Supervisor katy tang and norm lal yee. Do we have announcements . Yes, please silence all cell phones and Electronic Devices and completed speaker cords included as part of the file should be submitted to the clerk. Items acted on today will be on [inaudible] item 1 amending the administrative code requiring prepackage food and beverages sold in vending machines on City Property or served at city meetings have [inaudible] we amended a Committee Last week. Our city has a very strong record of prioritizingiment provement in Public Health by encouraging healthy life styles for employees and residentsment Healthy Eating is a key factor reducing a number of chronic conditions we see prevalent across the city and here in San Francisco including obesity, heart disease, stroke, cancer and other threatening disease. This cost the taxpayers millions each year in health car can you cost jz believe it should be a priority to lower the cost. I do believe we should dpoo everything in our power to implement policies that seek to benefit the public and make the holethy choice a easy choice. We started this dialogue in earnest over the past several years with the tax discussions last year. A father of 3 Young Children and believe by leading in example in this regard and the city should lead as well. The Healthy Beverage snam policy will be one the staungest in the country. It will shet nutrition guideline jz standards sold in vending machine jz food and beverages served in city events using public resource squz encourages restaurants on City Property to have a balance of healthy food. The first components set nutritional standsards and guidelines for vending machines we develop in consalitation with American Heart Association, department of Public Health. It will limit the amount of cal ease offered and require that the food option served are low sugar sodium and all types of [inaudible] all these requirements are prospective so the new stad nds and guidelines apply to contract jz properties extended or renewed aftersth ordinance. The second component requires city departments do bet efforts using city funds meet the recommended nutritional guidelines mptd for example, it requires water is available and accessible, vegetarian and vegan offered and food offered includes fruits vegetables grains and [inaudible] the third component encourages restaurants to have better balance of healthier food options available. Lastly, we accepted amendment tooz strengthen the legislation as well. I do we believe we owe to the 28,000 in the city and taxpayer tooz implement policies that lead outcomes for employees and visitors to city hall to more productive City Employees and cost save frgz the taxpayers. It accomplishes the goals by making the healthy choice the easy place. Prnl note, as i mentioned when i introduced this the fact that my 3 year old Son Associates coming with city hall going to the m m machine isnt something i want to continue. The legislation isnt possibility with American Heart Association and brittany Government Affairs director in the bay area, department of Public Health, Health Services [inaudible] from my office and a number of others. We have a chance to be a leader and hope you support this proposal and look forward to discussion with full board. With that we dont have a budget analyst report. Any questions or comments before Public Comment . Okay, well move toPublic Comment. Anyone like to comment on item 1 . If you would please come forward, everyone will have two minutes. Speak on one of the microphones. Good morning, my name is chris stalk locks and chairman of the berd of greater bay area of the American Heart Association and i representing the Heart Association today in support of this bill. We believe that healthy americans come from betder choices, better choices but what they do and activities they take and what they consume and feel like any ordinance that allows formakes it easier for consumers to make a healthy choice is a better choice and has a benefit to the citizen and city itself. I speak in support of the ordinance and thank you for your leadership on this issue. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. My name is cristina [inaudible] department of Public Health and work on chronic dw zeez prevention and direct the shape of San Francisco initiative and we have been working on this making healthy choice the ease a choice 10 year jz support any type of legislation that helps make that come true. I want to thank you supervisor farrell putting this forward hope we get support for this today. Anybody else wish to comment on item 1 . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Supervisor tang. Just want to thank supervisor farrell bringing this forward. Im excited encouraging more vegetarian and vegan options so like to send this forward with positive recommendation to full board second by supervisor yee and take without objection. Item number 2. Itism 2, resolution approved a cooperative agreement between city and state of California Department of transportation concerning the Development Review of the projecktd initiation document for luck bard street vision zero project. We have dpw to speak here. Shannon karen from San Francisco public works and here before you to seek apruchbl for public works to into into agreement for cal tranls for gement review and approval oof projict initiation initiative. This project features pudpestren and curb extension and sewer and Water Infrastructure improvements. Extoneds along lombard street from van ness avenue to intersection of richardson and fran cyst co street. The execution of the agreement is cal trans [inaudible] cooperative agreement specifies the terms and conditions for city funding contribution of 200,000 to cal trans. Fund frg the coopwhichs from a sfmta revenue bond thmpt project document is a engineering decision document that identifies the need, purpose and feasibility of the project. Public works began design the project and required cal tran review and approval of the project initiation document to proceed with final design and secure a inroachment for cal trans for construction. As stated in the public worked order dated february 2, 2016 recommend the board approve the agreement including payment of 200,000 to cal trans. Happy to answer questions. Thank you very much. Colleagues any question . I want to thank you for your work and the whole team for their work on this. This is years in the making and years left to go but this will be a positive improvement. Anyone wish to comment on item number 2 . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Colleagues item 4entertain a motion to send the item forward. So moved. Motion by supervisor tang and seconded by supervisor yee. Item 3, proceeds from certificate of participation of animal care and control renovation project. This motion is sponsored by supervisor tang. I see we have staff here and including our director of animal care control to speak on the item so ill keep this brief but very excited to continue to move the effort forward for rebiltd of the Animal Shelter in San Francisco. What we have before us today is the propeation from certificate of participation but put it on controllers reserve and come in the fall can follow up legislation. Very excited about this and with that ill turn it over to city staff who would like to make a presentation. Good morning, [inaudible] Controllers Office of public finance. The ord nnss before you appropriates 60, 500,000 to finance cost of animal care and control renovation. With approval of the ordinance the board approved the appropriation placed on controllers reserve pending authorization salefment separate legislation to authorize execution and delivery will be nrtd deuced at a future board meetings with related finances and documents. The cops are expected to be executed ina mount to fully pay the cost of the project including interest financing and delivery for the project. The appropriation amount is [inaudible] estimated with a conservative Interest Ratef 6 and is a half percent. The propeation amount includes 920,000 dollar. Available to answer questions related to fimancing and have jim [inaudible] with department of public works and [inaudible] with animal control to answer project related questions. Thank you. Colleagues, any questions . Okay, mr. Rose can we go to your report for item 3, please . Yes, mr. Chair, on page 3 of the report we note the current cost estimate to relocate and construct a new animal care control shelter is [inaudible] and that is shown in table one on page four of the report. Page four shown in table two the ordinance appropriations 60, 500,00049 million is allocated for animal care and control renovation project and 10, 580 thousand to reserve and finance cost and 900,000 cost for market uncertainty. On page 5 the report the Controllers Offices estimates 59, 580,000 at Interest Rate of 6. 622 percent. Average debt service is estimated 5, 241, 710 and interest and principle payments over the 20s year term are 110, 075, 900. We recommend you approve this resolution. Colleagues any questions . We move to Public Comment. Anyone wig to comment on item 3 . Seeing none Public Comment is closed. Excited to move to full board with positive recommendation. Motion by supervisor tang and second by supervisor yee. Item 4, resolution approving a Lease Agreement between Swissport Cargo Service and city for approximately 20,000 square feet of space in west field cargo building 632 and related areas on plot 9. We have cathy wagner here. Good morning. Cathy wagner with San Francisco international airport. The proposed resolution seeks approval for aviation lease between swissport and airport for 19,000 square feet in the west field cargo building. The term of the lease is 3 years with two one year options to extend bringing the potential lease term march 31, 2020. The estimated rent associated with this new term including the two one year options is 2. 3 Million Dollars, solis dus require ret row act tivty to april 2015 as the airport was involved in a series of negotiation with swissport to upgrade equipment when the item was introduced and the board package needed to be refiled. I apologize but it does require ret row actativity. Colleagues any question snz mr. Rose, can we go to your report . Yes on page 8 of our report shown in table 2 the airport estimates 2, 345, 996 in rent paid ofern the 5 year term och the lease including the two option years. The estimated rent of that 2. 3 million includes anium rent increase of approximately 2. 5 percent. We recommend you amend thiss resolution for ret row activity and approve the resolution as amended. Thank you very much. Colleagues any question snz seeing none move to Public Comment. Anyone wish to comment on item 4 . Public comment is closed. Colleagues any motion. Move this item with recommended amendment to the full board. Motion by supervisor yee. The amendment and the under lying amendment. Second by supervisor tang without objection. Thank you. Item number 5 madam clerk. Resolution ret row active authorizing department of environment grants from the association of bay area governments in the amount of approximately 600,000 to perform activities as bay area rejinal Energy Network program. Mr. Rod regs here. Thank you for the opportunity. The resolution before you are grant funds to continue the support the work the department does on energy efficiency. Specifically we have 4 goals in mind for this grant work. The first is target multifamily upgrades. We have a goal of trying to upgrade 1200 units in San Francisco to reduce annual the energy load by 15 percent. The second effort we are focusing on with these resources is target Single Family homes in San Francisco to join the home upgrade california program. The third objective that we have is we are hosting several workshops and forums for contractors engineer, consultants and building officials to encourage Energy Efficient code compliant. The last is improve access to commercial and residential pace programs we have to help projects remove barriers, encourage scale and promote new programs to take advantage of that. The department encourages your support of the resolution z happy to answer any questions. Thank you mr. Rodriguez. This is a great one. Any questions. Move to Public Comment. Anybody wish to comment on item 5 . Seeing none Public Comment is closed. Motion to sends the item forward. Like to make a motion to send forward mptd motion by supervisor tang and seconded by supervisor yee. Item 6 item 6 resolution approving emergency public works under administrative code to design, prepare and upgrade [inaudible] at the Sheriffs Department county jails number 1 and 2. Thank you very much. From public works amie lam project manager public works. So, im seeking approval for the emergency work designing repairing and upgrading the Security System for county jail number 1 and 2. Not to exceed 2, 900, 670. In 2014 [inaudible] caused a failure of the main intercom system, [inaudible] so, at that year they repaired the emergency work to have a fix for both portions of the work. So right now the Sheriffs Department is continuing emergency work to complete the whole system. So they completed system that needs to continue to complete the whole Security System and then because the security reasons they would like to keep the professional consultants and contract in one piece. And any other comments . Colleagues, any questions . Supervisor yee. Thank you for the presentation. I noticed that this isthis particular item has been in the Capital Planning process for a while, is that correct . Yes. How long has it been in the Capital Planning process . Just curious. I like to have from the sheriff [inaudible] dan [inaudible] with San Francisco stairf Department Facility maintenance manager. We had this as a capical project for about 2 years. There was a older projeblth associated with this beginning of the Security System replacement but we were not able to move forward and ultimately when the system died about 2 years ago, we needed to declare a emergency. Just keep it alive somehow. Thank you. Any further questions. Mr. Rose can we go it report. . Page 12 we note the total estimated expenditure for coipty jail 1 and 2, 3, 916, 047. [inaudible] 2015 and then the estimated 2, 967,000 for the new work under the proposed resolution. Page 13 of our report we note the board of supervisors appropriated a million 400 thousand in the 1516 budget and million 400 thousand in the 1617 budget so totals 2. 8 million with carry over with 116,000 that equals this request of 2, 967,000. On page 14 we recommend you approve the resolution. Thank you very much. Any questions . Seeing none, open up to Public Comment. Anyone wish to comment on item 6 . Public comment closed. Move to full board. Motion by supervisor yee and second by supervisor tang, take that without objection. Madam clerk do we have any other business . Thank you, we are adjourned. [meeting adjourned] supervisor Budget Finance Committee meeting for monday, may 2, 2016, my name is mooerlt im joined by katie tang and supervisor norman yee and joined by supervisor kim thank you clerk linda wong and jim smith and charles kremack for covering this meeting madam clerk, any announcements . Electronic devices. Completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. Colleagues 3 departmental Budget Hearings this afternoon and take them out of order dph next and she was third and mention in advance supervisor tang and i have different engagements well be leaving anothers 2 oclock i appreciate your patience with that madam clerk call item 2. Hearing to receive a budget update from the hearing agency from 20162017 and 20172018. Okay. Thank you we have a number of departments within hsa that well be talking but still came up up mr. Recognizing and he can be the miss to in terms of everyones order. Govern supervisors director with the Human Services agency yeah sort of 40 departments we will decide on the best order given the presentation and as you may know the Human Services agency formally comprise 3 very well Departments Department of aging Adult Services and the office of early care and education as you may know the mayors annnced aid move forward with the budget establishing a new department of homelessness or Homeless Services which will move out the hsa division of Homelessness Department and we have sam dodge to present on the initial thoughts of of department of homelessness ill move into the department of health and department of aging Adult Services and early care and education interest as you may know Human Services agency broadly speaking we serve the low income single adults and families and seniors and children in San Francisco and through the various programs to promote the sufficiency amongst the population and the agencies that protects 9 vulnerability through the Child Welfare and protective services and Human Services as well. But for the latter fall under daasw rather than walk you through a lot of dollars and sort of the more detailed portions of our proposed budget i want to talk about arithmetics about what is driving where were propose to spend how public dollars so essentially yield of our Protection ProgramChild Welfare our programs are driven by serving those who are in most defined and income we do it in 4 principle areas through income supports and throughout the public assistance, cal works as well as the county of Assistance Program undertook the nutritious all through our calfresh and a number of contracts with communitybased organizations we did provide health care and insurance 0 through medical that is as you may know sitting calendar in the acting and seek to provide the Housing Support from Emergency Shelter to subsidies to Supportive Housing that last piece currently the Human Services budgeted will move out of 20162017 so we look at how we can configure those and governed by federal and state law that authors the programs and well talk about in broader terms to our level it is whos poor in San Francisco and despite the Economic Growth job growth and decreasing unemployment there be hundreds of thousands of residents that are struggling financially and this bar graph you see where those fall it is important to note were not using the federal definition of poverty the wolfed one hundred but in San Francisco bay area would have had is defined and object and 2 had had percent your considered low income in San Francisco as you can see the numbers were looking at extremely poor under 50 percent of poverty we have 45 thousand residents the vast majority are in 1 or many of the programs as well as the next bar under one hundred federal poverty an example in the medicine be Affordable Health care act it touched up to one hundred percent and the second bar a little bit of the third and obviously a significant expansion in the medicaid so, now ill quorum through the programs that again, we administrative at the campus and city level that are authorized through the federal legislation in addition through state implementing legislation so medical as you can see the Affordable Health care act continues to be a tremors success and asset to the portion of San Francisco since we began in 2014 we reached one hundred and 20 thousand cases of february of this year and as you can see did significant increase in the chart on the right notablely though the medical has tripled of one hundred and 34 percent the number of staff in the budget who support of enrollment and the comboiblth the oewd workers has increased by 28 percent this is not to say we dont need the Ability Services workers a quirk experience force those who apply and maintain their eligibility we have a significant change in our business processes to allow to serve the significant increase in population with staff that is not increasing proportional to that caseload increase also in medical a penetration in medical is in the highest of the state were touching well over 95 percent of those who are eligible state legislation that was passed i think two years ago will enable 16 hundred undocumented children inform receive medical Health Insurance they were only for limit medical we anticipate a little bit more uptick an increase to our caseload given the undocumented enrollments that given very, very soon calfresh a significant increase from the chart began well before the implementation of the passage of the and implementation the Affordable Health care act due to outreach due to efficiency we have undertaken to opening up neighborhood offices and the partnerships and with the food bank and other food providers however, we do unlike medical weve reached again, a vast majority we have a was to go with calfresh different studies show our penetration is 50 to 55 percent of those eligible those are projections on the low side in terms of penetration rate nevertheless, 45 or 60 percent question is where a number thousands of San Francisco households we can potentially enroll in the Calfresh Program the beauty of one of the benefits of the Affordable Health care act is providing Health Insurance through for the poorest of the poor allows us to market and do what we call in catcher reaching looking at those who are newly eligible and seeing who when a other benefits those households are enrolled in around calfresh to look at office of the city administrator those and expedite their enrollment and one of the streams to increase uptick of significant important food support were also trying to continue to integrate our eligibility work matt haney a single case worker for cal calfresh and cal works for an individual how their applying challenges do remain as i said weve gold a significant number of folks upwards of 20 minutes and open enforcement again call rates for folks who choose to enroll on the phone and our goal to have wait times of less than 30 seconds that will drive the demand time rate were relying on overtime hours were proposing the budget in june proposal to increase the eligibility workforce in calfresh and medical again not an increase as portional to the there on the last to help principally help get for households on calfresh but produce the less wait 7, 8, 9 for the eligibility programs on the cash so far as and Investment Infrastructure is the Calfresh Program comprised of 4 programs for those centered around the need of the population other than, of course, their poverty needs whether . Movement towards federal ssi or moving employment or less requirements due to a little of the applicant or recipient the case has declined cal works case welfare to work is cash assistance for families is declined not as the caseload this tends to you look at sort of do a 10 to 15 year look back it rise and falls with the unemployment so more dulls are benefiting and getting jobs as well as those for federal disability through ssi that puts them off the caseload we still have almost 55 hundred individuals that again those are single adults over 18 with no did not significant numbers still need to move into federal disability or employment were attempting to do is make a lot of pragmatic changes some of those we can do simply changing the operations but a number will require changes no local ordinances youll see in the proposal in june is a number of amendments to the county assistant ordinance with the eye and simplifying the application and the goiblth requirements to get those who are able to work quicker into jobs and subsidized employment and assistance so, of course, ill talk more in detail in a couple of months but this is been a two year internal and external undertaking for this program recognizing where the unique needs and various needs amongst the population to govern the ordinance to meet those are challenging but we think weve produced a passage of reforms that helps us drive that caseload down over time drive that in the near term increase it as we see others on board we want those who are entitled to public assistance to come in and stay on so we can engage them in the Robust Services to offer them cal is our state mandated program for families that are low income pertaining families on cal workers comprise 80 percent of the caseload and parents that e low income and for all of them to get the paternities into work if parents cant work due to a disability we do the same cap that helps them navigate the application process with the ssi their children, however, will remain eligible for cal workers, however, the parents are not required to work the fetsdz and the state requirement of 50 percent if we are blow 50 percent were subject to come be subject to federal and state fiscal sanction who years ago we were 35 percent and we had been there for probably a decade due to significant state reforms as well as changes in the local operation and Service Delivery weve pushed the number of significantly and good for two reasons well not face a fiscal sanction but more families are engaged in Employment Training and subsidize employment and doing removal work their children are getting caregiver and Health Treatment and transportation and all those obviously are critical if we are to move families from public assistance into the workforce and ultimately into selfsufficiency the other piece of cal workers were glad this govern focuses on positive changes which is funding of Additional Service through cal workers the cal working program for housing subsidies so far cal works families two hundred homeless cal works family all of our cal works parents through the robust profiler process a state required appraisal very, very comprehensive tools that looks at really the whole family what is going on within the family we need to aid what are the strengths to get that family off public assistance and selfsufficiency what is going on with their household and and their inward and housing, etc. That then helps inform our welfare to work plans and related support of services we need to provide parents and their kids in order to move them again off of the public assistance and the last is a local strategy but embedded in the cal works the project 5 hundred initiative that i say youre not Human Services agency but ours as in the citys as in the Mayors Office are significant other reels significant partner in this department of health but also department of children, youth, and Families First 5 rec and park, the idea being those families 5 hundred of our lowest new york families in San Francisco need more than income support and job training to get out of poverty they need help with the department of health and Child Maternal Health and safety and access to afterschool programs with dcyf or summer exams through rec and park and looking at wag, we do to stop and disruptive this transition of entering generational poverty and focusing on without going into much detail but a two generation strategy that looks at low income moms who have a new born many of whom have older siblings that is the hook anothers breaking that entering generation all poverty we dont want that newborn and sibling to become poor when they hit adulthood but to break that and the strategy to easily define the population and identify the population but this is going through work and research by the department of health the engagement and the opportunities for engagement when a mom has a new born a much, much better when they have an older have older children some inviting program that the Public Health department has been doing nor a number of years moms seem more receptive and needing of the program when this is the sort of entree into the whole initiative not mom you have a new born lets get to work lets help you manage the first 12 or 24 months with the new born and managing that household is the next steps to move into work and off of poverty and the last area ill talk about not necessarily a low Income Program is it so not it if so by happenstance but our really crisis preservation our Public Protection for kids when the defendants but the Child Welfare services the administration of child prevent Services Adoptions and a whole range of category it seeks to prevent abuse and. Thank you very much. Next speaker. Keep families intact and assists children that are of abuse and neglect in a better way to make sure that all the negative the negative impact of that abuse on the kid is in a debated as quickly as possible and over the long term technical Child Welfare 9 Core Practice mode and care reform and broadly speaking those are strategies that helps e helps us in broad terms keep families intact and children do need to come into the foster care make that stay as short as possible by adoption in foster care make sure those replacements with supposedly and meet the needs of kids through Mental Health and educational supports and connections with adults through families to maintain the connection with the extended families through better visitation and a whole host of evidence informed evidence based practices that fall under the title 40 waiver and the continued care reform i want to note specifically though the third bludgeon an issue that garntsd attention at the state level weve known for years decades really that our kids in foster care are vulnerable sexual abuse and dont want to criminalize kids victims of sexual abuse but local and state and local practices to address that particular program the hundreds of kids that are at risk and children engaged in sex trafficking and better training for the staff a noncriminalization approach for those children who are victims theres literally dozens of bills in the state protective if sentencing reform to criminalization to look at the reforms in the way the probation deals with children and sight reforms in the way we can help help those vulnerable children. One second supervisor kim. I just had some questions on the Foster Care Program you said that you tried to use it sparely to limit the amount of time w45u9 the average time in spending in foster care. So the number is driving down the average length of the stay will be ball parking we have a cohort of kids in foster a long time six or eight years more kids that may have come in at a young age and not able to get if unification with the parents or adoption their older and in care significant challenge getting older kids adopted out of the system youre faced as a tragic that kids have to go into foster care we are doing a better job but the cohort remains the kids in foster care kids that come in as a younger age belief before six or eight months we are better another addressing the kids that are older needs to come into foster care is sexual abuse and other things we look at the length of stay in care and look at the first time entries into care the unification rates were picking up in every area with the care thats a good thing when you look at the caseloads there were 28 hundred kids in foster care. How many 28 hundred about 8 years ago now blow seven hundred and thats kids under a 18 we do fortunately have what is called nonminor dependent foster care through the Assembly Bill 12 which loud the kids to remain in foster through age 21st and 18 theyre not prepared to enter the world whether college and whatever so we can provide for their support up to age 22 in the form of housing or tuition that numbers is 200 and 50 so under seven hundred kids and 200 and 50 nondid not that would be been out of the system. Between 200 and 50 and ages 18 to 21 yes. And seven hundred that are 18. 6 hundred and 97 that is a couple days ago. Theres used to be 28 hundred what year. That is probably around 2006 or 2008. Thats great over the course of 10 years and yeah. What did you think accounted for that reduction. It is a significant reduction and not unlike a reduction statewide 60 percent reduction due to a significant number of reforms with the federal and the adoption act but also some of the 636 and other state reforms that really moved the system from a process oriented focus are we are doing the monthly visits are the homes licensed and how the kids are doing in care how short how long are the kids in care hallway quickly to adoption and held to the 18 federal measurements which we look at quarterly come out how are we are doing in 2000 i used to at a underlying blind when we didnt know about the unification and uc berkley statewide manages this data for all 58 county to during this trial deep to know decade you anywhere with with the needs of reforms addressing the particular system and begin to drive down things like care we know better now it is much, much better to provide inhome care rather than the first relaxing relax to remove the kids from their birth parents and she for example, she was on drugs when they gave birth we automatically remove but now not whats the process forces treatment and not pull one more thing away from a mom that is struggling so were mindful of the importance of intact families and when we can keep them save we want the kids to stay at home and changes no guardianship now the freshen and they pay for guardians to be legal guardians only then they got no more support now we do now with their aunt and getting Financial Support a series of reforms that you know they implement it has with funding to drive those numbers down. So use to be as a Family Guardian over parenting didnt get the same advantage to take care of thats correct. Incentivizing yeah, the adults that strangers that are foster. Yeah. And the other sings you brought it up the title 40 what the title 70 side were one of the 10 counties statewide that signed on to the waiver title 40 the truth of the matter for foster care 2 works for nonwaiver county you only get the federal funding when the child is remove from their home and it didnt play out on the ground thinking we removed the kids i can get more money but to use the federal dollars we want to use the federal dollars for intact home we cannot on the state or local dollars the federal money we can now do we we think is the best the Human Services are part of labor that allows for much Better Service much more density wrap up we dont have wrap up services for kids is it doesnt matter anymore tens of thousands of dollars we can use in a better way. For the 18 to 20 more transitional issues to fostered what kind of support to access to College Higher education. Yeah. Well to that many of the kids 12 enter a post dependent living plan plan theres a lot of acronyms in the plan it says a plan that is how can we get you once to age 22 in a place to be you can be dependent a draft to college or through College Component might be a better Vocational Training or roommate matching a host of the activities we are funded to we can implement to address the needs of those kids it is a challenge many of these kids as i said turn 18 in the system had multi placements a halfdozen foster homes and many different schools not their high School Dilemma or ged those are the issues were struggling with and if we dont intervention we know the negative outcomes long term we know that the process p,z e, finance governance pecks of being homeless we know their greater so not only you know is it good for the individual. In the systems much like making the entering generational poverty breaking that needs for crisis intervention and imagine for kids in foster care that is ab 6 do. The likelihood of being homelessness in foster care is stunning my second question to cal workers or workers is the wage pay minimum wage is it 13 an hour now. 13 or 1350. 1225, 13 in july. Oh. Thats right. Oh, let me check he thought that was january it went up to 13 but maybe july 1st we know the population is growing demographic women with children under of one of the faster growing. We can debate that supervisor it is a given. It is growing. Sure. And i know that those programs are already expensive were not suggesting to pay more but a what can we do to stabilize those families to make sure theyre not turning into homelessness. Sure the cal works i mentioned it the support state dollars of which we received over 2 million i think that provides a rental unit subsidy or subsidy it is a need in 1998 we sponsored a bill spaepz was the author to use the cal works it passed the protective then govern gray davis fast forward to 2014 the protective realized this was an issue and signed by the give me it supervisor youre talking about families that are already in cal works they have assess to the training and subsidize jobs childcare whatever the work were doing with campus Family Services and the wait lists get to availism of cal works to get into the state funded support typically a family that is homeless we dont require them to be doing activities theyre number one work with us is to try to end homeless so that can, done through the cal works and once in partnership with the department of children, youth, and families and other provider we get them there rental unit it is with the case working as well as our employments counselor and move them at a fast track into employment with the 13 an hour wage and the outcomes we see from subsidizing employment continue to be very, very positive 2 3rds of exist continue to earn and off assistance and the only poverty out of poverty country is out of work by getting homeless families stable and wrap up with the childcare transportation and that job were seeing good successes thank you uhhuh. So supervisor yee. First of all, i want to commend your work on the fosters child serving kids and i know that is a lot of it operationally is also the advocacy from the city to the state and to the federal because 10 years ago it was a mess and you talk about some of the benchmarks for foster care system and for some of these initiatives youre talking about project 5 hundred and others what i hear how had had you measure the success. We have the strategy. Im not hearing how ill measure. Sure i talked about the outcome for families and childrens to supervisor kims question i did not go into the detail in the presentation but i certainly will in june the project 5 hundred the ultimate goal to get families out of poverty is that 200 percent or whatever for project 5 hundred the goals are more in the way were approaching this driven by that particular families strength and needs so for particular family it maybe simply getting their child to school on time for 6 months maybe having our child in high Quality Childcare it would be attending you know 4 months have a job ready course or it is such an intensive casework Family Interactive prose the goal how many families got out of poverty were engaged with signed a contract but we have an measure with the dependent family well be working with that person or firm only one person to identify the metrics both at the family level and but also the progressive level and dialoguing with our partners in health more than just in comes and Outcomes Health of the parents and child that is a process again, we Just Launched project 5 hundred and havent gold the first family but those are the things im certainly in any presentation in june walk through some of the significant benchmarks and indicators Performance Measurements so far all the programs. Thats correct i would be personally kind of interested to go dope and didnt have to be necessarily it would be just my office. Ill be happy to. Clearances any other questions or comments if im not mistaken well call up homeless. Through the committee sam dodge or department of children, youth, and families executed up as well well call Homeless Services only balls we wanted to certain individuals to hear that before they leave. Sam dodge told me weve been engaged that the district and hsa and working to stand up Depth Department of Homeless Services this is an overview about what is coming in and where were in the process i want to be cognizant of your time sow go a little bit fast those are some of the ideas informing our efforts heres our goals to end the homelessness for 8 thousand people in the next 4 years prevents people from becoming homeless with the time to reeducate and decrease the number of people exercising homelessness at one time these are the guideline principles San Francisco is a Housing First city we know that is an evidentiary based best practices to rapidly return people to housing it is better and Customer Service is important with an engagements of over seven hundred people experiencing homelessness they told us again and again approach is allowed people to accept the services a practical measure and also an important emphasis were helping people in the middle of their crisis to be proud of and Customer Service approach and Trauma Services is the best cooperated with transparent how to make the decisions about plummet and focus on the long term homeless and the strategy practices with the staff coming in the next quarter so this is our spending as supervises know it has been a drastic increase in the budget serving people exercising homelessness and 50 percent over this time period heres the distribution of where were spending that money it is a combination of you know the Human Services agency and the department of health the big buckets and theres some others but you know were pulling down federal money to help support our programs between medical and the continuum process i want to say we have got the second year tier funding San Francisco was waterway 31 million from hud a record year on top of last years we won a Bonus Program is it so good news and there was some cuts even though we won the record amount of funds for great programs that will help people end homeless but seen kits in the job programs this is part our our budget to expand our services what we know works. We continuing of federal money. Again, this is how that money that 200 and 41 million is spent the lions share is in support of housing for people formally homeless and emphasis there is a lot of confusion within the building about the amount of resources were spending on people exercising homelessness and where the resources are spent so the vast majority is you know keeping people housed that are formally homeless and medically frail the Health Services because of the Health Conditions and preventing homelessness and training hope people through rental subsidies we have you know thanks to the board made Strategic Investments in outreach and shelters and additional housing really the smaller part of our system and what programs are coming over into the new departments and from preservation to remove to intervention with the trickle housing and the permanent housing and rapid housing programs are coming together with a full supreme from the streets to home. Not one answer for people exercising homelessness everyones journey is individual we look at the programs into serving people in ways that will help them return to housing and those are the buckets we use families with children and trickle age youth and veterans you know, i want to say weve seen that street Homeless People exercising homelessness are a little bit different had an the intervention with people that are making good use of our shelter system heres some of the system graphs places for growth you know often based on the great work that is done already this is part of the idea of the new department that we experimented to a point we know we can do more by corresponding our efforts we corridor the entry with the homeless in the housing with our veterans effort and working to bring that cooperated entry model to single dulls and rapid rehousing is director was explaining so successful with the families were really not bringing it to scale like we can he can do it with other populations weve seen it work in other counties a county wide database that ties the communities together and makes assessable the programs for people to end their homelessness not silos of programs within our Provider Community or within our departments but really a client based system and part that have is having cooperated database and also you know helping people move out of the expensive interventions that are right sized for their needs helping people move out of the supportive hours when appropriate and when we can give them dont under the circumstances. Mr. Dodge. Why not go ahead. This is our department timeline right now weve done a director search with entries around the crisis and making our decision the mayor is weighing options the ideas to do transfer the function with the budget and continue with the Strategic Planning when we get everybody together with that, ill answer questions. Mr. Dodge first of all, thank you for your work this topic youre doing an amazing job in that a year of transition and all the planning to thank you there are two things in terms of of the bar chart and spending i think one of the things that gets talked about i think we need to do a better job of saying this is as new spending every year if we dont do this the families will be on street and adds a sixth number to the theres people are saying gosh were spending it is in a defensive position if we didnt do that what would happen and lastly i hope at some point we remove the Supportive Housing i think that is right way to talk about it and certainly to build the housing ladder in the city and Going Forward supervisor yee. Thank you mr. Dodge thank you for your work and coming out to district 7 for our housing summit to end homelessness i think that was very helpful for people to here the prospective on that a couple of questions that note at that particular meeting but it was actually a few days later people wanted to talk about homelessness when i had the experts to answer the questions a couple of questions maybe you can help me or think about this they the question i asked director about benchmarking how are you seeing assess in your programs as we move forward because there it comes from the prospective like oh, were spending a quarter of a billion dollars how do we measure that. Thank you, supervisor we have been looking at outcome based success measures i mean the Homeless Services is one of these unique social crisis categories with you end homelessness and hope poem to stabilize and return to housing youve had success part of our work with the Navigation Center to have a weekly dashboard to look at the indicators and the macro indicators how many people have we housed and where are people in the housing supreme and the timelines for success and how will we can work on the steps this is part of the goals to really bring our whole system to have a predictable model to look alive as we go how are we are doing is there interventions a lag or gap in the services you know we want to really make sure were allocating the right interventions to the right populations people experience homelessness in a variety of was but the most tells me indicators the time that people are homeless it is very exists we have a small group of people that have homeless history of a decade or more and we need real and deceptiveness intervention we have a large group of people that experience short bouts of homeless and the shelter can help many people catch their breath and return to the mainstream of life to make sure were allocating the right resources to the right populations and our ultimate measure of success our appointing count how many people are experiencing homelessness and how many people are experiencing homelessness in the shelters that looks at the broadly context you know the state of california and the nation there are some things that blow against us that are hard to defeat but if were making the programs and we are you know giving people the right intervene and we should be able to see significant progress in that appointment count how many people are experiencing homelessness at the same time. I appreciate that i think maybe similar views to supervisor farrell about the support of housing piece and how they explain that it i get a feeling when people think about homeless preservation or homeless helping the hoping we dont consider housing at all it is almost like who is out on the street trying to remove them this is not everybody but a lot of people think that way so that would be helpful for me to explain it for example, for the support of housing we definitely figure out how we can show some success in that my guess the percentage should be divided into Supportive Housing not going back spot streets i would love to have those numbers to explain to people and by the way, to the people out there that think this is the end of where we are supportive of our people in San Francisco the residents with homeless preservation there is we support a lot of legal organizations to help tenants for instance, and that is not part of this but we also as most people have been fighting to have more Affordable Housing built this is also a piece of this because it is all about how we keep people from having to go into the streets so that much of it is about Affordable Housing so if you could break it down more for us. Sure. In terms of even the buckets you were talking about i could explain that better to people. Our Supportive Housing and programs consistently shown well over 95 or 90 percent success rates with all populations so im talking about people that are facing multi extreme challenges in their lives whether they are be physical, Mental Health crisis or Substance Abuse a others we know that housing works we know our communitybased provider meet the people where theyre at and make them successful and help them with their lives when people are connected to the services they do very well and as far as preservation as i often consider rapid rehousing part of prevention and a success rate with rapid rehousing parts of this idea that once our back into our own housing life is important manageable and our supporters work that much better at that point so you know that is scaling the models the interventions we know much work well the cost of shelter and those kind of interventions are nothing Navigation Center is the high cost intervention. Necessary for some people if we take the same cost of interventions whether paying back rents or Legal Services see great dividends people dont return to the shelters or not touch the homelessness again that adage the penny of prevention is true in Homeless Services. One more comment the sometimes when i have in a place i can have more discussion with people that i think i could sort of defy a difference prospective i think i it is actually a lot more affordable and cheaper to do the work as you put someone in jail. Oh, yeah. I mean in the real amazing work that the department of health has been doing with their highest utilizers in the system someone is out on the street and maintaining their existence can be 60 or 80,000 a year rather than getting them into Supportive Housing manage this complex issue much better for 20,000 a year so making those kinds of trades it is important the doing the right thing and we have the capacity we cant do it all at once but moving toward a system that helps people return to housing with the kind of supports to be successful in the interim there is situations on the street we need to respond respectfully to also ways that help address the you know a safety and Homeless Needs for the entire community including those experiencing homelessness with the department we stepping forward to build the system to respond to the people in homelessness. Supervisor kim. Thank you supervisor yee. You know what i thank supervisor farrell and supervisor yee you touched on the question and feedback we get so much from the neighborhood meeting we spent out this money on homelessness and how is it effective it is getting worse so how do you breakdown it is 40,000 per homeless person how come not making that work and it helps us to know that chunk is housing people. You cant count that towards the 6 seven hundred people that live in the shelter but that would be helpful to the residents to understand as we grow this budget and their investment on homelessness how we spend those dollars even on a personal was not accurate way to understand how to address homelessness but that would be helpful to us were often at the meeting answer those questions and two ive had this conversation with you, you used to work in new york city the other city were we often compared to with homelessness how come new york city is to good to a would be good to get a comparison on how we and i dont recognize addresses it. In the category of 55 million in the intervention like shelters and trickle housing and drop in centers the vfth in new york city is over billion dollars they we have a nightly shelter capacity of other than 13 hundred and people they have a nightly capacity of 60 thousand it is hard to understand but people understand that 200 person shelter a large shelter you escape that up to 60 thousand and you know there are shelters in every simple neighborhood in new york city so go theyre a little bit of a difference in their state constitution which is a effected with lawsuits that entitles people a right to shelter people are. Right. To shelter and have a right to get both a shelter bed that night it is an expensive are system and a difficult shelter respend a lot of money that is it is a comparison theres in the comparison that really needs to be made you get a few feet of snow in new york city and the summers are not easy there is a flash rain and high humidity so it is a very diversity context than california as far as what it takes to live outside so speaking to that i think that is better to compare apples to apples and not the 42,000 we spend 45 million on outreach and shelters and drop in centers in comparison to nobs new york city that spends a billion dollars whats the Homeless Count the Homeless Count on the street is around 3 and a half thousand their Homeless Count overall is over 60 thousand. Right. So living on the streets is 35 hundred in shelters about 60 thousand San Francisco what you say i thought that is 16 hundred shelter beds but 13 hundred including the Navigation Center. Oh, yeah. If you include the family shelters. It is 16 hundred. So we have roughly 16 hundred in shelter and minus that is 67 hour count on the streets is 5 thousand. No our count ones the street a 35 hundred we do a robust count compared to office of the city administrator communities we look at the parts of the system of care whether that is residential treatment or people in hospitals trickle housing, even jails and so thats the distribution of where people find themselves. Roughly 35 on the street and 6 seven hundred in the jails and not permanent Affordable Housing. Right. Yeah. It that would be helpful to get a breakdown i think of more the apples to apples to take out Supportive Housing i dont think people think about spend on homelessness it is but it would be good for people to have a more contextual lists in how were spending how money. Thank you anyone else thank you very much all right. Thank you. Is this the end of the Human Services aging and adult i dont have a list come on up. Good afternoon. Supervisors director the department of aging Adult Services and we want to commend give a brief overview of the department and talk about some of the efforts that we are undertaking in each the divisions the first one in our Largest Division in the department is home support United States of america is a nonnecessarily inhome care for elderly at risk of institutionalization most of the people 74 percent are seniors age 65 and offer 40 percent of guys inhome care live alone over half of that are Asian Pacific islanders 52 hers percent and most of clients are chinese 62 percent and looting the caregiver 19 thousand caregivers in the program and 62 percent are providing care for a Family Member and in 2016 ihss providers were protected in the fair labor standards act that means they are entitled to overtime and travel pay pay for travel between clients and theyre also paid for waste time when theyre waiting for a decrease appointment that is really created a lot of Washington High School within the Community County and particularly the way the states implement theyve done in in a collection way there are a lot nuances in terms of how it is rolling out i think one of the things i want to talk about that today is the real looking at the way the social workers provide assessments in the community and trying to use the social workers in a productive manner meaning theyve saelsz for in home hours this is a real opportunity once a year could look at other things the clients need one of the things weve implemented the survey we looked at the numbers from the Security Task force of the number of older adults who live in hunger we are like this is a great opportunity to kind of capture those folks and other ways to get nutrition to them outside of ihss so weve implemented that and probably have results around with that what that looks like in the next year or so tracking that two other things we are doing screening and the initial depreciation screening for people not go social workers our staff went out and did initial screening and report back if they find people that are living at risk in communities we havent implemented that but will do that in the next year a couple of nvn supportive issues and looking at some increase staffing and in Home Supportive Services the Second Division is the protective Services Division that includes Adult Protective Services the conservativeship Representative Public administrator i wanted to highlight the adult protective serves as you know aps investigates the obligations of abuse with elderly and alongside report of selfneglect so as you can see on this slide one of the biggest things that we get in terms of the reports on health and safety and a lot of the health and safety issues are related to hoarding we have is that right one hundred and 70 cases of conformed Environmental Issues in homes labor that is typically our hoarding issues so weve did a study with university of San Francisco that was done in boston we tried an intervention with people with hoarding disorder weve discovered it really takes a lot of effort and time to work with someone with hoarding disorder typically our cases with opened for 39 days and this is just in the accurate for someone is hoarding disorder not enough time so to work on those cases to work with people around managing this disorder we had a lot of collaboration with the Mental Health soefshgs they have good program buses about our social workers working with the individuals item by item and helping to change that behavior. One of the other efforts in this division is the public convert terrors looking at the District Attorneys Office and the Public Defenders Office and the court we are looking how to how to better collaborative between the district and the department of aging Adult Services to remove obstacles for anymore people in the pipeline for conservativeship. A quick look once you get probation officer that situation how do you reverse it it seems a person is getting better. When they police have that a one year conservativeship and the person has theres a place for a jury trial and many ways people can ask to have it look at again and the whole idea behind many conservatorship to keep someone at at at least redistrict in terms of placement or the medication they get and the whole goal always to get them into the community it is a one road at a time and has to be removed and most people in the program at this time are in for 3 years at most this is kind of the average the recidivism once people are into the program is not high the treatment actually works and people go out back 0 into the community. Thank you. The Third Division the the longterm home care specifically we talk about the new critical quality surveillance so the longterm care the community where some of the efforts like the rental Assistance ProjectService Connect program and the new itself equality Assurance Program we basically took divisions and put them into one unit and the idea behind that we could our social workers we are seeing people with medical issues in the community and a lot of time those people are ended up in hospitals or not being adequately treated medically so one of the easily ways to get our nurses out there toe we created this unit and 200 and 29 people in the units so far and basically, people are seeing the nurses that help with Health Management for untreated conditions and help are chronic illness. Able to look at peoples medications and see that people are using their medications in the correct way or old message and things like that it is really were putting in a lot of Outcome Measures and not a lot of results but should have in the next few months we firmly believe that will help with people being not limited to to hospitals and recidivism well be tracking and mention is it so something new were undertaking and then the last provision is it in take provision the biggest thing that is really our Community Piece we have our daasw intact hub that we created and all the Community Services contracts and in we opened you received an invitation and provided representation and that basically is a way that people with our public site for people to get assistance but a way were integrating well, i think with Human Services agency this is a Service Center for medical eligibility and our focus is really the seniors with disabilities and making sure they get the services a between the guest and our daas information for assistance and Adult Protective Services meals intact so well have a lot of data whether there and reporting that out in the next year. And then i wanted to point out that last year, we really greatly increased the amount of nutrition because the money that was pout into the mayors budget but from the board weve been able to really increase the number of meals and on the home delivered side i think that is about it for right now unless you have questions. Thank you. Any questions. Seeing none, thank you very much next up is michelle from the office of early care and education i want to tell everyone this is my favorite office. Thank you, supervisor. Im michelle the Deputy Director of the office of education were a Young Department 2 years but in the office weve been working in the office for many, many years and collectively hundred years of experience we have an amazing Early Education system in the city but theres certainly room for growth in terms of the lining of resources and streamlining those who are providers and for families to improve access to highlight quality care as a family selfsufficiency is a fail support and to help families go to work in early ed preparation to make sure that children on fiscal are ready to learn in that next year of 20162017 were going to the next phase of Office Taking on the region of the p f a shifting from first 5 to the office we had the money in the budget last year but the Actual Administration of the payment was administrative code weve been working with the first 5 to and then the processes and train up and that administration is moving over to the office along with the several of the first or of the p f a key position were leaving two positions to manage the Quality Improvement support and assessment process and coaching oversight and in this current year we complete a analysis of the care and Education Funding in San Francisco about almost wolfed Million Dollars comes through the office now in the coming year but a lot of those dollars bypass the city to providers so a lot of the work is about all the rules and limitations of the federal, state requirements around those dollars and even worse the rates that that our providers are expected to provide high quality care with the sprucedup reimbursement rate and working with the providers and laying funds to try to keep their doors open and try to improve quality those 0 subsidize lots with the low income children in the city we want to make sure that theyre able to assess hi quality that, of course, analysis gives us guidance about how we are financing and recommending how to streamline how we fund our providers and how we finance the subsidy of children so well be looking over the next year at options on how to implement that the basic recommendations from the San Francisco analysis is two hundred and 3 page report but the basic recommends were incorporated into the plan that was presented here at a hearing two weeks ago and were wrapping up the written report, of course, youll receive in those the fiscal analysis recommended really funding programs up to the base level of quality of tier 3 of the quality rating and what it would cost to finance the programs and then regarding the quality with quality enhancement loaf that for the quality not just what were doing now over the next year well be doing a Quality Support process evaluation to see if there are more efficiency in the Quality Support and working with our provider communities and with parents and our contractors so the citywide plan that was presented to the board really includes a number of aspirational overarching where weer heading with the comprehensive system and with parity for teachers from k through 12 a heavy lift but certainly there is a teacher crisis in early ed right now difficult for our programs to attract teachers and keep teachers here when someone in from time to time theyll be a preschool teacher in from time to time we are investing a lot in training and coaching and Quality Improvement and we have great providers in the city and we want to keep our teachers here so and theres a number of recommendations in the citywide plan, which i wont go into great detail but ill be happy to share outside of this Budget Hearing and over the next year the office of care and education is charged in from the ordinance in collaboration with the first 5 San FranciscoUnified School District to develop an evaluation strategy for that all the e. C. Services in the city and we know that one of of our i our challenges is integration to understand what is working and not working we need to align our and integrate our workforce register with the child enforcement and quality database to see where the inputs and how the children are doing one of our measures of success is the kindergarten observation that will happen at kindergarten do we want to know the children that be doing well and what children has input with what teachers and sponsored in various was were move the needle on quality and especially a happy to share the progress were making on that another time but did want to share a snapshot of what subsidize types of enforcement we have that are being funded by the Office Currently so this represents a little over 86 hundred children some of those are state funded and some local podiums that weve developed that are categorical like the access assess program for homeless and the Childrens Services for foster children and children served through hsa and an over laptop of the program because those programs are in trouble primarily because the state being insufficient but swimming upstream to address that from the state is pga a regional rate our local dollars would go further in supported quality. And the next the last slide is just two different slices of what the occ budget the first slide our budget by fund source and the second slide is how those Funding Sources are drbltd into program areas. And with that, i will close and ill be happy to answer any questions you may have. Okay. Any questions. I dont have any questions. But thank you for your presentation. And i guess thats the end of the Human Services agency presentations. Thank you, supervisor as trent do you want to say anything to close it. Thanks thank you for the opportunity look forward to coming back in june and presenting comprehensive detail. Thank you a motion to continue this item to the call of the chair. What would you like to take Public Comment. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Could i have a motion to continue this to the call of the chair okay with no objection the that item passes and thank you very much i like to have a motion to excuse supervisor farrell and supervisor tang from the meeting. Can i have a motion please. Okay with no without objection the madam clerk call up item one. Item number one hearing to receive a bucket update in the Sheriffs Department for fiscal year 20162017 and 20172018. And id like to welcome sheriff hennessy to the podium and shes give a nice short presentation. laughter . Thank you supervisors thank you for having me here and pleased to be here to present the Sheriffs DepartmentDepartment Overview for 20162017 to start out our expenditure in 20152016 has been almost 200 and 3 million and change our total staff of april 30th of 2 a hundred and 8 and staff of one hundred and 63 and sivenlg vacancies and authors one of wolfed and scorn vacancies of 75 our with alternates incarceration 8 and 41 everyday it is a number of people out on alternative fence on incarceration in 2016 beginning in the first 3 months our jald population as an average of three hundred plus and the incarceration is 8 hundred and 32. So my Department PrioritiesGoing Forward a staffing we have been phil a lot of positions on overtime in fact, a number of overtime reemployment from permanent salaries a overtime in order to keep up to do the jobs we perform for the city and county seso one of the priorities to hire from the community and also as you may know zuckerberg San Francisco general is opening a hospital and asked us to staff that so well hiring may or may not when we hired the sworn staff takes 6 to 8 months ago to get potato people to work they go to the academy and because of that theyll not be available for some time weve begun to hire that to be able to serve the people of San Francisco the way we should some of the reforms not just reforms some of them are running to fundamentals with the training and education and some of the education will do diversity is exponent we have other exploring and things of that nature were asking for funds to do this training for supervisors and manages not mandated but in my view when our Holding People acknowledge you need to do that and our first line supervisors are the people responsible and others training a training for the staff in crisis intervention tran has given as a minimum but try and cover the whole department and that includes the deesclation techniques as well as on the department of health be able to provide more informational Substance Abuse and Deputy Sheriffs working in our jails im looking at other audits of the internal affairs unit is doing i think we need to put resources but make sure im targeting the right resources and also want to make sure i can be transparent about the types of discipline and the discipline we provide and also the results of these those investigations and as well as im looking at the information and Technology Services to make sure theyre performing where they should we, pull the data out of our systems and make sure we can make sense of it and provide find the work in a way that is efficient one of the new positions im asking for a position for the jails that means someone that is like youve seen in a hospital someone that works with the jails behind the scenes finding out the kind of care kind of reporting to the top and making sure we are doing with we can to make sure were providing the services that are protecting the people and the Constitutional Rights as well as making sure were providing proper care medical service and day to day items and the other final one thing in the reforms the body worn cameras and fixed cameras we are talking about 60 body worn cameras and county jail our linear not a lot of cameras in position well i couldnt store addition but like to move forward with and another priority is Capital Improvement particularly retroactively county jail two on the as you may or may not know were working through the reenvisioning trying to close the county jail at some point in order to do that well have to renovate county jail two and renovate the laundry and make sure we have jails predicament ability to spate people predicament to the division but that jail was built in 1994 and opened as a work furlough not the high standards from the jails have had in terms of security other priority continue the services to subtle your projects programming for prisoners inside and out in the community and to categorization which includes an alteration 7 people to prearrangement Assessment Program called the supervised prerelease b will get a new name were using a risk ascertainment uniqueness with the drvrz and the adult probation. Commissioner. Before you go to the next page. Excuse myself for one minute ill be back we dont have a quorum i need to stop the presentation for one minute. Would you like to take a recess. Yeah. One minute recess. Do i need to Say Something a can i have a motion . For a one minute recess this is been a one minute recess. One okay welcome back to the budget and finance committee thank you very much for the little recess sheriff hennessy continue. Well, i did go back and did you have a question or continue. Go ahead and continue. Okay so this page talks about our scorn hiring and separation sponsor the last new years youll see differences were blow quite a bit so the department has an increase in hiring authority by a reduction in overflow room over two years it will take two years to capture with the so the department is holdings two Academy Classes for the personnel to fill vacant positions and the department will hire 31 for the San Francisco general building that includes 16 cadets and Deputy Sheriff with an analysis by was in the department for over thirty years and proud of the department for recruiting a number of people of different ethic nights in our department and doing that for years and years and seconds we have quite a good representation from the community of different ethic nights and thirty percent white and 18 percent africanamerican and aps i think 340 percent and hispanic we have 18 percent and it is like that for a number of years there were were falling short in my opinion from females on this 16 percent one time close to thirty percent well be working on that as well but the budget request expenditures the largest amount of money to staffing as general and im not going to read the slide if you have any the questions on this slide ill just move on. And the request by division as you may know the Sheriffs Department operates the jails and include a number of other things but mostly the jails and the field is patrol and city hall is one plays and the laguna honda and is clients we provide Field Operations and Programs Division does all the work for other programs that we do inside and outside of the jails for prisoners and we have a facility equipment facilities that goes to 5 percent. So for instance, 5 keys is would be under programs. 4 keys is selfsupporting a great thing about 5 keys it is a Charter School through ada adult tenants the daily is 5 keys not an limping line item in the thats one of the things they dont a lot of the workout in the community. And finally i think i workout too fast we have grants we have right now and one of the newer grants is the offender transitional housing we were talking about housing in other city departments but were housing through support of collaboration with the community we design to reduce coliseum recidivism and the eligibility for this grant is through the misdemeanor it provides mentor to make sure that people have Supportive Housing that is key introduce the process and an anti drug that is responsible for providing linkage prior to release from custody so we have that as well and different care programs that work with the various programs like the citrus focusing a lot on Substance Abuse and trauma and getting people into the community thats the eva quick overview of the department the department is large it is as you may know and theres a lot of that gondolas that is complicated and intertwined i thought id give you the overview for today. Any questions seeing none, supervisor kim. Well, this is not a question for today, i brought up sheriff hennessy many of my comments on learning about the Electronic Monitoring Program to the board not at this time but prepare you but id like to learn more that the program and the effectiveness and the cost charge and inmates planting. Other Public Comment phone number for this item seeing none, Public Comment is clos closed. Thank you. Thank you. Could i have a motion to continue this item to the call of the chair . So moved. With no objection that item passes. Theres could you please madam clerk call the last item. Item number 3 the budget update in the Public Health for fiscal year 20162017 and 20172018. A id like to ask that someone make a motion or Public Comments any Public Comment on this item . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed can i have a motion to continue this item to the may 11 meeting. Can i have a motion . Please. So moved. Moved with no objection is the moved madam clerk million. Mr. Mr. Chair theres no further business. So mardi gr meeting adjour speaking foreign language. shop and dine in the 49 promotes local biz and challenges the san franciscans to do their shop and dine in the 49 within the by supporting the services we help San Francisco remain unique and successful and vibrant so where will you shop and dine in the 49 San Francisco owes itch of the charm to the many neighborhoods people coma greet and meet it has an personality these neighborhoods are economic engine seeing the changes is a big deal to me especially being a San Francisco native and it is important to support the local businesses but also a lot to over here it is nice not to have to go downtown i think that is very important 0 for us to circulate our dollars the community before we bring them outside of the community for the time we have one dollars in the community is the better off we are it is about Economic Empowerment by apron ingress the businesses that are here. Shopping local cuts down the cyber foot youll find cookies and being transported the world where everything is manufactured and put on the Assembly Line having something local is meaning more the more we support our local businesses the more i can walk down to where i need to be. Bridges contingency bye like west portal it is about city and San Francisco may have a big name but a small city and a lot of small communities shop and dine in the 49 highlighted that and reminded people come outburst and i love that about this city ill always be a good evening, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the regular meeting of the the meeting will come to order. This is the regular meeting of land use and transportation im supervisor cowen the chair of that to my right is supervisor wiener the vice chair and to my left is supervisor peskin hell be joining us shortly our clerk is victor young and like to make a moment to thank jesse larson and phil jackson if sfgovtv for broadcasting this meeting today mr. Clerk announcements . Electronic devices. Completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. Items acted upon today will appear on the may 24, 2016 board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. All right. Thank you so much well colleagues supervisor farrell supported this item hes here im turn the rest of the meeting over to him. Thank you, madam chair call item one. Ordinance amending the police code to prohibit anyone from keeping a firearm unless it is disabled with the trigger lock. Thank you, madam chair so colleagues gun violence a large irk across the country and here in San Francisco one the leading factors continues to be the unsafe storage of firearms during last year the shooting in San Francisco did a significant amount of work this is followup legislation because call the roll under San Francisco law only handguns and rifles and shotgun are to locked i want to thank supervisor cohen and supervisor campos that did a past amount of legislation in the arraign this closes the loophole mandated occupy filers not just handguns have proper trigger locks on the department of justice list a recent study over 1. 6 million childrens were living with loaded and unlocated firearms and 73 under the age of 10 were in homes with no location felt parents firearms according to the department of justice status a program in the doj posted 90 thousand firearms are arrested in burglars and 15 percent are used in other crimes while this legislation selfwas not an incident in the streets of San Francisco thankfully i personally dont believe in waiting for a disaster this was a glaring will that we governed last year im proud to have it come to committee i want to thank quickly both alison and julie from the law center to protect folks from gun violence over the past years i want to thank and jessie from my office and katherine from previously my office for all but work they put 2, 3, 4 and i look forward to having the fame to be aggressive around gun storage laws colleagues he hope to have your support and ill be happy to answer any questions you may have. Thank you supervisor farrell and colleagues anyone in the cue lets go ahead and take Public Comment any member of the public please be advised hi, im al sob an attorney at the law center to prevent gun violence thank you for thereby ordinance to save storage orientals those amendments will require guns in not only the residence of the owner to be safely stored all firearms only handguns and require lost containers to be listed on the california roster of Firearm Safety devices this legislation is very important accidental shootings is a significant problem in the country territorial were responsible for one shooting that year on may 1st the post recorded in 2016 the piece of shootings by toddlers accelerated thinking lost cabins in the homes are substantial to gun stoelgz the u. S. Department of justice reports 90 thousand firearms are stolen every year during burglaries and unlost guns in home are for people that want to do harm the sandy hook massacre used guns from his mothers arrest natural that makes firearms less likely to get to toddlers and cancel teens and closes the leadership such as a bayview of a woman to leave them around and theal shooting by children are undocumented and the safe storage law on the roster to insure sympathizer reasonably secure forbes in 2012 recorded a 3yearold can open guns those amendments lake the safe storage have consistent with the Second Amendment gun people can carry a loaded gun and assess it in the matter of seconds thank you supervisor mark farrells and the rest of the board for your consideration for this legislation. inaudible . At this time thank you colleagues is there a motion or discussion im sorry. Apologizes towards the City Attorney one clerical error. John gibner, deputy City Attorney on page 3 line 6 the word handgun is missing so after the committee sought this out well submit a clean version with error corrected its deleted basic in the wrong spot. Thank you, mr. Accept City Attorney motion supervisor peskin this is anonymous thank you okay mr. Clerk, call item 2. Item two resolution for an option agreement for the sale of block the northern one thirds by fulsome by the Successor Agency to the San FranciscoRedevelopment Agency to f four transbay partner, llc for 45 million thank you. I i believe that scott or ms. Sally from the occ to present on this item. Good afternoon, supervisors i have some copies of presentation for the supervisor as well as copies for the public thank you. Today to seek approval with the f four, llc for transbay block 4 for a sales privacy eve 45 millions and my that agenda for today is ill combgd on block 4 and parcel f another within the transbay project area that is related to the matter before you provides some of the terms of the option agreement and discuss the determination before the board a fair Market Analysis of the sales price of 45 million other considerations we look at during the staff analysis and finally some steps heres the map of the Transbay Development project area divided two zone one of the state owned parcels part of development of transbay the portion and block 4 as you can see right kiblgdz other than the righthand side if youre unanimous familiar with that neighborhood on the Transit Center bus terminal till taken up blocks 2, 3, 4 parcel f is adjacent to the trans center ill give you a little bit of background and block 4 in zone one of the project area under the occ land use jurisdiction with the temporary terminal zoned for a tower up to 4 hundred and 50 feet with adjacent midrise buildings that the townhomes and skoendz for residential use with the parking and will need to be a mixed income part of the requirements under the transbay project area the desire project area must insure that 35 percent are available for protecting and moderate based on the projects were working on now and upcoming pipeline within the district we estimate that 454 percent or approximately half of block 4 will need to be available in order to keep us on track with the 45 percent goal heres an example of massing not a project proposal ill go into we dont have the specifics were at option agreement stage based on the mapping residential Design Guidelines this is the favor what youll see in the tower with the rise building on the townhomes facing the transbay park this is our block 3 weve developed by at a future date as i mentioned parcel f is a t. J. Tjpa adjacent to the Transit Center and zoned for seven hundred and 50 feet zone two has land jurisdiction designated to the Planning Department through the designation as you are familiar with an option process with the tjpa undertook for parcel f for the procedures for the Transit Center ultimately 9 process was not held but United States tjpa continued to have negotiations with the prequalified birds one of the birds was urban pacific they brought on Hines Development upward with the salesfroce tower and Goldman Sachs fifth avenue for the tjpa financing so theyre familiar with the transbay area in the project they submitted angle over offer to the tjpa parcel f and block 4 sierra club seeing the two projects Work Together right now we know about project f as mixed use has has a hotel in the middle and residential at the top the tjpa board approved the purpose agreement with the developer for parcel if for 160 million for march the condition was there was an approval of the option on block 4 from occ so we negotiated that option agreement and which was approved by our commission the Purchase Price was 45 million it could be load through the negotiation in the wrong direction or if thats the case lower well come back for a fair market determination as i mentioned the site is on the location of the temporary Transit Center if for some reason the delays it is k9d for but the purpose must be equal or greater than fair market thats why were here before you the developer whether deposit 5 hundred thousand with occ with the approval that covers the costs with an option for another 100 percent thousands if we need the costs and most importantly the developer agreed to provide for 4 percent Affordable Housing in the project with no occ subsidy thats a significant friction our Commission Approved it on april 19th of this year, the other considerations that lasts until 2018 it gives over two years thats the average timeframe for any of the transbay blocks to move to the discipline process and oats new york city around the development and around that time well work to define the project the mass design and the fee and concerns something that includes approval over parcel f residential component assistance not within our purview of zone two goes to the Planning Department because of the amount of residential units it is important to understand how we meet the 45 requirement we have approve rights over that to know exactly how many units and what kind of housing one thing we anticipate both block four and parcel f they continue to refine to look at whether that makes sense or make sense to offsite any of the avenue to block 4 we know challenges and including Affordable Housing at the top of these tower so see if 0 block four is a better site we do know i want to flag about the possibility analyze it that is a proposal made well come back to the board with separate approval so youll be able to make your detectors at this time were requiring the developer bring on an Affordable Housing developer with experience and providing Affordable Housing of 45 percent Affordable Housing project is a significant amount we want to make sure youll see expertise we need one thing that was important for us to flag this is the beginning an option agreement we want to signal we have a couple of Community Benefit goals to work on this right now to incorporate the best practices and doing everythin for the certificate of see corporations and the developers agreed that part of 500,000 deposit communitybased organization toward certificate of preference holders to make sure were learning what we can and providing the service for the housing but were seeking to develop a robust plan that includes moma the contracting opportunities for Small Businesses and economically disadvantaged San Francisco residents and businesses to make sure the empowering space there is ground floor retail and other xhernld used to make sure those are focused on the communities local nonprofits or Small Businesses, that would be provided belowmarketrate rates or other terms to help us improve the neighborhood that we can. So, now to the meat the fair market determination and so were required to have a determination made under state law under the health and safety code the property must be the considerations for the property must consist of fair market so we provided to you in our file what we call a section 443 report that includes the option agreement and an analysis in any cost the disprobation officer of lands does this disposition help to eliminate light yes and what the estimated value again since we dont have a specific project before you at this point we used perimeters to come up what we think a Hypothetical Development somewhere and did massing and estimate that around 5 hundred and 80 utilities plus for the tower and look at the 100 percent rental scenario all the units are offered at scenario a confined on other transbay blocks the top of the tower might include for sale marketrate homes and we looked at those are described go amongst the tower any subsidy it will be zero and what the revenues for each type of units and came up within an adjusted value and on the fair market of the lot and in the remedy scenario with an estimate of 18 want 6 million and on a reversal and centennial that was higher which assured us the offer of 45 million did in fact, meet the requirement of the marketrate with a strong requirement from the developer and staff feels confident we are achieving the sate mandate fair market so another consideration is this does facilitate the sale of parcel f that is critical of providing 47 percent of units at their costs which the highest on the transbay this is a significant Community Benefit, of course, all the other terms of the project with highway, traffic and safety will be worked in the disposition that goes back and forth who the developer and what their Design Concept and the Community Benefits and standard d da terms based on that staffs recommendation the option be approved i wanted to highlight we have reached out to the community this item was heard at the april transbay cac meeting and supportive and endorsed this with a couple of comments to ask us as and move forward with the Affordable Housing throughout the project there be consideration how transbay block 3 or the park will be programmed that includes high quality chrjz programs and the project there be high quality with exterior and for the unit designs for the residents and so for the next steps the estimated timing from the board approves the option agreement with the tjpa and developer will close on parcel f in june and well spends the remainder of 2016 working with the Development Team to have their dispensary join the team with the concept and framing and get into the meat with the negotiations in 2017 and as an as i mentioned the terminal needs to be removed by the 2018 scheduled to open early 2018 that concludes my presentation. I have representatives of both the Development Team and the tjpa are here if you have my questions as well as myself. We have a couple of questions in the kind supervisor peskin. So relative to the 3 million from the 45, 52 million with the temporary terminal not abandoned by thirty june 2018 what is the timeline for the completion of transbay and the abandonment and demolition of temporary terminal. We anticipate the tear terminal will be off by that point, we have as i mentioned occ blocks on three and four and other timeframes you know for next steps other than to continue to work with to your knowledge but at this point we dont anticipate past that point is a caveat should it in the be a mechanism built into the agreement. Right i did descents on the vote this body loaned tjpa a quarter of a billion dollars to the extent the project continues to come in late and over budget it just gives me a heart burn to on intersections that might cost us an additional 3 million from 45 to 42 million i mean is there any arrangement arrangement if they fail that tjpa will reimbursement the city that 30 million. Well, ill turn to representatives the tjpa that are here to answer that question supervisor. Good afternoon, commissioners im mark intern executive director with the transbay joint powers authority. Whats your name. Mark. Mark. Youre the new executive director. Intern. Nice to meet you. Nice to meet you as well your currently schedule to open the Transit Center in 2017 we saw no reason youll not dedicate the parcel before 2018 were confident that land block 4 and 3 as well with the adjusted block that be available by 2018 for you have a 6 month cushion your telling us. Yes. If you fail inform perform. I will not fail to perform. Perfect thats a good answer, of course, your only the intern director. Not up to me. Thank you, supervisor wiener. Thank you, thank you for the presentation i thank you for this and it is exciting the project will go move forward and i on intersections the 4 percent affordable is terrific one thing i want to just get to classification, of course, nothing is free and so there is a you stated and also stated in the yeah in the presentation that theres no public subsidy to get to that 45 percent and so the 45 million Purchase Price that valuation that led to the purpose price was that 45 percent the or of the units will be belowmarketrate. Thats where we know the pipeline of projects in transbay we know that block 4 has to be 45 percent. Right in to make that fair market salutation the 45 percent affordability number was baked into that evaluation. Yeah. The communitybased allows for that consideration they call fair reuse a shorthand the fair market to take into account any restrictions. Im going to happy hazard a guess not 45 percent but to the esteem none of us want sold for marketrate with no or loans 12 percent whatever the minimum under the San Francisco law point evaluation of the property will be less than 45 percent. Yes. It has an impact. 42 or 45 percent is a higher evaluation he know that is how you phase it even though it is correct is occ is not cutting a check youre the public subsidy you can build more Affordable Housing but occ is certainly going to receive less of a lower Purchase Price because of the higher affordability number than would have received if a lower affordability unable thats correct. All the transbay properties well state with a minimum requirements will be and you know will be based those requirements. Im not chriss that 45 percent is awesome but im saying i dont think really necessarily accurate to say no public subsidy there is a public induce in get to the higher inclusionary number of occ and the city is receiving a lower Purchase Price just like one 60 fulsome the occ basically gave the lands in challenge for the higher affordability there is always there is a public subsidy here occ is receiving less money than lower inclusionary percentage. Yes. Tjpa will be the one receiving the landfill and like i said the government public entities it is important not accurate to say no subsidys but a government subsidy in a reduced Purchase Price pushing the affordability up to 45 percent and some people that like to pretend were just forcing the developer to do some High Percentage and beating up the developer and squeezing it act out of the developer that might be true for a portion of inclusionary but a portion of the inclusion were i totally support inclusionary housing but help to increase the percentage that is important to be transparent that there is an actual public subsidy. Thank you. Thank you. All right. Thank you lets if youre done with our presentation go ahead and take Public Comment open for item 2 come to the podium if you have questions well. Thank you, dean with local 2 the hotel and Restaurant Workers Union i appreciate if supervisor peskin and supervisor wiener on the subject focusing on the questions of Affordable Housing and what were paying for them obviously a close nexus in many that highlights between Hotels Development and the needs in the city more Affordable Housing the question of in circumstances when workers will be able to organize a union and to live in the city is obviously a huge focus of ours i was assured in the hallway prior to the meeting the project sponsors intends to negotiate with the union prior to entitlements and were looking forward to work working towards that end obviously this is a huge importance as the city decided whether that is appropriate to have a hotel and parcel the question of the quality of jobs and the impact that those jobs will have on the need more Affordable Housing is skairl in the jurisdiction of the city and at Planning Commission and ultimately the board of supervisors under section 303 and so it i look forward to future dialogue. Thank you for raising the questions. Thank you. Any other member of the public to speak at this time. Anyone on behalf of the preserve purchase that wants to confirm the comments by the speaker. Afternoon im cameron with times i ask confirm weve. Speak into the my case or speak up. The tjpa we have an agreement to follow the labor recommendation policy of the tjpa so i this were covered there with an agreement that any projects that we have applied for parcel we intend te