Who Would Benefit From California's Age Appropriate Design Code? Apparently Porn Companies, Privacy Lawyers, And Medical Disinfo Peddlers. But Not Kids

This week we've been writing about California bill AB 2273, a dangerous bill that has effectively sailed through the California legislature with little pushback, because it's wrapped up in "protect the children" language and no one wants to be seen as not wanting to "protect the children." But, like so many bills that frame themselves…

Related Keywords

Hollywood ,California ,United States ,City Of Berkeley ,United Kingdom ,Oakland ,America ,American ,Shoshana Wodinsky ,Emaria Farrell ,Mike Masnick ,Tim Kendall ,Gavin Newsom ,Douglas Perednia ,Eric Goldman ,Rob Bonta ,Tristan Harris ,Joan Ganz Cooney Center ,American Academy Of Pediatrics ,Omidyar Network ,Twitter ,Children Partnership ,California Lawyers Association ,Do Curious Inc Ive ,Consumer Federation Of California ,California Public Interest Research Group ,Public Health ,Outschool Inc ,California Federation Of Teachers ,Roblox Corporation ,Senate Floor Analyses ,Disorders Coalition ,Rights Foundation ,Humane Technology ,Do Curious Inc ,Pinterest ,National Hispanic Media Coalition ,Netflix ,Consumer Federation Of America ,Porn Companies ,California Senate ,Who Would Benefit From California ,Age Appropriate Design ,Apparently Porn Companies ,Privacy Lawyers ,Medical Disinfo ,Not Kids ,Lawyers Association ,Privacy Law ,Countering Digital ,Ganz Cooney Center ,Protection Impact ,Privacy Law Section ,Curious Inc ,Social Dilemma ,Attorney General ,