Power its all around us in the sun and the winds and caves waves power that lights our homes while protecting our Natural Resources clean power will provide power to san franciscans how about works right now our power is from pg e from nonrenewable systems that comes over pg e maintained lines with clean power your energy about think generated by caesarean more renewable sources come to our home e. R. Businesses to the pg e lines adjourned. Hello and welcome to this presentation. Im San Francisco purrs since that time weve helped people clean up their criminal records. We created this to help you understand how this worked. Well plan or explain all the steps. After watching this program youll know what to expect after completing the process. Hi, there are im deputy and im part of the clean slate team. The first thing we will need to know whether your despicable to have our convictions dismissed cant be on parole or currently charged with a crime or serving a sentence and it must be from San Francisco. While your colleagues will get to know your circumstances there are 3 steps. Getting the clean slate process started it simple you can get them done in the same day. First fill out an application and they can be opinioned on sf defender. Org. Next youll obtain a copy of your rap sheet thats a rap sheet going 80 the hall of justice at 850 bryant street on the fourth floor. The bureau is open monday through friday from 8 to 5. Its located one block away from the Public Defenders Office youll need to bring our photo id. Finally, theres your our own your rap sheet to the front desk. Youll receive a letter from 2 to three weeks explaining the next steps. Lets review the 3 steps if that fillist the Police Stations and on your Police Station and 3 deliver our rap sheet and application 0. 40 to the defender. It can help with Financial Aid for colleagues. I want you to meet a client who did the Clean Slate Program he refunds a nonprofit literary series. Please meet joe. Peep at the Clean Slate Program worked with me today, i i am an author of 3 books a husband and a father would you recommend clean slight to another person i would definitely recommend that. So, now you have a better understanding of the gibt address benefits of the Clean Slate Program as well as highway to get started. Lets hear some common questions. Keep in mind those are general questions youll you may be seated with an attorney who be provide more information based on our circumstances just to be clear i dont have to tell my employers will my ejections. Yes. As well as convictions that have been dismissed. If someone runs a criminal background theyll see the charges but its dismissed. You will be able to legally tell your employers person never convicted i dont to tell anyone is there a way to rears them. Theres some cases you can. Maybe youre arrested because police thought you were someone else. Wound our arrest record is sealed you can say you were never if i wanted to clear my record if i was convicted of a felon. It is also known as a one letter officer the clean stating hit. May be able to get it raersz but if i went to prisoner you may quality for a correspondent certified document saying youre a lay abating citizen are. You had should be aware for some state jobs state agencies are allotted to consider our criminal history. Those jobs are private security jobs Health Care Workers and other careers involving the children the i can sick or elder. It will benefit you Human Resources heres some of the things clean slate cant do it doesnt prevent an old conviction to there the sense of a new criminal action. The court might connotes more sentences even if it been submit you cant own or polgs possess a firearm. If it bars you from carrying an firearm eclipsing our record wont change that. Submittal doesnt rove a sex ejection. If youre required to register as a sex offender that process will continue even if your record has been cleared, however, other forms of royalties maybe eligible. We look forward to helping you move forward with your life so, now you know a little bit more about the program we encourage you to apply go the sf purifyi purifying. Org or stop by any place for our Clean Slate Program. Our team looks forward to serving good morning and welcome to the board of supervisors meeting of tuesday, november 3, 2015, election day madam clerk call the roll. Thank you madam president commissioner avalos supervisor president london breed supervisor campos supervisor christensen supervisor cowen supervisor farrell . Supervisor farrell supervisor kim not present supervisor mar supervisor tang not present supervisor wiener supervisor yee maept we have quorum thank you ladies and gentlemen, please join us in the pledges the United States of america and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Thank you are they may communication madam clerk no communication to report colleagues, any changes to the september 29th regular board minutes sienna motion to approve motion by supervisor yee and seconded by supervisor mar colleagues well take that without objection. Well take that without objection. Those minutes passes unanimously once we the Public Comment has taken place madam clerk the consent items 1 through 4 those items are route and if a members of the board object call is that i would and items one through 4. Supervisor yee commissioner avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor christensen supervisor cohen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang supervisor wiener there are 11 is. Those motion are approved unanimously next. The please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones and other Electronic Devices are prohibited. So require the firearms dealers to operate ammunition sales the Police Department colleagues, can we take that same house, same call . Well take that without objection. This ordinance is feinstein pass anonymously. Next. To appropriate 26 million 28 million in fund balance and 6 hundred plus be employment if the sewer place expenditures to the Port Commission through 20152016 same house, same call . Well take that without objection. This ordinance is finally passed unanimously. Next item. An ordinance to deappropriate and appropriate the 3 housing unit 5 taxable go bond for the safety loan in the Mayors Office and Community Development in fiscal years 20152016. Same house, same call . Well take that without objection. The ordinance is feinstein passed unanimously call items 8 and 9. There too ordinance that implement to the 2007 through the memorandum of understanding between the city and is locals 958 by the terms of conditions and predicament for 2015 through 2018. Same house, same call . Well take that without objection. The ordinances are feinstein passed unanimously item 10. Item 10 to appropriate to the random reply department and positioning a 8. 7 million from 2008 clean and safe parks bond and approximately 48 percent Million Dollars for the clean and safe bond second series and to deappropriate and appropriate one . 4 million for clean and safe neighborhoods to support the radiology and construction of parks and open spaces and placing 52. 5 million for the pending of the sale for 20152016. Same house, same call . Well take that without objection. The ordinance is passed unanimously. Item 11 an ordinance to authorize the settle of a lawsuit in the Southern Nevada envelope Adult Mental Health services in San Francisco supreme court. Same house, same call . Well take that without objection. The ordinance has finally passed unanimously item 12 to authorize the sflements of a illuminate by a i g quash it filed in San Francisco supreme court. Same house, same call . Well take that without objection. The ordinance is finally passed unanimously item 13 and 13 an ordinance to amend the ordinance 10 61 entitled to change the official sidewalk at the westerly contributor of reserve avenue and obtain portions of revere action and the ceqa determination and make the others appropriate vrnthd same house, same call . Well take that without objection. The ordinance is finally passed unanimously. Item 14 an urgency to approve the storefront mergers of greater than 7 a hundred and 99 square feet in the coordinating city hall use for 10 months and 15 days to affirm the planning ceqa determination in making others finding madam president in requires did votes with the section roll call vote. Sorry. Surprise commissioner avalos. Thank you madam president colleagues, we briefing continued this from the last Board Meeting today, im asking to extend the interim controls that will prohibit the commercial mergers greater than seven hundred and 99 gross square feet in the quatro district we seeking an estimation of 10 months and 15 days last week our office through the Economic Workforce Development as well as the Planning Department host a Community Meeting on 24th street to begin the discussion about concepts we would expect in addressing concepts that well address the special use district and begin to collect feedback from the consultants on that those 3 offices work with the Mayors Office and the City Attorneys Office and right now were working on crafting the language around the sud we will be introducing a proposal to that effective by the end of this year in the meantime the original need for the interim controls remains were proposing that item today, i respectfully ask for your support. Thank you, madam clerk please call the roll. Supervisor yee. Commissioner avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor christensen supervisor cohen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang supervisor wiener no there 10 is with supervisor wiener in the descent this ordinance is finally passed an item for the appropriate 41 of hetch hetchy revenue functions precedes from the Renewable Energy bonds in fiscal years 20152016. Roll call. On item 15 supervisor yee commissioner avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor christensen supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang supervisor wiener there are 11 is the ordinance passes unanimously on the First Reading next item, please. Item 16 resolution for the district 2 to amend its 360 to energy thirty thousand clients in the Residential Care faulting facilities with importing housing and stabilization for a total amazement not to exceed 93 million from 20132019. Same house, same call . Well take that without objection. The resolution is adapted unanimously item 17. Item 17 a resolution to authorize the treasurer to execute an agreement with the state board of equalization for the local mobile Services Collection act for a term to commence through expiration of the act. Same house, same call . Well take that without objection. The resolution is adopted unanimously item number 18 please. Item 18 to authorize the general manager of the Public Utilities commission and is Treasure Island droeshg director to enter into an agreement with the port of oakland for the use of davis electric invasion to serve Yerba Buena Island for a term of 80 years to commence for the boards approval with a greed cost of 7 million. Same house, same call . Well take that without objection. This resolution is adopted unanimously can you please call items 19 and 20 together. A further resolution to establish the infrastructure financing district 2 and 20 the resolution to issue a bond nooicht 20 plus Million Dollars for the city at the port of San Francisco. Same house, same call . Supervisor wiener madam president i dont see supervisor wieners name on the roster supervisor wiener. No, im going to defer to supervisor cowen. Thank you thank you, supervisor wiener for the deferral if you any one point to speak please put your name on the roster. Thank you, supervisor breed were grateful in land use we had a long conversation around that particular item ive spoken with supervisor kim i see shes agreed to talk about reasons for the fee difference. Oh, excuse me. This needs to be referred to the end of the agenda. Okay madam clerk can we go to item 24. Resolution to relieving authorize the port of San Francisco so accept and expend a grant approximately 1. 4 million from the department want Homeland Security program for the period of september 201402016. Same house, same call . Well take that without objection. The resolution is adapted unanimously madam clerk can you please call item 2. Madam president supervisor cowen has indicated 19 and 20 theyre prepared to speak on it. I was for item 22 ill speak to item 22 when it comes back. Were on item 19 and 20 would you like to speak on items 19 and 20. No ill speak on item 22. Supervisor cowen i want to speak on item 19 to continue this item to work with the parties involves ive got the blessing the Mayors Office as well. As for 20. 20 we were able to go ahead and vote on supervisor cowen has made a motion to continue item 19 seconded by supervisor wiener colleagues take the continuance to the meeting of. Three weeks. November 17th. Thank you. Seeing no objection the motion passes to the meeting of november 17th. And item 20 colleagues, can we take this item same house, same call . Well take that without objection. The resolution passed unanimously madam clerk call item 22. Item 22. An ordinance to establish a citywide transportation ostensibly and is it your understanding the impact fee with expectations along the transportation fee remains operative to reflect the changes to amend the section to clarify the homeless shelter in the transportation sfeent make the planning code to firmer the ceqa determination and make others appropriate vksdz. Supervisor wiener. Thank you very much madam president this is an exciting day this has been in the works for years to take a step to extend our transit impact fee that will be known as is sustainability fee to Residential Construction the sustainability fee was adopted 35 years ago and for all those decades applied to commercial development but not to residential and so Residential Development in San Francisco moornlt how large does not autumn pay the Transit Development fees a hole in the fees of this growth if inform San Francisco it is critically important our transportation infrastructure keep up with our housing approximate and transit impact fees are one way to do that colleagues youll recall 3 years ago when the renewal of the impact fees we had discussions about that fee and moving forward we have now the opportunities to take this huge step and to extend the fee to Residential Development it will generate hundreds of Million Dollars of duo dollars for the transportation improvement over the next 15 years in combination with the prop b from the ballot that ties transit that funding to population growth and the prop a the transportation bond as well as upcoming opportunities with the vehicle license fee were gaining monument in San Francisco to funds the modern and reliable Transit System we all need over Transit Systems are over capacity and necessarily we need to extend that for that bart and all the systems of course, we in committee had a lot of discussion about what the appropriate level of the fee was we in committee did increase the fee by one dollar per square feet for residential and commercial for large projects we also removed the plan areas exemption and then we also limited the grandfathering provision to end as of july 21st the date of introduction of this legislation so this has been a thoroughly thor vetted piece of legislation 0 takes a huge step forward to get the knocks to the residential we did a lot of work in committee to extend it further i know there is discussion about other aspects of the legislation with one can take the position the fee should be higher than selfis no matter would level someone will step forward and say it is should be higher but right now this legislation takes a big step forward and appropriately balances the need for our transit fund and for transit impact fees with making sure that we are actually having housing built in San Francisco so colleagues, i ask for your support and we want to thank everyone in making this legislation a reality. Commissioner avalos. Thank you madam president colleagues im someone so i will be proposing making some amendments i believe that the Planning Department and the mta did really great work on crafting our transit Standpoint Program and the fee is something we spell need as as city all of the colleagues have been voting 11 zero to put anymore funds into Transportation Needs in San Francisco we are dedicated to doing that i have been glad we all that had consensus we need to fight for all dollars for transportation in San Francisco weve talked about also trying to find every dollar whether we can find for the infrastructure in the city we actually have a lot of money left on the table with the transit sustainability fee i sat in at the Land Use Commission i felt that was important we bring this effort into the light of day into the legislative arena the discussion that had been done before coming to committee was in the Mayors Office setting what what the fee will be developers or creating a deal one of the on that was going on and we look at what the fee is compared to what the nexus study will measure the impacts and what were chair mar for the fee will be pay for the residential impacts and nonresidential we are also not taking into consideration that projects had that have been in the pipeline before july 1st of last year 2014 anticipating that that fee would be established yet giving them a pass for the for the most part and not doing it but collecting has much as we can. Many of the developers that are impacted saw it coming and so ill be proposing we actually have grandfathering with a fee only residential and nonresidential ive been concerned i actually went to the Planning Commission with when the Planning Commission was reviewing the tsf to look at how different fees levels for different parties part of San Francisco we see development happening at the gangbusters levels other plays in San Francisco not seeing that happen particularly in district 11 we looking at a onesizefitsall fee for the entire city does that create a disincentive for development in places where land values are not quite as high as in the Downtown Core the city ill be proposing that we look at having a geographic study about to set the structure for the fee based on geography in california id like to propose a number of those amendments if you may indulge me colleagues, i have a handout youll receive the first is the motion to increase the nonresidential fee for gross square feet of 8 hundred to 99 thousands to 18 and 0. 54 a number of months ago that will be together well want to take them spacial and commissioner avalos have you handed out those amendment. I have it explains what the amendments and the City Attorney has crafted legislation that has actual language prepared for not necessarily for your desk but at the end of the day it will be made in accepted. Well take each of your amendments one by one. I havent had a chance and it is a lengthy list youll go over them one by one. In fact, my office has been sharing this information with legislative aide to in city hall so surprised it is new information. Well, the specifics of the information im aware of i was aware you were going to propose amendments. Okay. So my first motion to raise the nonresidential tsf for gross square feet of 8 hundred thousand 8 hundred to 99 thousand nine hundred and 99 square feet to raise the fee 0. 50 to 8. 54 also on nonresidential to over nine hundred and 94 thousand 99 gross square feet to raise it 4 to 23. 04 thats below the nucleus 23 percent nexus so well be addressing the impacts on transportation but it will be only a small portion that is my first. You want to take both of these together. Yes. Okay. So commissioner avalos has made a motion seconded by supervisor campos and madam clerk is there any discussion regarding the amendment. Seeing no supervisor campos. Thank you. I do want to Say Something not only about that specific amendment but actually think that applies to the variance amendments we know that will be presented and i think to members of the public that are watching this i think that if theres every an example of power that those corporate and players have in this building in many respect about to happen is an ill nexus study is the length of development and transportation and it shows that when you build like this city has been building theres a cost associated with that and that cost has prelims in the Transit System it is interesting people talk about how much they support Public Transit and promote Public Transportation when it comes to forcing powerful commentary interests and money interests to pay for this that is where somehow the commitment goes away or you know weathers down a little bit because what commissioner avalos is talking about here is actually a modest increase that talks about essentially on this charging 21 percent in the case of the First Amendment and 21. 2 percent is permissible under the nexus study and the ceqa Second Amendment in his motion on charges 23. 8 percent of the nukes what it shows we can charge were talking about hearsay of billions of left on the table if there is ever an example of a corporate give away by the city and county of San Francisco this is it and so when we have discussions we will Going Forward in 6 months or a year if now how we need more money for transportation lets not forget what people are doing today giving in m many rights a pass to folks that should be asked to pay their fair share and are not being asked to pay their fair share when we come out here and say how we need to find more money for transportation lets remember that we left a lot of money on the table here today and even that at the end of the day it is not what we say about Public Transit but willing to do to make people pay for that that i proudly support those amendments. Thank you commissioner avalos sdmooe you have questions on the amendment. I have a question. About the amendment. Yes. This is about the amendment recommended to the amendment lets first city planning. I want to be clear there are other names on the roster and i think that commissioner avalos has made a motion for a specific amendment i wanted to make sure we keep the questions or comments kwaerd towards the specific amendment. Directly related that up to you it is related to an amendment i need information on the feasibility piece of it. Okay. So maybe for city planning i want to better understand what this does in terms of feasibility a month somebody calculated and how conservative it the palm that was circulated. Director ram is here if the Planning Department. Thank you, supervisors john ram my staff lisa has been working the numbers ill say in some parts of city we were at the max in terms of the Feasibility Study we were comfortable with it is discussions but the tilt feasible analysis we were middleincome in certain areas ill let any staff answer that if i could. Lisa chang with the Planning Department has director ram mens we reran the feasibility numbers taking into consideration the childcare fee in the areas where the growth is anticipated in the area plan where about 60 percent of growth anticipated for 4 out of the 6 protocols the new mooementd amended fee because the childcare fee is with the feasibility but for chronicling the portfolios we were using a general indicator further we found in some of the areas that are currently not feasible the fee could you know continue to impact the feasibility but we did find overall for projects where an areas that are generally feasible into fees will not impact that legislation. Okay. Supervisor mar. I said to thank ms. Chin and director ram for explaining that im supportive of supervisor campos amendment i think that looking at the the several the feasible study and the nexus study that the maximum amaze we could bump it up sixth higher and be well within the maximum amount i think that supervisors developments are reasonable theyre actually very modest combaus because supervisor campos mentioned 0. 50 more for the socalled smaller and roughly one homicide thought square feet not near the maximum of the Feasibility Study part of the nexus study im supportive and appreciative it is graduated or teetered so it really take into consideration the the impacts from the much larger developments im prevalent supervisor campos is right that this the studies allow our city to allocate much more i think what was proposed by commissioner avalos is modest given what the study shows thanks to supervisor wiener and the Mayors Office im supportive of increasing the fees as property by commissioner avalos. Supervisor wiener. Thank you, very much. Madam president you know, i wasnt going to say anything no response to commissioner avalos amendments i respect his right ive said at the beginning from someone supervisor or anyone can always want one can say it should be a bit higher and we have increased residential transit impact fees in the legislation if zero to almost 8 per square feet i think that is important to see where weve started if zero to 8 per square feet and this is a huge step forward so and despite some of the raefr dramatic rhetoric weve heard in chambers are in today, if you dont support whatever the highest number someone proposes your somehow not really fighting for transit funding that is frankly on absurd agreement some of us fighting for transit funding hard for years work hard to get prop b for example, passed last november which half of the board voted against to get the mooning bond passed and working to make sure we go to the ballot next november with the vehicle license fee this legislation in its current form i provide significantly increased transit funding there are a lot of people in the Development Community who are unhappy we introduced legislation to begin with that extended the impact fees to the Residential Development and people upcoming u unhappy people in Committee Supervisor cowen and i were they were unhappy with us to support the changes were trying to engage in responsible law making we actually do work over a period of years instead of dive bombing at the last minute and come up with responsible legislation that take into account the views of stakeholders and moving forward with legislation that will significantly increase funding for our Transit System and do so in a responsible way thank you, supervisor wiener commissioner avalos. Ill let the last word go. Supervisor campos. How responsible is it to charge our developer friends only a fraction of what we charge them is that responsibility policymaking before we started patting ourselves on the back be honest with the people in the city and county of San Francisco im store that some people find it difficult to make developers uncomfortable but the reality is that the level of development that is happening in this city is not only impacting the housing because the buildings that has