On - 018 the workers claimed their termination was illegal and redundancy scheme done in bad faith they also argued there no proof of losses incurred by company retrenchment violated collective bargaining agreement effective at time that provides case layoffs - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Court of Appeals (File photo) MANILA - The Court of Appeals (CA) has dismissed a suit filed by nearly 100 regular employees of a soda company after they were retrenched due to redundancy in 2018. The CA Special First Division dismissed the petition of 93 members of Coca-Cola Femsa Phils. Inc.'s (CCFPI) Manila Sales Force Union in a 16-page decision dated November 26 and uploaded recently, saying there was no proof that petitioners were coerced into signing the deed of receipt, release, waiver, and quitclaim. The appellate court said while the retrenched workers claimed they did not voluntarily sign the documents, "no fraud was employed in the execution of the deed and the consideration is sufficient and reasonable". The workers were in the pre-selling department, which markets and processes orders of stores, restaurants, and similar businesses. They were granted 175 percent of their salary per year of service as separation pay and hospitalization and medical benefits for

Cola femsa philsFirst divisionManila sales force unionCoca cola femsaCourt of appeals file photo manila the ca has dismisseda suit filed by nearly 100 regular employees ofa soda company after they were retrenched due to redundancy in 2018 special first division dismissed petition 93 members coca cola femsa phils inc 39s ccfpi sales force union ina 16 page decision dated november 26 and uploaded recentlyAying there was no proof that petitioners were coerced into signing the deed of receiptNd quitclaim the appellate court said while retrenched workers claimed they did not voluntarily sign documentsUot no fraud was employed in the execution of deed and consideration is sufficient reasonable quot workers were pre selling departmentHich markets and processes orders of storesNd similar businesses they were granted 175 percent of their salary per year service as separation pay and hospitalization medical benefits for five years or upon reaching 65 ageWhichever comes firstOn march 1018 the workers claimed their termination was illegal and redundancy scheme done in bad faith they also argued there no proof of losses incurred by company retrenchment violated collective bargaining agreement effective at time that provides case layoffsReference would be given to union members and seniority followed the company countered it was forced adopta hybrid model since pre sellers 39 visits potential customers do not always translate into salesEspite huge labor costs under the new modelHolesalers will take overa conventional routing system crs and from 131