Rebuttal. I know this isnt the Planning Commission thats why my brief has nothing to do with changes it states what is and what is its is the this that was prepared in the application and the building in the application my arguments it through 4 have merit i know youve read them i standoff ready to answer questions technical or otherwise but i think that given the fact that a extension of this process cant happen until after the dr process the issues that i raised this is the only opportunity to do that. Base after this those questions become, you know, history. And well, the defining questions becomes something that is not going to be handled again only in the variance process. To by pitting the cart before the horse what happens nerk that whatever financial convenient for the permit holder putting the cart before the horse here really kind of inindividuals. Or i would say makes for difficult to determine the finding that of specific to the zoning variance process again, i stand to answer any questions you may have thank you. Okay. Thank you now you have 3 minutes maam. Good evening, commissioners. I just want to make this brief its been a long evening thank you your daughter has been very good. Thank you par im the Property Owner and basketball this property last year ive been a resident of San Francisco since 2002 currently im a single mom and my daughter started kindergarten at clarendon so my intent to be a fulltime resident of cosponsor bit hes. And what i saw the property last year, i was enthralled to be able to build my dream home so im not planning to do a live split but planning to build a Second Property on the property and make that a condo it will be modest from 2 thousand to 25 hundred square feet obviously could i live in the 25 hundred square feet home but it has historic sixth as an it didnt work well, for my familys needs it didnt have a garage so i want to talk about the backyard building proposal. Overhead this is a view looking at towards cosponsor bit street you see the mooiftd house on cosponsor bit was blocked by the cypress stre it blocked the gentlemans windows our building thats proposed will not block his south facing views we plan on cutting out a light well, to match his this we have no opposition from the cosponsor bit Heights Association we met with them, etc. And right now, were asking for the permit to go forward were going to plan on working with the neighbors and really respect the overlay design aspect, you know, in going along with the 17 street confronted thats a mixed use neighborhood bus the proposal to be a singlefamily home and the lot is the largest lot in the middle of cosponsor bit and 17 street its the only lot with a backyard that actually could fit a house so thank you. Thank you. Mr. Sanchez anything further. No. Well submit the ordinance it sounds like everyone was preparing for a dr process i havent heard it was in the brief some of the things in terms of the oral testimony not much discussion on the variance i find especially the two elements that would be fairly compelling one the fact there are extraordinary circumstances with that lot and the fact that the by splitting the two this youre able to maintain the open space was a key point to the variance and the other is the fact that the other the rights of the Property Owner are being shared from those of adjacent Property Owners and i think those are the two points that carry me into accepting the variance. I personally generally wouldnt those are special circumstances and as our Zoning Administrator had said earlier it completes the missing tooth open the block i generally dont support those types of variances in general but i believe this at least at this point that makes sense and there will be further discussion through city departments to vet this project. I agree i have nothing further to add. Move to uphold the department and the issuance of the variance on that on the basis that the criteria was appropriate for this particular site. Therefore the Zoning Administrator. Deny the error. Through he forgot his paperwork for a while and im sure it without the possibility of parole happen again. We have a motion from commissioner fong to uphold the grant of the variance on the basis that the Zoning Administrator doesnt error or abuse his discretion and it was met i think thats what you said the criteria was met . Yes. On that motion to uphold the granting commissioner hurtado. Commissioner president lazarus. Commissioner honda thank you. The vote is 4 to zero this variance is upheld thank you. Scompldz theres no further business. Okay. Ill have this paperwork you tomorrow