Climate change policies. My action today at the latest in a series of steps to create american jobs and to grow american wealth. Chris we will discuss the president s move to revive the fossil fuel industry with scott pruitt, head of the Environmental Protection agency. Its a Fox News Sunday exclusive. Plus, President Trump attacks members of his own party, but the House Freedom caucus bites back. Thats not how our government works. Chris we will ask our son sunday panel about the growing civil war inside the g. O. P. And our power player of the week, going even deeper into space. This telescope is 100 times more sensitive than hubble. Chris all right now on Fox News Sunday. And hello again from fox news in washington. The white house is fighting back against the investigation into possible links between the drum campaign in russia, claiming the press and congress should focus instead on allegations the Obama Administration conducted political surveillance of the trumpeting. In a moment we will discuss the fallout with Senate Majority leader mitch mcconnell. The first, lets bring in fox news close respondent kevin corke. As usual in the case in washington scandals, its the coverup and not the calm so much crime that usually ensnares. There are legitimate questions about that with respect to the ongoing controversy over what House Intelligence Committee chair devin nunes know about possible surveillance of trump aids and how he came about getting that information, news you may recall claim to have such compelling information he needed to rush to the white house to kill the president himself. He did that without telling fellow members of the committee, which is highly unusual. They received Key Information from a pair of white house aides, calling into question not only his relationship with the administration, but his ability to be impartial, as this investigation unfolds, concerns for his complicated decision to delay former attorney general sally relates from testifying. It would have been filmic included john klapper. A Washington Post report you may have heard it suggested the trump report was behind the delay, something the white house drawing with i hope she testifies. I look forward to it. To be honest, the hearing was actually never notified. If a troop, choose to move forward, great. The report in the Washington Post is 100 pulse. Paul ryan said that nunes told him his source has a whistleblowertype information. We will see what that means. We dont know at this point, but what we certainly know is that mike flynn, the former National Security advisor had his rights violated in masada. We will see for example to testify with immunity. As time will tell, we will see how that all turns out. Chris kevin corke reporting from the white house. Kevin, thanks for that. Joining me now from kentucky to discuss this at a much more, Senate Majority leader mitch mcconnell. Senator, welcome back to Fox News Sunday. Good morning. Chris lets start with russia. You were, last month briefed by fbi director comey. Have you seen any evidence of collusion between russia and the cut, Trump Campaign for any evidence that the Obama Administration did anything improper in surveilling the trumpeting. Senator mcconnell as you know, i asked the senate Intelligence Committee to investigate all of these allegations. Senator burr and senator warner are Going Forward on a very constructive and bipartisan basis. The only thing i asked them to do was to find out what happened, and once they found out what happened, hopefully they will be able to issue a unanimous report and we will all know what, if anything, based on these allegations. Chris obviously we dont know what went on, do you worry that this continuing controversy is interfering with the president s ability to pushes agenda . Senator mcconnell it certainly not helpful. The president s actual agenda has been really quite constructive. All the efforts to begin the deregulatory effort we need to get the economy moving again, the Supreme Court nominee that i know we will be discussing later, moving it forward on tax reform. This is just what the country needs to get the kind of growth rate that would produce jobs and opportunity for the next generation. Chris i want to ask you one last question what russia before we get to the Supreme Court justice. Given all of the politics on all sides, the continuing controversy, why not appoint an independent 9 11style commission or have the Justice Department appoint a special counsel so you have a truly nonpartisan, independent investigation that everybody can trust . Senator mcconnell its just not necessary, based on what we know now. Weve got a bipartisan investigation underway, its called the senator Intelligence Committee. Senator warner has joined press conference this week. They clearly laid out that they are going wherever the facts take them. We dont need yet another investigation. We know the fbi is looking at it. From their perspective. It will be handled appropriately and it will be handled well. Chris you have promised that the senate will confirm judge neil gorsuch to the u. S. Supreme court for friday. Two questions, one, do you stand by that schedule, friday boat, and two, do you have the eight votes of democrats so that you can beat a filibuster . Senator mcconnell look, judge gorsuch deserves to be confirmed. Unanimously wellqualified by the american bar association. My counterpart senator schumer once called it the gold standar standard. 97 of his rulings were unanimous, only reversed one time in a case in which he participated by the Supreme Court. President obamas former acting solicitor general said theres no reason to oppose them. Thats when he will be confirmed. Exactly how that happens will be up to our democratic colleagues. I think it is noteworthy that no Supreme Court justice has ever in the history of our country then stopped by a partisan filibuster ever. In fact, the business of filibustering charges is a fairly recent invention, ironically of the nonminority in the senate, the democrats. And in particular, senator schumer, convinced his colleagues after bush 43 got elected to start filibustering judges. Chris will there be a confirmation vote by friday . Senator mcconnell yes. We will confirm judge gorsuch this week. Chris secondly, do you have the eight democratic votes, as we said here today to avoid a filibuster . Senator mcconnell i dont think we know. There are democrats who have not yet announced their position. In the course of the week, what you ask me will become revealed by announcements of democrats who have not yet said what they will do. Chris you said that he will be confirmed one way or the other, so does that mean if you can stop a filibuster that you will go to the Nuclear Option and change the senate rules so that you can cut off debate with 51 votes and confirm him . Senator mcconnell what im telling you is that judge gorsuch is going to be confirmed. The way in which that occurs is in the hands of the democratic minority. I think during the course of the week we will find out exactly how this will end, but it will end with his confirmation. Chris let me pick up on that. Back in 2013, the democrats invoked the Nuclear Option to allow a simple majority, 51 votes, on confirmation of Lower Court Judges. At that time, you said that was a big mistake. Here you are, sir. Do you think this is in the be interest of the United States and the american obviously you can break the rules change the rules to achieve that. But some of us have been here long enough to know that the she was sometimes on the other foot. Chris now you are prepared to do the same thing, change the rules to break the rules, the question is i understand you want neil gorsuch on the court, but is it worth it, because what youre basically doing is destroying part of what makes the senate special, they need to reach out to a bipartisan majority. Senator mcconnell the answer to your question is, of course i was upset about their effort to break the rules in order to change the rules. The rest of the story is, when we came to the majority a year and a half later, we discussed whether or not we should change it back. I argued against that, precisely because the way we ended up was the way the senate had operated on confirmations for 230 years, down to 2000. This business of filibustering judge appointments is a recent phenomenon, even though it was always possible, chris, to filibuster executive branch appointments, it just wasnt fun. The most conspicuous example of that was the Clarence Thomas nomination. He was confirmed for the Supreme Court 5248. For your listeners to know, all it takes to get a filibuster in the senate is for any one of a hundred senators to have 60 votes. The most controversial Supreme Court nomination in history. Not a single one said you had to get 60 votes. Even though i very much dislike the way the Senate Democrats did this 2013, in effect, it was for the practice, the practice of the custom of the senate down to 2000. Chris the government runs out of money on april 20th, which means we could have another Government Shutdown on the 29th, which just coincidentally would beat Donald Trumps 99 day in office. How confident are you that you and congress can avoid the governments shutdown . Senator mcconnell im very confident. The two Appropriations Committee are working on the bill on a bipartisan basis. We will be talking to Senate Democrats, they will be relevant to this process. It will require 60 votes. Im confident Senate Democrats are not going to want to shutdown the government. They use to use that against us all the time and it worked pretty effectively for them. I cant imagine they would want to acquire the Government Shutdown label. Chris look, theres some argument, they will say its you, republicans, who could make the shot dont happen. There are a number of priorities that President Trump and other republicans want that democrats find unacceptable. I want to go through a couple of them with you. 1. 5 billion to Start Building the wall with mexico, a major defense spending increase in domestic spendingcoervatives wat defunding of planned parenthood. Question, are you prepared to risk a Government Shutdown over any of those issues . Senator mcconnell look, we will negotiate all of those items in the context of this funding bill, which will fund the government through septembe. We will be debating these issues again for next years appropriations, which start october 1st, but we will be able to work all that out, nobody wants a Government Shutdown. I think the Senate Democrats know that every time without a Government Shutdown situation, is from the congress who has been blamed and not the president. I would advise President Trump, dont worry about them sticking that label on you. If congress owns Government Shutdown brand and theres no incentive frankly for either th. I think we will be able to work all this out later this mon chris just to push on one of them, because that 1. 5 billn to Start Building a wall, you would not risk a Government Shutdown by insisting that be in a spending bill . Senator mcconnell what im saying is we are going to work all this out on a bipartisan basis. The democrats will be fully involved in the discussions, some of the president. We will work it out and avoid any kind of catastrophic event. Chris senator mcconnell, thats a hopeful note on which joint. Thank you, thanks for your time, its always good to talk with you, sir. Senator mcconnell thank you. Chris up next, the man behind President Trumps sweeping effort to rollback obama Climate Change policies. Epa chief scott pruitt. What we do every night is like something out of a strange dream. Except that the next morning. It all makes sense. Fedex powers global ecommerce. With networks built over 40 years. That are massive. Farreaching. And, yes. Maybe a bit magical. Visit fedex. Com slash dream youre hetruck, suv. Used car, thats smart. Truecar can help. Its great for finding a new car, but you already knew that. Its also great for finding the perfect used car. Youll see what a fair price is, and you can connect with a truecar certified dealer. So, no matter what youre looking for. There it is. This is how buying a used car should be. This is truecar. Chris a look at nationals park, or washingtons finest have opening day tomorrow for the baseball season. But, there will be no president ial first pitch as the white house declined an invitation. Mr. Trump, once called Global Warming and, swans a sweeping executive order for regulators to rewrite president obamas Climate Change policies. Join and we know from oklahoma is scott pruitt, mr. Trumps new administrator for the Environmental Protection agency. Mr. Pruitt, welcome to Fox News Sunday. Scott good morning, chris, how are you . Chris good. When the obama epa announced its Clean Power Plan, it said that the reduction in Carbon Pollution would have the following health benefits. I want to put them up on the screen. By 2030, it said there would be 90,000 fewer asthma attacks a year. 300,000 fewer missed work and school days, and 3600 fewer premature deaths a year. Without the Clean Power Plan, how are you going to prevent those terrible things . Scott chris, i think whats important this past week is to recognize that the president is keeping his promise to the American People to rollback regulatorying the last couple of years. Ast to a u. S. The steps have beee Supreme Courtsaid that the powes been used has been an overreach. The president is keeping his promise to deal with that overreach. It doesnt mean that clean air and clean water is not going to be the focus in the future. Well do it right within the consistency of the framework that congress passed. I think thats very important to recognize. Chris youre giving me a regulatory answer, a political answer, you are not giving me a health answer. I talked about 90,000 fewer asthma attacks, 300,000 fewer missed days in school and work. The obama clean power that Carbon Pollution from the power sector would be reduced by 30 . It would be in 2005. Heres what the American Lung association says. Half of all americans now live in counties with unhealthy air. You talk about all the regulatory overreach, but the question is, there are 166 Million People living in unclean air and you are going to remove some of the pollution restrictions, which will make the air even worse. Scott a couple things, we are actually pre1994 levels with respect to our co2 footprint. This country is doing far better than most across the globe. As you know, also since 1980, weve got a 65 reduction in those key air pollutants, particulate matter and ozone, while at the same time we have a growing economy. I think whats happened the last several years as weve adapted to and adopted this Previous Administrations views that if your pro drops and pro and environment. Thats not the way we do business in this country. Chris if i may come if you are talking about these reductions, but even with those reductions, the fact is that according to the American Lung association, which would have an interest in this, 166 Million People are living in unsafe air and if you do away with the Clean Power Plan and boost, as the president promises, coal production, then you will make the air even worse. What about the hundred 66 Million People . Scott i think what you are referring to is, we have about 40 of the country with those key air pollutants under our standards, which are outside of the co2 discussion. I agree wholeheartedly that we need to focus at making sure we make progress there. Thats one of the key priorities of the administration, to improve air quality to be on the 60 attainment that we see. Thats not been focal point over the last several years as much as it should be. Dont let me just ask, and you think that rewriting in effect, doing away with the Clean Power Plan will improve air quality which you say is a major goal . Scott look, i think what we have to mind is that epa only possesses the power of the Congress Gets it. The epaed twice to regulate co2. The Supreme Court struck it down and separately, the clean that t introduced in 2015, which are subject to a u. S. Supreme court state. As much as we want to see progress made in clean air and clean water, with an the framework of what congress has passed. Tools the past Administration Just made it up. They authority on a statute. As a commitment to the newadnisa progrowth, proenvironment approach. The law you talked about many times, the regulatory overreach, the executive fiat that the Previous Administration engaged in. We cant continue that process, because what happens is clean air is not advanced because you have litigation such as the Clean Power Plan. You have a stage of enforcement on the same power plan. Theres no progress being made for cleaner and we are also spending money on litigation. Chris that goes both ways, because the fact is, you are already in litigation on the attempt to reverse the Clean Power Plan. You are already getting sued on that. This litigation either way. Let me pursue this issue. President trump has been some act on mike is going to sit on this week with chinese president chi. Weve been pushing chinese leaders to improve Greenhouse Gas emissions and reverse them. Are you comfortable seeing the roles were reversed this week where it will not be the chinese president bush and President Trump to cut down on pollution . Scott look, its quite when you look at what happened in paris, the Paris Agreement and paris accord, china and india werent required to take any steps until the the year 2. That discussion, to think that china and india are more committed to the co2 reduction in the country is more its false. If we are pre1994 levels, and do you know why . Largely because of innovation of technology. Horizontal drilling, theres been a conversion to natural gas in the generation of electricity. Whats important in my view is the Utility Companies across the country that are generating electricity, the apa doesnt need to pick winners and lawyers. Sing to the American People that we will be anticoal, antifossil fuel as we generate electricity. Thats bad for america. Fuel diversity is very importan important. We have shown leadership. As ive indicated, weve made great progress with air quality since 1980. We made progress in the co2 reduction site as well. At the same time, we grown jobs. We have nothing to be apologetic about as a country. Chris im sorry, ted say tt again. Scott we have nothing to be apologetic about with respect to these key issues. The president doesnt either. He shown great leadership and projobs and proenvironment, we can do both. Hr a specific question, if you talk about the paris accords, which do call for reductions by china and other countries by 2,030. China has already begun reducing his emissions. President in january said that the Paris Climate Accord should remain enforced as the chief environmental officer for the Trump Administration, can you make the same commitment to the Paris Climate Accords . Scott Engagement International is very important. To demonstrate the leadership that we have shown on this issue with china and india and other nations is very important. Those discussions should ensue. What paris represents is about issue for this country. China and india backloaded theirs. That caused a detraction in our economy. Weve shown leadership on this issue the keyway. Chris sir, the point is that the president is more committed to paris than the United States is. Scott is he more committed in action indeed . The answer is no. Weve demonstrated through the steps were taken already the pre1994 levels. We can burn coal in clean fashion. We shouldnt have this commitment by the u. S. Government to say that fossil fuels are bad. The u. S. Epa and the government should not pick winners and losers and thats what happened the last several years demonstr. Chris im sorry to rush you along, but we have limited a Famous Exchange a would like to play right now. Do you believe that its be u believe . Believe that its the py contributor. 95 tudies thatClimate Change likely increase in the mid 20th century is due to hans. Dioxide now than in thend they t years on record. Mr. Pr coincidence . I said in mydual senators as is changing. Human activie real issue is howe contribute measuring that with precision. About it, theo2hat is the issue. From theveyou cant simply make that up. You cant do with the president did Administration Simply reimagined authority. Hat u. S. Supreme court stay against the power plan. Why President Trumps dealing with that regulatory reach to deal withues in the framework not agree to Global Warming and the question is, what if you are wrong . What earth is warming, what if it is dramatic Climate Change and we as humans through Carbon Emissions are contribute intolee Greenhouse Gas, has a greenhouselobal warme does and other types of gases. Thess is how much we contribute to it can be done about it from a process perspective. Chris dower plants belchingn emissions into the air, you dont think that plays a scott e done it better by claim. The innovative and technological advances weve seen al natural gas production, it all contributeto co2 footprint that is better than pre1994. We have nothing wo e are going e within the framework of the Clean Air Act and deal with we advance clean air, clean program. Chris let me ask improve th, that i p up some of the cuts that are included in t here are some of the 56 restorr farmers, pesticide safety. What does that say about the commitment of this administration and youth to cleaning up the environment when youre making a 31 cut in your agency and cutting things like that, what are runoffs for farmers . Scott part of the issue is that over the last several years there has been a lack of commitment to stay partnership. We have state departments of Environmental Quality across the country have the resources and the expertise to deal with clean water and clean air issues. We knew in that partnership chris they are going to pick up the flak and make water runoff and great lakes restoration, but that all just bco ive met with several governors, in fact wiin met with 20 plus governors. In those gatherings acroth are o projobs and this, this attitude in washin oklahoma and kansas and colorado and the rest of the country the air they breathe and are not going to take care of the air andand states that, t believe that. We were checked and we look forward to partnering with achieve good outcomes. Scott thanks for please come back. Its an important conversation you, sir. Scott thanks, chris. Will bring in our sunday group to discuss the growing controversy. They say the real scandal is what the Obama Administration did. Sfx engine revving silence chris coming up, the battle took them from the president Supreme Court nominee, judge neik. If the Nuclear Option is involved its because so. Chris we will ask our panel about the threat of a should be very concerned to people that an administration or people in an administration, people serving in government or provided classified information, or given clearance in the trust of the United States government misused, mishandled, and potentially did some very bad things classified information. Chris white house Spokesman Sean Spicer pushing back on reporters questions about the Trump Campaign in russia, sing the real focus should be on the Obama Administrations week of classified information about the trump transition. Its time now for our sunday group, laura ingraham, editor of lifezette. Gerald seib, of the wall street journal. Julie pace covers the white house for the associated press. In former National SecurityCouncil Staff for gillian turne gillian turner. Laura, the president and his team dug in deeper this week on this whole russia scandal and their argument now is that the Obama Administration surveilled the trump team and then spread that classified information for political purposes. Is this helping or hurting the white house . If they know that as long as this investigation goes on, the harder it is for them to push on a number of fronts their domestic agenda, foreign policy. I think a lot of folks do believe that the russia focus is meant in part to delegitimize the presidency of donald trump. If one sean spicer make that point, i think hes right. If he he sent a letter a few days ago. The senator. If you dont want to tangle wit with. He sent a letter to the fbi about the number two coperson at the fbi. His wife received 700,000 in political contributions arranged and facilitated by none other than clinton friend terry mcauliffe. His concern is that all documents be preserved and all communications turned over about what what he knew and when he knew it about the unmasking of individuals who were surveilled during the trump transition or during the Trump Campaign. If it turns out at the end of all of this that the fbi and our Intelligence Agency have turned into a partisan political operations with agendas, then republicans and democrats should be very concerned. If it all turns out this is just a routine investigation, the Trump Administration will have the egg on its face. I have a feeling that we will find out a lot more about who was involved in the unmasking and who had an agenda. Chris speaking about finding out a lot more, devin nunes, the chair of the House Intelligence Committee who indicated that he got information about surveillance and unmasking from an outsider. Take a look. Sources and methods are kept very confidential. We invite whistleblowers to come forward. [indistinct question] the administration i dont think is aware of this, so i go over there tell them what i know. It involves them. Chris as the week went on, it became clear that officials of the president s own National Security council were deeply involved in this, which raises the question, are the president and his team and devin nunes all working together to protect trump. I think its important to note that even before nunes came out and said he had this information, there were officials in the white house that were telling reporters, you should really be focused on the issue of improper unmasking. This is where we think the real story is. Then suddenly devin nunes shows up and says hes received information on exactly that topic. Look, if there is on improper unmasking chris unmasking means identification. Basically that means that there were surveillance of people, and they have not even been an american, it may have been foreigners. There talk about americans and american person one unamerican person to if it becomes clear that american person one is donald trump, youre not supposed to say that. When they say when you are talking about someone like president or his National Security advisor, their identity becomes almost impossible to reveal based on the nature of the conversation. If there was mishandling of the investigation, that would be a concern. The white house and nunes arent doing any favors when the coverup how they are getting information. Chris as someone who work in the National Security council both in the bush 43 administration and the Obama Administration, such a partisan issue and also for the former National Security advisor, Michael Flynn to see community from criminal prosecution in return for testifying. Along those lines, i want to point out, heres what mr. Flynn and donald trump said during the campaign about the fact that Clinton Campaign officials got immunity in the email investigation. When youre given immunity, that means that you probably committed a crime. If you are not guilty of a crime, what do you need immunity for . Chris now President TrumpPresident Trump is supporting immunity for Michael Flynn. The whole situation, the whole scenario is highly unusual. I would say this, the story, especially nunes involvement, its like an onion. Everyday we are peeling back more and more layers. We could kind of go back and forth to infinity on who checked into the white house when and when they left and who talk to who, but at the core of the story remains two issues. Two National Security issues. One is the leaking of classified information to include the surveillance issue. The other potential russian attempt and interference in United States general election. Boththe issues are way more important than the politicn they both have implications for American National defense. Way, they both spannedople thay that theres no evidence of collusion between the Trump Campaign team in russia in the general ele true, but i actually argue that that makes estigation, a really thorough investigation about russian efforts more because it means that whatever they were able wherever they were able to get on their own. Isnt that more compe thats one of the things as fbi aring, he said that heand also f Trump Campaign, u and i have coa lot ofhis town. What stands out for you inike t. This is singular, there isnt anythingouis the fact that you have cotdiscussedo openly. Im not sure thats ininhe white house interest to have it go onder if the white house would be better served if everybody could just turn onvole will get to the bottom of the spirit surveillance, and russian meddling. I think the one this week is wet a glimpse that maybe theres one thing that canene Intelligence Committee or have two senators, senator burr on the republican si, democratic. They come out and have a press conference and an which they loe responsible adults and actual bipartisan effort might answer some of these questions in a way thats credible and believable and that maybe will make this all go away eventually. Chris eventually. We have to take a break here. When we come back, we will discuss the president s war with the conservative Freedom Caucus following his defeat on Obamacare Repeal and replace. Plus, what would you like to ask the panel about the growing divide inside the g. O. P. Cannot go to facebook or twitter, foxnewssunday and we may use your question on the air. Med. It will be an opportunity for the democrats to invoke closure. We will see where that ends. If judge gorsuch fails toot,t to irrevocably change the rules of the to change the nominee. Chris nd democratic leader Chuck Schumer both sho the showdown over neil gurt nominee. A clerk under Clarence Thomas, im not taking sidesr,nd worse. Is there any way wars it looks like this week we will see a part of the senate changeg more into doesnt take a bipartisanotes, a simple majority canonnell was rt in his point. This is a 200 yearer changed. G a sunday during lent t in the way he characterizes thi this. There has never been a parsa sut nominee. When my former during all of the controversy surrounding clarence confirmed, the boatti on the Supreme Court, much to the consternation of the left. This is ridiculous at this point. Chris republicans were filibustering Lower Court Judges in the Bush Administration not the Bush Administration, and the clinton administration. This has gone back and forth. The Supreme Court nomination process has never gotten to this point there was a threaten of a partisan filibuster. Mcconnell, he knows the stuff inside and out to completely write the way he characterizes it. I understand that democrats dont want neil gorsuch to be on the court, i got that. Hes going to be on the court. This in the end hurts Chuck Schumer. It hurts the democrats, because if you get rid of this world, the role, now it you will only be able to have 52 justices to be able to confirm the next nominee. 51 senators. It could be the next opening will come in june. Chris thats what i want to up on with you. As explosive at comic as this conservative judge conservative judge. There is talk and speculation that anthonyy swing vote in the senate might retire. At that naming somebody who can shift the balance of the court for three decades. Us tg for not invoking fillet Nuclear Option. This is not an appointment that changes the ideological balance of the court. This preserves the status quo. The next one probably wont be, or may not bee your firepower until then. I think the problem right now piece saying the narratives here. The democratic narrative a stolt tapered it was supposed to be filled by is a National Referendum on who ou president ial election. This is basically a reconciled. Chris thats right. As i said, no clean handsomeness,fect hypocrisy. Lets go to the trump agenda in the wake of the Health Care Defeat in the first big issue, which i with senator mcconnell, a real possibility of a Government Shutdown on april 28tas been attacking members of the House Freedom caucus reaching out to Senate Democrats and house democrats. That they have any legislative strategy Going Forward on this pending a shutdown or anything else . Well [laughs] chris ka chris moving on. They talk about reaching out to democrats, they talk about trying to put pressure on the House Freedom caucus. Its largely just talk at this point. You look at the democrats, theres almost no indication that democrats are ready to start working with this administration on either Something Like an infrastructure package, which in. Should have some bipartisan support. If when it comes to the House Freedom caucus, you see these guys respond to the tweets from trump. They are not feeling the pressure, they are not backing away. This has always been a relationship thalittle odd betwe Freedom Caucus, because the thel want to shake up washington, but thea ideology. Chris quick that i also askd mcconnell, is the president , do you think, willing to shutdown the government to insist that funding for theio wh democrats it will blow it up. That is a great question. Col Pressure Point here. If trump is willing to go for the wellfunded, its going tos. Chris i supporters will saye promised us a wall. Promises of that campaign. Chris esons for the panel, n the growing divide inside the g. O. P. , this tweet from someone known as frank the tenth. He writes, is it really a divide, or are they just playing as usual at the expense of the people. Gillian, how you address mr. Tank, this is for you. It started out opposition, depending on what side of the aisle use it on. Me, who sit somewhere in between is that this has now become a very real divide. Mayb entrenched in the wake of the clash of the Health Care Bill that we are last few days especially, the white house taking in its heelse they are now targeting people individually. By name in tweets. By name. Theres what we are seeing on the side of the Freedom Caucus is that they are now gearing the future. What is it going to look for like in a tax reform debate . Again, the origin of this and what the original sin is is kind of obe at this point, but the battle lines have been drawn and i dont see that theres a way that this will improve. Chris as i said to julie, the question is, is there an end game here, if they are going to alienate the House Freedom caucus and not reach out to democrats, theres a problem. Thank you, panel. See you next sunday. Up next, our power player of the week, nasas new i on the universe. For the car you want,l,h now youre an experts n w cars always meant to be. This is truecar. Chris for the past 27 years, the Hubble Space Telescope has been providing answers for some of the mysteries of the universe. Now nasa is ready with a new and improved model with hopes to uncover much more. Here is our power player of the week. Size matters when youre trying to collect light from chg about the james webb telescope, a project hes ten years. When its launched in the fall of 18 more powerful than the hubble telescope. Does telescope will be 100 hubble. We can see objects that are 100 times more faint than the hubble can chris and yes part of that is size. 10 feet across. T across but the seven times the collecting area that hubble did. Chr hits 1 million miles in t will also have fives on shields, because he distorts images. A i tennis court, five players, and each layer is less than half the thickness of a piece of paper. Chris how warm is it on the side of the sun shield and how cold is it here . About side with the spacecrat is. And on the side its minus 400 degrees fahrenheit. It essentially adds an spf of 1 telescope. Chris we got a huge book outside washington. To get the huge mirror to fit thefold it up a transformer. Then they shake it and expose it to noise to make sure it will survive the violence of a rocket launch. Attempting to make sure that it hasnt changed at all afterat environment. Chris what will it allow us to see that we cant say no . The fir being formed. Wh he m, and the vast reaches of space, some of the light we see now was emitted from the first stars after the big bang. Chris so in effect he will be able to go back in time, you will see a light that is only now getting to us from 13 billion years ago. Its very exciting. We think we know we will see, but im not positive. Chris it was supposed to launch in 2014 at a cost of 4 billion. Now its scheduled for late 2018 at a cost of 8 billion. The project manager says its worth it. Chris is there one question that you hope it will answer . Yes, i would love for her to answer that we are not alone. Chris life. Life. Chris key said it will give a much clearer answer, whether those seven planets that were recently discovered orbiting another star can support life. Its all part of whats been called our new eye on the universe. We push the envelope in every area on this project. Logistics, technology, science. Every day you wake up and say whats going to hit my desk today and tackle it as a team. Just a great experience. Chris the telescope is such a big in the first leg of its long journey later this month, leaving the Washington Area under cover of darkness. It will be flown to houston and then los angeles for assembly. Finally perry through the panama canal to French Guiana for launch late next year. Thats it for today. Have a great week, and we will see you next Fox News Sunday the following is a paid presentation, brought to you by beachbody, but filmed by me on my iphone and directly from my heart. Hold up. I want to ask you a question. How do you feel when you look at yourself in the mirror . Not so good. Like, ugh. Gross. Who is this person . Like, you know you have to do something, but its so confusing theres fad diets, extreme workouts, and its working for other people, but it is not working for you. You just want a system, a program that actually works hello that doesnt feel like punishment. Girl, i got you. Announcer introducing piyo, the best of pilates and the best of yoga fused together to create a bodysculpting and weight loss miracle. I am 40, and i have a better body than i did when i w