Golden gate care onservancy and the parks successful and open to all visitors in san franciscans in bayview receipts the consciousnesscy helps to provide are interpret programs with the Golden Gate Bridge and alcatraz and we many of you potentially visited the centers on alcatraz so i strongly urge to adopt this measure that will create and place for the alcatraz experience and have full confidence in the port. Thank you very much next speaker, please. Good morning, supervisors nice to see you familiar with both sides in the member six the conservancy this is go for inform San Francisco and glad to see this the correspondencecy dont a great job with the celebration a worldclass capture and theyll do a great job. Thank you, commissioner. Morning john sftravel as you may know there are 24. 6 million visitors they spend billions of dollars every hour everyday and support 76 plus jobs one of the most attractive and top attractions is obviously Alcatraz Island and in fact, the 6 more visited designations in San Francisco with 19 percent of all visitors that. Come to San Francisco visit the island easy access is important to maintain the attractivenessness and an iconic attraction this new agreement extends the papering that enable access from an place in close prompt to other amenity and attractions when placed together kraed create a designation that enhances the overall visitors attraction we wholeheartedly support this and congratulations to support and hope youll approve that thank you. Anyone wish to comment on this item seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Supervisor tang. All right. Thank you for your presentation he was reading through this and thought how i finally visited alcatraz for the first time i know embarrassing my parents waiting in line for a hotdog so i think this is be a wonderful experience so thank you very much for bringing 24 forgot with that said, ill make a most to i make a motion to send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. Thank you very much supervisor tang and again, thank you for the presentation and thank you for all your hard work. Mr. Chair, i building an amendment. As amended first to amend and send fort with a positive recommendation. Madam clerk add me as a cosponsor without objection. Okay madam clerk call item 5. Item 5 retroactively 30 years the was the District Attorney to accept and expend a 2016 through june 2017 authorizing the office of District Attorney to accept and expend a grant of 89 thousand for july 2017 through june 2018 and an amount of approximately 89 for the period of 2018 to 2019 to continue the criminal institution impact. Thank you for having me. Im the deputy chief of Victim Services i want to let you know that grant provides us an opportunity to let us have a resolution specialist to serve victims with the collection of restitution theyre very helpful in bringing the gap between the Operation Department and the District Attorneys office this last year, we trained over one he 50 staff mentioned on restitution to have a better understanding when the victim is entitled to collect for restitution and thats really it do you have any questions. Supervisor tang. Yeah. Thank you chair farrell so in terms of the grant is that mostly towards training or for the restitution. It is for the staffing of the restitution specialist that restitution specialist that training not just looking at the collection but also getting out there and bridging that gap amendment it is difficulty in the District Attorney probation officers and the victims when their understanding they can request restitution when the victim or the did not is found guilty or pleads guest guilty to a crime we found victims dont understand this resolution tuition specialist informs victims of their voting rights. Okay well open up for Public Comment anyone wish to comment on item number 5 seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Ill make 80 a motion wmgsz to the full board. Without objection. Madam clerk call item 6. The resolution arthurs the execution and delivery of a multi family note in one or more series in an aggregate not to exceed 49. 5 million to provide ferns of a construction multi family known as presidio prop x. Thank you, supervisors im a project manager at the Mayors Office of housing representing castro San FranciscoPort Commission and here to present the board with the 72 construction of multi Family Housing on connecticut also known as block x the transactions fundamentals have not changed since you presented 9 resolution to that committee in march of this year the issuance is a conduit finance with in recourse to the general fund all the project units will serve the families earning no more than 60 percent ami this is the phase one of the master plan the San FranciscoPort Commission and requires no relocation as it is a vacant site since march the developer 3wri7b8gd you think housing has excused allocation from the state the developer working with the city has identified Financing Team so we have on board the construction and permanent mortgage learned and investigator on council and Municipal Advisors the Financing Team met and developed a document in the package before you today, we anticipate closing many bond in middecember with construction beginning in early 2017 construction is accepted to be complete in the summer of 2018 that concludes my presentation. If you have any questions im here. Thank you very much any questions on item 6 okay opening up for Public Comment anyone wish to comment seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Motion to move forward. Ill make a motion city college. We can take that without objection. Madam clerk call item 7. Item 7 resolution authorizing the conclusion and delivery of certificates of participation an tax exempt or bias evidencing and representing a principle amount, 201165 point plus Million Dollar and improvement on the animal care facilities only property within the city. Okay. Thank you very much this hematemesis was sponsored by supervisor tang. I know we have Department Staff to speak on the item excited to see you and thank you to the Mayors Office and the capital team and our Public Finance team to make sure we are develop a new Animal Shelter in San Francisco with great excitement we have this one of our final financial pieces with that, im going to turn it over to Department Staff. With the Controllers Office of public financials the proposal inviting 60 million in south of market of participation with the annual control facility to be located on 1419 bryant street with the approval the board authorizes the city to sell commercial paper to fund this on an inventory base and to provide permanent financing on a elementary basis the certifies are to be executed in amounts to be fell paid with interest financing and delivery expenses because the plan of finance is seeking a paper to finance the costs we estimate to deliver the certificates in the summer of 2018 with the approve of that resolution the board approves the related fence in the forms including the property and Lease Agreement and trust and a preliminary statement that is the former of notice of tennis for the fail and appendix a the resolution approving the revised preliminary statement will be brought back to the board with the financials and other areas of disclosure for the city will structure the certificates and a third Party Trustees the office of chief examiner portions the hospital and the animal care and control facilities about collectively serve as a lease property for the certificate lastly a reminder in march the board amended the capital plan for the animal control confidence certificates as the debt program in may of this year, the board approved the certificates for the animal care and control project im available to answer any questions and have virginia the director of ac c and ken the manager to answer any project related questions. Thank you very much that presentation i think that just for Public Purposes and reminder of the cost and how much is comping from cop from the general fund appropriate i dont know if you want to speak to that harry maybe through the chair to mr. Rose. Mr. Rose, can we go to your report. Yes. Chair farrell and supervisor tang, we report on page 19 the board of supervisors appropriated the 60 plus Million Dollars in certificates of participation precedes of which 49 million to fund the animal control and 10 million plus from Debt Services reserves and financing and 9 hundred plus for uncertainty and the Interest Rate and this is shown or detailed on page 20 of our report that is in the table one we also note that on page 20 based on a consciousness 1 00 and Maturity Date of 20 years the office of Public Finance estimates the Interest Rate payments to be approximately 5 million plus that is other than average and the total principle and interest over 20 years one plus 59 million is principle and 50 million plus is interest we recommend that you approve that resolution. Okay. Thank you very much mr. Rose no questions. One more question i want to ask a real estate issue i know were playing music chairs with sfmta and wanted an update. Thank you for the question mr. Chair and supervisor tang so the real estate is a proposed animal care on bryant is currently occupied by sfmta and public works is managing them to relocate them and renovate the building this project is currently on time for design that the giving of that predecessor project starts in the summer of 2015 for the relocation for the summer of 2018 were on time for that as well. Where is sfmta what exactly is happening you know that last time we remember we were sure the designation is 1570 burk avenue and so that their consolidating and renovating that warehouse for that designation and great to hear that was resolved. Thank you very much. Okay open up for Public Comment this time open up for Public Comment i know that supervisor tang has cards here everyone will have two minutes. Thank you. I want to acknowledge the director of ac c but cards for calling names please come on up. Good morning. My name is jane i serve on the animal control Welfare Commission been a long term volunteer as of november 2015 animal control meetings San Francisco care and director donahue with the project sponsors from dpw presented plans for the shelter attending voice on the support for the building theyll meet the best practices and approve the level of adaptability it addresses the safety concerns for the public and the commission as well that was for these reasons that the Commission Recommended that the board of supervisors support the proposal to build a new shelter through the certifies of participation were confident the new building will improve the quality of care for the shelter that is functional in the event of a disaster, and, secondly, id like to personally thank the board of supervisors commissioner tang in particular dpw and the city zoning administrators and the budget and finance committee everyone pulled together it shows a great deep appreciation for the animals and for the people of San Francisco so i thank you personally. Thank you very much i too want to thank the city administrators office. Next speaker, please. Im im the chair of sf dog and wholeheartedly support this new shelter and also that the couples most people know that it is a place for adoption of dogs for often woman stay in abusive relationships they believe that people can bring their animals to aa c and protect them once a woman finds a place to live she can get her pet back if a Fire Destroys our home you can go there and fires and a kwaernth disaster you cant underestimate the comfort knowing their pets will be taken care of whether natural or personal people died in new orleans because they refused to save themselves it was reassuring well not face those choices ac c will take care of the animal in the extreme cases and getting them the help to do this necessarily they need a new building. Gandhi said you can judge the greatness of a nation how they treat their animals please move forward and support this building for animal control. Thank you very much. Next speaker, please. Good morning, everybody. Im micro the chief executive officer for the friends of animal control i wanted to you know if any of you viefdz the 14er89 youve seen the need for the new shelter and need i want to thank you for. Making that happen i wont go through what jane said but theres a reason for the shelter number one i think that that was mentioned in the event of a major earthquake the shelter must be selfsufficient for 72 hours hours to take care of people and animals displaced we dont expect the building can do this the shelters are crowded and it is not heath having a new building allows for that the veterinary facilities doesnt cover that right now ac c staff cant properly isolate those animals so the new facilities will provide for that also, we will emphasis the animal care and controls is for people we heard in Hurricane Katrina people are jeopardizes their own safety as refuse to evacuate unless their pets are taken care of federal law is amended in 2006 to require the state and local preparation to include people are petsd it is important in Animal Shelter provide for this the shelter did a great job in it was converted to angle Animal Shelter for that length of time for 26 years weve going done a great job with the facilities and we really, really need this thank you for helping us and the animals. Thank you very much any Public Comment on this item okay. Seeing none. Public comment is closed. All right. So with that, again, just really amazing effort group effort at the city to make that happen so im enthusiastically making a motion to move forward with a positive recommendation to the full board. Thank you supervisor tang please put my name is a cosponsor and supervisor tang know well not be here without the advocacy of supervisor tang over the last year plus on this item thank you very much and with that, madam clerk without objection. Madam clerk would you call item 8 please. Item 8 resolution for the sales of multi housing revenue bond not to exceed one plus Million Dollars for the financing for the construction of a three hundred 11 unit multi Family Housing in the city from 510 fulsome street. Good morning. Im gretchen the Development Specialist to the Affordable Housing team with the office of Economic Development today is a erases authorizing the issuance of multi Family Housing not to exceed one and 32 million to provide the affordable portion of a mixed use known as bloke 9 located on 900 fulsome street as Bridge Housing are the developers thank you look at the map provide in our packets youll see 72 hours between fundamentally street first street and ecker in the contributing project area that was established in june of 2005 with the board of supervisors adoption of tip of the iceberg redevelopment it is with ocii meeting the obligation by the Assembly Bill to insures that 35 percent of new Housing Units built in the project area are volleyball to and occupied by low income and moderate income households it will be comprised of 1 and 36 marketrate housing and one and 9 belowmarketrate housing the total units in the building are 5 hundred and 4 the belowmarketrate housing will be located within the lower 21 floors of building and dispersed with the marketrate unit the bmr economist of 34 studios 61 one bedroom and two bedrooms and will be affordable to households earning up to 50 area medium income or for a 3 person household that will be finances with city tax exempt housing Revenue Bonds this transaction is a conduit financing and not requiring repayment the tax exempt in the california Allocation Committee expires in january of 2017 approval of this bond issuance by the november 29th board of supervisors meeting insures that the Developments Team has enough time to close the fencing for the Expiration Date to begin construction to there after. Vertical construction of affordable of contributing 9 will begin in the winter and completed in the summer of 2019 the contributing 9 Team Precious our support and look forward to seeing you at at event that concludes my presentation. Ill be happy to answer any questions you may have. Thank you thanks very much any questions move on to Public Comment anyone wish to comment on item number 8 seeing none, Public Comment is closed. All right. Thaengs for the very thorough presentation ill make a motion to i make a motion to send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. Motion by supervisor tang and without objection madam clerk, is there any additional business to come before this body . Theres no further business. Thanks everybody president director nolan. Present. Vice president brinkman. Present. Director borden. Present. Please be noted that director heinicke is cant join us today. Announcement of sound producing devices. [gavel] ladies and gentlemen, please, please. Cell phones set on vibrate and call interference and the board ask theyre off. Item 4 is approval of the minutes. Is there a motion and a second. Second. Okay. Is there Public Comment. I guess there s good afternoon. Good afternoon. I am the executive director of Library Users association. I noticed that your minutes have in some cases very extensive or relatively extensive descriptions of what members of the public have said, and in other instances only indicate whether somebody spoke in favor or opposed to an item on the agenda. Since its my understanding that the sunshine ordinance requires you to summarize what people have said from the public as well as to indicate whether they favor or oppose i am concerned that youre not following adequately the sunshine ordinance and i would like to know why there is that differential in the minutes that i am seeing . Thank you. And i would oppose approval of the minutes as they stand without summaries of every Public Comment thats in there. Thank you. We have a motion and a discussion . Any further discussion . Maybe the City Attorney would speak on what is required . I i dont know its required butted you like to care to comment on that. The ordinance does require a brief summary of comments. [inaudible] [off mic] okay. So what do you want to do with this . Directors so just to clarify so when for general Public Comment on matters within the jurisdiction of the mta not on the agenda there are extensive summaries of what people say. The sunshine ordinance requires just a summary of what somebody said and whether or not they support, oppose or speak to neither so for when the board takes an action on an item i show whether or not the member members of the public support, oppose or neither, but when the item is not on the agenda then there is a large extensive summary of what was said. I am generally following the board of supervisors actions with these minutes. Okay. Good enough for me. Members of the board we have a motion and a second. Any further discussion . Discussion . All in favor say aye. Aye. Thank you. Next item. Item 5 communications. Please be advised that 14 has been removed from the agenda at the request of staff. Okay. And that concludes item 5. Item 6 introduction of new or Unfinished Business by board members. Is there Public Comment on communications . Yes. What do you want to say . Its not clear to me what communications refers to, but i have sent through the secretary to each member a letter concerning our concerns with respect to item 12, the 19 polk bus so i hope that all the members have received this letter and i have a copy to give you when the time comes and i can give you to you if you like and a two page letter concerning the polk 19 reroute. Okay. Thank you. Anyone else thank you. Under communications were set there. New or Unfinished Business. Seeing none. Number 7 is the directors report. Good afternoon mr. Reiskin. Good afternoon board and staff. A number of items to give you an update on. The first last tuesday was a big day in city, state and country. Im not sure how to go about summarizing but i did want to acknowledge that with regard to the changes at the federal level. Obviously theres a lot theres much more than we dont know than we do. This agency has a strong and deep relationship with the United States department of transportation and we expect that to continue. We look forward to working with them and the new administration. Really not much more we know at the federal level at this point. Just the main news locally have to do with there were a number of pron sigzs on the ballot that directly or indirectly impacted the agency. The main ones with direct impact was prop j and the Charter Amendment that would have set aside funds for transportation and Homeless Services and housing. That was passed overwhelmingly by the voters and current count 2 3 report. Prop k which was the sales tax that did not say so in the voter information was meant to be the Funding Source for prop j did not pass and it did not pass by a rather wide margin. As a result of that the mayor exercised his prerogative with regard to prop j to essentially invalidate it absent the funds to execute it. So the good news is there that when faced with the question should the city devote more dollars to transportation the voters overwhelmingly said yes. The third one directly related to this agency was prop l which would have changed how members of this body, of your body, are appointed. It would have changed the vote threshold for the board of supervisors rejection of an mta budget. That also failed. And then there were a few other measures that will impact our baseline. I believe the increase in the real estate tax, the increase the establishment of a soda tax, and the dignity fund set aside all together will have an impact. I think it will be in the positive impact to the general fund set aside but were waiting for the folks in the building to crunch the numbers and let us know what that impact will be so thats how we came out of the election and i am sure there will be more discussion as we go further down the road and we learn more about the final results as well as what changes will come as a result of what the voters did last tuesday. I wanted to just to note that i am sure that nobody has missed it at this point but we started the first stage of construction along van ness this past weekend. There had been some activities that already started but these were the first that started to impact traffic flow. We were able to work over the weekend to do the first part was eliminating the left turns or most of the left turns which was the planned early phase of the project so we can start to work in the median. We will continue during the week, during overnight hours work that will be impactful like that will generally be done off hours and we want to make sure everyone is aware of it. I think the media covered it extensively and have folks plan extra time and alternative routes and updates can be found at sfmta. Com slash van ness, one word van ness and you can get updates and sign up for alerts and get real time over the course of the project information so i encourage everyone to do that. Again its sfmta. Com van ness. In terms of vision zero update a couple of items to report. The first and this is something you may have seen in the news also the department of Public Health here in the city and county of San Francisco recently completed an analysis of the medical cost related from transportation related severe injuries that are treated at our county general hospital. They looked at a period from 201214 and found that the medical costs from these injuries amounted to more than 100 million or 35 million a year just at one hospital, pregy staggering statistics. Its the only level one travella center in the city so the most serious and severe collision victims will end up there so 35 million a year in city and county funds being spent to treat people as a result of traffic collisions. There were more than 4,000 patients included in the analysis. Average cost per patient of more than 25,000 and a total of 10,000 days of hospitalization. Pedestrians comprise the largest proportion of the cost at 44 followed by Motor Vehicle occupants at 22 . Motorcycles at 18 and bicyclists at 16 . Not surprisingly the pedestrians were the ones that were the most severely injured while the Motor Vehicle occupants were the least severely injured and my only point in raising this it underscores yet another dimension how important vision zero is in the work that were doing and try to advance and how our projects can really make a difference so anything that we do out there to reduce the incidence of serious and fatal collisions will turn the numbers around which is what we all want. With regard to Golden Gate Park i think we have been updating you along the way but we completed the last of nine speed humps in Golden Gate Park on jfk park on the western part and people routinely travel i think seven to 9 miles above the speed limit and we expect its higher at night. This came as a result in part of the mayors august 4 executive directive that directed us to work in short order with rec and park to bring improvements to the area in six months. We did it in four months and directed us to work with rec and park on a longer evaluation of the park and used as a thory way and the speeds traveling and make it safer so were starting a dialogue with Community Members this winter to explore potential solutions for changes in the park and i may have mentioned this last time but to reinforce we will be convening with rec and park and open house and december 3 from 10 to noon in the golden gate the fair building and encourage folks to participate if they have an interest in Golden Gate Park and making it safer. Next vision zero item or update i wanted to give you a lot bit of an update about the embarcadero enhancement project. Its something i dont think we have really talked about here at least in quite a while and working with the port and planning and, public works to improve safety along the embarcadero and its really being look at it much as a complete street potentially with dedicated spaces for the many modes that are competing for space along the embarcadero including potential protected bike way. Its now on the citys high injury network, the embarcadero, which you know is the 12 of streets that are responsible for 70 of the severe and fatal pedestrian injuries. Actually thats for all injuries. We had between 2011 and this year there were 102 People Killed or injured along the embarcadero while walking or riding a bike. One was a fatality, somebody who was walking and there were ten cyclists severely injured so 100 people over the course of five years, so thats why were working to make it a safer more comfortable street. This is from at t park all the way up to powell street and looking how the street functions for everybody and how we can make it safer. This thursday at pier 1 from four to 7 00 p. M. We will have an open house so again we encourage the public to join and help us think through how we can make this street safer. Its a very important street. A lot of san franciscans use it and people from out of town and in different ways and we want it safe and funded through the mtc through a grant with supplemental funding from us and the port and we will have very extensive Public Participation so that folks can help us develop and review designs and think about the trade offs, and again folks can get more information on our website sfmta. Com embarcadero. With regard to our operators and the role they play with regard to vision zero the more folks that we have on a bus with thats operated by a professional operator and those trips that arent made by individuals who are not professional drivers i think thats an important part of our getting to zero with regard to vision zero and to that end we honored 315 of our transit operators a week and a half ago had 15 years of a safe driving record and four of 35 or more years and one driving safely for 42 years, really amazing and driving safely means no preventable collisions for at least 15 years so it was a great event, great to be honoring our operators and great that there were so many of them that actually met the criteria being safe operators given the challenges of our operating environment and the increased congestion and other uses in the city so congratulations to our operators on that. And then finally in terms of projects the balboa park station area and Plaza Improvement project. This is a project in and around the balboa park station which is right across the 280 interchange, one of the busiest transit hubs in the area and muni terminals and four lanes and busy bart station and muni above ground traffic and anyone that walked around the san jose geneva area knows it can be chaotic and this project is improve safety and accessibility particularly for pedestrians around the station and while improving system reliability for muni and a landscape median along geneva and sidewalk lanes there and pedestrian lighting, curb ramps and way finding signs around the station so we can help gets the best folk whether going to bart, muni, above ground or below ground. We are also on the north side of that complex up on ocean avenue putting flashing bacons on ocean avenue at the 280 off ramp which has been a challenging intersection for folks walking and improving the accessity of the walk way. Its used more since bart put in the northern connection which is great but we want to make it safe. The work on ocean avenue began and last a month and we have been doing outreach and will have impacts and theres a lot of information on the website. We ask folks to be patient while the work is going on but make the area around balboa park nicer for people using it and particularly people walking to and from transit and lastly just wanted to update you on the subway shuttle that i mentioned last week. We completed the second week of its operation and already were seeing a positive impact on reducing crowding and improving reliability in the subway. The way were doing it during the morning commute we have two one car trains that are shuttling in the subway. Last time i said we returning them out to 22 understand and terraval. After we finished the planning and started operations we decided just to turn them at castro so theyre running between castro and embarcadero and its castro and church and to some extents van ness where we have the crowding issues so were addressing those. Were slotting them dynamically into the system where we see theres crowding on the platforms. They have been carrying 100 riders a trip so theyre making a big difference and we found turning at castro is more effective than sending out to taraval. We monitoring this daily and will have a full report in a month or so. In the ach what were doing is using the extra trains to fill in service on lines as needed so if we have a break down or we have some other disruption along the line we can slot into any of the lines and thats been helping as well where we have gaps in service or other anomalies so thanks for the support and having us do that. Its already making a difference and [inaudible] cole valley shuttle is as well and that concludes my report. [inaudible] members of the board. I did take the opportunity wednesday to ride through gold park and check out the speed bumps and theyre nice and the cars have to slow down for them. I am looking forward to the Public Meeting and the next step of the plan and it was surprising how much cut through traffic there is in Golden Gate Park and except for the speed bumps and this time of year with the head lights it makes it more unsafe and youre blind when in a row with on coming head lights and i dont know if there was something unusual going on but the amount was disturbing and i look forward to the meeting saturday on the third and i hope we get a transformative plan for Golden Gate Park and make it work for the next 75 years with the amount of pedestrian and bike and decreased traffic traffic we expect. With the things were talking about and a separate entity and some of the things down we havent been able to keep up and i am wondering we have kept up and the concept of crowd sources improvements is a great idea. We want to make sure that the improvements are actually going to make things safer and not cause any unplanned or unintended consequences. We welcome the activism. Would love to get the ideas so we can evaluate and install where appropriate. Anybody else . Members of the public. [calling speaker names] [inaudible] thank you. [inaudible] hearing the comments about balboa park i wanted to let you know of communication inadequacy or inefficiency on the j line for people with disabilities. The Digital Information signs in the stations talk of the out bound j stop being moved. Zero about where is the first accessible inbound stop. I have gone by that area this past weekend because over three and a half weeks ago i reported to the Multimodal Access Committee there were no signs. There is a midblock high boarding ramp platform at san jose at seneca but the signs say no m line boarding. Thats all the signs that are there. There is nothing to say j line accessible boarding neither side or foot or bottom of the ramp. There is nothing at the minibus and trolley stops by balboa park, not for the 29, the 43, the eight, the 54 so passengers coming off the buses dont know where to get to j. Now, maybe theres information in bart but there is nothing on your digital signs and no paper signage to indicate where do you go, so if youre coming from the airport at night and you want to take the j to the next two, three stops and its raining what are you going to do . Somebody slipped up. You dont know where to go. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker please. Terreek mamood. Good afternoon. Good afternoon directors. You must be doing lots of good things but why we speak on these issues is to bring to your attention some of the problem we face on the street with the vision zero. Anywhere you drive in downtown and some other areas the light night time, the street light is so dim. Its nearly impossible to see anybody coming in the crosswalk even in the middle of the road. The Biggest Issue of injuries and everything if not the day time during the night time we cannot see it. You must set up a committee to go into the street and look at the lights. The design of the lamps facing upward in an old style lamps we cannot see anything in that light barely. I was in redwood city to drop a customer a few days ago and i was surprised and saw led lights facing downward and the right was so bright and i could easily see 200meter way who is walking and who isnt walking so that would be a great improvement in the plan if you can do that one. Thank you. Anyone else care to address the board under Public Comment . Under directors report. Peter warfield. First of all there were nine items i believe on the directors. I wish there were explanatory documents and i would like to publicly ask from what the director is reading from when he is reading his report right now. With respect to proposition k and j i think it should be noted that there were people who were definitely in favor of helping homeless and the mta to have a good Public Transit system, but did not want to have it funded with a regressive tax and perhaps and i know it concerns some folks a set aside which i believe was for 25 years which reduces i think its generally understood accountability and my sad experience is growing that the mta is not as responsive and accountable as i certainly would like it to be and as i am learning others want it to be. With regard to van ness construction i think its a catastrophe for removed service and stops for everybody and crossing multiple lanes of a extremely busy highway during the day and night high 101 to get to and from the transit happening there. With respect to vision zero i am very glad that the director mentioned the Public Health department because one of the things they said in a prior report was not only that the pedestrians are by far the most Vulnerable People in this city to injuries especially serious injuries but theres serious under reporting when you compare hospital records with other records which apparently the mta has, and especially the demographics are important. Older people, disabled people, et cetera are much more vulnerable to severe injury and consequences and that needs to be taken into account by mta. Thank you. Anyone else ms. Boomer on this one, on the directors report . These are matters discussed by director reiskin only. Sure. We want us to be on the record for 12. Okay. No other comments. Ms. Boomer next item. Citizens Advisory Council report. Chairman nolan i dont see the cac chair here actually and due to fire codes gentlemen i need you to find a seat please so there will be no report. Okay. Item Public Comment. This is the opportunity for the Public Comment to address matters within the jurisdiction of the sfmta and