Illegal settlements, but as far as International Concerns go, irans proposal is a just and practical solution for peace. If the International Community applies resolve rather than issue resolutions, it can hold israel to a referendum. Hello and welcome, youre watching iran today. In this episode well be diagnosing conflict resolution, iranian style. But why should the Islamic Republic of iran be so concerned about the palestinian issue . In other words, what is the significance of palestine for iran in the first place . Dominate the region, disrupt regional relations and render the area un safe and unstable. Undoubtedly, from this perspective, the Islamic Republic of iran has an islamic viewpoint on the palestinian issue, and his other perspective, is a humane perspective. In my opinion, the Islamic Republic of iran pays more attention to the islamic viewpoint on palestine. Ultimately, there was a nation called palestine and palestinians live there. There are documents from israeli authorities that indicate palestinian origins and is evident and documented that a land named palestine existed, not israel. Israel is fabricated name, but the palestinian issue can also be significant for tehran from yet another point of view. Mr. Mehdi shakibai, the director of media cultural center, told us. He is also member of the international in the region, initiated by the victorious powers of world war ii, with the aim of exploding and plundering the regions wealth holds significance for the Islamic Republic of iran. Fundamentally, the philosophy behind of a the regimes establishment is to confront any country opposing the interests of america in the region, proposing the interest of the colonial powers victorious in world war ii, hence from national perspective, the Israeli Regime could pose a threat to irans national security, thus the issue of palestine can be viewed from this angle as well. With this resolution or referendum, the decadesl occupation of palestine may end, but it will happen in a civilized fashion for both sides. It will bring peace to the region, and it may not be the worst thing for jews, because in determining their destiny, palestinians may vote for Israeli Settlers to stay in a reassembled palestine. This is dr. Majid abbasi, the dean of the law and Political Science faculty at all. راهکاری که مقام معظم رهبری در دیدار با دانشجویان فرمودند. All Palestinian Refugees who left palestine after 1948 have the right to return to the occupied lands, have the right to vote and formed the future government in palestine. You know that since the regimes establishment, the israelis have imposed several major wars on the region in 1948, in 1956, 1967 and 1973. These are four major wars imposed on the region and the regime still continues with its warmongering. The solution refers. To by the leadership is not about eliminating israel or jews, the Islamic Republic of iran has no issue with jews, but it has a problem with zionists who are invaders, occupiers and have deprived the Palestinian People of their right to determine their own destiny. They kill women, children and noncombatants in palestine. The leaders proposal is based on democracy. Western countries claim that democracy is essential for them, and in democracy its said that every individual has the right to vote. Accord. To this proposal, both palestinians and jews present in the occupied territories can participate in a referendum, they can vote, and naturally the future government, whatever it might be, will be the legitimate government of palestine, and this is the best outcome that could happen. Now, what is the referendum all about . Its exactly that, a referendum or democratic vote to uphold palestinian undeniable right to selfdetermination by the original. Inhabitants of palestine before 1948 when israel was created. It has nothing to do with throwing jews into the sea or setting half of palestine on fire. That sort of method was applied by nazi ashkannazi europeans and threatened by arabs who saw their brothers being thrown out of their homes by nominal jews pouring in from europe. Mr. Musaddiq pour told us antisemitic words attributed to iran are nothing but distorted remarks with hidden. Contrary to the misleading perception, the leaders statements harbor distinct connotations as articulated in their recent address, however intentional or inadvertant misconstructions persist both within and outside iran, amplified by opposition factions and even within thesignist sphere. This escued interpretation perpetrates narrative of existential threat positioning iran as the agent of destruction. This narrative propagated intentionally or otherwise fasters calls for increased armment of israel justified as an صحبت می کنن به دروغ میگن که ایران میگه که بایستی یهودی ها رو یا سهیونیستا رو به دریا بریزن نه این حرفو دیگران یه وقتایی قبل ها کسایی از عرب ها گفتن ما هیچ وقت نگفتیم اینو ما کسی رو به دریا نمی رسیم ما میگیم نظر مردم نظر اون دولتی که با آراه مردم فلسطین تشکیل شد تصمیم گیری خواهد کرد. The process of Holding Referendum was outlined in five points before irans leader of the revolution, Ayatollah Khamenei pressed on with its importance. The first point is that all original palestinians, be they muslim, christian or jewish are entitled to participating in the referendum. Dr. Believes irans referendum proposal is one of the best, although the west doesnt take it seriously. The Islamic Republic of iran ardently advocates for resolution to the ongoing predicament. While iran has developed a robusted strategy and solution, regrettably other stakeholders, particularly western powers seem devoid of a clear strategy. Instead, they resort to accusation. And fail to uphold the resolutions they themselves indorse. This behavior signals a deliberate attempt to valify the Islamic Republic of iran. Irans proposed solution stands as one of the most progressive and plans aligning rigorously with international standards, both in its political design and practical application. Nevertheless, iran faces basess accusations of fostering insecurity coupled with efforts to bolster the zionist regimes control over the entire populace in this region. Such actions is startly contradict the foundational principles of democracy and equiity. The second point in the process of the referendum is that representatives of the Palestinian People, be the. Muslim, christian or jewish will themselves hold a management role in all planning stages and in executing the plan. The third point is to facilitate participation by all palestinians in the referendum, especially displaced palestinians, a worldwide project will have to be implemented. That would be identifying, conducting a consensus on and registrating the identity of all palestinian citizens in palestine and elsewhere. An International Organization will be responsible for implementing this project in the presence of palestinian representatives. The fourth point is an International Committee will be put together under supervision of and in collaboration with the United Nations, with palestinian representatives present. Its purpose would be to execute the set plan and to focus on fundamental palestinian historic matters, rulership, sovereignty and of course. And finally, the fifth point in the process of holding a referendum is that an International Fund will be created with help from members of the International Community under supervision of the said committee to support and see the plan through. The Israeli Regime does make point of saying iran wants to wipe israel off the map. What better way to feed iranophobia . Occasionally hurt such remarks inside the country that is however not. Runs official line. The countrys Foreign Policy is determined and announced by the leader, then the president , Foreign Ministry and Supreme NationalSecurity Council. The Islamic Republic of iran supports palestinians to realize the right to freedom and independence and selfdetermination and choice governmental system. Freedom and independence were models moving forward irans own revolution of 1979. Another issue is human rights, which from the universal declaration of human rights to other human rights conventions, are matters written by western countries themselves and have nothing to do with the Islamic Republic of iran. According to these principles concerning human rights, one of the rights that nations have is the right to determine their destiny. Well, the Palestinian People who have lived in this land for millenia have the right to decide their fate and their future. The person who said jews. Occupying palestine would be thrown into the sea, was Jamal Abdul Nasir, the first president of the republic of egypt. Saddam hussein decades later said half of palestine would be set of blaze, referring to jewish occupied parts obviously. It was during nasas time that the sixth day war of 1967 between israel and an arab league of egypt, syria, jordan and iraq happened. Israel unexpectedly preempted the attack beginning with the destruction of egypts air force on june 5th. Not only was occupied land freed by the arab alliance, but Israel Occupied yet more. That would be a part of egypt, jordan and syria. Let us make it clear from the beginning, the us veto at the unsc for immediate cease fire makes it complicit in the carnage in gaza. As bombs continue to rain down on Palestinian Civilians and cause widespread destruction, the us has once again used its power to block any attempt by the United NationsSecurity Council to demand a cease fire in gaza. By vetoing this resolution, the us stands alone in casting its vote against humanity. Once again, the nsc has failed by refusing to genuinely commit to serious negotiations and by allowing a war mongering empire to stop any efforts at relieving the palestinians from more suffering. The crisis in gaza will. Get worse and runs the risk of extending, us veto cefire this week on the media stream. Theres plenty more to be said, but first a quick media review to give other outlets a chance to get a word in. Hello everyone and welcome back to news exops from all across the world. Is irans viewpoint does not involve throwing jews into the sea, shafan writes, the leader of the Islamic Revolution ali khamenei, affirmed irans belief. In the necessity of conducting a referendum in palestine to gauge the peoples opinion, emphasizing that irans perspective does not entil throwing jews into the sea. Moving on, finding the way out of the israel palestine crisis, why a referendum might be the only solution to the problem. Terron times wise, it seems that at this point, with the absolute rist god of israeli officials towards human lives, a referendum might be the only path towards a mutually agreeable future for the muslims, christians and jews the region. Iran has clear stance on palestine president raisi says, the iranian president say ibrahim raisi has highlighted the fact that the Islamic Republic of iran has a clear stance on the issue of palestine while stressing that the zionist regime is an occupier. Irnar rais, the iranian president , ibrahim raisi said iran believes that the strategic and democratic way out of the Palestinian Conflict would be one that respects the ideas of all palestinians including muslims, christians and jews. Now hamas operation of ended us political agenda in region, leader says, quoting from the leader of the Islamic Revolution, may news wice, the historic event of alexa storm is against the zionist regime, but its aimed at the american ization, this incident literally managed to disrupt the table of american policies in the region and got riling, if this storm continues, it will wipe up the whole table. Thats it for me, thank you so much for being with us and see you later. Irans leader actually stressed the importance of a referendum on february 5th, 2020 in addressing various groups. Well, that was over half a century later than nas. But he did it. Praised the brave resistance of palestinians and their Freedom Fighters against bullying and occupation, but his and irans proposed method and means ending the Israeli Occupation is the referendum, which was registered by the un in irans name. Its one of the better solutions. In advocating for solution, the Islamic Republic of iran proposes a comprehensive international that enables widerspread participation elucidating the collective desires and preferences of the consent populist. Regretably israel stounchly opposes this proposition. Despite the displacement of approximately 70 of the regional Palestinian Community from the Ancestral Lands a substantial majority still resides within the region. If a referendum were to transpire, the current demographic composition with nearly 7. 3 million palestinians compared to approximately 6. 6 million jews indicates a likely outcome favoring the palestinian coast. Irans proposal alliance with democratic principles and the global discourse on the importance of respecting public opinion, notably any insinuations or rhetoric hinting at violence against jews including notions of drowning them remain utterly divorced from the Islamic Republic of irans estance, while historical figures such as the late Jamal Abdul Nasir of egypt may have employed. Such language in the past, its crucial to underscore that Islamic Republic of iran has never spouseed any declarations advocating for the subjugation of sues at sea otherwise. Heres americas solution proposed during the trump era by former us president trumps advisor and soninlaw jared kushner, himself, jewish. The deal of the century was named, but acted more as deal breaker. It was clearly a zinus plan sugar coated. As american, which at best put other arab leaders in charge of palestinian interests. If the socalled deal the century had worked, hamas would not have felt pressed into attempting alaqsa flood operation. That was series of coordinated armed attacks led by hamas from the gaza strip into the gaza envelope of neighboring now Israeli Occupied territory. Various perspectives. Attempt to address the crocs of the issue surrounding the palestinian crisis and its imperative resolution. Irans proposal advocates for a referendum seeking a comprehensive approach. Alternatively, proponents of the two state theory advocate israels withdraval from the west bank, gaza street and jerusalem. However, certain stances, including that of Trumps Administration appear to sideline the urgency of resolving this crisis, prioritizing other concerns. They argue that bolstering relations with israel and. App states and recognizing israel as legitimate regional entity could potentially mitigate instability, yet assessing the efficacy of this proposition demands to scrutiny, has the zionist. Regime brought about height and diminished security in the region following the Abraham Accords and associated agrements. This inquiry bears significance considering israels continued siege and gaza, a flagrant violation of International Norms that warents condemnation. Severe suppression persists along the west bank coast marked by the tragic toll of the tufan alexa, resulting in over 300 fatalities and more than a thousand injuries accompanied by widerspread destruction of homes. Such gream realities underscore the fallacy in a certain. That diplomatic ties between israel and select arab nations are all the pathway to regional peace. Irans solution to 70 plus years of conflict, perhaps the longest conflict the un has had its plate is steadfast and simple. Palestine belongs to the palestinians as it has been documented in history and antiguity. Therefore, the destiny of palestine must be decided by the palestinians. In the democratic world of today, that is the only way. In fact, a referendum can put the west to the test to see how true it is to its democratic values. The proposed referendum would be based on the principle of selfdetermination, basic birth right for people to decide their own political, economic and social system in gaining International Status for themselves. Selfdetermination is a principle recognized by International Law to be upheld by governments, whereas as it has not been upheled in regard to palestinians, neither when the existence of israeli rule over occupied palestinian territory was first announced, nor since. United nations General Assembly resolution 194 was adopted near the end of the 1947 till 1949 palestine war, during which time jewish immigrants to palestine took over. The territory was known as the start of the war as british ruled mandatory. Palestine, the war or this central component of the nakba ended in the state of israel being established by the jews in may 1948. The creation of israel was conveniently declared on the last day of the british mandate. During the set war around 700,00 palestinian arabs were displaced. That was 85 of the total palestinian arab population. Currently discourse swirls around three prominent blueprints concerning the palestinian issue the Islamic Republic of irans proposal, the United Nations endorse two state solution backed by american and european support and trumps initiative. Notably trumps plan, although without any international backing, presents a stark departure from established un resolutions, marking it as a unilateral endeavor focused on disrupting the palestinian landscape. And wider regional dynamics and resolution 194 defined principles for reaching a final settlement and returning Palestinian Refugees to their homes. Article 11 of the resolution resolves that refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbors should be permitted to do so at the earliest Practicable Date and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property, which under principles of International Law or equity, should be made good by the governments or authorities responsible. The resolution also calls for the establishment of the United NationsConciliation Commission to facilitate peace between israel and arab states continuing the efforts of un mediator falk bernadad following his assassination. Well, that hasnt gone too well. In fact, given israel never. Stop taking from palestinians, it would hardly want to compensate them properly for whats lost. No surprise, as it is an occupying force. Zianost jews crept up as early as the mid1900s and now as israel, they continue their occupation, guns ablazing. Irans proposed referendum stresses how it is first opposed to occupation, racism, war and insecurity. Second, its main angle is the participation and opinion of the people of palestine, third, it is based on the legal principle of selfdetermination, and fourth, it is realistic and practicable. To the Islamic Republic of iran, palestine is not a tactical matter, rather it is ideological and humanitarian, yard stick of commitment to humane principles or opposition to them. Palestine is in fact the embodiment of the pain commonly. Suffered from cruelty, transgression and colonialism. Thats all for today. Thank you for watching from the whole team. Please do tune in, same times next week. Each week after. Dont forget to leave us your comments and topic requests. You can also follow us on facebook, instagram and twitter via at eran today show. Till next time, take care. Dozens of palestinians are killed in the latest israeli air strikes in gaza, the total tolneurs. 18,800. Another ship reportedly comes under attack near yemen where armed forces have pledged operations against israelbound vessels in response to the gaza onslaught. Also in our headlines, more protests are held nationwide to call for a cease fire in gaza and end the israeli bloodshed