comparemela.com

Reignite his campaign. Im rand paul. Im trying to kill the tax code all 70,000 pages of it. Well ask the kentucky senator about his strategy to regain his momentum ahead of the first president ial debate. And our sunday group weighs in on a slump in the polls for clinton and Donald Trumps threat to run as a thirdparty candidate. Look im a republican. Im a conservative. Im running. Im in first place. All right now. On fox news sunday. Hello, again, from fox news in washington. Hillary Clintons Campaign has been hit by a bombshell. News that two inspectors general sent a referral to the fbi about the mishandling of classified information on clintons email account. Well have a debate between Carly Fiorina and a top official of the liberal group, emilys list about that and those undercover planned parenthood videos. First lets get the latest on the clinton case from chief White House Correspondent ed henry. Ed . Reporter this weekend Hillary Clinton is trying to rip the bandaid off and get this scandal behind her but there are new signs today more political and even legal problems could be coming. I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received. Reporter eager to turn the page on her email troubles, she revealed shell testify before the House Select Committee on benghazi in october setting up a showdown with republican chairman who could uncover new revelations four months before the iowa caucuses. I have said repeatedly that i will answer questions before the house committee. Reporter yet theres a dispute over which questions. Clinton lawyer david kendall, a veteran of the Monica Lewinsky scandal wants to limit it to benghazi and lock in october 22nds only appearance. The state department has been slow to hand over emails and they worry key documents will be held back until after the appearance and while clinton wants only benghazi questions, her email arrangement clearly falls within the scope of the select committees jurisdiction. That arrangement came under fire again after two inspectors general found clinton sent at least four emails with classified information despite this promise. There is no classified material. Reporter in fairness to clinton, the emails did not contain classification markings though investigators believe her server may contain hundreds more classified emails. While clinton aides pounced on the New York Times dialing back on its original report suggesting its a criminal matter, republicans note that mishandling of classified information could lead to charges and clinton will release more emails in response to a court order which could lead to more revelations, especially if the Intelligence Committee blocks the release of some of those emails to prevent the leak of more classified information. Ed thanks for that. Joining us now, one of the clintons toughest critics, republican president ial candidate Carly Fiorina and jess mcintosh. Lets start with the security referral by two inspectors general to the fbi. Do you think that Hillary Clinton broke the law . Its clear she broke the rules. Its absolutely Crystal Clear she broke the rules. Its Crystal Clear that she has been engaged in a coverup of lots of things. Benghazi, the fact she broke the rules. How amazing that shes had this server in her basement all this time and decides to wipe it clean two years after she leaves the state department and just before she gets ready to run for president. Of course shes engaged in a coverup and of course shes broken the rules. Ms. Mcintosh, here are two inspectors general, two independent government watchdogs who said in the referral to the fbi that there was classified information that was being transmitted. Classified information at that time, not subsequently, that was still classified and this is information that never should have been transmitted through private email. You know, questions about the emails have been asked and answered for months. She said repeatedly that shes looking forward to testifying before the committee and i know she intends to do that. I think shes very smartly kept her president ial campaign focused on the lives of Everyday Americans and what she wants to do for them as president. I think thats where voters want her to be. I think thats the kind of debate they want to have with her candidates and i think shes doing the right thing by keeping it there. Ms. Forenoenven fiorina, is the information irrelevant . Its completely relevant. Its right at the center of what voters care about. You see we know voters care about whether a potential president is trustworthy. And what voters are discover inging day after day drip by drip is that Hillary Clinton is not trustworthy. Its the heart of the matter. Shes not trustworthy. She has engaged in coverups and shes not been truthful. Every day that goes by we learn that over and over and over. No amount of spin and no amount of talking points is going to change that reality. Ms. Mcintosh the fact is that voters in the polls say by substantial numbers they dont find Hillary Clinton honest and trustworthy trustworthy. And shes leading republican rivals in the polls. Thats not true anymore. In fact, shes trailing in three key swing states in a poll this week. There are some discrepancies with how many republicans they sampled. Consistently voters are excited about her message to make the American Economy work better for families. I want to keep this balanced. Youre not answering my question. What about the honest and trustworthiness . I think she has a Long Campaign to talk to voters about who she is and why shes doing what shes doing and what she wants to do for them. I think that well see those numbers change. I think that were seeing voters still very interested in what shes going to do for them as president despite those numbers. Theres a bill bit of strangeness there. Shes going to keep the conversation going and its going very well for her so far. Lets turn to undercover videos that antiabortion activists have released in the last two weeks. Heres what would planned parenthood officials said about altering abortions in order to retrieve fetal tissue. Here it is. Less crunching technique. Crushing above and below specific organs to be used for fetal research. Whats wrong with that . My gosh by the way, this has nothing to do with whether youre prochoice or prolife. This has to do with the moral foundation of our nation. If a woman was sitting outside of planned parenthood in her obgyns office looking at this ultrasound at the same point in her pregnancy, her doctor would say to her look at your baby. Look at its heartbeat. Look at its fingers and toes. Planned parenthood has lobbied against a womans opportunity to look at an ultrasound before she makes an incredibly difficult choice to end the unborn life within her and yet they are using that same technology to harvest body parts which they claim are not a life, in order to sell them to save another life. Its unbelievably hypocritical and i find it astounding that anyone can defend it. Well, ms. Mcintosh, let me ask but what specific aspect of this. The law on this is clear. Lets put it up on the screen. No alteration of the timingetiming method or procedures used to terminate the pregnancy was used solely for the purposes of obtaining the tissue. This is what a planned parenthood official says. Then ms. Mcintosh, the same woman says shes going to ask the surgeon at this planned parenthood facility about violating the protocol about switching procedures in order to get better parts. Isnt that a direct violation of the federal law . After hours of talking to this staffer in this dishonestly edited video, they got her to say she would talk to a doctor. Thats not an admission of a crime. Listening to this language is ugly and uncomfortable and i completely understand that. The whole concept of Organ Donation is a really difficult thing to think about. The families that benefit from this life saving medical research are immensely grateful for kindness that patients do when they donate these things. Were talking about people with loved ones with alzheimers, parkinsons, this tissue donation was used to make the rabies vaccine chicken pox vaccine, polio vaccine. This directly relates to americans health. This is live saving medical research. Thats certainly one of the points that defenders of this procedure make. Fetal research has been used to find cures for diseases. The National Institutes of health spent 76 million on research on fetal tissue. You may not like the way its happening but dont these tissues dont these organs, go to a good cause . Lets just start with her comment about a heavily edited video. I mean, i find it fascinating that planned parenthood, emilys list and the rest of the proabortion lobby are now suddenly so concerned about a heavily edited video. I dont recall them ever being concerned about a heavily edited video of mitt romney at a fundraiser. I dont remember them being concerned about edward snowden. Weve had a lot of things where information has come out that we needed to see. So instead of going after the people who have put out this video information we clearly need to see, lets talk about the issue here. Of course theyre trying to change the subject. Of course theyre trying to say this is life saving research. I find it amazing that this group of proabortion lobbyists continue to say that they are protecting womens health. Really . Lateterm abortion is bad for womens health. They continue to lobby against parental notification. Really . Its protecting a teenagers health that she can go to a tanning salon or a tattoo with her mothers permission but get an abortion without her mothers permission . This is not about someone elses health. This is about a womans health. A womans opportunity to have all of the choices in front of her and its about a life that she is bearing. So lets talk about once again, im prolife as you know but there are plenty of prochoice women who are horrified by this as they should be. And by the way, after hours honestly. The fact that these officials can sit here swilling their wine, drinking their salad, laughing over getting a lamborghini and talk about specimens of fetal tissue, you find horrifying and the majority of americans do as well. There are two issues here. Specifically whether or not you are in favor or not of abortion, ms. Mcintosh, the altering of the procedure and the procedure has to be altered to get fetal body parts and theres the question of price. Selling fetal tissue for profit. This is undercover video of a planned parenthood official haggling over price. Here she is. What would make you happy . What would work for you . You cant deny what youre seeing there, ms. Mcintosh. Shes haggling over the price. I saw a tasteless joke absolutely. It was more than just a joke. She also said talking about what the price is the first person to offer always ends up at the low end. The law is they are allowed to recover costs. Cost is cost. If its 100 its 100. Shes talking about something more than cost. She had also said in the same video that had been so long since she had a conversation where somebody wanted to discuss compensation that she didnt even know what cost was. So i think talking about the deceptively edited videos does matter when they take out the ten times where the planned parenthood staffer very clearly says they wouldnt be able to sell this because it violates the law and theyre not going to do that. That was the other staffer. Not this one. Correct yes. I think that republicans maybe risk alienating folks theyre not thinking about alienating when they talk about the abortion debate the way ms. Fiorina does. Its important to know that 65 of the women who get abortions are moms already. And the decision when to have a child is the most important economic one that most American Families will ever face. I dont believe that politicians should be involved in making that choice for them. For heavens sake, the left side of the aisle politicians are involved all the time. Emilys list is involved in politics every single day and consistently emilys list lobbies for proabortion candidates. Theres no justification anymore for federal funding of planned parenthood. The only reason planned parenthood is standing up asking to be federally funded this will work better if you let me ask the question. Well talk about federal funding. Ms. Fiorina, you have called for an end to federal funding. Its about half a billion dollars a year goes to planned parenthood. I want to put up these statistics. It is the single largest provider of abortions. 327,000 in 2013. It also performed 487,000 breast exams and Hillary Clinton says its a matter of womens health. I hope that this situation will not further undermine the very Important Services that planned parenthood provides. Let me pick up on that with you ms. Fiorina. Doesnt planned parenthood do a lot of things . If you defund them are you going to lose things likes breast exams and pap smears and hiv tests . I thought obamacare was supposed to take care of that. Im tired of the conard about womens health. There are plenty of places where women can achieve and have these services. If planned parenthood is so concerned about womens health, why dont they accept, for example, federal funding of pregnancy centers. One next door to every single planned parenthood clinic so women can look at an ultrasound before they choose to have an abortion or so that they can have options presented to them if they choose to bring the life into the world but, no, planned parenthood doesnt want that. Its not about womens health. Its about planned parenthood wanting to preserve their political power so they can lobby consistently on behalf of proabortion democrats. Why should they be given federal funding . Why should they get federal funding so they can continue to lobby for certain candidates as emilys list does every single day. Ms. Fiorina, ms. Mcintosh, we have run out of time. Thank you both for joining us today. Up next, republican president ial candidate rand paul looks to revive his campaign ahead of the first gop political debate. Well ask how he plans to do that when we come right back. Kid hey dad, who was that man . Dad hes our broker. He helps looks after all our money. Kid do you pay him . Dad of course. Kid how much . Dad i dont know exactly. Kid what if youre not happy . Does he have to pay you back . Dad nope. Kid why not . Dad it doesnt work that way. Kid why not . Vo are you asking enough questions about the way your wealth is managed . Wealth management at Charles Schwab do you toss and turn . Wake up with back pain . If so, call now the sleep number bed supports you with a cushion of air that conforms to your body for more proper spinal alignment and better sleep. Before i had my sleep number bed i just had a hard time getting us because id been tossing and turning all night. Now with my sleep number bed, im able to sleep through the night and i wake up refreshed. Call or click now for a free 50 savings card and catalog. Its the perfect bed for couples because you adjust each side of the bed to your sleep number setting. The sleep number bed is the bed clinically proven to reduce back pain and 93 of participants reported back pain relief. Plus it costs about the same an innerspring yet lasts twice as long. So if you want to sleep better or find relief from back pain, call now call this number or click now for your free 50 savings card and catalog with price list. Call now or click for your free 50 savings card and catalog. A look outside the beltway at the new jersey festival of ballooning this weekend. But now back to the race for the white house. Just 11 days before the fox News Facebook president ial debate on august 6th in cleveland. Republican rand paul will almost certainly be on the stage as one of the top ten candidates in the national polls. Senator paul, welcome back to fox news sunday. Thanks for having me, chris. I want to start with a couple subjects we discussed in the previous segment. Do you believe that Hillary Clinton broke the law in her handling of classified information on her private email and what if the Justice Department decides not to investigate . Well, i think its pretty damning that president obamas Justice Department has even brought this up. The fact that they are saying that theyre concerned that classified information was transferred. People have to understand how many things are classified. Even her daily schedule is classified to protect her and to protect the people who protect her. Think about if she had emailed the ambassador in benghazi. I dont think she ever did communicate with him. Had she tipping off people to his whereabouts through email would be something that would be very sensitive if not classified so thats why we have a rule and thats why even she knew there was a rule. They actually admonished one of her ambassadors because he wasnt using the proper server. I dont understand how she can skate by and act as if she wasnt aware of the law. Let me ask you about the planned parenthood videos after they were released you offered an amendment to the highway funding bill to defund planned parenthood but Senate Majority leader mcconnell is not even going to offer you a vote on that amendment. What are you going to do now . I think conservatives across the country are outraged by this. Ive submitted a discharge petition. This is highly unusual for a nonleadership position to submit a discharge petition. This means ill try to force a vote on this. I think the time is now to discuss whether taxpayer dollars should go to such a gruesome procedure. The doctor on video in a casual voice while sipping wine and eat eatingeat eating bree talks about getting baby parts to sell to research. Do people want their taxpayer dollars going to this type of procedure . What happens if it looks like you wont get a vote on the senate floor . They may block me today on a vote on an amendment to the highway bill but im trying to file for a discharge position to have a separate bill. If i have 16 senators sign a bill saying they think we should defund planned parenthood, people who are outraged will call senators and say have you signed rand pauls discharge position because they want a vote on Defunding Planned Parenthood because even prochoice people are horrible of the idea of preserving part of the baby and not crushing brain to harvest the liver. People are outraged by this. I think the American People deserve to have a vote on it. Senator, lets turn to the state of your campaign. Back in december of 2013, you were running second in the polls with 17 . Last november you ranked first in the polls with 11. 8 but now in the latest real clear politics of polls you are in seventh place with 5. 6 support. Why has your campaign lost momentum sir . Im not so sure we have. There are a lot of polls out there. Some of the polls that we find very interesting are when you poll my candidacy head to head with Hillary Clinton, we actually beat Hillary Clinton in five states won by president obama. We lead her in pennsylvania that hasnt been won by a republican since 1988. So this is what ive been saying about my candidacy. Im a different kind of republican. Im a republican who can win independent vote. In all five of those states we beat Hillary Clinton by nearly ten points among independents. Thats how you win. We have to convince enough republicans that this is a winning message that i could win the purple states and thats what the early polling shows. There is also a sense in terms of your diminished status at least in the republican primary polls that the world has changed on you. You were running strong in the polls a couple years ago, even a year ago, when your positions on limits to foreign intervention, limits to domestic surveillance were very popular. But now with isis on the march and with increased domestic terrorism at home, theres a concern that maybe you arent tough enough on those issues. I think the interesting thing is we poll these issues and we asked these questions of voters all of the time. There was a poll not too long ago in iowa and they ask should we be more involved in foreign war like john mccain who wants to be everywhere all the time or do you think we should be less involved or moreand it polls equally in iowa and same in New Hampshire and nevada. So i think the party is split on some of these things. I do want to defend america. I will defend against terrorists. I think i would do a lot more than the others on the stage because i think they are distracting ourselves from the real terrorist threat by collecting so much information that we get inundated by the information and we get distracted. I want to collect more information on terrorists but i want to do it according to the Fourth Amendment put forward that suspicion shoulding individualized and there should be a warrant with the judges name on it. We are asking the viewers to submit questions either written or videos that were going to ask candidates on that stage. Facebook tells us that the top three issues among people who talk about you are taxes, intelligence gathering and privacy and Homeland Security and heres a comment from Johnny Anderson on facebook who writes senator rand paul is working overtime to protect homegrown terrorists. Americans are dying. Senator how do you answer johnny . I think its kind of a misunderstanding of the situation. The interesting thing is we just had another terrorist shooting in chattanooga. We had boston bombing. All of these occurred under mass accumulation of data. Bulk collection of data that president obama is doing which is ruled illegal by the courts. So weve been having these terrorist attacks despite collection of all this information and when you look at it, i think maybe were distracted by too much information. Malcolm gladwell says good Decision Making isnt about knowledge or data its about understanding the data. I actually want to collect more information about terrorists but i dont want to indiscriminately collect all americans information and invade their privacy. I think what weve been doing, even the government admits we havent been catching many terrorists with this bulk collection of data. Congress says we shouldnt do it. Courts said we shouldnt do it. I think it goes against every sense of what the Founding Fathers put into the Fourth Amendment amendment. I think my position on privacy is very popular. People under 40 83 of people under 40 think the government shouldnt be collecting your phone records all the time. Senator you put out a video this week that showed you destroying the irs tax code and at various points you set it on fire, you feed it into a wood chipper, you use a chainsaw to take to it. And i guess the question i have because it doesnt seem to be a bit of a stunt, is this an effort to take the spotlight away from donald trump who seems to be soaking up all of the medias attention these days. You know i have three teenage sons. The teenage sons dont watch the news channels but they pass things around from friend to friend. So i think what you find is that if you have Something Interesting or people think is clever or funny, it gets passed around from teenager to teenager so i try to put things out that sometimes will get into the hands of youth who arent watching traditional news. Senator, one of your big issues in this campaign, i think you have been talking about it more than any of other republican candidates is trying to grow the party. Youre campaigning in inner cities and reaching out to minorities. Do you worry that trumps comments about Illegal Immigrants coming over the Mexican Border is going to hurt that effort and alienate the very kind of voters that youre trying to attract . You know, every candidate is going to have to do what they want to do. My concern is i want to reach out to new people and go places no republican has been going. So ive been to detroit. Ive been to ferguson. Ive been to the south side of chicago. Ive been to inner city philadelphia at a boys latin school. Ive been trying to go places that no one else is going. Ive been to historically black colleges. Ill keep doing that and reaching out. When i think of immigration i think that you do have to have a secure border. I dont automatically think that immigrants are bad people. I think most immigrants come here seeking the american dream. Im not going to vilify all immigrants with a broad brush. I think that there are some bad people. I put in legislation on the sanctuary cities to make sure that never happens again but i think by in large people that come to our country want the american dream. Senator paul, thank you. Thanks for coming in. Well see you on the campaign trail and most likely at that first debate. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Up next our sunday group joins the conversation about Hillary Clintons potential legal problems and Donald Trumps threat. Im certainly well aware of the classification requirements and did not send classified material. We all have a responsibility to get this right. Hillary clinton in march and again on friday defending her use of a personal email server as she now faces the possibility of an fbi investigation. Its time for our sunday group. Fox news senior political analysts brit hume Cheryl Stolberg and juan williams. Brit, there was bad news for the Clinton Campaign this week as we saw referral by two inspectors general to the fbi about the handling of classified emails, classified information on her private emails and then also some polls. Lets put these up on the screen. Quinnipiac polls in swing states of colorado, iowa, and virginia showing her trailing marco rubio, jeb bush and scott walker in all three of those states and in those states, her numbers have dropped on the question of whether shes honest and trust trustworthy trustworthy. How serious for Hillary Clinton, both the polls and this potential new investigation . I was stunned by those polls. I didnt believe that she had fallen that far in the eyes of voters in states where she would normally be expected to get a decent reception. I think its striking. I think this whole email controversy feeds that and the news that these inspectors general looking at 40 out of thousands found ten instances in which they thought four instances, 10 , in which classified material that they said was classified at the time the emails were written and sent that to me says that goes to the question of whether shes as i think shes proven herself to be many times, a liar. She said theres no classified information in these emails of hers and on a small sample they found 10 took classified information. Whether the Justice Department will ever do anything about it is highly dubious but it does feed the Public Perception of here. How big a deal for clinton . The fact that you have two inspectors general. These are government officials but theyre independent outside the bureaucracy, state department and Intelligence Community saying that there was classified information, classified at the time, that was being sent and some of it was being sent by Hillary Clinton and referring to this to the fbi. How big a deal and do you think its big enough that it may begin to nudge somebody else like joe biden or Elizabeth Warren to get into the race . Intentionally releasing classified information is a big deal. David petraeus, the general, was sentenced to probation for doing that just this year. Whether or not mrs. Clinton did that, i think we should set that aside. She said she didnt release classified material. As britt said, this goes to a narrative about her campaign. Questions that voters have. Is she trustworthy and one of us and the existence of the private email server raise the questions in the minds of many americans. Most ordinary americans dont have a private email server at home. They expect their government officials to be using government email servers. Its striking to me that were still talking about this story five months after the New York Times broke the initial story about this private email server. I think these are the questions that are going to continue to percolate throughout her campaign. Whether or not it will nudge joe biden in or anybody else in is hard to say. Shes clearly going to have to continue to address these questions and we know shes going to testify or she says she will in october. This isnt going away. I want to switch to the other big political story this week and that involves donald trump who has raised the possibility, in effect a threat, if he doesnt feel hes being treated fairly by the Republican National committee, he may run as an independent thirdparty candidate. George looking back at ross perot in 1992 who got 19 of vote, didnt win electoral votes but george h. W. Bush thought he was the difference between winning and losing, whats the possibility if trump decides to go ahead and run as an independent he hands this presidency over to the democrats. Thats a real possibility i should say at this point. My wife works for scott walker. That said, you put your finger on successful thirdparty candidates have two things in common. Theyre all unsuccessful. They dont win. They have a Regional Base. They actually won electoral votes. Ross perot didnt. Its a marathon and not a sprint. Theres a long time before votes are cast in iowa. There is going to be information that gets out after all of it about his manners or lack thereof and theyll find that hes unprincipled and that he was prochoice, very prochoice as he used to say. Theyre going to find that he gave money to Hillary Clinton Chuck Schumer reid, nancy pelosi, because he obviously wanted a Democratic Congress and theyre going to want to think about that. Other issues. The Worst Supreme Court decision probably of this century which vastly expanded the power of people like donald trump using government to take away private property. He supports that. Well see how people like that. Trump went to the border with mexico, the southern border on texas this week, and to talk about illegal immigration and he got a tough reception from reporters. Take a look. Have you seen any evidence here to confirm your fears about mexico sending criminals across the border . Yes i have. Ive heard it. Ive heard it from a lot of different people. What evidence specifically have you seen . Well show you the evidence. Well be showing you the evidence at some point. Yawn juan, what do you make of that and this threat to run as an independent . That was big news of the week. If he runs as an independent, it reminds me of ralph nader. George makes a relevant point. He doesnt have a Regional Base but a national base. I thought after last weeks events where he was so harshly critical of senator mccain that he would cave but according to what weve seen in sketchy polls that have come out since, hes still in this race and in some cases leading. I think hes still around. One of the more ridiculous things he said on the border was hes going to win the hispanic vote. I dont know where he gets that idea from. They have him like 7020 versus a Hillary Clinton. What you see instead is hes damaging the republican brand. I think thats whats going on here. You see a poll this week indicating the republican favorability rating has gone down First Six Months of this year. I think thats directly tied into the kind of extremism that youre seeing from donald trump and its impact on independent and swing voters. Its interesting. I talked about that with rand paul. Some people trying to grow the party and he seems in some respects to try to contract it. When we come back secretary of state kerry goes to capitol hill to try to sell the nuclear deal with iran. The reaction . Not so good. Not unlike a hotel guest that leaves only with a Hotel Bathrobe on his back, i believe he had been fleeced. We set out to dismantle their ability to build a nuclear weapon. Were back now with the panel. Brit we always knew that republicans would oppose this deal. Do you get any sense that the president and his team may be losing some support among Congressional Democrats who will decide whether this deal goes through or not . I think there are a lot of Congressional Democrats who are opposed to this deal and perhaps wile hear about more of them. The question, however, is does that mean that the president will be unable to hold 34 senators and or a third plus one of the house of representatives. He only has to do that to sustain his veto. I think it will be damaging to him and to the attitude that the people have about this agreement if it isnt approved. It wont be approved. It will likely be disapproved but not by enough to withstand a veto in which case the president gets an agreement on paper until the end of his term but that will be a big deal for him and hell claim it as a victory. Sheryl, there are a number of issues that critics have with this deal. The whole inspections regime. The fact that the arms embargo against iran is lifted starting in five years. The fact that while we limit it their basic Nuclear Infrastructure remains intact through this deal. What do you see as the biggest problem in trying of those trying to get it through congress over the next two months . I think the biggest Sticking Point is that its not a permanent fix. Over time, beginning in about ten years and over time from 10 to 15 years iran will be able to enrich uranium again. Thats number one. Members of Congress Also have concerns about the fact that theres a 24day wait period for the iaeas inspections to take place and concerns that money will flow to bad actors in the region and once sanctions are lifted and money starts flowing into iran, that some of it will flow into the bad actors in the region. I would say also in addition to what brit said, one democrat to watch is Chuck Schumer. Senator from new york. Senator from new york. In line to become democratic leader after harry reid steps down. This week in new york there were 10,000 protesters in times square demanding Chuck Schumer vote against this deal. Senator schumer is usually very outspoken and talkative. Hes unusually quiet right now. His aides say hes not made a decision about what hes going to do. Im going to ask an unfair question. What do you think schumer is going to do . I have no idea. I tried to find out yesterday. The answer was hes still thinking about it. Would you agree that if schumer goes against this it may sink the deal . I think schumer is in a really difficult bind. Hes supposed to be someone who is carrying president obamas water on capitol hill and if he goes against it and already theres one democrat openly against it and thats bob menendez of new jersey. Hell vote against it if his vote is not needed. If the vote is needed, hell vote for it. We see moderate democrats that vote for the Affordable Care act. Its always the same dance. The question to me is how Many Democrats have enough institutional pride to vote against this in part because the president has gone out of his way to insult congress by going first to the United Nations saying Congress Opinion is interesting but optional and a real afterthought. Those who hold to the constitutional oath they took to defend the constitution who understand this should have been a treaty anyway should vote against this on procedural grounds. Another issue is the fierce opposition to the deal from israel and there was an Interesting Development on that front this week. Jonathan pollard not directly related to this but youll see in a moment bear with me, u. S. Officials say theyre preparing to release pollard who spied for israel and gave them u. S. Secrets that they may release him even before possibly his mandatory 30year parole consideration comes up. Hes been in prison for just about in november it will be 30 years. The thought is although administration flatly denies it juan, this may be a way to get israel to be less opposed to the deal. What do you make of all this . This is a real spy. He stole classified information. Stole it and then he pled guilty to it and of course the and sold it. So what you have here is a real bad actor. From president reagan through president clinton through the second president ial bush and first president bush, everybody said no to this because you cant allow that to happen as an example to the rest of the Intelligence Community. Nonetheless, i think this would be a conciliatory gesture. It would be a consolation in some sense to netanyahu and to israel. Would it be effective . I dont know. Remember, hes eligible for parole in november. I think what happened this week is they floated it as a kind of, you know, is this a possibility and what would america say and what would israel say . It doesnt look like its getting great acclimation from anybody. I think for israel they would like to see their guy out of jail. Do you think thats enough to get israel and netanyahu to soften their criticism of the iran deal . On the iran deal absolutely not. Conceivable it would have softening effect on the tensions between the United States and israel that relate to a range of issues but not on the iran deal. Israel believes its a threat to the very existence. They wont change that view because some long sought spy of theirs gets out of the pokey. You dont hear the word pokey very often. Sheryl, the white house flatly denies that theres any linkage between release of pollard and trying to smooth things over with israel. The fact is if the white house goes ahead with it and they were leaking the possibility heavily this week they would be going very much over the very strong objections of the cia, the fbi, other agencies who feel this is a guy who spied and stole secrets, sold secrets to israel, was a civilian analyst but was working along with the navy, military secrets your thoughts about that and also the impact it would have on israel . Frankly to little effect. Relations between barack obama and netanyahu are so sour its not going to cure that. Israel does view iran and this deal as a threat. Thank you, panel. See you next sunday. Up next our power player of the week. How one of the biggest names in hotels is appealing to the next generation of travelers. His name has been one of americas best brands for more than half a century. As we told you last november, now hes trying to tailor that brand for the next generation. Heres our power player of the week. Before you walk through the lobby, you checked in and went to your room and never came back to the lobby unless you were on the way out of the hotel. Today the lobby is a gathering place. Thats totally different. Bill marriott is talking about millennials. Folks in their 20s and early 30s and what they want in hotels. While marriott has been in the business 60 years i traveled 110,000 miles last year. At age 83 hes all about the future. How much of your focus is on the millennials . Right now about 45 to 50 of our business. In another three to four years it will be 60 of our business. We got talking about a portfolio project in new york city that we have going on. Marriott has an Innovation Lab where staffers brainstorm and talk with millennials and even have mockups of potential hotel rooms. Edgy, not much color, big beds and big tvs. But often no desk since theyre on their laptops. This is the shower . Almost right in the guest room. Its bare bones. You have a bed, a shower, a sink. And a big tv. You can tell marriott is having to adjust to some of it. We were not exactly cool with flowered bedspreads. Now theres no bedspreads. Theres a cover over the sheet and blanksets but no real bedspread. This is what customers want. That could be the motto for marriotts success. Bills dad started with a root beer stand in 1927. He opened on the same day lindbergh flew the atlantic. He said we went in business on the same day. You got all of the publicity. Now marriott has 19 brands. More than 4,000 hotels. 720,000 rooms and a lot of guests. Probably over a Million People a night. How does that make you feel . Concerned that they are being well taken care of. Three years ago marriott stepped down as chairman and ceo. You havent exactly retired though, have you . I dont think i will until they carry me out feet first. I average 40 to 50 hours a week. Why do you keep doing it . I love it. When we asked what the satisfaction of the job is, marriott surprised us. He talked about 360,000 employees. 50 of our general managers in our hotels have been with the company 25 years or more and have started out as hourly workers and that to me is terrific. When we bring someone in as a waiter and make them president of the company thats just the way america is supposed to work. Even though hes moved upstairs in the company bill marriott visits about 200 of his hotels each year. He shows no signs of slowing down. And thats it for today. Have a great week. Well see you back next fox news sunday. Oh oh oh oh oh . applause well god bless you. Its a joy to come into your homes and if youre ever in our area, please stop by and be a part of one of our services. I promise you we will make you feel right at home. Thanks so much for tuning in and thank you again for coming out. I like to start with something funny. I heard about this country grandmother. She would go out on her front porch every morning and thank the lord for another day. Her neighbor didnt believe in god. Hed shout back, theres no such thing as the lord one day, he overheard her asking god to give her groceries for the week. He snuck over the next morning and put some groceries on her front porch. She got up and said, thank you, lord. You did it again

© 2024 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.