Transcripts For SFGTV LIVE BOS Full Board Of Supervisors 20160614

[gavel] good afternoon everybody and welcome to the San Francisco board of supervisors meeting for tuesday, june 14, 2016. Mme. Clerk, can you please call the roll . Thank you mme. Pres. Supervisor avalos. Here. Pres. Breed. Here. Supervisor campos. Here. Supervisor cohen. Here. Supervisor farrell. Here. Supervisor kim. Here. Supervisor mar. Here. Supervisor tang. Tang not present. Supervisor wiener. Here. Supervisor yee. Here. Mme. Pres. , you have a quorum. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, can you please join us for the pledge of allegiance . [pledge of allegiance] members, are there any changes to the Meeting Minutes of may 10, 2016. No changes, the Meeting Minutes are passed. Mme. Clerk, can you please read our first item. Campos1. 160511[settlement of claims and litigation landslide damage casitas avenue and miraloma drive not to exceed 5,000,000]sponsor yeeordinance authorizing the Public Utilities commission and the City Attorneys Office to approve settlements of claims or litigation arising out of the january 25, 2016, landslide between casitas avenue and miraloma drive, for amounts exceeding 25,000 per claim, notwithstanding administrative code, sections 10. 22, 10. 221, and 10. 222, for amounts up to 1,000,000 and not to exceed 5,000,000 in total, if the controller certifies availability of funds, and subject to periodic reporting to the board of supervisors government audit and oversight committee. Can you please join me in a moment of silence . We need to make moresome coordinated effort to make sure that there renowned San Francisco pride celebrations can express themselves. Supervisors, turning our attention back to the issues in our own cities for a moment. We know that neighborhood crime is up in every neighborhood that i visit in the districtswe need to feel safe from home burglaries and home invasions. Andthis is why my budget included the hiring and training of Additional Police officers for our neighborhoods. We need Community Members to purchase a paid in our solutions of the neighborhood crime. Today im introducing an ordinance for the neighborhood crime Advisory Board and we will invite Community Leaders to join with City Department staff to identify priorities in Community Driven solutions. We will work with organizations to make sure that these crimes get prosecuted and when the times come we will make sure that they get to stand up in court and testify so we are working together with our Police Department and our leaders to make San Francisco is safer any for san franciscans to enjoy. And with that said i have. Mdm. Clerk, can you please read the Consent Agenda . Agendaall matters listed hereunder constitute a Consent Agenda, are considered to be routine by the board of supervisors and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the board. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the board so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered as a separate item. Questions on the Consent Agenda are on final passage, first reading, adoption, or approved, as indicated. [roll call vote] these items are passed unanimously. Can you please read item 3. Kim3. 160464[appropriation Municipal Transportation Agency revenue bond proceeds transportation Capital Projects and equipment 207,000,000 fy20162017]sponsor mayorordinance appropriating 207,000,000 of revenue bond proceeds to the Municipal Transportation Agency for transportation projects and equipment in fy20162017. [roll call vote] item 3 passes unanimously. Can you please read item number four. Agenda4. 160466[appropriation Mission Bay Improvement Fund warrior arena improvement Capital Projects 5,980,000 fys 20162017 and 20172018]sponsor mayorordinance appropriating 5,980,000 to the Municipal Transportation Agency mta , consisting of 3,050,000 general Fund Contribution and 350,000 of mtas operating fund in fy20162017, and 2,310,000 general Fund Contribution and 270,000 of mtas operating fund in fy20172018 to support planning, design, and outreach for the transportation Capital Improvement projects in connection with the proposed Golden State Warriors event center and mixed use development in mission bay. [roll call vote] there are 10 ayes in one no with supervisor avalos in the dissent. The ordinance passes. Item number five please item number five agenda4. 160466[appropriation Mission Bay Improvement Fund warrior arena improvement Capital Projects 5,980,000 fys 20162017 and 20172018]sponsor mayorordinance ordinance deappropriating 7,566,391 surplus revenue designated for general reserve from the Public Library and reappropriating as Debt Service Payment in fy20152016. [roll call vote] there are 11 ayes. The ordinance finally passes unanimously. Madam clerk please read items six through 11 together. Item 6state of California Water resources control boards Revolving Loan funds state loan funds or grant funds state grant funds , water revenues and Water Capacity fees for the San Francisco Public Utilities commission sfpuc Water Enterprises Capital Improvement program for fy20162017 at 149,910,090 and for fy20172018 at 122,323,530; and reappropriating water Capital Project appropriations of 56,750,500 in fy20162017 and 27,0000,000 in fy20172018; and placing 220,762,620 of revenue bond and state loan funds or state grant funds proceeds and 5,300,000 of Water Capacity fee proceeds by project on controllers reserve subject to the controllers certification of funds availability, including proceeds of indebtedness, and for construction related expenditures excluding program management, planning and design for these projects, as applicable, is also subject to the prior occurrence of the sfpucs and the board of supervisors discretionary adoption of California Environmental quality act ceqa findings for projects, following review and consideration of completed project related environmental analysis, where required. Item 7 is an ordinance toappropriating a total of 1,215,201,280 of proceeds from Revenue Bonds, state of California Water resources control boards Revolving Loan funds state loan funds or grant funds state grant funds , wastewater revenue and capacity fees for the San Francisco Public Utilities commission sfpuc wasteWater Enterprises Capital Improvement program for fy20162017 at 312,852,320 and for fy20172018 at 902,348,960; reappropriation of 7,000,000 and deappropriation of 10,750,000 wastewater revenue bond projects in fy20162017; and placing 1,112,601,280 in Revenue Bonds or state loan or grant funds and 14,600,000 in capacity fees by project on controllers reserve subject to the controllers certification of funds availability, including proceeds of indebtedness, and for construction related expenditures excluding program management, planning, and design for these projects, as applicable, is also subject to the prior occurrence of the sfpucs and the board of supervisors discretionary adoption of California Environmental quality act ceqa findings for projects, following review and consideration of completed project related environmental analysis, where required. fiscal impact 06 07 and item 8 is an ordinance to appropriate appropriation Revenue Bonds, hetch hetchy revenue, cap, and trade allowance of 158,125,530 reappropriation of 11,332,750, and deappropriation of 4,222,602 hetch hetchy water and power Capital Improvements. Item 9 is aordinance toRevenue Bonds and other forms of indebtedness by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Commission in an aggregate Principal Amount not to exceed 1,112,601,280 to finance the costs of various capital wastewater projects benefitting the wastewater enterprise pursuant to amendments to the charter of the city and county of San Francisco enacted by the voters on november 5, 2002, as proposition e; authorizing the issuance of wastewater revenue refunding bonds; declaring the official intent of the commission to reimburse itself with one or more issues of taxexempt or taxable bonds or other forms of indebtedness; and ratifying previous actions taken in connection therewith, as defined herein. Item 10 mayorordinance authorizing the issuance and sale of taxexempt or taxable water Revenue Bonds and other forms of indebtedness by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Commission in an aggregate Principal Amount not to exceed 264,997,468 to finance the costs of various capital water projects benefitting the water enterprise pursuant to amendments to the charter of the city and county of San Francisco enacted by the voters on november 5, 2002, as proposition e; authorizing the issuance of water revenue refunding bonds; declaring the official intent of the commission to reimburse itself with one or more issues of taxexempt or taxable bonds or other forms of indebtedness; and ratifying previous actions taken in connection therewith, as defined herein. And item 11 mayorordinance authorizing the issuance and sale of taxexempt or taxable power Revenue Bonds and other forms of indebtedness mayorordinance authorizing the issuance and sale of taxexempt or taxable power Revenue Bonds and other forms of indebtedness by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Commission in an aggregate Principal Amount not to exceed 32,483,088 to finance the costs of various Capital Projects benefitting the power enterprise pursuant to charter, sections 9. 107 6 and 9. 107 8 ; authorization to issue refunding power Revenue Bonds; declaring the official intent of the commission to reimburse itself with one or more issues of taxexempt or taxable bonds; and ratifying previous actions taken in connection therewith, as defined herein. Colleagues can we take this item same house same call . Without objection thisordinance amending the administrative code to require the installation and use of telematic Vehicle Tracking systems in all Motor Vehicles owned or leased by the city, other than vehicles used for law enforcement, and submission of an annual report by the city administrator on vehicle use based on data derived from those systems; and affirming the Planning Departments determination under the California Environmental quality act. Can we take this same house same call . The item passes unanimously. Please mme. Clerk call item 13. Item 13 marordinance amending the administrative code to require the city to open and operate no fewer than Six Navigation Centers within twentyfour months of the Effective Date of the ordinance, offering comprehensive health, mental health, and other services to Homeless People, and moving Homeless People off the streets and into permanent housing or transitional or stable Supportive Housing that eventually leads to permanent housing through Case Management, social Service Programs, and the integration of other relevant city services; specifying programmatic requirements for Navigation Centers; requiring the development of plans for the equitable distribution of shelter and housing resources, and the identification of sustainable Revenue Sources for the development of new, permanent housing; and affirming the Planning Departments determination under the California Environmental quality act. Supervisor campos because there are some changes i would like to hold off on this. Mme. Clerk can you please call item 14. Ordinance amending the administrative code to require appraisals and appraisal reviews for certain city jurisdictional transfers, acquisitions, conveyances, and leases of real property; requiring that appraisals conform to the uniform standards of professional appraisal practice and be prepared by qualified appraisers; and increasing the rent limits for the director of propertys existing authority to enter into leases for the city. Can we take thissame house same call . This item finally passes unanimously. Itemmarordinance amending the 15 ordinance amending theadministrative code to revise the residential unit conversion ordinance to require hosting platforms verify that a residential unit is on the city registry prior to listing; require hosting platforms respond to notices and requests for information; provide for civil, administrative, and criminal penalties against hosting platforms for violations of the residential unit conversion ordinance; and affirming the Planning Departments determination under the California Environmental. Members can we take the same house same call . Item is been passed unanimously. With that madam clerk can you please call the roll on item 15. [roll call vote] there are 10 ayes. The ordinance is finally passed unanimously. Item 16 please ordinance amending the planning code to allow for greater flexibility in the screening and enclosure of rooftop mechanical equipment, modify midblock alley controls and their applicability to the south of market neighborhood commercial transit district, folsom street neighborhood commercial transit district, regional commercial district and c3 downtown commercial district; affirming the Planning Departments determination under the California Environmental quality act; and making findings of consistency with the general plan, and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1, and findings of public convenience, necessity, and welfare under planning code, section 302. Roll call vote. [roll call vote] there are 11 ayes. This ordinance finally passes unanimously. Item 17. Item 17 is an ordinance amending ordinance no. 1610, as amended, to authorize the collection and levy of special taxes within city and county of San Francisco special tax district no. 20091 San Francisco sustainable financing for accessibility modifications and improvements to privately owned buildings or real property; and directing the clerk of the board to publish a notice of public hearing and other matters related thereto. Colleagues can we take this item same house same call . Without objection this passes unanimously. Next item please item 18is an ordinance deappropriating 300,000 district 7 board projects in the general city responsibility gen and appropriating 300,000 to various departments in order to support the district 7 participatory budgeting projects in fy20152016. Colleagues, can we take this item same house same call . The item passes unanimously. Madam clerk please read 19 and 20 together. Item 19is a proposed interim budget and appropriation ordinance appropriating all estimated receipts and all estimated expenditures for departments of the city and county of San Francisco as of may 31, 2016, for the fys ending june 30, 2017, and june 30, 2018. Mayorproposed interim annual salary ordinance enumerating positions in the annual budget and appropriation ordinance for the fys ending june 30, 2017, and june 30, 2018, continuing, creating, or establishing these positions; enumerating and including therein all positions created by charter or state law for which compensations are paid from city and county funds and appropriated in the annual appropriation ordinance; authorizing appointments or continuation of appointments thereto; specifying and fixing the compensations and Work Schedules thereof; and authorizing appointments to temporary positions and fixing compensations therefore. Item 21 resolution authorizing the office of Contract Administration to enter into the Second Amendment to the contract agreement between the city and county of San Francisco and xtech jv, a technology marketplace, tier 1a generalist contractor, to increase the contract limit from 32,000,000 to 56,000,000 for the period of october 1, 2014, through september 30, 2017. office of Contract Administration colleagues, can we take these item same house same call . Without objection these ordinances passed unanimously. Mdm. Clerk please read items 21 through 28 together please. Resolution authorizing the office of Contract Administration to enter into the Second Amendment to the contract agreement between the city and county of San Francisco and xtech jv, a technology marketplace, tier 1a generalist contractor, to increase the contract limit from 32,000,000 to 56,000,000 for the period of october 1, 2014, through september 30, 2017 office of Contract Administration item 22 resolution authorizing the office of Contract Administration to enter into the Second Amendment to the contract agreement between the city and county of San Francisco and computerland of silicon valley, a technology marketplace, tier 1a generalist contractor, to increase the contract limit from 32,000,000 to 44,000,000 for the period of october 1, 2014, through september 30, 2017. Item 23 is a resolution authorizing the office of Contract Administration to enter into the First Amendment to the contract agreement between the city and county of San Francisco and Intervision Systems technologies, inc. , a technology marketplace, tier 1b specialist contractor, to increase the contract limit from 12,000,000 to 15,000,000 for the period of october 1, 2014, through september 30, 2017. Item 24 is aresolution authorizing the office of Contract Administration to enter into the Second Amendment to the contract agreement between the city and county of San Francisco and en pointe technologies sales, inc. , a technology marketplace, tier 1a generalist contractor, to increase the contract limit from 31,000,000 to 50,000,000 for the period of october 1, 2014, through september 30, 2017. Item 25 is a resolution authorizing the office of Contract Administration to enter into a contract agreement between the city and county of San Francisco and Cornerstone Technology partners ii jv, a technology marketplace, tier 1b specialist contractor, for an amount not to exceed 12,000,000 for an initial three year term to commence following board approval, with two options to extend the contracts for up to one year each at the sole and absolute discretion of the city. Item 26 is aresolution authorizing the office of Contract Administration to enter into a contract agreement between the city and county of San Francisco and learn it , inc. , a technology marketplace, tier 1b specialist contractor, for an amount not to exceed 12,000,000 for an initial three year term, to commence following board approval, with two options to extend the contracts for up to one year each at the sole and absolute discretion of the city. Item 27 resolution authorizing the office of Contract Administration to enter into a contract agreement between the city and county of San Francisco and Softnet Solutions inc. , a technology marketplace, tier 1b specialist contractor, for an amount not to exceed 12,000,000 for an initial three year term to commence following board approval, with two options to extend the contracts for up to one year each at the sole and absolute discretion of the city. Item 28 is aagreement between the city and county of San Francisco and united layer, inc. , a technology marketplace, tier 1b specialist contractor, for an amount not to exceed 12,000,000 for an initial three year term to commence following board approval, with two options to extend the contracts for up to one year each at the sole and absolute discretion of the city. Colleagues, can we take those item same house same call . Without objection those resolutions are adopted unanimously. Item 29 please. Item 29 isa resolution authorizing designated city and county officials to execute and file on behalf of the city and county of San Francisco any actions necessary for the purpose of obtaining state and federal Financial Assistance under various grant programs, including the federal fiscal year 2016 urban Areas Security Initiative grant, the federal fiscal year 2016 state Homeland Security grant program, the 2016 Emergency Management performance grant, and the 2016 local Government Oil spill contingency plan grant program. Supervisor avalos . Thank you i will be voting against this initiative against this grant i was seeking an amendment because mostly part of the funds for the region pay for the militarization of Police Departments in particular he there have been allegations of abuse within the Police Department and in oakland and other parts of the county and i do not feel that is the right pathway that we should be takingthat we should be using for dollars for Emergency Preparedness and that we have to make sure that our people on the ground in the community havethe resources to take care of themselves and we have this were that we are in that only exacerbates the violence that we are seeing in southwest asia and in europe and in our streets and in the United States. We cannot fight for peace by militarizing the world and we cannot fight for Nuclear Disarmament by increasing by millions of dollars in the next 30 years are nuclear arsenal. We cannot stop violence in ourmilitarizing our Police Department. And we have to create places in our state where guns are not being regulated effectively in our nation i cannot support this initiative because this is about wrong pathway for Emergency Preparedness in the nation and in the world. Mme. Supervisor can you please call the roll. [roll call vote] there are 10 ayes and 1 no with supervisor avalos in the dissent. The item passes. Item 30 please. Item 30 is acohenresolution authorizing the execution and performance of an option to ground lease in connection with the parcels located at 1101 connecticut street assessors parcel block no. 4287, lot no. 007 parcel one and connecticut street and 25th street assessors parcel block no. 4287, no. Lot 001a parcel two and together with parcel one, the property for no cost, which expires on june 30, 2017, with an extension option of six months until december 31, 2017, between the city and county of San Francisco and potrero Housing Associates i, l. P. , a california limited partnership; adopting findings that the conveyance is consistent with the general plan, and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1; and authorizing and directing the execution of any documents necessary to implement this resolution, as defined herein. Roll call vote please. [roll call vote] there are 11 ayes. The resolution is adopted unanimously. Okay mme. Clerk lets go to item number 33. Item 33 is ayeeresolution retroactively authorizing the San Francisco children and Families Commission to accept and expend an increase to the grant from the United States department of education through the California Department of education in the amount of 300,000 for a total of 2,020,560 for support of an Early Learning Quality Improvement system for the period of july 1, 2012, through june 30, 2016. Colleagues, can we take this item same house same call . Without objection the resolution is adopted unanimously. Item 34 please. Item 34 is aresolution approving contract no. Sfmta201617, paratransit broker and operating agreement, with transdev services, inc. , to provide paratransit brokerage and transportation services, in an amount not to exceed 142,902,104 for a fiveyear term beginning july 1, 2016, with an option for a fiveyear extension. Supervisor yee. Yes thank you. Ive been looking into mta and some issues with their transit and in the past i havegot to sponsor this particular item but i have to Say Something in light of what happened last week with the tragic death of miss harris who actually was taking a transit to a meeting and being hit by the same vehicle that drove her there and killed her. It made me question a lot about whether or not the mta who contracts with transdev whether they require any training for these drivers and transdev responded and to my surprise their training is actually very extensive. Is anyone familiar that is here at all . Thank you for the report. I am wondering whether or not these paratransit vehicles have gps . The paratransit vehicles are equipped with mobile Data Computers which are gps activated so we do collect the same kind of telematics information that you are talking about. They also have a drive cam which also collects vehicle an audible. And when there are g forces on the vehicle these collect the same as on the buses. Is there a way this can help us with our vision zero which is that all vehicles should have sensor detectors that would alarm a driver that they are about to hit something . Are these vehicles armed with that . There arent that that is something that we could look into. We do not own the vehicles. Their own by the mta but we can look into this with the vehicles. Thank you. Thank you supervisory yee. Can we take this item colleagues, same house same call . The item passes unanimously. Item 35 mme. Clerk. Item 35 is aan ordinance amending the administrative code to allow persons receiving tenantbased rental assistance under the federal housing opportunities for persons with aids hopwa program to be eligible for protections against rent increases. For longterm survivors of hiv. And for reasons that no one can remember these survivors are no longer covered under rent control. Hopwa recipients has we recently learned have no such protection. We saw that this hopwa recipient did not receive rent control and lo and behold no one why this was not in there. We workaids program as well as with other associations and we all agree that this will protect the hopwa recipients. Longterm survivors and those living with aids in the city including seniors. These residents of our city have been to hell and back. They have suffered with their health for so many years they have also many people in their lives to this epidemic and these are people who disproportionately are struggling with housing and people who if they lose their rent control housing they are really going to struggle to remain in the city and they will have to leave the city or become homeless and that is the last thing that we need to have. We need to support our residents living with hiv they deserve rent control just like others deserve rent control and deserve that stability and this legislation will provide them with the stability that they need. Pres. Breed and supervisor compos at like to thank for signing on in the cosponsors and colleagues i asked for your support. I want to also thank jeff in my office for his on this legislation. Thank you,i just want to thank you supervisor wiener i am alsoin support of this legislation. Supervisor yee. I want to thank supervisor wiener for catching this loophole and im also in sport as well. Thank you supervisor yee. Supervisor campos. I want to thank supervisor wiener for closing this loophole and im proud to be us supporter. Thank you can we take this item same house same call . The item passes unanimously on the first reading. Mdm. Clerk lets skip over two or 3 pm special order and we can go to [roll call vote] for introductions. Before we do that i would like to say that items 44 and 45 were not forwarded to the board as Committee Reports that they were not in front of this body today. Thank you mme. Clerk. Roll call for special items. Supervisor avaloss first. Supervisor cohen. I just would like to say that she was a friend of my family and she will be missed by all of us. Supervisor kim d want to rerefer . Supervisor mar . Supervisor campos. Thank you mme. Clerk and mme. Pres. I have a dear friend and memorial for Carla Johnson who so many of you are here and have worked withand she was a devoted advocate for the city of San Francisco in a dedicated city employeefor 27 years and overallas leader of the Mayors Office on disability and the overall coordinator of the citys of americans with disabilities act carla worked tirelessly to advocate for disability rights in all major San Francisco initiatives. By working closely with Community Based group she worked with ada coordinators and city contractors and carla promoted complete access to our City Government for all san franciscans. Our office worked very closely with carla on number of issues a itregarding disability rights and disability rights and often times she was a champion in a clinical part of opening in the nations first adult lgbt center for the homeless and she guided us through all the changes that needed to happen so the shelter could be opened. She really went above and beyond what was required and she made sure that we had all the information on the guidance that we needed. She was also a very close partner with our legislation to mandate all gender restrooms that san franciscans need. Not only as a Disability Rights Movement but as a member of the Lgbt Community and she shared stories of being harasseddue to her gender expression and not it is the most thoughtful legislation in our country and how timely that we can proudly say that even thoughothers try to attack members lgb t of the community to access restrooms and she had a big heart and besides the work that we did here through City Government i often ran into car lot one verna hill and as i took winston my english bulldog to play she had her dog and there is something happening i guess in this country lately in terms of the loss of remarkable people. I cannot imagine a kinder, nice or gentler human being than Carla Johnson. I feel blessed that i had the privilege in the honor to get to know her and to work with her. I know that she left the world a better place because of the work that she did but beyond that because of the love and dignity that she showed every single human being. Before i move on to the next item i know there are a couple my colleagues that want to say a couple words about Carla Johnson. I know supervisor kim wanted to say a few things as well. Supervisor kim and if anyone else wants to speak please put your name im sorry supervisor cohen. Supervisor kim. I just want to recognize Anna Rosenberg who wrote this on behalf of her partner. Carla jean johnson, with her strength dedication and striking good looks passed away in the arms of her partner in anna cubaberg she was a partner public works and she was a Deputy Director of the director of disability and she is personally built in spect it and develop so much of San Franciscoher presence is felt all over the city literally actually in our sidewalks. Her many achievements at many levels of government i will mention a few she was able tomake the first legislation for all places of public accommodation be accessible. She had accessibility performance standards of Digital Communication and self replication. Carla worked endlessly to advocate the idea that this included not only buildings but governments and programs in every part of the government. Carla advocated Disability Access in many of the buildings and hotels and Disability Access at many of the playgrounds. Her partner anna said that one of her favorite jobs in the city was volunteering to officiate for samesex marriages in in the city. Is as if she lived to be 112. She had no regrets. She appreciated the dedicated people she got to meet and collaborate with. On behalf of her partner anna she was grateful and she got to wear many hats for the city. She got to be remembered first and foremost as a carpenter and roof storing the beauty of old victorians. Carla johnson will be committed wearing jeans and tshirt and cowboy boots and i wanted to add my own words to her partners words and i thank carla so much not just for her leadership but forher strength and her compassion. Whether it be from our sidewalk programs to our shelters many of our homeless are homeless because of physical disabilities or other disabilities and carla took on an Important Role as a department lead and she felt that her voice and her advocacy was the most important thing every day and not protecting her job and that issomething that is so difficult and challenging to do and i just really want to respect and remember carla mostly about her heart. She really truly cared about so many members of our community and city and it is with immense love apart from this that i wish her and her family our condolences and carla ,rest in power. Thank you. Supervisor cohen. Thank you. It is so hard to believe were talking about car lie in a past tense in the last few years i had the privilege of working with carla on the bayview opera house. She was a true advocate of the Disability Community and i know everyone that worked with her enjoyed working with her and collaborating with her. She was a strong believer that all of our New Buildings and projects should be accessible to everyone which has made such an incredible impact on our city and in our residents lives. As you know, we will be holding a service for carlotta in july which she wanted to be used as a fundraiser to close the gap for the bayview opera house. When i heard this news i was so touched. I was so touched. It just reminded me that carla was truly a Public Servant all the way up until the end she was thinking of others above herself. So carla will truly be missed and i joined all of you enclosing todays meeting in her memory that will truly live on and im grateful that we all had an opportunity i think about a month ago to recognize and present an award to her when she was still with us and she had not but you need to hear our thoughts and our experiences that we have shared working with carla, i want to thank anna, is she here today . No but she is watching on sfgtv. Carla will be loved and she will live on not only in our hearts but in the streets and the sidewalks in the bathrooms of this great city that she loved. Thank you. Thank you supervisor cohen. Supervisor mar. Thank you. I will try not to be redundant to what my colleagues have said but as i think of carla in her jeans and her cowboy boots i think it really represents carla in the way that she is in it is such a Warm Community that we live in and i know San Francisco and vernal heights is such a wonderful place to live in she was only 56 when she passed and ive learned so much from her. She gave me new eyes to see and feel the world to do my part to try to help to empower people as we worked on the 25th anniversary of the ada she help me understand how law and policy was created not disconnected from social movements and sometimes people take direct actions with building takeovers and others a g policy and ball to approve the lives that follow them she also taught me that dignity of the people with disabilities as were fighting for equal rights for people to gain employment and to remove the barriers and treat people with dignity as they advocate for jobs and economic livelihood for themselves and as we close i will just say thank you and my condolences to her family and friends and all of the people who carla had touched in their lives including me. Thank you and with that colleagues truly we have lost a true champion and someone who has done an amazing job in the city and county of San Francisco and gave so much of herself to so many amazing projects including the place where i served at the executive director at the arts complex and she will be missed and colleagues without objection i would like to adjourn the Board Meeting on behalf of every member of the supervisors. Thank you without objection. With that i would like to turn it back over the supervisor campos. Thank you very muchi would like to mdm. Pres. I would like to talk about the tragedy that began in orlando and i would like to let you know there are numbers of people in the Lgbt Community to ask that we remember the victims in some fashion and draft a resolution and we look forward to working with supervisor wiener or anyone who is interested in this to create a plaque in San Francisco to remember the 49 49 victims that lost their lives in that massacre. We have been approached bylgbq activist who would like to see that happen i know in response to this weve gotten a lot of comments from not only the lgbq community but also those involved with the pride festival and i know that the Police Commissioner and 30 stated that this is a time for us to be diligent and i would like to give to give the number 4155755544 and if you see anything please call and report it and i would also like tostart with a moment of silence for the victims and i know that its been a very difficult few days for me not only as a gay man but as a latino man to see the tragedy that took place and then as a gay latino man to see the names of the pictures of the people who perished in so many members of my community and i want to thank my colleagues for all of your words, your condolences and then for coming together and i want to thank supervisor wiener for working to make that happen and i think it was a beautiful thing to see the city and county of San Francisco come together and be united here in front of the mayor and here in front of other elected officials in here with other members of the community that were impacted and the one thing that i was really struck by was how everyone that i had spoken to about this crisis with guns and hatred keeps going back to how we are not gonna let people use this tragedy to divide us and especially to scapegoat this community. So colleagues i would simply ask that just like we closed in the member he as an entire grouped of the great Carla Johnson that we also adjourn as a group in memory of all the members that perished in this tragedy and i would ask that at you would join me in that you each have a list of the name of the 49 victims that we divided among the supervisors and i would simply ask that we read those names so the names of these individuals i have read and that people hear them in the city and county of San Francisco and we thought we would do it by district order one through 11 so with that i will ask supervisor mar to begin the process. Akira monet marie 18, a honda row Barrios Martinez 21, amanda ivr and Mercedes Florez 25 and 26. Gene c rock greediest 25 years old. Anthony vista 25, Antonio Yvonne brown 29. Christopher joseph santa 24. The uncut Deirdre Dayton 22. Eddie dion cut justice 33. Geraldo a man is 25 Alberto Silverman and as 25. Jean Carlos Mendez perez 35. Gerald Arthur Wright 31. Joe rayon p32 . Jonathan antonio vega 24, Chavez Martinez 25, [inaudible]27,juan Ramon Guerrero 22 and 32. Louisa marr, 37. Martin bonitas torres 33, [inaudible] 30. Paul terrel henry 41, Peter Gonzalez cruise this legislation inspired by our civil grand jury and the Ethics Commission and by doing so would inspire the tax patent dollars and the collective confidence of our taxpaying government. The City Employees failing to employee their duties and the gross waste of city resources in the citys conflict of interest in ethics and lobbying and Campaign Laws have been violated in these activities need to come to light. The person reporting them should not suffer retaliation for doing so. Our laws should encourage people to report such abuse and protect them while they do. Unfortunately, and it is in its 2015 reports the San Francisco protection ordinance is in need of change. The city grand jury found the opposite. That existing city law is failing to provide adequate protection for the whistle blowers. The Ethics Commission carefully reviewed and approved them as law i was happy to bring them before the board of supervisors today. Our legislation will strengthen law by number one, expanding the types of complaints that can constitute improper governmental activities to also include gross waste fraud and abuse of city resources. Number two it will expand protections including city contractors and those filing a complaint at any city county or federal agencies and not just a department which they work. Employees are asked to speak up in their own department but are allowed to Say Something to another agency and they deserve equal protection. Number three of this legislation increases penalties from a maximum of 5000 to a maximum of 10,000 with those who are been to be retaliated against a whistle blower. And number four that we call the the retaliating incident against a whistleblower and what clarifies what kinds of regulatory actions are covered under the ordinance protections this includes negative actions regarding an appointment and promotion and transfer and reassignments in performance evaluation and suspension and termination and other disciplinary action. To reinforce confidentiality protections the legislation creates new sanctions for knowing the disclosure of a whistleblowers identity and it also encourages investigation into a whistleblowers investigation and also clarifying the Gold Standard used to assess evidence and it what stage of that standard applies. These changes in concert with the extensive regulations the commission has already adopted will vastly improve the citys whistleblower protection and investigations and foster a fairer, more responsive government. The civil grand jury first raised these issues in the Ethics Commission responded and now we have the opportunity to make them all. Weve an important opportunity to fix what is broken in the city for far too long. I want to thank the civil grand jury members who work so hard volunteering their time to make the city better and to hold the city accountable. Thank you to the Ethics Commission and to the director leanne and to our deputy City Attorney anders shane and to our chief of staff Conor Johnson and im proud to be introducing this ordinance today and i ask you to join me in support of it. Thank you very much and the rest i submit. Thank you mme. Pres. Supervisor kim. I was waiting to announce an event this weekend but before i got confirmation of that i want to add my words to the memorial today of the 50 men and women that died in orlando on saturday night. I want to thank supervisor david campos for introducing this on behalf of the board and it was the first time that i saw 50 names and its incredibly moving we talk about numbers you can gloss over what this means but seeing each namereminds you of the family and friends that each human beings had. I think that one other thing that i would just say is that something that struck me so much about this incident is that we dont often think of nightclubs as a any new type of secret space and a lot of times people escaped to these nightlife venues as a place to be free and when you talk about the freedom to love it is clubs where you can create the space to flirt with whoever you want to flirt with her to dance with whoever you want to dance with and to love you want to loveand its in those very spaces that people really get to express this freedom to love and knowing so many of those in the nightlife business that organize and djs here in San Francisco specific communities spaces for people to be who they want to be an even with a heavier heart i acknowledge not only the terror but the incredible violation that someone must feel to have someone enter a space like that where people feel like they are really building the safe communities in the safe spaces. Io, i do want to thank supervisor campos and weiner and i just want to thank supervisor campos and i know that the Latino Community is planning a visual this weekend and we would ask that we would attempt solidarity. There are so many things that are being said in this country today against our Latino Community and against immigrants and i think it is hard to really untie what has happened this weekend in the crosssection of a fear that is taking place in this country and its more important that we as elected leaders stand together against this type of hate and the rest i submit. Thank you supervisor kim. Mme. Pres. , there are no other names on the roster that concludes the introduction of new business. Thank you. Now it is my understanding that we are ready for item number 14. Supervisor campos. Thank you mme. Pres. Thank you for coming back to me. I have some copies of the revised ordinance as well as revise legislative judges that i would ask the clerk of the court and the staff to help with and as you will see there are a number of changes that are being made and i just want to begin by thanking Jeff Kaczynski who will be heading the new Department One homelessness and the changes that i am circulating and i will ask jeff just say a few words and he can speak on them if he wants to in one thing we are incorporating one his suggestion and we are being made on the spirit of making sure that he has as he takes over this new role is the flexibility that he needs to be as successful and effective as possible. Colleagues, i want to begin by thanking folks who have worked with this on me and i want to thank specifically supervisors avalos and mar on there are cosponsorships. And this legislation is advocating the safety of Homeless People on the streets of San Francisco and Homeless People in San Francisco are suffering in the residence in the city and county of San Francisco are suffering and especially in a place like district 9 ucr neighborhoods bearing an undue share of the brunt and as you have seen encampments have become commonplace in many of these neighborhoods whether it is division street or vernal heights but this legislation does is it requires the city to build Navigation Centers using effective and humane methods to address one key part of the homeless crisis and it complements other efforts in the form of shelters and incentives we defined Navigation Centers and legislations based on what works in our districts and entry shelters through Case Management and social Service Programs and we know that this helps moving Homeless People off the streets and out of encampments and into housing. Or transitional housing that eventually leads to permanent housing. This allows other services to Homeless People in including health and employment managementthese also allow people to bring their belongings and their pets and family members with them. And Jeff Kaczynski to address our goals. While supporting our citys overall strategy to end homelessness. Again, i have circulated the amendments and i would like to just note some of the highlights that this legislation does. Number one, it adds capacity to our shelter system by creating six new Navigation Systems in San Francisco over the next six years. Some will be new sites that we will become Navigation Centers and one will become a shelter for youth. We are beginning the important work of bringing our shelters into the 21st century and i want to thank pres. Breed and others who have made important suggestions on this point in the goal here is to ensure that we have a system that is low barrier and that we are providing the resources and support for people to be successful. We are incorporating processes of how people enter these Navigation Centers and exit these Navigation Centers and this will also ensure that we focus on the goal of identifying longterm housing for people that are homeless. Housing at the end of the day is the key. I want to thank again my cosponsors supervisor avalos and supervisor marand i want to thank hesba who have given us an analysis on how we can make this Navigation Center better and so there is no taking away resources from the system. I want to thank Jennifer Frieden back jackie jenksand alexander wise from the San Francisco challenge and laura thomas and i want to thank all of the people who have worked over the years to make the Navigation Centers successful including our former colleague dusty i see Julie Ledbetter in the audience and i want to thank episcopal services. And i want to thank you and ask Jeff Kaczynski to say a few words because we would like his valuable input and we would like to move forward collectively as we move forward and like most of you i am committed to making jeff as successful as he can be in his new role and i know that me as a board will work with the right with the mayor to make this work and with that i would like to ask jeff to say a few words. Supervisor campos would you like to move the amendment . Yes thank you. Thank you that its been mood before we move these i will turn this over to jeff. Thank you supervisors and thank you for giving me a few weeks to read the legislation. Really what i have found is that it really matches up quite well with the direction for the department that has been set by mayor lee it is an acknowledgment of the success of the first Navigation Center as well as the people of San Franciscos frustration with the growing street population and the need to address Navigation Centers andthe legislation by supervisor compos is not changed is all the only changes in my mind were primarily administrative and more flexibility to fit this in with our current planning process with the department as well as to match up with the budget that has been presented with the mayor and a little bit of flexibility as we are to open up six new Navigation Centers in the next two years and i appreciate everyone on the board of supervisors who helped to participate in this project and think this is a great example in the spirit of coming together and i hope this will continue at this new department gets launched. Thank you and with that i would like to introduce supervisor farrell thank youmdm. Pres. And further over the past few years we have been working to reduce homelessness in our city and we had some concerns of the original proposal shifted us away from that and the one existence has been successful thanks to the support of a lot of people in this room but they are just a version of our existing shelters but just much much better in the housing on the backend. I really want to thank supervisor campos for the changes he introduced. I was briefed on them earlier. This seems to be a necessary component of our Navigation Centers and a very happy to see the changes in the city composed a plan to how we will help the individuals on the streets. Without new revenue for housing the residents will continue to feel the pain points and an additional to the changes we can have a better resource and i think it is a huge step in the right direction from our citys perspective and im really excited about that and that is very good with the collaboration with mr. Kaczynski and i think hes off to the races with as tough as that is. This continues to be a team effort of homelessness here in San Francisco and i want to thank everyone involved in this issue and i look forward to supporting your. Thank you supervisor farrell. Supervisor cohen. Thank you. I think you for the strong sense of urgency that you brought to this conversation a conversation ive certainly been part of for a while and definitely want to acknowledge the amendments that the legislation that were moving in a very good direction and i want to recognize and formally welcome Jeff Kaczynski i apologize for having my back to you but i will get that last name down eventually. I appreciate you working with supervisor compos this man doesnt even have an office yet and hes already cooperating legislation with you supervisor campos and i think it indicates that we are off to a really good start and i appreciate jeff being able to have some of that flexibility that he was concerned about maintaining and preserving and seeing it in the legislation im excited about it and i cant wait for this to manifest because we have a lot of people in the streets are hurting and need our support. Thank you. Thank you supervisor cohen. Supervisor campos. I just want to mention all of the people that have given their insight and really made it possible for us to get to this point but i forgot to mention this name and this is Carolyn Goossen and that is from my staff and carolyn you are a superstar and thank you for your incredible work. Thank you and seeing no other names on the roster colleagues can we take the motion to amend without objection and without objection the motion to amend passes unanimously in the item is amended mme. Clerk can you please call the roll . [roll call vote] there are 11 ayes. The ordinance passes unanimously as amended on the first reading. Mdm. Clerk can we go to our First Special water. Item 36 of the special orderis ahearing of persons interested in or objecting to the certification of a conditional use authorization pursuant to planning code, sections 207, 209. 1, 303, and 317, for a proposed project at 313323 cumberland street, assessors parcel block no. 3601, lot nos. 043 and 044, identified in permit application nos. 2014. 0627. 9813 and 2014. 0627. 9820, issued by the Planning Commission by motion no. 19604 dated march 31, 2016, to demolish a singlefamily structure and construct a new twofamily structure on a 5,700 squarefoot lot within an rh1 residential house, onefamily zoning district, a 40x height and bulk district, and the Dolores Heights special use district. Item 39 is amotion directing the clerk of the board to prepare findings in support of the board of supervisors disapproval of the proposed conditional use authorization identified as permit application nos. 2014. 0627. 9813 and 2014. 0627. 9820 for a proposed project located at 313323 cumberland street. We will consider constructing a new structure on a in the Dolores Heights special use district and without objection colleagues i want to recognize supervisor wiener to make comments we will conduct a hearing and move forward and specifically discuss the resolution of this matter. Supervisor wiener. Thank you very much mdm. Pres. And colleagues as we went over yesterday this appeal has been resolved with both the appellant and the project sponsor my office did conduct a mediation yesterday and i want to thank the project sponsor and the appellants and other neighbors for participating in good faith after a very contentious process and being willing to sit down and engage in a giveandtake and move towards a resolution. I also want to thank andy fryman in my office for her work in helping me move this towards a resolution. I would like to read into the record and we will provide this in writing the agreement the parties went into yesterday and at the conclusion of the hearing i will make a motion essentially to adopt and modify conditional use with additional conditions. So i would just read this mme. Pres. This is not very long. [reading agreement] again this was signed by the sponsor and the appellant yesterday i am not a president soi just would like to have the sponsor of the project and the appellant state their agreement one the record. So we will open up the hearing and we will conduct the hearing and we will also open it up to Public Comment and move forward and at the time that they are recognized they can state the specific agreements. With that colleagues, we will proceed with theand the appellant will have up to 10 minutes this hearing and representatives please come forward. Good afternoon pres. Breed and members of the board supervisors my name is bruce bond i am here to affirm that we reached agreement in mediation yesterday and i agree to the terms of the agreement. Thank you very much. Are there any members of the public who would like to speak in support of the appeal . Seeing none. In support . You have two minutes. Good afternoon my name is anastasia state longterm resident of the district and this approval is going to set a precedence. I realize they have settled but they are merging two lots in if you allow merging of two lots throughout the city its not really going to do anything to alleviate the problem of our Housing Stock being settled. The other thing is i dont know if they will settle on our excavation and they are putting two lots together to build in our housing size is 8000 ft. 2 and the have an apartment down in the basement its going to be a section to the house on the book and the excavation for the secondary unit is very concerning because the life of the lots trees will be jeopardized in the nightingales that inhabited and habits it will be disturbed and it the owners do not show that they respectthat as well. Any other comments . Seeing none. Public comment is closed. Thank you very much. Im from the Planning Department we will be waving a presentation today. I would just want to thank you for mediating this issue and this will be in addition to the five pages of additions to the approval thank you very much. Supervisor renal. Yes, that is correct. Thank you. That is in addition modifications. With that, the project sponsor will have up to 10 minutes with the project sponsor like to make a comment . Good afternoon respective supervisor i just want to affirm that we did Reach Agreement on the project yesterday i want to thank the neighbors for actually working with us and we want to thank the council and thank supervisor wiener in the office for helping us to mediate that andthroughout the city. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Is there anyone else that would like to speak in opposition of the appeal at this time . Seeing none. Public comment is closed. With that is hearing has been conducted and is now closed. Supervisor wiener . Mme. Pres. I would like to make the following motion which in effect will adopt and modified conditional use based on a settlement that the parties have reached and the specific notion will be following a motion to amend items 38 to disapprove the conditional use and to approve conditional use with additional conditions as stated by me at t okay, is there a second. Item 38 as amended passes unanimously in item 37 through 39 on the table. All right mme. Clerk organized supervisor the appellant asked that we continue this to do for two weeks to june 21 and we hope to meet a resolution before next tuesdays Board Meeting. Supervisor wiener made a request for a continuance is there a second . Seeing none. Public comment is now closed. On the motion to continue this item to the meeting of june 21, 2016, can we take that without objection . Without objection we will continue to the meeting of june 21, 2016. All right mme. Clerk, now lets go to Public Comment . At this time the public can can address the supervisors public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the board, including items being considered today which have not been considered by a Board Committee and excluding items which have been considered by a Board Committee. Members of the public may address the board for up to three minutes. Each member of the public will be allotted the same number of minutes to speak, except that public speakers using translation assistance will be allowed to testify for twice the amount of the public testimony time limit. If simultaneous translation on items of interest o the Public Services are used, speakers will be governed by the public testimony time limit applied to speakers not requesting translation assistance. The president or the board may limit the total testimony to 30 minutes. Members of the public who want a document placed on the overhead for display should clearly state such and subsequently remove the document when they want the screen to return to live coverage of the meeting. For adoption without committee referencethese measures were introduced for adoption without [indecipherable] here you see his picture when he visits years and here is his picture at 74 years. Im very proud to shake hands in egypt in oakland. And i think his wife and i would like for her to be around here for life and i would like to give my sympathy to the family of the 49 people that have been killed [timer dings] i want to thank supervisor kim for crying to those people. If she knows that people are doesnt know them most people dont like violence happening this way. I wish you good luck and i would like to thank you for giving your time to present for myself and i would thank you. [timer dings] what a lovely building. My name is i am a resident of south market. And the city has proposed a mini park to go in on. I really dont like the design of this park we have children and we have dogs and this is nothing but concrete the newest playground to god place playground to god pl. , god park is five blocks in the other department i propose that we keep the trees in that park and that we turn the upper portion of that lot into Community Gardens in the lower part into basketball courts. As well as an overall Maintenance Cost of the facility that is being created. What this map here does not show is that from east to west on this lot is a 64 foot change in grade so for the city to install what is proposed hereit is going to cost significantly more and maybe thats why we keep having contractors back out. [timer dings] we dont have that. It would be nice to have our kids be be nice to have our kids be able to welcome home, man. [gavel] good afternoon and welcome to the local Agency Formation commission. Im john avalos chair of the commission joined by the right by vice chair commissioner cynthia crews and to my left eric mar. Mr. Clerk please share with us your announcements [inaudible] coffee but from memory, please sounds all cell phones and electronic devices. If you wish to speak or have a documents to provide to the commission, please provide it for the clerk into the inclusion of the file. Thank you. Todays meeting is broadcast by sfgtv staff. Jesse larson and charles clement. Thank you for your service. Mr. Clerk, looks like weve weve done the rollcall. If you could please actually, yet a couple of commissioners absent. Do we motion to excuse commissioner campos . Will take that without objection [gavel] we just didnt local. Lets go on to the next item that motion was to excuse commissioner campos. The motion was made by commissioner mar. Seconded by commissioner crews did that motion passes without objection with commissioner campos being absent thank you. Number two, please item number two approval of sflafco minutes from the may 20, 2016 regular meeting. Any comments or questions . Commissioner chris like to move to approve them will do that after Public Comment. Will open up Public Comment on sflafcos minutes. We will close Public Comment [gavel] motion from commissioner crews did seconded by commissioner mar dirt will take that without objection should be dick without objection that passes. Great. The agenda item number three resolution to the board of supervisors regarding amendment to sflafco terms. Okay, so this is a resolution that discusses moving our executive officers position, which is actually terminating im not sure what the date isjune 30 continued for two more years. The continuance of the position will be allowed by resolution, but also would be subject to a decision by sflafco extending funding and the fte by the board of supervisors. So, really, i want to make sure that especially moving through this fiscal year that as we are launching cca, executive officer position can continue. Thats supercritical. I also feel that since we spent a great deal of our time on cca, clean power sf, there were in transition right now to look at new projects, that sflafco can pick up longterm, one that we talked about for a number of years have been the municipal fiber program, which is been off and on the topic of discussion, but not a real longterm topic. I want to make sure that we put something before us very very shortly that could address some of the longterm work that sflafco could you. I believe this other projects that we can pick up as well as an agency and i want to see if those can be explored. So, im willing to entertain other ideas that commissioners might have before inserting other ideas and projects that could be for sflafco seconds i support the position for two more years that will be through the fiscalto the end of the fiscal year 2018. Commissioner crews i think that it was a few minutes ago we talked about future agenda items and how we could use our executive director without impacting the work on cca but also making sure there something in the pipeline. I think that possibly at the next meeting i like to bring some ideas forward for other projects. I just want to give myself some to think about it and maybe look at work that other sflafco that are similar to us have done. And you sort of thinking about how we can best utilize the agency. I certainly support expanding mr. Breeds context. Im sorry. Its the position not a contact. And then making sure that we have projects and Budget Approved through that time if thats appropriate. Great. I am wondering if theres a little bit of what you might be able to do before this resolution comes before the board of supervisors. That could be may be sharing just maybe through email with us that would be helpful. Because i think we are going to be a lot of questions will be asked about future work that sflafco could do. I think the municipal fiber one that the board will be readily ready to discuss but other things we could throw in the mix as potential work for sflafco in the future but other ideas that come up, i heard, would be preparing the city with longterm plans for Sea Level Rise and some of the infrastructure will have to develop around that. I think that could be a great project. I think other jurisdictions might be looking at similar type of issues and might want to explore what they find perhaps in california. What i was thinking was calbut he recently and perhaps there was some workshops that were relevant to our sflafco but other sflafco in california werehow they are staff hours and projects and everything are directed to my maybe that would give us some insight into ways we can expand. Okay. Will open the site up for Public Comment. Any member of the public who would like to comment, please come forward. See no one come forward will close Public Comment. [gavel] will move this recommendation. Moved and seconded. Will take that without objection. [gavel] motion to refer without passes without objection with commissioner campos being excused. Great. Lets go on to item number four case item number four executive officers report. Jason breed executive officer. The things i want point out since were meeting today of the leaders chairs provocative not them have our meeting on june 24 did so when next meeting will not be until july 22. I want make sure folks were aware that we dont have a cca update on this agenda because we want to [inaudible] i wanted to a couple quick update on stuff going on. Theres a bill called ab 1530, which doesnt directly impact cca itself but it does the with Electricity Generation and passthroughs that occurred. It would impact both pg any andcustomers equally. But it does have some issues with it of how setting sometimes they dont like that potentially impact related cca matters. We are monitoring that im and theres also a second oh, and four, ab11 which would basically limited the cpuc independence from state legislature. Right now, theres a firewall put in place and still learning about this just came out. Last couple days for me so im still learning to try to get my head around it but from what i understand would basically say the cpuc would it potentially stokes this but the state legislature could change our functions and how it works and actually be more treated more like a department that an independent agency. So, there could be some good. But also be very bad that occurs with that. I know theres some advocacy groups out there that are advocating against it. The constitutionalnt it is already past two thirds by the assembly. It still needs a two thirds vote in the state senate and then would go to the November Ballot and when he two thirds of the general public support as well. If not can happen immediately but something that might be worthwhile to Pay Attention to potentially and come out opposed to if we so desire. Ashley came on my later after after we did this i judge it out what the judges determine if theres any action we need to take before the next meeting as far as sending opposed letters to the state senate or anything like that to try and stop it it makes sense for us to use out what are the initiatives to do this come from . I apologize. I dont have that information with me. I know that some in the audience is a lot more detail on this bill than i do. I would yield to Public Comment to answer that question. Okay. Commissioner crews. Not that i havent spent a lot of time on the california secretary of state website, but when do you know when the filing deadline is for this in terms when it needs to be put onto go on the November Ballot . Window would be finalized . Im assuming in the next month or two women 20 to finalize anything to about. Since its a state legislator posits its a slightly different process and i dont know the state processes then i know the signature gathering one. Thanks. Okay, thank you. When we hear from the public. Public comment. Good afternoon, commissioners that eric brooks, today on speak on behalf of both energy folks like california for Energy Choice and public next along around public broadband and Internet Access because it was the to the bill that your staff just raised. Its actually technical corrections aca11 because its for ballot measure. Basically, with this bill came from is that it sponsor a summary member mike gateau, had attempted to put through a measure and failed that wouldve allowed at t to completely dump it where mine service which would have been very bad for a lot of low income people that need their phones. He had previous legislation that actually have divided the cpuc into up into five entities. This legislation will create a ballot measure that we completely openended and will allow the legislature, if it wishes, to completely get rid of the california Public Utilities commission. Absolutely. Create new agencies to put their responsible is another existing agencies. It would get caught lunch to the legislature to do whatever it wants. In light of the fact that the legislature is heavily influenced by fossil fuel interests and communications interest, for example, in the sp350, oil limits were completely gutted from the appeal because of money pressure from oil companies, so, were facing a situation where this gets to the ballot and it passes, we will have to engage in a gargantuan effort to make sure we dont end up going out of the fine hand which is the cpuc witches admittedly be terrible and into the fire of the legislature hacking us to bits. So, i really encourage you to staff follow this carefully. Quickly, it wont be too late by next months meeting to deal with this, but you may want to consider special meeting if it looks like this is moving forward me to weigh in on it. Thanks. I decided i should also mention like i said, this impacts not just clean energy and committee choice. This impacts the public bobbin system. The legislature several years ago also got rid of the ability of local municipalities like ourselves, to form our own Franchise Agreements and the hardline on our Franchise Agreement with Communications Providers like comcast. Now those are state franchises. So on communications as well, we will be throwing control of these utilities these two communication utilities to the legislature and that to me is a scary prospect at this potential major benefits on both energy and efficient but also as potential disastrous consequences. So, thanks. Thank you. Any of the members of the public would like to comment . Seeing none, will close Public Comment is closed. [gavel] this is just an information item so we are onto our next item item number five, public, members of the public may address the sflafco on matters that are within their jurisdiction and not on todays agenda good afternoon commissioners. The mass population, of the giant, upon [inaudible] of active missionary forces leading to total ms. Of wellbeing of having extreme fine way of changing [inaudible] definitely witty expectation for mankind the support for the holy truth. Such achievement that one this of the life always can service in ones [inaudible]. Mutual [inaudible]. I for the existence of stick static and consistency of natural [inaudible] for nothing so importance of nature [inaudible] functional good control of human passion and intuition. [inaudible] will be no more than promotion of [inaudible]. Personal achievement and meeting client destiny stepbystep of good acts [inaudible] having chosen this of wellbeing to fulfill one soul and personal salvation. [inaudible] requires medication and mercy. [inaudible] thank you. Good afternoon again commissioned just the benefit of the public i forgot to say my name which is eric brooks. Thank you very much. No other speakers will close Public Comments. [gavel] going to our next item item number six, future agenda items. Great. We did talk about future work o sflafco and night when i like to do it her next meeting is our executive officer could provide us with a little Background Research and provide us with potential longterm projects if sflafco could be involved in. I think looking at noticeable broadband, looking at fiber, looking at Sea Level Rise, open source voting which is one we taken up as well. I think working with commissioner crews to see if other sflafcos are working on projects that might be appropriate here for San Francisco might be worthwhile as well. Okay, this item is now open up for Public Comment. Future agenda items. See no member of the public, and will close Public Comments. [gavel] will go on tour last item item number seven, adjournment we are adjourned. Thank you. [gavel] [adjournment] light for our city and our streets illuminating our ideas and values starting in 2016 the San Francisco Public Utilities commission is xhoefl that light with new led with the did i audits for better light for streets and pedestrian and theyre even better for this vitally lasting longer and consuming up to 50 Percent Less Energy upgrading takes thirty minutes remove the old street light and repeat 18 thousand 5 hundred times while our street lights will be improving the clean energy will remain the same every San Francisco street light is powder by 100 percent godfathers hetch hetchy power in one simple word serious as day turns [gavel] good afternoon everybody and welcome to the San Francisco board of supervisors meeting for tuesday, june 14, 2016. Mme. Clerk, can you please call the roll . Thank you mme. Pres. Supervisor avalos. Here. Pres. Breed. Here. Supervisor campos. Here. Supervisor cohen. Here. Supervisor farrell. Here. Supervisor ki