Election original documents. Capabilities they reveal and the secrets they contain make clear the very real issues in balancing the Public Interest with National Security. Worked inside the secret safe though say this power is vital for National Security and is used only for National Security. Will what the state needs, Law Enforcement needs is the possibility of accessing the communications of the terrorist s, the criminals, the kidnappers, the proliferators, the pedophiles. Those communications are all mixed up with everyone elses communications. Around the emails globe. You have powerful capability to find a small amount you are looking for. It does not mean you state is reading everyones email, would thatt nor conceivably be feasible. People might fear they could be reading my emails . I would put the proposition the other way round. Would you really support a world in which it was not possible for the police and intelligence agencies to find communications of the terrorist and the proliferators and the criminals nd the kidnappers . The state . We trust Technology Allows it to do things they could never have done before, collecting and sifting through billions of orords to find a connection reconstructing a persons social interactions. Innovative ande complex. Although there is a system of oversight and accountability or instance every search has to be justified under the human rights act critics feel this is not strong enough. They could conceivably check every in sector of the sort that snowden exposed. It should be impossible. The mechanism is not there. That ismething justified by National Security has expanded into invading all of our privacy . Or the ability to do so. There are fairly responsible people. I know some of the people involved in this and they are decent, civilized people. But the state simply shouldnt have these powers because one day they get used wrongly, you know. By then it is too late. As well as processing vast amounts of data, the snowden thes also point to intelligence agencies deliberately undermining security protocols on the internet. Like the process of encryption, with the goal of making it easier for them to gain access to data. Us, the revelations in Early September that the nsa had a major Covert Program to compromise Internet Security aandards and products was 9 11 moment. Some Security Experts have been left outraged. They spent decades trying to make sure people can communicate to and privately over the internet. The goal is to ensure this is not the case, that weekend break anyones that we can break anyones privacy at any time and they can interfere with the transaction at any time. In order to do this they have compromised in various ways many articles on which the internet relies. Now, when you introduce these vulnerabilities, they are not just available for the spies to use. They are available for a guise to use as well. To use as well. The files confirm the tale of what is being built. They also contain pale page after page of topsecret operations. By making this material vulnerable to those who want to know britains egret and in disclosing certain aspects of it, have Edward Snowdens actions compromised National Security . Not even the kgb in its heyday of mclean in may 1950s could have dreamt of acquiring classifiedly intelligence documents. My fear is we are now going to crashs a slow motion car in which gradually sources dry up and targets, such as cyber criminals will work out what kind of capabilities we have and they will adapt their methods. It will be harder to track them down. Collect the balance between secrecy and accountability is being shifted as the direct result of snowdens disclosures. A senior official told me they would have to be more transparent about nsa work. But can the public understand more about the machine being built in secret. How confident will it be that it is being used to keep us safe rather than spying on us . Gordon carrera. Forjournalist responsible publishing the information leaked by Edward Snowden joins me from rio. Why should you be the arbiter and what is in Public Interest and vital to National Security . I am not the arbiter of that. I work with a huge number of guardian editors and some of the most experienced National Security journalist in the world and journalism, which is designed to serve as a check on those in power is about shining light on what those people in power are doing that they try to hide from the public and those are the judgments that all journalism requires every single day. British documents that we know. Presumably at least that many from the nsa. You heard from the former gc hq chief saying not even mclean would have an impact such as this and this is a car crash coming. This idea that there is 58,000 documents just because the u. K. Government said it, i would hope we learned that government claims are not tantamount to be truth. I think the broader point is it does not matter how many documents the guardian or other newspapers possess. The question is, what are they doing with those documents . Every single article we publish and every single article we will a pledge, we have carefully gone over every single line of everything will document and not of what, not one comma we publish could possibly be said to image National Security. It is all about informing people what their governments are doing. Connections could often be tracking terrorists. Wouldbe terrorists may change their tactics. So its very possible you have actually buy your actions made toeasier or terrorists understand how to invade all the checks made on them online. That is completely ludicrous. Fundament of the your question is entirely false. We have shown more than a mere collection of metadata. We have shown all sorts of invasions into the content of communications between n people having conversations online, the collection of their browsing history. The idea that terrorists did not know, excuse me, that the United States and u. K. Governments were trying to monitor their communications is laughable. Terroristevery capable of tying their own shoes have long known the u. K. And u. S. Governments are trying to monitor communications. The only thing we have informed people love is this of is that this is targeted at them. Do you think that the majority of people might actually feel quite safe . Shock thatit is a government officials lied to the face of journalist who do not seem to mind very much. In the segment you just played, you had people defending the gc hq on the grounds that this is only about terrorists and pedophiles. Yet, we have reported the gc hq and nsa are signing on petrobras. Are there terrorists and petrobras customer they are spying on the organization of american states when they are negotiating economic agreements. Are they terrorists . I think the job of the journalist is to prevent people in power from lying to their citizens. How can you guarantee the material you have you can keep safe . The thing is, could it possibly be on a memory stick in your pocket . If you want to know how you can keeping safe . We at the guardian have protected all of our data with extremely advanced methods of encryption and our documents have remained completely secure. We have not lost control of any of our material. That remains entirely secure. , when reason i ask this your partner, i suppose in the evidence it said what he was doingmaterial f paper, the sides being cryptic files. That is not very worrying about how caful you are about security . Well, i guess i need to give you the reminder again that as a journalist you should be aware that simply because a government makes a claim, especially when they are making that claim in the middle of a lawsuit while theyre being sued for violating the law, one should not go around assuming that claim to be factually true. So you are denying it . It was alive. The idea that he was caring and password that allowed access to those documents is absolutely the idea that he was carrying around a password that allowed access to those documents is absolutely false. The only ones who lost control of those documents are the gc hq and nsa. Just look at the affidavit they filed. They said we have to keep this material because it is all heavily encrypted and we have only been able to reconstruct 75 of those documents. What happened to dave and maranda, once he was helped and so forth, and as is partner, that must have been very distressing for you, you have said i will be far more aggressive in my reporting now. I am going to publish more documents. I am going to publish more documents on england. I think they will be sorry for what they did. Is there something coming down the pipeline . Because that was a number of months ago now. Actually it was a couple weeks ago. I think it was four weeks ago. There have been four about tch qs spying on petrobras, which scandal withr brazil. The interview is in or to gaze. The translation you are reading from his very poor. The interview is in portuguese. I said it will be looked at in most democracies where press freedoms are protected, unlike in the u. K. , it is a very thuggish form of behavior and will make them look quite bad. I think they are it is contrary to their interests. It had nothing to do with revenge journalism. Tuc however inappropriate the translation do you see however inappropriate the translation was, it would seem you acting as a campaigner and activist you talked about revenge journalist revenge journalism being inappropriate. You can see how people would think that . No, i will tell you my view of journalism. The more people abuse power, the more accountability they need through journalism. When i see a government like the u. K. Barge into the newsroom where i work and demand that they destroy their computers, the thing you would expect to hear imuran or russia or china or when they detain someone who is a journalist under a Terrorism Law and acknowledge through the media they are doing it to be intimidating, that is a government abusing their power and showing they need more transparency and that is the will of journalism. Are you still in touch with Edward Snowden . Sure. He is my source and i speak with them regularly. How do you know how he is being treated . How do you know, more importantly, that he has not had to give up secrets under russian protection . Because unlike the u. K. And u. S. Government, mr. Snowdens statements have proven to be completely true in every instance. I have never once seen him lie to me about anything. I know that he has protect it the data he has with extreme levels of encryption that not the nsa can crack and even risked his life to go to the russians and help them surveilled. , but he has been to china hong kong, russia now. You cant be sure he has not had to give up something. You pointed out various to lay just a few minutes ago that no one can prove a negative, so if you are looking for me to prove to you they do not have any data, i can do that. What i can do is tell you all the evidence we actually know makes it ludicrous to the think to think they have not obtained any of that data. There is zero evidence in any responsible journalist would refrain from suggesting that happened when they have no evidence that it did. Thank you very much indeed. Now, lets discuss this further with Pauline Neville jones, former chair of the joint intelligence committee. Shouldnt we have been told about all of this stuff anyway . I think that government does have to have powers to protect us. There are extraordinary things being said by Glenn Greenwald. In particular and i think it is incredulous he actually believes that the russians and chinese are not in full possessions of that information. So you actually believe oh, yes. Why do you believe that to be the case . The russians will have taken possession of his computer. They would have done this. I have no doubt that all they have now a great deal of information which is damaging to us, to our security, and which is the result of the trail on the part of the shafted employee. Did you know this was going on . The internet we talk about people who are worried about this, this huge explosion in surveillance. It is an explosion of the massive increase interception always is taking place. You can intercept mail. You can intercept telephone calls. What should they think in a situation where you have enormous expansion of communication which requires purposes of protection than to have comparable powers of collection, in order to find the tiny bits that really matter, that all of this is being read. It is not, kirsty. It is not. Tiny is not all about bits. We now face the greatest threat to our liberties and the second world war. We are sleepwalking into despotism because of the amount of material being collected, because these databases which are not about tiny amounts of an formation will be used, and not just by governments. Snowden was working for corporation. It will be accessed and others in government. And most important of all, people will start to self censor. We will find the very fax the total surveillance of our activities means it is not the question of if you have not done anything wrong, you have nothing to fear. The structure will stop us doing things that are right. Greenwald Glenn Greenwald says terrorists are smart. They take risks. Listening to the communication of im sorry. You have to actually go through the data in order to get the clues that will enable you to what does it matter what the brazilians are doing at petrograd esther mark at petrobras . You might be going after terrorists, that what are our interest it is out of control. Bei agree there needs to control over the system. There does need to be accountability. Is there enough control . What i do believe is they are acting according to law. I do believe on the other hand, given the public anxiety aroused by this that we do need to have actually a body like the Information Security committee actually do a review. Is that a good thing . Im sorry [all talking at once] law. Is not under the it is acting beyond the law at this point. That is a crucial idea. And the idea that the Intelligence Services have said toneed all the raw data search through is absurd. If you have a clue, then you have access to track something. Gordonas something in carreras film that there has been a deliberate undermining of encryption. This is not new. Not new look, there is a tension between the need for security and we need to intercept community. This is nothing new. On heart, actually in a way you think there should be a review, that Glenn Greenwald was right . No, absolutely not. There is no question he has done a huge public service. What the intelligent Security Committee needs to do the quack needs to do in the house of commons . Is the joint committee. Very senior mps. Anymore than the judges if you could say one thing to Glenn Greenwald, what would you say . I think there is no way that young man would have been able to resist. A very Senior Intelligence expert in this country saying there is no way, no way on earth, the Edward Snowden has not had to give up something in russia or indeed perhaps before that in china . The ignorance of those comments is truly astounding to me. First of all, you would think a rational person, before making an extremely serious accusation like russia and china has gotten all of his data with have at least a little bit of evidence before saying that. There is none. Let me please let me just make the point. I listened for a long time. I just want to make the point. They could make out the data on his laptop. That is not how data works. Its not 1998. Data is stored on thumb drives. On the some drives are encrypted shells and i know this because ive read the documents i have on this. Not even the nsa can break those. The encryption codes are 4000 characters long. Clarification. You dont have the dont believe capabilities of the nsa matter. The russians a very sophisticated capabilities. From all of us, goodbye. Funding for this presentation is made possible by the Freeman Foundation of new york, stowe per month in honolulu, newmans own foundation, and union bank. At union bank, our relationship managers use their expertise in Global Finance to guide you through the Business Strategies and opportunities of international commerce. We put our extended Global Network to work for a wide range of companies, from Small Businesses to major corporations. What can we do for you . Wasbc newsnight presented bykcet los motorweek join us and see if the resurrected Jeep Cherokee is worth bringing back. Pat goss smokes out a few common problems down at goss garage. We celebrate two decades of doing whats right for all of us. And for the 11th time, well see whats new with an allnew Toyota Corolla so come drive with us, next announcer motorweek , televisions original automotive magazine. Brought to you by. Goodbye, my dearest. Wait yes . When i buy new tires do i need allterrain . Isnt the road pretty much the only terrain ill be on . Announcer theres a better place to ask questions about your tires. Just been gnawing at me. Announcer tirerack. Com can help you get the answers you need, and help you find which tires are best for you. More information is available at tirerack. Com. Rockauto has auto parts from hundreds of manufacturers. No matter what customers drive, they can Purchase Online from a comprehensive selection of brands, prices, and specifications. Rockauto. Com. All the parts your car will ever need. 3m. Maker of 3m paint defender system. Helps protect your paint in three steps. Drying to a clear, removable film for protection. More Information Available at 3mauto. Com. Diehard. More Information Available at diehard. Com john when jeep said it was bringing the cherokee nameplate back to america, most of the response was positive. But when photos of the new utility were leaked, that response became an uproar. Jeep fans, it seemed, were less than thrilled with the slick new styling. Fortunately, it does look far better in person. Plus, theres a lot to like about the new cherokee beyond what meets the eye. For jeep purists, the 2014 cherokee is a hard pill to swallow. The squinty lights, fold over grille, and even a wedgey window profile. And then there is the matter of it being a crossover derived from a frontwheel drive car. Heresy granted, this cherokees new look may not be as macho as a sleeveless denim jacket; and its certainly doesnt look as purposeful as the original square jawed, 1980s vintage xj, but we dont agree that its been hit with an ugly stick. There are many reasons that a boxy shape was discarded in favor of a slicker design, but aerodynamics is certainly a key one. The new form cuts through the air far more effortlessly, enabling better fuel economy and a quieter ride. And despite the softer lines, the cherokee still has a nice stance to it. Its 182inch overall length puts it in between compact and midsize suvs, but the fact that it shares a platform with the dodge dart makes it a compact to us. Weve heard a lot of complaints about the front lighting, with its highmounted, nissan jukestyle, slanted daytime running lights drawing most of the ire. Headlights and fog lights are stacked below. Fortunately, a dedicated trailhawk model packs what should matter most to jeep fans; standard fourwheel drive with an off road kit that adds an inch of ground clearance, skid plates, red front tow hooks, and the biggie. A locking rear differential. Dodge dart influence extends to the standard tigershark 2. 4liter i4 engine. Ratings are 184horsepower and 171 poundfeet of torque. Available is an allnew 3. 2liter v6, the second member of the pentastar family. It cranks out 271horsepower and 239 poundfeet of torque. Another debut is chryslers new 9speed automatic transmission,