transit steady which got some initial work underway already. this is a study that will explore moving the ocean view library line to the west side so that it can be more user friendly and more integrated into the land use fronting that area. this is a fantastic opportunity that has come out of the planning proposal and it gives us an opportunity to focus on the west side of the city in a very significant way. i am hopeful this will be an important effort and expect meetings with the community to start in the fall. we are organizing the outreach and technical work now. the study that has been underway for a long time is now reaching its final stages and i wanted to report that we have been coordinating with the city and community's effort to restart the program of developing this site -- this has been really incomplete for some time now. we have been working with the planning department to make sure they are integrated into land use that makes sense for the infrastructure investment. i am expecting at this point that i will bring a final report detailing the proposal to the board and for approval this fall. after the approval by this board, we have been gauged actively with the npa and we are collaborating with sorting out -- we have been in engage actively with the mta and are collaborating with sorting out the alternatives and it planned to conduct extensive outreach to stakeholders when the final analysis are completed. that will happen with the final certification of the document. there is extensive information on our website about this. the central freeway circulation study has issued a draft final report. it's a very interesting study. i expect to bring it for approval in september. of course, it identifies a number of the shortcomings we knew we had to deal with after we put in place the beautiful urban design concept we had. we always knew there was going to be a follow-up on the traffic and circulation issues. and other aspects of this study. we have had a significant amount of activity -- the bridge continues and we've had a significant amount of community input through outreach conducted by the authority's staff in april and we have found support for a future caltrans station and some corresponding concerns and we are working with the department and communities on that. there are some funding issues with keeping the street open because building a bridge there is more expensive but it's the appropriate thing to do. we will have more details for you in september. the other thing that's happening in district 11 is the hunters point mobility study where we have a significant amount of activity. on august 21, the team will present at a meeting from 1:00 until 3:00 that i want to alert the community. this is at 1800's oakdale avenue and people are encouraged to attend. this would really leverage the resources that community already has in place. shared resources to really improve mobility in that area. we have a fairly extensive i am about the program allocations of proposition k. i want to point out that the board appropriated debt total of $118 million in sales tax for transportation and there is also a comparison of the% allocated versus program and in terms of programmatic categories which are not huge projects, for things like traffic signals and so on, we have a 71% ratio and 29% has not come in for allocation. operations and maintenance has claimed everything allocated to it. there are some details in the report about which programs have had the most problems allocating funds. i want to focus on a couple of things that are important to your understanding of how the program works. we have had many originally allocated by action of the board and was not used and wasn't needed anymore. of that money, 1.8 $6 million is the direct result of improvements that have been made -- $1.86 million is the direct results of the improvements that have been made. this is a significant milestone because back in 2003 when the program was approved, there was a sense that double the amount of money would be needed that here we are receiving money back. this is a $20 million program. this is good news and there is another thing worth mentioning -- about $3.3 million from the completed presidio-19th avenue project. a very significant thing that came from taking advantage of the climate that allowed us to get the job done cheaper. we always talk about cost overruns so when we can talk about how things can happen cheaper, i don't want to miss the chance to highlight it. our commercial paper program, we have been dealing with replacing the facility, the german bank underwriting our commercial paper. we have had some changes in the amount of subsidy the german government is providing all of which resulted in a much more extensive facility. we negotiated and got wells fargo to take that. as a result, we're saving almost $1 million a year. we have more than 10 institutions ready to buy our paper and this has been a good turn for the commercial paper program and i want to thank our deputy director for leading this effort. this is a very good outcome for us. that concludes my report. i'm happy to answer questions about anything in it. supervisor campos: commissioners, any questions for our executive director? seeing none, why don't we open up to public comment? anyone who like to speak on the executive director's report, please come forward. >> i have a number of issues. first and foremost, as i have requested before, the san francisco county transportation authority, we the people of san francisco would like to know how the present legislation in washington d.c. favors us or does not favor s. this is often times about a number of projects and we want to see how many of these projects to the republicans are democrats favor a sore adversely impact us? to come here and generally speak about something and say to save time or whatever -- we want to know because we pay a certain people to do their jobs and we want to know whether our representatives, highest level representatives really do us a favor or disfavor when it comes to transportation projects. this on van ness, we have been discussing the california pacific medical center. right now, it is rife with politics, corrupt politics. we had a counsel from the center come here to this podium and tell our legislative members, are so-called representatives that they were not privy to certain financial documents and reports, and helping them. we want to know what's going on with that hospital and what's going to happen nothing much is happening. nothing much is happening because of funding. you have a developer -- don't waste your money -- spend it on traffic lights on san bruno. don't waste your money on an eir that's not going to go anywhere and don't make statements if you don't know who's going to be the developer. as to that community meetings that you want more information about hunters point, time is running out so i will stop here. supervisor campos: next speaker, please. >> good morning, commissioners. i'm a member of the citizens advisory committee for the transportation authority. regarding one item the executive director brought up, the item about 19th avenue, this item was brought before our committee a couple of months ago. i voiced concerns there and i will share those concerns with you. first of all, as far as relocating into the middle of 19th avenue, i -- it seems ludicrous because as it is, when you have to take the 28 bus line going northbound, you have to cross 19th avenue and there is a light there. if they want to realign it into the street, and of doing that, build a bus bridge over the 19th avenue so that people with walkers and canes and wheelchair's can go over 19th avenue safely. realigning to the center will just cause more traffic and problems. thank you very much. supervisor campos: thank you. next speaker please. >> i would like to address the report we just heard. i noticed the report basically talks about fact we are getting all of this revenue from all of these different areas and supposedly we are seeing an increase in the quality of our public transportation system. all of these organizations have been grouped into one organization and it sucks all the finances of -- out of all of these previously separate organizations and it disappears into a black hole and then we have nothing to show for it. my response to the report is you can basically jump up here and say what you want because you have taken the public for such a ride over the past few years that we don't know what you are doing with our money. that has become so blatantly apparent that it has come to my attention and many people in this city, where is the money going? who is responsible? who is reporting it? i see a huge black hole in finances and all of these different projects and you have certain areas that are completely allowed to fall into disrepair and other projects that are allowed to streamline. it's a classic example of legislative abuse. thank you. supervisor campos: is there any other member of the public would like to speak? seeing none, public comment is closed. i would like to bank our executive director for his presentation in posting his report online. could you please call item no. 5 quest for >> authorize the executive director to execute a memorandum of agreement with the treasure island development authority to implement the treasure island transportation program and authorize the terms and conditions. supervisor campos: this is an item that came before the finance committee. any comments or questions or presentations from staff? why don't we open it up to public comment? is there any member of the public would like to speak on item number five? seeing none, public comment is closed. we can take a roll call on item five. >> [roll-call] the item passes. >> the item is approved. could we please call item no. 6? >> approve the fiscal year 2012-2013 transportation fund for the clean air program of projects and authorize the executive director to execute a contract to the bay area quality management district. supervisor campos: this is an item that came before the committee which is chaired by commissioner avalos. why don't we open it up to public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. can we take this same house, same call. the item passes item number seven. >> allocate $1.3 million in proposition k funds and amend the relevance by-your prioritization programs. supervisor campos: is there any member of the public to it like to speak on item number seven? seeing none, public comment is closed. can we take this same house, same call. the item passes. item #8. >> allocate $19 billion in funds to the san francisco means of transportation agency for the central subway tunnel construction. supervisor campos: is there any member of the public to it like to speak on item number eight? i think we have one member of the public. >> a good morning, again, commissioners. i'm on the citizens' advisory committee. on the third street light rail, i'm on the citizens' advisory group representing the transportation authority and when this item was brought before our committee, i voted to have this move forward. i did the same thing last week at the plans and programs committee. i have been working on this since the very beginning. i vote -- i would like to have to approve this item. supervisor campos: thank you for your good work. is there any member of the public to it like to speak on this? seeing none, public comment is closed. can we take this same house, same call. the item passes. item #9. >> allocate $210,000 with conditions to the san francisco and sensible transportation agency. supervisor campos: is there any member of the public to like to speak on this item? supervisor campos: can we take this same house, same call. the item passes. item number 10. >> approve the prop delay strategic plan policy and priority criteria. this is an action item. supervisor campos: any member of the public to like to speak on this item, please come for. >> good morning, again commissioners. i was on the committee that helped put this proposition on the ballot and get past. i worked for weeks on this and i urge the committee to pass it and i urge the rest of the to do the same thing today. thank you. supervisor campos: thank you for your comments and your work. is there any member of the public would like to speak? seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues, can we take this same house, same call. the item passes. can you call item no. 11? >> the introduction of new items. supervisor campos: colleagues, any new items to be introduced? is there any member of the public who wishes to speak on this item? if so, please come forward. >> last week at the plans and programs committee and the introduction of new items, in a few coming months, you will be hearing about the geary rapid transit project. what i want you to remember is proposition b had to packages on it. since you will be recessing -- you will be off until september, i suggest what all of you do, like i told you last month, read a three documents. read the final report of the geary transit task force which was published back in 1999. also the final report published back in 1995 of the work that has been done on the geary light rail project. with the central subway going forward, there's a stop at union square and there is a spur at union square for geary light rail. this is what the people voted for back in 1989. also, if you have a chance coming to the short range transit plan. the only way to alleviate traffic congestion is a light rail system, not a bus rapid transit. if you get the bus rapid transit going of ford, you're never going to get the money for a light rail. what the people have been wanting for over 50 years. thank you very much. supervisor campos: thank you very much. any other member of the public like to speak on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed. can we call item no. 12? >> item 12, public comment. this is -- supervisor campos: this is for any member of the public wishes to comment. seeing none, public comment is closed. seeing none, public comment is closed. -- we will be going into legislative recess until september 25 and we will have a finance committee meeting on september 11 and a plans and programs meeting on september 18. madame clerk, can you please call item no. 13? supervisor campos>> item number supervisor campos: we are adjourned. >> there are kids and families ever were. it is really an extraordinary playground. it has got a little something for everyone. it is aesthetically billion. it is completely accessible. you can see how excited people are for this playground. it is very special. >> on opening day in the brand- new helen diller playground at north park, children can be seen swinging, gliding, swinging, exploring, digging, hanging, jumping, and even making drumming sounds. this major renovation was possible with the generous donation of more than $1.5 million from the mercer fund in honor of san francisco bay area philanthropist helen diller. together with the clean and safe neighborhood parks fund and the city's general fund. >> 4. 3. 2. 1. [applause] >> the playground is broken into three general areas. one for the preschool set, another for older children, and a sand area designed for kids of all ages. unlike the old playground, the new one is accessible to people with disabilities. this brand-new playground has several unique and exciting features. two slides, including one 45- foot super slide with an elevation change of nearly 30 feet. climbing ropes and walls, including one made of granite. 88 suspension bridge. recycling, traditional swing, plus a therapeutics win for children with disabilities, and even a sand garden with chines and drums. >> it is a visionary $3.5 million world class playground in the heart of san francisco. this is just