Using Natural Experiments to Analyze the Impact of State Legislation on the Incidence of Abortion

During the 2004 election, there was a substantial amount of discussion about whether or not legislation effectively reduces the incidence of abortion.

Related Keywords

Oklahoma ,United States ,Oregon ,West Virginia ,New Hampshire ,California ,University Of Alabama ,Alabama ,Kentucky ,National Bureau Of Economic Research ,Illinois ,Iowa ,Kansas ,Alaska ,Lauried Elam Evans ,Deborah Haas Wilson ,Stephan Gohman ,Wilday Parker ,Sara Whitehead ,Christinec George ,Cynthiaj Berg ,Patricia Donovan ,Glen Harold Stassen ,Robert Ohsfeldt ,Lilot Strauss ,Heritage Foundation ,Department Of Political Science ,Supreme Court ,Centers For Disease ,Research Family ,Journal Of Health Economics ,Foundation Center ,Disease Control ,Assistant Professor ,Political Science ,Abortion Data Received ,Disease Con ,Harold Stassen ,Courier Journal ,Joy Herndon ,Prevention Morbidity ,Mortality Weekly Report ,State Abortion Restrictions ,Minor Demand ,Human Resources ,Economic Impact ,State Pol ,Cparental Consent ,Notification Laws ,Medicaid Funding Restrictions ,Planning Perspectives ,Abortion Rates ,Policies Pro ,Economic Environment ,Economic Research Working Paper ,Health Economics ,Economic Policy ,State Policy Restrictions ,State Legislation ,Abortion During ,Data Analysisreport ,Family ,Abortion ,Michael New ,Natural Experiments ,