Making one and 22,000 lived in a building context with with Money Management and Case Management what are you doing with their money you are further take advantage of pope i putting a spanish woman on tv and under cry the 40 the percent of hours for people in the position like her the truth of the matter a higher percentage of housing for people making 95,000 a year this is an insult of the voters intelligence and my intelligence that 40 percent should be for people in need of Affordable Housing not people that are in high income making the amount of money i explained to you clapping. next speaker. calling names . Good afternoon supervisor cowen supervisor breed, supervisor kim and supervisor wiener im calling all of you individually because i have seen and watched on numerous occasions all of you that are sitting here with the courage on issues in San Francisco especially the controversial you make our stance known and the rest is history so we are here today, we want you to be disi have no further details i saw the speakers have spoken the injustice to the Africanamerican Community in San Francisco there must be justice this is the beginning of what youll see as we moved up with a lot of actions im going to echo supervisor breed is that it took us to come this way a first segregation and well come back and talk about the legislation there is room to accommodate everyone as also supervisor jane kim mentioned when the city goes to hud he want r we want to know what we say no excuses in this legislation moving forward and like i said i call on you individually i know you all and your leadership in the city to we wanted to 40 that is what the bayview Hunters Point multi Purchase Center is advocating and we deserve to get an opportunity once and for all thank you for your leadership and hope to see you on the street somewhere thanks. Thank you calling names . Good afternoon, supervisors thank you for this time my name is Shamann Walton im a native the San Francisco and bayview Hunters Point a resident of bayview Hunters Point a executive director of the Community Developers and a member of the San Francisco board of education there is not a point in time particularly in terms of what is going on ill every get excited about detailing Affordable Housing opportunities this is a must for recipe in the southeast sector of the city and chris as a whole we know about the gentrification in the western edition and the declining black population in San Francisco today and there is truly no credible argument in detailing the neighborhood preferences for families that have bang pushed out of the city continuingly that is in and of itself not acceptable but this legislation that 40 percent preference coupled with the housing bonds pass a couple weeks ago will help the residents in all ores r areas of San Francisco to stay in this city we dont need a delay in the neighborhood preference but speed up this benefits all san franciscans and all community let me actual why would he need this young Community Developers is building 60 percent of the Affordable Housing on the shipyard 050 to 60 percent ami by sheer numbers there is no type neighborhood preference for the folks that fought for this community not have the opportunity to stay we need to make sure that opportunity laftsz 40 percent a small ask if we want to put a dent in the trend that are eradicating trend in the city 24 city it supposed to be more all of us to keep us all here unfair is the system it favors people with higher population in a city that serves the population that has a huge decline thank you. clapping. thank you all right. Folks let me go over the rules i didnt do this at the beginning no applause not my rule id like to show fingers it is a much more visibly and kwol powerful visible anticipate when you hear something you dont like instead of boeing or hissing just thumps down. Good morning, madam chair and supervisor president london breed. And supervisors im donald a resident in San Francisco concerned about the housing crisis and speaking on behalf of the San Francisco bayview rurldz foundation a o of renter and other folks of life we definitely support this Affordable Housing with the neighborhood because we go down to the Planning Commission and hearings and we fight more Affordable Housing one that is built what happens next thats the problem because 55 unit were told that lgbt and hiv 2k5i7b8d men have the first dibs on the affordable units but it is only the first come, first serve from the pool of 10,000 applicant no designation if were in the neighborhood or not this is definitely a step in the right direction and the organization supports for the most part that we lean on the Developers Financing to finance the affordable projects all over the city and we support of 40 percent, of course, salons were able to give it additional height with the buildings we appreciate that because we want to bring those rents down and bring them down as soon as possible so we support this legislation it is a state of the art and thank you. Thank you calling names . Youre welcome. Thank you. Im curiosity im the Program Manager in San Francisco on behalf of the vaejdz community i urge you to increase the preference if 25 to 40 percent and destine is by the supervisorial district that all inevitable participants have not left out i urge you to do this today thank you. Thank you, sir. Good morning, supervisors. Im louis with the Economic Workforce Development agency in the mythical meta to has been struggling to aid this in the city working hard to make sure that new units are built we on the preference is a good thing let me say we think is a good thing, however, we think that this legislation is flawed and should be delayed some of the challenges with the legislation it lifts the pillow boundary as real neighborhood boundaries this does to the patch the essence of a neighborhood whether the mission or the castro or bayview i think that also the challenges that it treats all the neighborhoods the same the neighborhoods are unique and that is what makes San Francisco unique we dont want the mission to be treated agency the marina and having a nuance approach to this legislation is really, really important a 40 percent krotdz does not necessarily make sense for us i tell you that 40 percent doesnt make sense for the mission lastly there is Little Community input not a going back and forth between staff or the board or community on this legislation i will encourage for legislation to be delayed so that the kind of prospective for the Community Meeting i reminded you this does not needing meet the needs of Mission District. calling names . Im malcolm with the chinatown Vice President center for the record chinatown cdc strongly supports a neighborhood preference not any misconception e acceptance again that there is no the neighborhood preference this proposal a political district preference and will undermine the goal of trying to keep brown and black folks in San Francisco while at the same time excluding board psychopaths of folks in districts out of 5 and 10 and 6 and 8 at this point so we urge the board to slow down to taking it and forget how to craft a neighborhood preference i promise you well be at the table we strongly support a neighborhood apprehensive i want to be clear on that thank you. Thank you next cards in front of the me are calling names . First up grace mary citizens are you here . Okay good morning or good afternoon. Im grace martinez a organizer with the california for community gunshot a native san franciscan i dont know if it matters ive been organizing primarily in district 10 in the black community and specifically around housing issues we have to acknowledge that housing is not only a k34r5ik9 issue but contentious this legislation before us today only addresses a portion of problem the black community has been decimated in population from 2000 to now 12 though africanamericans have been displaced from San Francisco and in large part not an issue of Affordable Housing but i think in order to do justice more than 40 percent neighborhood preference i think what is challenging that we support both either the delay or also pga something right now but no matter this warrant more discussion and research in order to turn the tide of the migration it occurred. Thank you, sir. Good afternoon. Im from the council of the Community Organizations first of all, i want to say we whoefrld support of the idea of a neighborhood preference particularly in the community that clamor for the preferences in their neighborhood as member gallo malcolm said not a neighborhood preference a district preference of 40 percent in the bayview for example, 40 percent of the units for folks for potrero hill a 40 percent preference in district 540 percent for folks in the inner sunset the other part there are particular communities and particular problems were trying to aid for example, 55 laguna as supervisor wiener quoted is at the assumption that 40 percent of youll senior lgbt household live in district 8. More over that if we move to something working in as supervisor kim mentioned since most people work in district 6 doesnt work and live in is preference in district 6 will end up being a citywide perch as were trying to solve a problem four neighborhood preferences by having created boundary that are district preferences and by not addressing this specific concerns of the specific neighborhoods ive heard come up the behaving the western edition and selma were missing the boat the other thing telling me with hud that contacted the city around their concerns rather than the city working the clerk will take the roll with hud to make sure that 40 percent is a legal boundary we can reach citywide maybe wait new now but the problem greater if we are forced to watt with no preferences and challenged legally if above to address overseeing particular neighborhoods in the mission and bayview and reaching higher than 40 percent and Southern California our problem thank you very much kathy davis and im kathy be davis the director of str services the africanamerican leaders that have all come up and support that and want to to move forward speaking on their behalf and the on behalf of the community we need to make change happy i disagree with this i have been working on this for over a year and a half the legislation since june up personally made sure we had a separately argument designed by the equal Justice Society and the Public Advocates to look at what was possible and this is what is possible a lot time and energy into this the supervisors are taking a risk and we need to support that. Yes. I bought a neighborhood preference but looking at supervisorial district as a win we need to Work Together we need to make some change happen other things added on top of that for the africanamerican yes, maam displacements preferences noted just about neighborhood by displacement outburst of San Francisco not just the neighborhood but the entire city to supporting that and make change happen and make that happen today, i think that it is really important that we stop this you can hurry up and wait and oh, im not involved well become part of future mr. Larkin but do stop us that working hard to make that happen thank you. Thank you very much. Are you carla tucker. Good morning. Im carla my mother is a native san franciscan im a native San Francisco born and raised in the bayview community. Community id like to stay in therefore i strongly obtain to any delays in the increase for the 40 percent we look at the out migration of black people weve waited long enough this is a community i believe in and its time thank you. Thank you. Next speaker is oh, l i please come up, sir. Thank you very much im a lifetime residents ive been before this body and grew up in San Francisco advocating more Affordable Housing the 40 percent of new development is good i like to see that passes if more important to three and four those developments that have already been up and running and we have people that are living in those developments that are not in the requirement of legislation and lay under the health and safety code you heard me mention those before you 33. 34. 3 the preference of the community to have as residents that live in the development in their community i dont think is off the table it should be that way but also the preference of the income categories of the people residing in overseeing developments is important in bayview Hunters Point you have development that have taken place that the ami 50 percent of the ami is very low if that very low a declaratory but of an existing law that requires the extremely low being added to it variable income not only provided for but occupied with affordability coverage of 55 years and this has not took place in my opinion for the off migration for africanamerican is the lack of oversight and holding those accountable for adhering to the policies that makes sure that the people in those income policies remain in the development this is a document i have that for the final and exclusive determination the Mayors Office of housing the final conclusion and determination of the this legislation lay was offered by john burton sb 2113 that replies housing that was torn down in San Francisco from the 50s through the 70s and 80s but now that requirement for the replacement of those unite has been taken over the table by the department of finance so 5 thousand 8 hundred something unit in the morning be available and developed for people of those income categories impounded with the problem of not be able to hold the developers and the managers accountability to what the law requires thank you. Thank you. Okay. inaudible . Thank you. Sir your time is up we have a chamber to get to thank you. calling names . Rose. Hello. Good morning, supervisors and everybody here i was displaced i was from the sunset district and i managed to get a preservation because it happened right after the preference and i working hard with the Mayors Office with broke and ultimately we got the preferences the biggest problem if i had to move into my neighborhood i wouldnt have been able to no Affordable Housing there i was lucky we were so esteem we did not fit into any qualification anywhere to the challenge was intense and the table at bayview helped us to the qualification is more important than if you have to go through a lottery but then win the lottery and not qualify you know how frustrating that is so the thing is that most people in the low income are going to be protecting low and extreme although, the one and 20 im people make so much money a really good salary is compared to what theyre making we need to reconstruct our city and really understand what reasonable housing is an Affordable Housing we need to rebegin this and bhiefz neighborhood i moved into a family apartment beautiful building on the street we met wonderful people and there were needles everywhere people have defecating outside children have to witness this we have to rebegin also building for the homeless michael apartments in neighborhoods like taylor and eddy a good micro apartment getting off the streets and live in a place thirty days and after that through months. Think about it. Thank you for giving us something to think about calling names . Hello my name is teresa from the balls Housing Program part of the program being a market weve been praying for a neighborhood preference that is just to be clear although outside of market is receiving so Much Development in but there are with the collaboration housing with the marketrate and people mentions the ami about the income levels we need to probe into the may be preferences and coinciding with the income levels in that neighborhood because right now the inclusionary housing it is stuck continue in 55 percent ami and a lot of people that are applying coming to our office looking for Affordable Housing are also not 55 percent ami 40 percent ami, thirty percent ami people are receiving and when their say so that is to be looked at and also i want to cite one example on the ellis act people cant get Affordable Housing at the same time, if there is a 100 percent ava state funded Affordable Housing will not allow local preference so their needs to be a Community Planning and communication with the hud and or in this particular situation the neighborhood preference because there are also ellis act evicted not being accepted because of the income levels is a complicated matter that housing shortage and were asking for a continuance for delays there need to be a talk in the neighborhood as to what are the income levels in the neighborhood at this point, a discussion of doyle us inclusionary housing income requirements and we really need to look as well, thank you. Good morning. Im chris from the Housing Program i also i have to say im really bothered this is coming before us on the same hearing as the 5m the developer has been going into the neighborhood saying a neighborhood preference and dont worry about preference to the Housing Available and it feels hard to hear that on the same day neighborhood preference ive been working on for 20 years during the redevelopment days with disliking preferences i want to make sure that will happen and not rushed through the process developers both affordable and marketrate developers is a win for them they love to promise neighborhood preference but for the sole practitioners they have to get people into the unit it is not a win an empty promise a political political promise to put this forward without making sure we can make sure that the numbers work for people i believe in this i think we should have a task force to make sure we qualify and i appreciate that people came out here to talk about the numbers and how it hadnt worked in the process how the state money in their dollars federal money how it restrict so many people it is a reality the bureaucracies is a huge barrier it is hard to keep peoples morale ii urge to open that up and make 3 solvent not just past this Development Deal but work on this so people are guaranteed theyll get what theyve been promised thank you. Okay dj followed by calling names . Thats all the cards i have anyone else want to speak please get in line dj. Thank you good morning, supervisors. Im dj the Deputy Director the Young Developers in district 10 residents and a member of the go Bond Oversight Committee i want to farmed came forward and say to press forward what is present i know that supervisor president london breed articulated is it so beautifully right now, were taking a step in the right direction no room for delay we see our communities and folks and residents in the community pushed out this is one way to go ahead and see a start to ending that im in sponge strong support. Im. Com in case a San FranciscoHousing Authority residents i know if so hard we need a change from 25 to 40 percent in my situation i know that is good to help the people we need help so thank you and please help us out we need even though help. Good morning, supervisors from the Mission District i want to mention a strongly that the Mission District support the neighborhood preference the mission in particular the Latino Community has been displaced in a big numbers like the Africanamerican Community we really need to have a neighborhood preference but the way this was presented is effecting us like the neighborhood like the excelsior the excelsior didnt have any development is a Diverse Community theyre now part of that were asking you if you can delay and include other neighborhoods and the represents from the Planning Commission they ask no for the political supervisorial district but the neighborhood to make that happen and maybe if we have more time we can decide that the bayview needs more 40 percent but lets have the time and the this will have an impact in the community for the grassroots is happening in the mission and the bayview it is all over the city and take the time to address that you. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Yes. Good afternoon supervisor president london breed you can supervisor cowen supervisor wiener and supervisor kim