When Does an Idled Facility Become New Under the Clean Air Act? | Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently rejected EPA’s application of its “Reactivation Policy” to a St. Croix, USVI refinery, finding that a Clean Air Act (CAA)...

Related Keywords

Washington ,United States ,North Carolina ,California ,Michael Regan ,Third Court Decision ,Washington Post ,Court Decision ,Chevron ,Trump Administration ,Us Court ,A North Carolina District Court ,District Court ,Cenco Refining Co ,Duke Energy ,Kilpatrick Townsend Stockton ,Third Circuit Court ,Kilpatrick Townsend ,Third Circuit ,Clean Air Act ,Significant Deterioration ,Port Hamilton Refining ,Limetree Bay Terminals ,Reactivation Policy ,Determination Letter ,Monroe Electric ,Final Determination ,Sport Hamilton ,Third Court ,Environmental Justice ,Appeals Board ,Plantwide Applicability Limit ,Reactivation Policy Permanent Shutdown Factors ,Standing Reactivation Policy ,Better Environment ,North Carolina District Court ,Source Review ,Shutdown Source ,Proposed Operating Permit ,Standing Reactivation ,Croix Refinery ,