Of wines [inaudible] im involve would the Business Owners selling off sell liquor in the following business. Bristol farms, [inaudible] dean, fine wine and liquor on market street, target and wall greens various location downtop town. We are concerned about security. It is right near the montgomery bart station and transbay center. This is easy for people to take the alcohol and take it to another part of the community. The Business Owners have no track regard in california so dont if they are aware of the laws in california as well as thei dont what their affiliations are bayed on the board packet to the downtown area. I wonder about the Community Outreach and how much was done because i dont see letters of support from community organizations. I hear some might have come in later but they were not in the board packet that was posted to the public. The names on the Liquor License are all from out of state and this is actuallyput down what it is. This is a superstore selling 4 thousand selectionoffs wines and spirits serving the publicthere are 3 outlets within a square block socthis isnt necessary thank you for testifying andjust to cet to the trace you have no recommendation . The think is we would like continuance because i dont know what outreach they did and we want to be neutral. We just dont understand this kind of thank you. Seeing no other Public Comment ill close Public Comment. Let me weigh in i appreciate the presentation from the flat iron wine squz appreciate the thoughtfulness in the proposal. There does seem to be Significant Community concerns raised. Lutenent [inaudible] walked us throthu through the transfer of license to west port al to their yiria of the downtown area that is raised by the concerns. I feel as a Public Policy that when you have especially areas that are with large loincome populations that surround it like soufth market or the tenderloin we shouldnt increase the number of licenses in those areas. As a Public Policy that is a concern of mine. That is one of the main reasons besides the Community Concerns about this that im not supportive of this transfer. I think to move this forward ill motion that we table this item so i move we table this item for those reasons j. Supervisor christensen this is all most in my District Across the street. We did investigation so i have a empty store front which we dont like in a hotel 23u silty. I have spoken to supervisor kim who didnt object to this. We established this isnt a off sale liquor situation and i am sympathetic to mr. Mick noltys concern but we remember the controversy about Bristol Farms and had more problems in the wall green south of market than we are likely to have hat this location. I look as this a business that is appropriate in this area and i take very seriously the concerns about another Liquor License. I understand from supervisor kims office they made attempt to actually help the applicant find a existing lice ins in the district and not able to do so so there is a attempt to do that. I watched people make earnest efforts to do business and been twarted as t at this stage. Because of for visor kims lack of objection my imication is approve thix or send to the board supervisor campos i think i want to go now because it comes down to me and this committee. I think it is not a clear case from my perspective. I understand what lutenent fal zone z saying and i think that in many respects the argument makes sense. The bottom line for me though and i have said this from the very beginning of my role on this committee when i was chair of the committee that that thofend day to me it all comes down to Community Support for a license and i think that for me that means that there has to be a yes from the community to make smns happen. I am concerned in this case you have a neutral supervisor not saying one way or the other and im concerned so many members of the community have come out. I appreciate there may have been letters subsequent to putting together this package there is no one from the xhunty who is coming here and saying we support this in this hearing. I do worry that in the end this will culminate in one additional license in the neighborhood. For me and i guess what it comes down to to support a license there has to be support from the District Supervisor and community. In this case there is no objection, but no support from the dist rth supervisor or the community for that matter so given where it is i will be inclined to agree with supervisor mar. I think that if there is a opportunity to get another license from within the neighborhood that i think it would be a different matter for me but that is where i am. I would be supporting supervisor mars motion there are no other caunlts, let rr have a roll call on the motion to taiblt camp pose aye. Christensen, no. Mar, aye. We have 2 ayes and supervisor christensen dissenting thank you. Is there any other business before us mr. Evans . We have item number 3 mr. Chair. Please call item 3 ord nnss amending the mintry of code to sfb a Fire Safety Task force to review and make recommendation thooz board of have visors on proposed legislation and improve fire safety in multiunit residential and multiuse use buildsings supervisor campos thank you very much. I want to thank our representatives from the department of building inspection who have stayed here for this very long long meeting. The ordinance before you which is cosponsored by supervisor kim and want to thank her is to create a interagency emergency Fire Task Force that will meet over 3 months to review and develop legislation and other solutions for the purpose of improving fire safety in the city. I would thrike thank president breed for waving the 30 day rule when it comes to the legislation. We need to do everything we can to protect it people or city and county of San Francisco from future fires and we cant stop every fire but i know that we can do a better job and the goal is this task force will play a Critical Role in making that possible. The 7 Member AgencyTask Force Includes representative from the department of building insmeckz rsh the fire department, Public Utility Commission and want to thank the represent thv from the puc who staysed the meeting [inaudible] as well as department of public health. As you know we have seen a disproportioninate number of fires in the mission including the death of 3 people and believe by creating the task force that we will do a much better job. The task forbs will focus on 3 areas, one, review and make recommendation tooz the board of legislation to improve fire safety in multiunit residential buildings and mixed use buildsings including legislation that allows housing inspectors to asite owners when fire alarms are out of date [inaudible] the vecd goal is for the task force to suggest new amendments to the municipal code to improve fire safety regarding prevention emeasures post fire investigation, the process and resolution of complaint with Code Violations and interagency coordination and information sharing. Third we ask the body to make recommend on the feasibility requiring the snaugz of fire alarms and fire spring lers in multiunit buildings. This issue is a particular concern to supervisor kim who haeld hearing on this very important matter. The task force will meet at least once every 2 weeks for the next 3 month and the meet rgzope toon the puck public so anyone who has a interest is welcome to come and any with a particular expertise is invited to present during this time. We appreciate the feedback of the department of building inspection code advisry committee who has been very helpful and especially want to thank a number of individuals that are critical in making this possible who will participate in the tachck force. I would like st. Recognize [inaudible] rustle frathum fire department. Thank you so much captain for your help, your leadership as well as our fire chief [inaudible] white for her continued support. I also want to thank director hewy from department of building inspection who has been very helpful and acknowledge dan lorry, bill stron and here we have romary bosky from the department of build ing inspection mpt i also want to thank director garcia and department of health and [inaudible] from dph and thank [inaudible] kelly of puc. With that i turn it over to romary bosky of department of building inspection who will say a few words on behalf of dbi. Lucky for us and we are grateful will be the person staffing this task force and those of you who know dbi and how the city works know it does want get better than rose mary bosky so we are grateful. With that i want to thank rous heary good afternoon. A principle mission of the department of bilgdsing inspection which over laps with the aerjs identify is insure multiunit residential and multiuse buildings are properly maintained regarding habitability issues related to fire safety. With that in mind dbi is please today participate and provide administrative support to the interagency Fire Safety Task force. We realize 60 percent of the buildings target td by the legislation we are seeing the fires within were built before 1940 and that number riseed to 86 percent for buildings greater than 7 units built before 1970. We va745 to 75 year span between the time those buildings were built and the Fire Protection requirements required then and what is required today of new construction of apartment buildings. With respect to reto active provision if fire provision provided by the San Francisco housing code those provision have not amended or updated since the 1960so it is long over due so these prirements and the other recommendations be reviewed and analyzed in the confecs of this legislation. Dbi looks in conjunction with the other city departments and rr stake holders to submit [inaudible] did have to tep e step away and second me to express dph support sw willingness to participate in the task force great. I think that concludes the presentation and i also want to thank carolyn [inaudible] from my staff who is working diligently on the issue and of course the City Attorneys Office who have really turned this drafting around very quickly to make this happen. Lets open up for Public Comment. Anyone that would like to speak . Seeing none Public Comment is closed. Ill move we approve this with a positive recommendation and send to the full board. Well do that without objection. Thank you everyone for staying late. Mr. Even is there anything else before us no mr. Chair great, thank you. Meeting adjourned