And so if the cus are wrapped into the lp a the cu goes to the board of appeals. Correct. I think ive heard a desire to keep the process as is doesnt mean this is no a plat for administrative sdrooil but sdrooil but from the board of supervisors to the board of appeals will be continuous and moving on to rent controls this still i know supervisor breed amendment there is still a provision in here for replacement units both local and state Bonus Program not allowed to demolition or convert why include the next forgave. Thanks for the link afternoon together youre looking at the piece i hundreds to you the Conner Johnson shared it the state of requires the replacements of units so youre looking at one felt programs individually requested withholding affordable well have that replacement requirement. One time. 100 percent this says local and state. Thats a great question we can get a revised language of conors version were striving through the replacement you cant demolish a rentcontrolled unit i apologize weve think working closely with sxooepd City Attorneys and the Mayors Office to get this language really right. I think through the confusion your packets didnt get the update and ive heard complains what we pocket into the next legislation that helps clarify the ambiguity. Im appreciative of the work that staff is doing this is an issue since we met wherever the first time it is frustrating not to get the right piece of paper and have questions about whether or not reversal is good next issue on so theres one sud that is taken utilities called the north beach sud it refers to something call avenue Incentive Program i feel like if there is another Different Program if this pathway exists i suggest a number of neighborhoods facing gentrification and ill name tenderloin and chinatown and western edition and excelsior and hayes valley that is not at the top of list but feel like if there is one exemption what is special about the north beach that is different than the other neighborhoods. I think thats my comment for now i want to ill see what my fellow commissioners have to say. Commissioner moore. Im really trying to the more i spends dedicating here at a time to this particular profile the more sxhufd i get it is still last august to say the least i was open to a broad based approach but the more i heard about that the mover it shifts away my confidence that this was really something we can constructively layer that slowly convinces the groups that were meeting to come to terms and find themselves on another aspect how it was present which were asked and answered to the repeated listening to peoples comments and Unanswered Questions i remain as large as number of truly unresolved issues with a certain amount of uneasiness that is not possible many people told me it was a onesizefitsall presentation and i couldnt say that request conviction ive heard it several times i have heard that repeated questions asked in other neighborhoods with a slightly different plan and it will be roefdz and really no primitive way of answering those questions and there was continued a. M. Inputs im reporting im here to listen to what people are asking me and staying the credits fire of that difficu dialogue it is too much more but few and two the for the many as much id like this to work and such as i feel the fire under my butt it just seems like im spending more and more time my pile of letters and rubltsz it is hire a their people that are bringing facts to the tackle ive not heard adversarial shared im sitting here to do something i dont have all the information at the time i need it including the more open discussion with supervisor breed about what really protection of the rentcontrolled unit means i dont feel i have have that confidence is it really an incentive for market rate housing is that because of the all right existing overproduction of market rate housing and the under production of Affordable Housing that were trying to resolve yet were grandfathering in this the bam thats the most amazing part to me moving forward with similar assumptions where i personally see myself not being 45 anywhere slipping slowly into that income category where i feeling where dont i fit if im quite nervous when i hear the numbers theyre not better that is working for me, the numbers are more and more to what i end up probably having to destine myself into the lower income bracket of people that will be looking for this kind of housing im using as an example to speak about myself standing the crossfire the legislation at this time i feel the questions are learn the answers and the tools given to me i have a big issue with Historic Preservation commission and take it from the top not necessarily the order of priorities and lock orders im strong with liveability with respect to what were building but those who will be effected by the building and people that will be living next to buildings where the answers have not yielded been addressed and the location and density and equality we only talking about rh3 and the districts they have already an awareness as commission you spoke about certain parts of city have qualified to be exempt we also heard that in particular direction very particular sites and properties have been pulled out there is racial inequality where the most impacts will be and ultimate im concerned that the Commission Authority and oversight is diminished and not clarified as to the extent i can sit here and vote while you rely on us. Commissioner hillis. Thank you for everybody who has testified and its been enlightening i think this is certainly worst the effort it is complicated but every week, we face the question to to build more Affordable Housing and the status quo is 12 percent inclusionary housing we ask started again but 12 percent go inclusionary housing and thats not working for anyone so we have challenged staff to come up with ways to increase the amount of Affordable Housing we built in the city i appreciate this came from that challenge to come up with ideas to generate more Affordable Housing in weve looked at you know we should encourage 100 percent Affordable Housing projects and protecting rent control you know eliminating the ellis act and building higher percentage of the clvrgs is important we know that and the broader city elected officials are looking at percentage but the most aggressive proposals im here is 25 inclusionary and the question that the 25 percent pass the 18 or whatever ends up will adjust as a result of that so you know gets kicked done the road thats a question we need to address the idea a simple obviously did details are complicated but we have questions about what the im should be and in exchange including more housing to be billion built and certainly this raise questions it didnt work onesizefitsall approach it works better on a gas station on 19th avenue and geary and 19th street or vacate lots an lombard or wheel lands avenue in Visitacion Valley are a barky think dwoirth so we have to get at that and figure out how we get into more detail onesizefitsall approach and maybe a gone story and kind of our more narrow commercial with a lower percent or two stories and some of the thirty percent i dont know but we have to get at that question it is worth continuing rent control this commission was where i worked before we said rent control we shouldnt allow this to happen where rentcontrolled unit are being down the road and the commission agreed the last time supervisor president london breeds legislation we say we so what even the indents program you that is contrary the we think is ami levels where did we come up with the one 40 the one 20 was used why did we settle the 3 person household at within 40 that could be two individuals with a child the affordable is 518 were above were building you know were over spilled were building for one 40 but i dont think that exists so why not one 60 why not one 20 give us your thought why that level. Kristen Department Staff if i could have the overhead or laptop we did the work would the mayor to think about what they mean by middleincome and the bonds work up to one 50 we worked with the counsels talking with people with the inclusionary housing people that are looking for housing through the Mayors Office and as you can see on the slides youll see is income levels the one 20 and one 40 for a single permanent households or a 5 person households the very low were serve with inclusionary were having technical difficulty and as you can see on this slide over middleincome household a one person household can afford by afford spent thirty percent of their income and the market rate housing is 3 thousand 4 hundred so theyre not able to afford a home the same analysis to the right for a 3 percent parents and child 8 thousand and it is unreach able to our point the income group we dont have yes commenters are correct the market is the not serving we vice chair, have lots of conversations what are redrying to do what were serving. A various by neighborhoods you know value of housing or the marketrate of housing it various widely i dont know if it makes sense at some point to adjust those by neighborhoods because unifying obviously it as 3 person household four discounts if youre downtown along with the waterfront and if in the europe sunset i dont think there is ways to do that. We have thought about that we were concerned about what happens when the market goes down we are offering one 40 their subsidize and when the invoice so theyre required to do a market study blow ami in blow the Neighborhood Market the Neighborhood Market is low and the one 40 is matching were required to do the middleincome markets gone o 20 percent blow that. The 20 percent business issue is complicated you know, i think we started with protecting the legacy businesses and certainly im not interested in you know giving k f c a relocation sups but somehow bridging that between the legacy business and a bank are Title Company not interested and its a complicated issue exist law didnt protect that one story can be a lease can be termed terminated under the new program so it get complicated but thinking on more the best ways to protect Small Businesses that would be helpful and on the cu kind of approval given the concern and given some sites might work why not continue if you need a cu now you he had on a a cu you know what im saying ill roll over what the existing approval process is into this because i think there are challenges there are some sites might not work you might not fit the level of density so i generally think this is heading in the right direction is needs to go nor nuance but i know you took staff recommended continuing if we do i want to see the same level of effort and Community Involvement to groups you know starting to tease those issues out so thank you. I wanted to mention theres some very nice comments by the public and it is kind of difficult i identify and completely understand people that are deadly opposed and identify with people that are supportive this is part of San Francisco the unique blend and the variety of income level of folks one commenter struck to me i dont know if he supported or opposed but what makes San Francisco are the people of San Francisco what use to be multi generational the old joke how do you know on old san franciscan they ask where your fabricate went to high school were losing that i dont know if we will gain that back but the city is changing commissioner antonini is rights population is growing well be bigger and well be more folks i believe that ties into prauchl we talked about the 3 legged stool in housing there is certainly were out of the chalk maybe some things not in our control i wanted to again point out it is a reigning implication were in a position i think to lead that communication so some observations that strike me i did not hear anyone from the bayview it is the most impacted sorry thank you. One there was one okay. Not many but if you look at the dotted map that is highly impacts but the idea were maybe be exempting some districts kind of rubs me wrong it is difficult to make those kind of citywide overarching policies and decisions what makes San Francisco unique is that it is a you know you have to weve sat up here for years every single case is different address by address their unique what is next door is different next door to that it is difficult but want to be supportive the things id like to see thought about kicked around between now and the next meeting no demolition of rentcontrolled unit id like to learn more about the 320 and pretty close to our process now id like to explore and maybe hear offline or online any demolition of units looked at and district exemptions what makes that district special versus another one but ill leave it the worst thing we can do is nothing of we approve this program it is water down the worst thing for San Francisco not build any more housing in my opinion commissioner Vice President richards. So i have 13 pages of notes it will be awhile seriously first of all, i feel like tonight it is not 11 oclock shortterm rentals it is not the closet things we cut off a 10 cancel and another one wraps us around the next but in september prior to that it was to be funny it was in the summer but one wields things mentioning the experience and tonights at that point, we had the same potential for voter potential owners we dont tonight as well and initiatives entered and it is the same feeling of impact what are we are doing this for this might be history in 3 or 6 months i want to put that out there first mother of all questions for the City Attorney i weve heard from mr. Welch were in compliance and someone can someone comment on that about the state law. Curious stone we were talking about the Housing Element with the mcd that calvin brought up a document claim we are in fact, in compliance with the Housing Element law thereer details into the approvals and mcd was the the requirement we complete an ordinance implementing the state density allow ill provide that documentation at the next meeting. Second question then would be second mother of all issues is rent control im seeing the new supervisor breed amendment that talks about signs affidavit the form of a acceptable form their subject to the rent control the question i have on that if i have a building and it was built in 1910 and 4 units and he 6 years ago i ellis acted it and now applying for the states density bonus 5 year period and my belief is not under rent control it was 4 units built in 1910 it will be rentcontrolled unit and it follows the building as long as it is standing regardless if youre in and out of business is that the case . No i was going to say im i know enough about rent control to be dangerous so i want to say the intents of that which is to certifies close the door on a loophole your imagining so someone ellis acted theyre building and use this program so the idea of that time lag to greatly disincentivizes and prevent that so my thought ellis act never altered to create the disincentives creates the loopholes the legislation this did not demolish remove i think the word should be prohibits the words versus it is kind of a work in process and keep going down the list here. The whole issue lets talk about Historic Preservation i have photos i took when i talked u walked around noah valley ill walk you through there it are numbered 1, 2, 3 and mr. Butler Pay Attention ill ask your thoughts so number one a fuel view last thursday we approved the demolition of a singlefamily home in the 24th street mcd . Especially for if i friends in noah valley pros and cons to protect noah charms we got a flood of emails to is a see we approved the demolition if you lift this up it says 24th street i know pa a no density bonus was kwaed the developer was going to demolish this above the garage the notification created 5 units in this site i walked home and the church the basement of the church ill look at 24th street and the reason im concerned i looked at mr. Kellys description of where this house sits no Historic District so i can see those addresses all had significant work done but it passed they were not historic so this is the storefront but the details and the one above is altered like the one demolished go do page 2 the same block 4 is thank you very much oh, okay. Thats what we approved and so i wanted 0 people probation officer realize under the Current Program an incentive to demolition the buildings to make a profit and we approved that that building i think that was unanimous and reduced it a little bit so the house is not there page 3 please so furthers down the block we have those hours singlefamily homes addresses again and according to the addendum the eir talking about Historic Preservation commission and the staff report only identified Historic Resources will not be demolished the definition was recurs labeled code a the system in our Planning System so 4143 is a g and theyre all b ill walk into the planning information counter and hand in my permit what happens walk me through. Tim frye with the San Francisco planning some sorts of historic planning to determine whether or not it is a Historic Building for the sake of ceqa so it necessitates some rectify category a it is, in fact, a resource so whether the project sponsor prepares their own information or we use the Planning Department preservation staff prepares the information we will make that determination the building was, in fact, determined to be an a it will be i think eligible. The local pr i respect completely we didnt vote to dont worry about what was historic what other incidents about the resources process. What were looking for whether or not the property is eligible for the California Resources there are 3 cc r criteria that a building is eligible within significant events and two b significant persons and 3 or c is architecture it is related to the design are placement architect. So if someone slept there and harvey milk thats where we kept his storage were making things up or a you know a pristine example this is axiliary or what percentage of a hundred. This is based the current workload this is about 20 percent of those i find a Historic Resource and b the other 80 percent we dont. In our example excusing that two of the three houses probably are not historic and one might be. Potentially depending on what we found. I see the garage added and stuff taken away and one is sensitive but not remarkable so my concern then for people to think that soft sites apply to gas stations theyre having a rude awe wilma pang when bulldozer if thai think this kind of charm needs to be paid for lack of a better term so to the next slide please so those are all b and ethically street is concerning bus elizabeth is street mostly noah valley is in between noah valley those houses i thought oh, my god this is an ugly 3 Story Building and put a 6 story next to it ill dont worry about that this is one is an a in the eligible so even though the pressure is there to go higher thank you. The next one and across the street 375 ethic look like theyre kind of a pair but 375 is an a not here the 379 b will have to qualify because there are go historic next in your opinion. 379 appears to be the venture that is a very old early structure for this neighborhood well be requiring that Historic Resource to determine whether . An a or c. Lets assume George Washington didnt sleep there lets assume it, its not remarkable architecture because it relates to 375 is that a leg up to consider it to a. It is something that individually is significant. Okay. A district would be two prosper. Yeah. More than one sometimes a church has a directiony that could be a two district. We had a project on 27 street georgia is link gone probably this is determined to be a district but allowed it wont happen the construction im trying to make everyone clear we will you the first 15 feet to be kept like mr. Butler talked about but those conditions that could happen on nonage pd projects if in their determined to be ceqa eligible and correct and an important clarification for a district the recurs under ceqa is the whole collection of buildings so a change could potentially happen to within of the buildings and not result in an adverse changes that is under ceqa. Id like to have mr. Butler talk about that ill be asking you some questions please inform me we have a noah Valley District under the park we saw a district in noah valley that is a collection of buildings and i want to demolish within the 15 are ton what is my protection on the house or the dwelling. Well as tim mentioned well looking at the hectic resource that is the Historic Resource that is protected and then they will look at whether or not the district with remain eligible or perhaps three or four of those building if over all the cohesness remains. Thats a staff detector and thats right the local Historic District and the hpc. And under b no protection. Im sorry and the b designation has on a protection. Ill interject if it is a b well have to make that determination to demolition well have to determine if it is a resource. Youve been the department a long time have we allotted the demolition because it a within off and a coheaviness of that one building left. How many structures if that district its interesting theyre the ones that want to be exempt. Fifth story hundred can we go to the next one mr. Butler mentioned a very large document can you get the address if there go please 4107 the commercial state and federal or storefront somebody cads i want to look for this and inspector so many pages how would that structure be treated under the context statement. The department received a certified grant it conduct a city of the commercial weve surveyed 6 thousand buildings and the context statement provided a framework how to look at the buildings and determine chronicles with not it will be on the website and start the Community Outreach component and hope toe excuse me. House the Historic PreservationCommission Adopted in june. So im the owner of wings in amnesty and it looks original i dont know what is survey says i want to commends this is rights for me and the city napa valley from the developer i want bulldoze those we we will make a determination prior to the documentations whether or not it is a resource and if it was a resource not eligible. Thanks and any thoughts, sir anything to add. Ill say in our neighborhood in our offices you have a van ness auto eligible district which is in an area up zoned that increases the pressure on the auto garages that is a relevant ground example were losing 0 those garages to high density because of the pressure to build on the structure even though not part of Bonus Program. Lets go to the next one i think there is two more. So down the street open 24th street there is a portrait so this is 3 again, this is 24hour were the middle the Business District not on a side street verbiage so 3 whoops too much as you can see 3820 was a right projectile i know the developer that is 1, 2, 3, 4 stories i guess 40 and it can be entitled up to 4 actually ones and juxtapose next door is a cottage we also interesting enough approve the demolition this is for people to understand the relationship between what could happen and what is there add stories to the building on the right and nothing to the building on the left this youll end up with one huge thing and across the street another next slide that is kind of i want the people to envision this across the street this singlefamily home im not sure but noah valley with the kinds of buildings with the various building covered by the program i think i asked staff for this relevance of what we do tonight a map of the a structures needs to be super impose on the map so people clearly say that will not go away or an inhuman effort to demolition that that would be helpful mr. Butler anything to add i want to give folks maybe the commissioners and maybe move on question came up in Public Comment that was in the addendum to the 3r several commenters said up zone the 25 zoned gags and parking lots well get up to 16 thousand units why not thats what the eir says on page 19 why not do that that 20 would be simple people had been saying lets do that on page 19 of the eir why not the proposal up zone a small portion of these i think what youre hearing people are concerns about raising the height limit. On the 240. Wow. Sorry i think your question why not scale the program down sorry. Peter weve heard this question and put a lot of thought so really the answer is the parcels that are included in the program area are if i believe eligible for the bonus this program and the states analyzed program are Better Options even though we building the 240 sites are the ones to take advantage the first intent when we designed the program to creates an alternative to the way the state legislation will require us to implement the states density bonus law. Of they were not the thirty thousand left you can build affordable and get the bonus you cant do anything about that. Thats correct. We have density bonus and only the 12 percent bonus. One comment on the design i think rarely what we go with section 328 i mentioned on the guidelines lecture he time to see in the staff report how the programming conforms to the guidelines and any delineation whats the trade off so at least the public can say i get the people say this didnt consortium and it is nice toe hear the staff have that put that out there i have issues with block combinations and one of the speakers said 200 and 50 feet and 6 hundred plus south of market is not covered it is probably 650 i think the lot combinations need to be thwarted to the district theyre in. The man with the hat on if you had toe summarize what to do to make the Program Better what would it be. My main concern is open space a roof deck or a balcony is open space but i mean, if you go to wishes to speak medicine and look up open space open space is soil when i started you i cant have a backyard ground level because it is caged in shady and unused feel but this is helpful i think staff it will be thats my point with this in fill in density going in way were not building anymore parks were losing. One of my comments to staff like the lot mergersers the building evolved to the street had been proportional and you have noah valley two pain streets geary boulevard is almost an interstate make sense to center taller buildings on geary i asked staff to look at this i appreciate this work Small Businesses. Im worried about the displacement of Small Businesses as well i think that i would exclude the legacy businesses i think i said that early on in the communication to staff i know maam, you mentioned in the noah valley a federal logically occupies there was you mentioned in the noah valley meeting a federal relocation something i said i was going to ask you what does it include the type of businesses that will be faced with has to leave can anyone comment. Were trying to rack our brains but it has to do with with the requirements that are placed for in need of Affordable Housing project that is displacing residents or businesses some sorts of types of services and benefits they offer this is to when our using the federal funding it is limited to federal funding just to update you on what we are doing to the Small Businesses youre aware were providing early initiatives for time for is planning relocation and get out, get out the services that oewd has developed and continue to develop not just issues related to the program but citywide. Okay. Thank you. So this that whole issue around the impact on moifrpt communities in the western edition and bayview Hunters Point which are having percent and 23 percent of this potential eligible sites produced and interesting in sundays paper talking about real estate in the examiner the spotlights on the bayview so the gentlemen the back congratulations youre in the hottest new neighborhood in the real Estate Section somebody approached me i know that mr. Welch you mentioned in case income levels of from the africanamerican can you explain that and my colleagues participated in f that prom i didnt understand the earlier question but ill speak to let me deal with that question ill speak this is parts of onesizefitsall approach that is so outburstable we talk abbj about ami. Were talking about a district ami we use hudson regions ami and it is stunning to me that the director of the Mayors Office cant recall whether or not a local ami no local ami it is a regional number so when we eye a regional number and most importantly when we apply that to households in San Francisco it is onesizefitsall the American SurveyAmerican Community survey of the essence sews breakdown by ethnicity in 2015 issued a report on San Francisco why its white mooemdz was one and 4,000 asian medium income was 72,000 latino households income was 67,000 and africanamerican Household Income was 29,000 it was a huge issue and the africanAmerican Community when we talk about where this mapping that is in your report says most of sites exist and where most of units will be built if you take neighborhoods studies improve the significant or majority asian black and hispanic thats 60 percent of ah bp units proonld were project by project 64 percent of this fireman to work the lowest average households income in San Francisco so the only way those income those people will participate so a sell and get outs. So im in within of the neighborhoods and im a comedian how would i participate in that can i get a bmr units those are to 97,000 that put the medium income of asians latinos and africanamericans at the bottom ends africanamericans fall out the bottom they cant participate at the 12 percent unit at the 18 percent of one 21 to one 40 none of those medium incomes meet the inspire level to participate in 18 percent of the units this is ethic cleaning up this Program Using citystate regional based income figures misrepresent what actual households incomes are the africanamerican, latinos and asian population in San Francisco. Thank you i punishment that i had a concern about that. If i could reply i dont understand whether or not state law the whole question of the Housing Element the Housing Element specifically said the city will continue the policy of establishing the special sud and height exemptions intend to support of development of Affordable Housing by allowing density bonus for higher speciality Needs Housing thats the citys program codify that as the program you do suds that is what was in the Housing Elements and i will quote the letter of certification that the department of these it in full compliance with state law says your no full compliance of Housing Element law but in in violation of the density id like to see that argument this i remind you is 37 years after the package of the states density and the state housing of Communities Development fast forward the density bonus policy fully compliance im not a lawyer but gosh why do we finally say ive seen no opinion of the City Attorney ive seen no opinion on the website or gold opinion piece that is specifically saying doesnt interpret interpret that is as the law heres the license number law we were fully compliant after is license number decision. So the suds on the project to date is less than this program the percent the quotes i mean. Your staff report says 12 projects were done pursuant it is more one was on my block on eighth street withholding favorable senior developments there was no option from the communities and that happened automatically no problem it was a density bonus it converted church to unions okay. Mr. Smith director any comments. Were trying to have a reasonable complfgs and mr. Welch this is offensive and enough im willing to have a conversation when you use that kind of he terminology is down rights offensive sew it is offensive to me offensive he to me San Francisco proposed a program supposingly Affordable Housing higher than the income of the 64 percent of neighborhoods youll does it in it is offensive to me, sir. Thank you moving down the list i have something called invest in neighborhoods how does that relate to the process is there a relationship how let me think about the relationship. You know in general weve invested in neighborhoods working with planning and the office of Economic Workforce Development mostly around business protection of the businesses sups and as well as improvements through the skraptsz and so forth and the neighborhoods weve talked about expanding that kind of program to engage if the Community Life and the housing and parks and open space and so forth. Great, thank you thank you one second. Somebody wrought up something on a map about is that something we do . Yes, were working with the churches and provided. Witness rationed of that request what is the sort of Development Potential on the different sites trying to understand where the units will be one thing well come back with more detail and hoping well respond to the value of the map. So somebody maybe i have one thing i think the gentleman speak market rate housing is not solution i wrote down wheres the money maybe mr. Commissioner white i dont get it did i misquote you im sorry how 100 percent of a private developer. Yeah. I wouldnt put that on planning 100 percent but market rate Housing Developers should be held responsible for fees including the units as capturing as much the value as possible and saying that we believe that the city needs concentrate making sure we were aggressively making sure we were aggressively pursuing that Acquisition Program to maintain the rentcontrolled unit stock. One speaker talked about how to get off the ground did it available i mean and i think that came from one of the Community Members the coalition but weve been wards thats itself mayors group the list of Consultant Groups that are a list of participants and several meetings i dont believe that any of the working groups kept detailed minutes weve put on line the comments and questions weve received. I think thats it i took a lot of notes. Okay commissioner antonini. Yes. Thank you been a 48 year residents of San Francisco my dental business is 4 years i like to think of my people my patients as individuals not grownups ambassador but my patients include all members of ethic groups and multi generation and many of the patients are at the age they are looking to try to buy or rents something in San Francisco and many of those Public Safety are the category of the one and 140th percentile and there be here and looking to buy are rent here and so that is the way we should be viewing this situation think of people as individuals i know that emeralds took 10 years weve bone on this two years these myers are productive sxhivengs as identified a lot of things that need to be looked and the historic part is really important ways we dont want to see a incentive to destroy a lot of our Historic Houses of they dont qualify because it is what people come to San Francisco because we have victorians or eras we want to preserve we should incentivizes towards gas stations no longer here and other types of uses that are a little bit better certificate sites not saying out of the question having others included and also been stated theres an overproduction of marketrate housing not true under production relative to a demands for housing at high prices that exceeds and will continue to exceeds productions and is invading and will invade the Housing Stock that is what it is all about i know that some ive heard opposition to building housing for middleincome residents but, you know, theyre going to be here out of college and group and collectively rent units that are are rentcontrolled unit and marketrate they take units off the market that could be rents units that might be afford to lower income they dont provide other means theyll do that and continue this is what this program is all about and not much talk b 100 percent and lowr here on behalf of the appellant hardly anyone brought that up but seems an option about the group that gets the at least housing built in the middleincome residents and commissioner hillis brought up obviously this will be subject to whatever legislation may pass in the future sometime that will change the inclusionary requirements this will go have to be dovetailed and a dial that includes the middleincome housing that will answer our question so im going to one question about users the eastern neighborhoods we cant put this go eastern neighborhoods their rezoned thats a question that is up to staff to reply were not picking on neighborhoods only making available in southern neighborhoods. Were looking ways to deincentivised those maps this sxhudz the financial analyze and but i think the focus will be different the zoning controls where different the density krofldz or form based codes so thats why we separated the two. The nature that is an area that fits the description under which that is why those neighborhoods and areas are they fits the description of the corridors which support more housing and greater housing and dense were not singling out areas ill move to continue this item to april 14th. Second. Ill suggest in addition to that motion we look to see if we can do another informational symptom in march have a discussion like this so see if there are existing questions you cant have enough hearings and answer all the questions there will be some people that dont feel the questions were answered but a better chance. People to bring up things and with all due respect youre hearing through april are quite full if youd like an informational hearing well calendar it but still be here longer than tonight i believe the request to april 7th from staff i will. Before april 14th. Either one it doesnt matter give us more time maybe better off with april 14th any feelings commissioners i guess well go with the 14 a possibility of trying to work in some kind of informational if we have an extra week. Commissioner wu. So i want to be respect of staff but the request for a continuance was into my im on saturday morning arrest is report had been releases on january 14th i dont understand why the request for continuance for me, the weve had three or four or 5 informational hearings and we here got an answer on rent control this is breakdown to consider as pieces of legislation ive heard a number of gels to create rentcontrolled and some around goals with the density bonus or the 100 percent buildings avoid the suds i think that the roll for this commission on this piece of legislation was to name the issues i feel comfortable pushing it for the record to the Land Use Committee i have a list of 10 issues ill not read them until we see what happens. Commissioner hillis im comfortable with the continuance i think we need to look at the issues especially things like t inclusionary housing a bunch of issues raised by the commissioners and public which i think needs to be addressed and need to get into more detail on the legislation and definitely have another of your calendar is full another informational hearings sometime in march but to get the answers in clarity i think more meetings but were not demoing inclusionary housing but the status quo well see the developments only gas stations or in noah valley that have commercial buildings and the question is that appropriate is the are they appropriate we get more again thirty percent Affordable Housing we can debate over the level but to me that is not adding to gentrification or displacement that is helping by providing thirty percent Affordable Housing at times when the boards is debating 25 percent inclusion it is worth continuing the discussion and having for debate this has been constructive i havent my left side of emails and public testimony the only developer that calls me was Bridge Housing an Affordable Housing developer that encouraged us to pass the program and again, this continue the dialogue i support of continuance. Wow. I dont know if i want to sit through another one mr. Welch he appreciate your beliefs he sat here and used the words economic he cleansing i residential design it when i think of ethnic cleansing i think of things when i saw people lined up and getting shot because of a different religion i get where how coming from it could go create pressure thank you for your thoughts i think ethic cleans was not something i would have used but appreciate what you brought to the discussion i go back to the december 3rd hearing with supervisor wiener pr and we joked about it today he was saying basically it us dear completely do something do something stop continuing it i dont want a continuance why wait get it up to the language we voted, 3, 3. The land use got it to push it forward basically none of the things weve mentions i put myself back to tonight going you know, i think there are so many issues some of them political to be honest ill pin the boards for this one for the protection of legal loss to be honest the staff has done an amazing job absolutely no questions asked the work yonl i dont believe will not be lost but to get this thing over the line ill pin the board with rental enforcement so the production production production talk and some protection protection protection is great but the legally loss shortterm rentals ive been on the board i sat through the hearing the first hearing i was wheemgsed the 10 thousand vacant units what are we are doing to pin them into the market to im peg the boards coming up with a comprehensive solution to put this under the protection piece so id like to get it to the board as fast as possible dont support a continuance. Commissioner moore honestly the pile is high enough the discussions have been endless the department has given it the best and so has the public i think weve provided a phenomenal amount of data and phenomenal insight it is wide open im ready to let it move on to those who are in charge ill prepared to let it go i have to say the saturday morning request request for continues was continuance was a ive worked on this package two weeks ago hard and youre looking as if youre raising your forehead we were asked in in a compassionate tone to consider the continuance this was not the rights time the work was done youve given me a huge pile of studies and my work was done so im prepared to support the continuance to support the to not support the continuance and move on and lets it go. Commissioner antonini. Well im in favor of the continuance it is absence unfair to groups in greater numbers not thoughts that was being continued because that was what a lot of people called me i said it will get continued and after the commissioners came up come up what a laundry list there are a lot of things to make that legislation and we should do that here set the tone for the supervisors the supervisors tend to be more political then than we can and look at this and try tee build something that could you mean theyll make the decisions but were sort of passing it to them with unfinished parts as the speakers awe tests it is a good piece of legislation i want to see more communicated meetings and by april make Great Strides and in april that will be even more and a lot nor supports im voting in favor of the continuance. Commissioner Vice President richards i want to remind everybody we forwarded the list he did that tonight staff i know between now and the time the boards picks up well a work on the list and down 0 on paper i look at between now and april another 2 thousand residents move into San Francisco that we dont have homes for i hear that when i go to sleep it is kaikz issues i want the boards to act on that. Commissioner hillis. I mean, im supportive of the continuance the fact it came saturday not been shy to continue the items commissioner moore by any stretch is i dont think so it as problem but a disservice to the public that weve not talked about and o that i understand think shortterm rentals what we did was glow the list im happy to do that and lands think remedies of what we want to do so i dont think it is doing justice to the people that came out and talked about add you be to us and when you look at the videos that are hundreds of them they punts open thats not my duties im pointed out to make good policy it is a copout so you know im willing to go quickly and scheduled to an earlier meeting and agree to disagree but not giving a good debates not comfortable of moving and commissioner antonini. This is something i do this is actually a relief when you know that okay your familiar with everything has it stands now and knowing a week ago it will be modified and will be another date to make your decision is a relief so, i mean we worked under the circumstances by not continuing it i probably would have you know been a little bit more forceful about the clanks i was suggesting changes to the staff i want to see a product that we hopefully, will agree on owe forwards it to the boards in that way im voting for the continuance it could be sooner but not make a decision tonight. Commissioner Vice President richards that i have i guess staff youve done work and answered all the questions online i got the answers and maps and things put together and comments just to be clear to cleaver the language we felt we have been having an sledder pace of Community Meetings we forwarded these we knew a lot of things for maybe continue to a donates when we can digest so we can do something in 3 week. If we push this to the board you feel confront you know what the issues are i dont know it is the same as having for dialogue if well come back with responses but thats up to you we can come back sooner april 7th if that makes a difference and director rahaim i was going to do say what bill said in front of is a number of issues youve raised a number of issues that the communities has raised it would be our normal practice to not when there are those many issues not to move forward so see the next phase of work this is normally what youll do nicole certainly take our issues to the board but normally youll want to see the issues reluctance. Commissioner antonini. I could move for probably three weeks will be february 18th if im calendaring that. The 18 a cancelled hearing unless you time to reissue it. Probably a lot of commissioners lets going to the next week february 25th okay. I think that will be as quick as we can do it hearing what staff says next week is the fourth ill change my motion about the seconder to february 25th for final action. Yeah. Ill second. Commissioners, if theres nothing further shall i call the question . On the motion to continue. Sorry id like to make a request in that week well take an action and make recommendations to the full board we kind of go through 0 those issues like rent control and Small Business and lot mergers and ami kwha where the supplies and cu approval or not and you know make recommendations like we did did during the airbnb debate and forward it id like to see more communities weve heard a lot of people not able to digest their questions im not sure that three weeks gives us the ability to side that level of communities engagements id like to see that well see where we are in three weeks but more diagonal. Commissioner wu. So i i do want to read this list we can talk about them tonight or not so the way we calculate the will the mergers out loud and not allowed rentcontrolled unit or no demolition and 3 Small Business with the focus an legacy business and is 4 it is Decision Making 5 is something ill call liveability guidelines and 6 the density equality and 7 is how this program adjusts inclusion go baseline changes and the ccii process and 10 exemption to the program. Could you share that with staff later. Thank you ask commissioner wu for clarification i think that the program of applies but some areas are dense so it impactss areas definitely commissioner Vice President richards. Im looking forward to get to the finish line action on the 25 when we do this next. Commissioner antonini and id like to add it a have good list by commissioner wu the other thing the displacement of business interests in buildings where they might take advantage of the sites i brought up the right of first refusal and id like to see if staff works that that was one of the biggest concerns and the realistic concerns brought up by the speakers. If i can take the opportunities to talk about commissioner wu thank you for listing those if mean well act on all of them selectly but splits think some that sends a message when it goes on to the board in my opinion. Commissioner hillis. I think that was a great list a hierarchy or i know again going back to the gas station on 19th street versus mr. Of the sites commissioner Vice President richards was looking at in noah valley and you know you or you can imagine lee lapds is smaller but some sort density that gets complicated in issue of the design adjustment you know, i asked this before if we see the floor needs to be setback how that effects the percentage of quotes the project. Im sorry. Pilot program added to the list. Okay commissioners, if theres nothing further shall i call the question . On that motion to continue this matter with specific questions from the Commission Commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore no commissioner wu no commissioner richards and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes that passes 4 to two with commissioner moores and commissioner wu voting against that places us in general Public Comment i have no speaker cards. Any general Public Comment seeing none, the meeting is adjourned power its all around us in the sun and the winds and caves waves power that lights our homes while protecting our Natural Resources clean power will provide power to san franciscans how about works right now our power is from pg e from nonrenewable systems that comes over pg e maintained lines with clean power your energy about think generated by caesarean more renewable sources come to our home e. R. Businesses to the pg e lines shouting. . More and more citys high San Francisco is committing to dislocate to end all traffic death that means improving safety for people walking and driving and safety on our streets is everyones responsibility people can make mistakes but not result in injury or death all traffic collisions are preventable as drivers you play a large role that will give you the tools to drive safely on streets a recent survey asks hundreds of drivers about save city introduce driving what did they say watch for distracted behavior and slow down and be patient and check for people before you turn the facts about city driving shows how important to be alert most collisions happen in good weather allowance even at 25 mileperhour it takes a vehicle 85 feet to stop this is almost 7 car lengths slowing down makes collisions less savior when a person is hit by a passerby vehicle 25 minor the chance of death is 25 percent 40 percent that increases inform 85 percent slowing down didnt cost much time driving behind a person takes 9 extra semiautomatic and stopping at the yellow light takes only 30 seconds by hitting someone costs you hours and weeks of our time and maybe a life take a deep breath and take youre time cities Cross America are being safely for walking and driving some streets are confusing heres what you need to know all intersection kroukz of novelist marked some are marked to make them more visible other crosswalks and intersections are raised to the level of sidewalk to actress as speed bump and people are maybe crossing be cautious and watch for people when you approach any intersection advanced limit lines and pedestrian yield signs show drivers where people walk and stop behind the lines at stop signs and for people crossing bulb outs where the sidewalks extends into the street make that tease easy to see pedestrians and remember to slow down whether making reasons and watch for people on sidewalk estimations extensions that maybe closer than you expect and bicyclists may motive to the left to get around bulb outs this gives people a head start allowing pedestrians to enter the crosswalk before transfer starts moving makes them more visible pedestrian scrimmage and stop the vehicles in all directions allow people to cross including department of building inspection scrambles are paired with no light restriction and rapid beacons you turn bright whether the pedestrians are there or the center is activated precede slowly as you approach the beacons especially, if their activated a Pedestrian Crossing light turns yellow before turning sold red back to flash red procedure after making a full stop as long as the sidewalk is empty and, of course, stop whenever the light is red traffic circles reduce conflicts you must stop at the strewn and precede around the raise your right hand of the circle watch for people in crosswalks and people in bikes coming around the circle arrows indicate where people with bikes share the intersections and people have ride to people on bikes have the right to use the lane whether or not in the sharing bike lanes are for people protected by parks e. R. Parked cars and stay out of separated bike lanes unless an emergency dashed bike lanes are a shared zone four for vehicles to change lanes slow bike lanes allow the circles their unusually sprayed before me from other traffic some bike lanes are built to the level higher than the street but lower than the sidewalk they provide a safe separated space sponsor cyclists are around vehicles the box areas are marked with the stencil at intersections act as advanced limit lines for people to garter at a red light this increases the 1r0ir7b9 to drivers people will ride past stopped vehicles at the fronltd of the intersection give them room and stop short of limit line behind the bike without objection and cross only after the green light and people cleared the bike box bicycle traffic lights allow people on bikes to proceed while vehicles are stopped be unaware aware of those bike San FranciscoGeneral Hospital but stay alert and only skrans when the vehicle is cleared the intersection lets take a quiz to see what all of learned here we go number one when do month collisions happen did you say in daytime youre correct question two if an intersection is not marched is it still a crosswalk yes did you get it right great job one more before we go on whats one of the best things to do to avoid collisions . You can it take a breath Pay Attention and slow down city streets are crowded and chaotic so seeing everyone every single everything is difficult heres a test how many times did the white team pass the ball . If you answered 11 youre correct but did you notice anything else also be aware ever youre surrounded and remember that is easy 0 miss something if youre not looking for it heres some basic principles driving near peep e people from youre drivers seat it is difficult address our mirrors to reduce blind spots people on bicycles maybe be in our blind spot give yourselves plenty of time to react look out stay on the road from building to building not just curve to curve check driveways and behind parked vehicles for people that enter our path turning vehicles are especially dangerous important people walking and collisions often occur when vehicles are making tunnels when you turn remember check for people using the crosswalk before starting youre turn watch for people on bikes traveling in the ongoing direction always check our mirrors and blind spots patience pays off take a moment to make sure youre clear while it might feel youll save time by driving fast or turning without checking you wont save driving only adds a few semiautomatic to our trip a collision can cost you, your job or someones live heres important things to remember all crosswalks are legal and pedestrian have the rightofway people cross the street anywhere children and seniors and people with disabilities are the most vulnerable think city strits give buses and streetcars a lot of the space or people returning to catch a train dont block the box this creates dangerous situation for people walking how are forced into moving traffic and people bicycling out of the bike lane and people on bikes most city streets are legal for bicyclists even without signs people biking can fall in front of you provide a safe amount of space when passing someone on a bike a minimum of 3 feet is required by law in california and people on bikes prefer to be in the bike lane in for the this is often to avoid accidents give them room people on bikes will stay away from the traffic or watch out for open doors whoops that was a close one expect people to go to the front of the light and pass on the right a tap of the horn maybe useful to make youre preservation known but avoid using the horn it may saturday night be someone vehicles anybody right turns are especially dangerous important biking always approach right turns properly signal early and wait for people biking through the intersection move as far to the right to people on bikes can pass on the left lets try a few more questions who are the most Vulnerable People on city streets . Children . Seniors, and people with disabilities why do people on bikes ride close to travel there to avoid car doors what is one of the most dangerous situations for people walking and riding bikes . Turning vehicles and what can you do to make sure that everyone is safe in any situation . Thartsz stay patient and alert and, of course, slow down parking and loading a vehicle on accredit city streets is a challenge weather parking and unloading always check for people in our mirrors and blind spots and on the drivers side with our right turn right hand this causes you to look 40 on your left for bicyclists when passersby exiting the vehicle make sure about opening the door know where loading zones are if not loading zones available use side streets never stop in bike lanes or traffic lanes. Bad weathering and visible rain and fog or low lighting make it hard to see youre vehicle is likely to slide or loss control in eye i didnt controls and create issues for people walking and biking they tried try to avoid pulled and umbrellas and construction get slippery for people the safety thing to do in conditions whether wet or icy or dark slow down and drive more carefully remember going fast may on this save you a few semiautomatic but speeding may cause you a life or youre job people walking and biking are Vulnerable People can be distracted or make unsafe decisions as a driver the responsibility for safety lies with you a collision could mean the loss of our life or youre job and dealing with the legal implementations could take years or an emotional toll if someone is killed in a crash help us achieve vision zero and everyone can use the streets safely. Thank you for watch and following the important driving tests your remember were tests your remember were counting on you working for the city and county of San Francisco will immerse you in a vibrant and dynamic city thats on the forefront of economic growth, the arts, and social change. Our city has always been on the edge of progress and innovation. After all, were at the meeting of land and sea. Our city is famous for its iconic scenery, historic designs, and world class style. Its the birthplace of blue jeans, and where the rock holds court over the largest natural harbor on the west coast. The citys Information Technology professionals work on revolutionary projects, like providing free wifi to residents and visitors, developing new programs to keep sfo humming, and ensuring Patient Safety at San Francisco general. Our it professionals make government accessible through awardwinning mobile apps, and support vital Infrastructure Projects like the hetch hetchy Regional Water system. Our employees enjoy competitive salaries, as well as generous benefits programs. But most importantly, working for the city and county of San Francisco gives employees an opportunity to contribute their ideas, energy, and commitment to shape the citys future. Thank you for considering a career with the city and county of San Francisco. I want to welcome everyone to your home. The San FranciscoUnified School District board room. Welcome to our second meeting. I want to thank you for the important work and its critical work for not only the children in the city today but for the children of our city of tomorrow. Today were coming together to approve the outcomes framework that will be our north star if you will. We want to be true for all children, youth and families in San Francisco and what we want for them. I would