Pink lipstick and there were howls in this room. I thought you look like a 1950 superstar. Look at the time. My goodness. Happy International Womens day. To my favorite woman on msnbc. Wow, she did not say it right back to me. I like nobody in my life better than stephanie ruhle, not just here on msnbc. It is 11 00 a. M. Out west and 2 00 p. M. In the east. Remember this. Drain the swamp. Drain the swamp. Drain the swamp. Drain the swamp. And what is the president always saying about our Election Security . When i look at what happened as you know it was just a case where they found a million fraudulent votes. There are a lot of people, a lot of people my opinion and based on proof that trying to get in illegally and actually vote ill legally. We have so many people voted illegally, it is a disgrace. The president or his fellow republicans debate or consider any plan to drain the swamp and strengthen our election. The republicans passed a landmark bill, hr 1. The bill would enact a number of dramatic reforms designed to increase participation in the democratic process and reducing corruption on capitol hill, everything from making it easier to vote and slowing the revol revolving door between congress and lobbying firm. Sweeping reform is designed to make politics work for everyone. Yes, it is a democrats plan but the president ran and won a campaign to drain the swamp. You would think they would find some redeeming qualities in the spill. Something they could discuss debate, barter, pareapparently. Why is the Green New Deal getting in the senate when h. R. 1 is not . Because i get to decide what we vote on. Brings us to todays big question, when did Ethics Reform becomes a partisan issue . Joining me, garret haake and our msnbc contributor, e. J. Dionne and the Civil Rights Division at the doj, miss gupta. Garret, first off, whats in this bill . How much time do we have katy . This is a comprehensive Election Integrity and ethics bill that democrats have been putting together for some time. There are a million different pieces of this. Some of the big headlines include making election day a federal holiday and requiring tax return disclosures for president ial and Vice President ial candidates. Voter registration done through the dmv and make it compulsive. There is measures including the value of grass roots donations, limiting the strengths of big donations to our election process. This is a complete over haul of how we find our system. Why were republicans oppose to it and why wont it be brought up in the senate . Mitch mcconnell does not want it to be. Mitch mcconnell has been and hell not dispute the sentence, the most aggressive foe of Campaign Finance reform in the United States government during his career. He was the plaintiff against mccain feingold. This is an issue that created his political career. He has always been in the front line fighting against any changes. If you want to give 50,000 to the candidate of your choice, that ought to be your right because it is your 50,000, it is your voice. Republicans dont like some of the changes in this bill that would increase the strength of small donors and dont like some of the changes of this. House super pact candace close their donors or how much soupup pac pacs can do. As you said this will die a very quick death in the senate. Why is Mitch Mcconnell against voting against International Voting day. This bill is bundle up in so many different pieces with it. Mcconnell dismissed it out right. He did say there is one piece of election changes in this. It is not in many bill thats interesting. The issue of ballot harvesting. This is the issue that cost. He said if that had been in this bill, thats something he can discuss. It is not that all changes are off the table, all of these changes are off. For democrats this was such a huge priority, thats why they got the h. R. 1 designation. It was not just ballot harvesting in north carolincaro. It was the allegation also that those ballots were filled in, the blank ballots were filled in down the line for the republicans and then sentence. It was a number of things. There is two big buckets for this bill, there is the voting right component of this bill and the corruption component of this bill. Lets stick on voting for a second. This bill aims to make it easier for people to vote. Fundamentally, i think a lot of people would say listen, i like for it to be easier to vote and national holiday, i can take off work and go vote or know that i am going to be automatically registered in my stay, i dont have to go out and make an effort to register. Why is there such push back in congress on this idea, making it easer for all americans to get to the ballot box. We have dismal turn out in our elections. We have to reckon with the fact that our nation has had a long history around fighting for the right to vote. We are a couple of days after celebrating and commemorating the events, you had congressman john lewis giving us an impassion voting speech of h. R. 1. It was 50 plus years ago he was brutally beaten in selma. We have this long history contested access to the vote. This is not something thats historic that we can remember in black and white photos. We know that there is active voters suppression and there are people in this country and senator mcconnell did talk about National Election day and say it was a Democratic Party power grab. He and others feel very much that increasing and expanding the franchise somehow is a threat to their power base and instead it is based on really fundamentally a slunk electorate power base. H. R. 1 opens the franchise. There should be no member of congress that understands the rule of accountability and ethics in our government as being so crucial for the government to have legitimacy among voters who should feel threaten by this bill. Thats where we are. There is no reason why the senate should not have a hearing on the bill. They are refusing to have a hearing and to hold it. We saw voters in november come out to the ballot box, voting across the country voting for democracy reform. We ended up with the most record. I thought it is most symbolic on International Womens day today. To me this says a lot of weaponization of Voting Rights. It is an american issue. It is an issue about freeing up our democracy. There is a ton of support around the country for it. Thats why we need to see h. R. 1 become law. Why would more voting be a Democratic Power grab . Why would say making voting a national holiday, why would that be a Democratic Power grab, e. J. . Republicans tend to get more support from older voters and affluent voters. They tend to vote in larger numbers and a lot of them have more flexibility in their schedules. Democrats tend to do better. Younger voters with lower income and minority voters. I think back in the day where republicans used to be major supporters of Voting Rights, we would not have gotten a Voting Rights act without republicans. They have switched sides on this because they see where their support comes from. What you said at the out set was so important which is donald trump talked a lot about draining the swamp. But, in fact washington seems to have gotten swampier, the last couple of years. I think this bill responds to general threats to democracy both from Voter Suppression and gerrymandering but also from fears of corruption and the dominate of money in politics so thats why they put it all together in one bill. When you ask regular americans about how they feel about washington, a lot of people will tell you that they feel washington is corrupt. It is corrupt because there is so much money involved. Part of that because you cant track whos donating to whom. If it comes from the super pac, you can tell who donates to that super pac. They donate to super pacs. It is called dark money. This idea of making dark money more transparent of saying who exactly, where exactly is this money coming from, garret, i was on the hill the other day. We were asking a number of lawmakers whether theyll support Something Like the disclose act or make it so that dark money needed to be more transparent and there were a number of republican senators who were totally behind it. Lindsey graham was one of them. Why was this portion of the bill not being considered and if it is not, are there another bill thats out there that republicans would want to get behind. Theyre supposed to be anticorruption and the president ran on it. It is interesting katy, there is something coming to washington that change people spifs perspective on this. It is much easier to raise money for reelection than getting elected. You have access and donations. Once you are here, there are sources of money that are available to you that are not available to you. So you see politicians coming up here all the time talking about draining the swamp and the swamp starts to look appealing after a while. Yes. The specifics of whats in this bill because it is all packaged together, you are not going to see individual elements like the disclose act broken out of this and brought to the floor. Again, there is this sort of hypocrisy of incumbency that comes with this. Once you got here on the rules as they existed, you are not going to be the first people to the front line to change those rules. Thats why it is so important that you did have this young new diverse class freshmen and the democratic control house in particular who ran on this reform and got this passed in the house. Nbc garret haake and e. E. J. Dionne. Miss gupta. Congressman, thank you for being here. Whats the point of bringing it up if it it does not have a chance to see it live another day, katie hill. This is what happens when democrats are in power that enables us to ensure regular people have a voice and we are able to get big money out of politics and ensure the power is going to the people rather than big corporations and special interests. We have to hold the senate speed to the fire, every republican in the house their feet to the fire. It is their president who started this phrase of drain the swamp he was run on the phrase of draining the swamp. We had so many people voted for him because of that idea. I believer our political system was broken and for far too long, too many politicians were accountable of those special interests. That led us to this place where we are now where democracy are undermined at so many different levels. This is an important package for us to show the time is changing. We are standing up for whats right and ensure real regular people have a voice. The only way that it happens that we have politicians who are brave enough to say this is going to make my job harder and this means i have to go and talk to voters and i cant get tens of thousands of dollars from big donors or corporations. We cant stand for this. You see republicans control senate afraid to give people the right to vote, afraid to expand the electric shows it should be really telling to us. Any time you are suppressing the vote that means you are trying to hold onto your power and take it away from other people. Is this an effort more than anything else because it was not going to go anywhere in the senate, was this an effort to get the message out to voters for the 2020 election where democrats stand and not just for the presidency but down the ballot . To be honest with you, i was hoping it would not be a Party Line Vote and as controversial as it was. I thought running on this issue it was not a bipartisan issue. A lot of my voters who were republicans and especially independent were supportive of the idea. So i am shocked that the message worked buy the republicans and it shows you how powerful those special interests are and how much they control the pursestrings of the Republican Party right now because they did not want a single reform to pass. In the broader public, this is not partisan. In the halls of congress, it is and that should tell us a lot. Speaking of another vote that could potentially be a Party Line Vote. The mueller resolution, do you expect thatll be democrats voting for that or do you expect there will be republican support . I think there is a chance that we may get a few republicans, i hope that we do again. This is something that should not be partisan. We should want transparency and the American People to make sure they have the information that they need thats about the highest level of government and whos in charge and how we can trust the people we elected on important institutions that each of us depend on in our daytoday life. We are seeing of this tendency to protect the president , there is so much control and power ex hearthed exerted at the top. Until that starts to change then it is going to be really, really hard to pull them off. We may pass the resolutio Resolution Resolution resolution again, i dont know whats going to happen with it. If we were elected and got control in congress and put a check and balance on this president. I think if we pass this resolution, probably wont gos anywhere in the senate because as Mitch Mcconnell says so smugly that he decides what comes to the floor then we have to use whatever other means we have to make sure the American People get the information that comes from that report. Congresswoman katie hill. Thank you very much. Thank you, katy. Coming up, Paul Manafort, has incredible luck or our Justice System is incredibly flawed. Another director bites the dust at the white house. I know what it means to have reliable support. I found a company who believes in me. They look out for me. And they help me grow my career. At comcast its my job to constantly monitor our network, prevent problems, and to help provide the most Reliable Service possible. My name is tanya, i work at the Network Operations center for comcast. Were working to make things simple, easy and awesome. Spin the wheel again, just nine months assuming the role of White House Communications director, bill shine, has resigned. Shine wont be gone entirely. Hes going to begin to work in trumps 2020 reelection campaign. His exit comes just days after an exclusive new yorker magazine story exposed the very deep ties between fox news and the Trump Administration. Joining me, msnbc chief, halie jackson and our Associated Press reporter, jonathan lemire. How did this go out . I dont know, slowly and suddenly is the way to answer the question. Bill shine went to the trip to vietnam that the president went on. The president kind of got tired of shine. There was a sense that he was going to do more to shake up the white houses Communications Team which he led at the time. As of today, he no longer does. There would be more shine could do. The one that the president cares about the most. There is nothing he focuses on so much as his image when it relates on how hes portrayed on television or the media. This thing just came to an end here, to a close. It does not seem like there is a ton of bad blood and shine is moving on to be a Senior Adviser to the campaign would reflect it. He lasted 22 scarramuccis, eight months. The president , i read that he was excited for shine because shine promised he would get better coverage, better news and the fox who certainly got good news. Coverage did not change anywhere else. You are not going to suddenly give favorable coverage to the president. Are his expectations out of whack . Yes, it is a nowin job. I made it first, thank you. Okay. So basically, yes, this is a tough position which is nothing more than the president cares about than his media coverage. He fantasize himself his own communications director. This job is a revolving door. We had jason miller to doug keith and scarramucci and hope hicks and now bill shine. Shine came in with more expectations because he does have ten years at fox news and the president very fond of that coverage and that network and believed that shine is going to come in and change how this white house is perceived in a non fox media as well. That did not take place. Certainly some of that is of course as you skrus sajust said house reporters are going to cover whats happening. There are things that a director can do, to shape coverage or this way or that way. There was a sense that shine was not doing that. He also was to commit after over haul press shop. He did not bring in new hires that can help him. How much did the new yorker article contributed to this. The article does talk about bill shine and the connections he had before he went into the white house and what he was supposed to do there and there is a lot of connection between him and sean hannity. Did the exposing of that which we all knew to a degree, did that contribute to shines disaster . The report is out now, my sense it is in the works prior of the publication of that article. But, it certainly shows a bright light on the relationship between fox news and the white house and it was no, maam complementary towards shine and highlighted the expectations as he came into the door that the president felt that he did not fulfill. It was not just one moment but over the last six weeks or two mo months or so. This guy is not doing what i wanted him to do. The campaign represents a soft plain income. Will mulvaney become the acting director as well . Thats donald trump and thats never going to change as long as hes in the west wing. What you will see return to what we saw, remember back when sean spicer acted as the communication director, Kellyanne Conway is not directly involved in coms but shes often on television. I imagine thats something you will see in the interim until they hire somebody. Donald trump is his best messenger. Halie jackson and jonathan lemire. What separates Paul Manafort from everyone else, well tell you after this. Walk it off look. One more mile look. Reply all look. Own your look with fewer lines. Theres only one botox® cosmetic. Its the only one fda approved to temporarily make frown lines, crows feet and forehead lines look better. The effects of botox® cosmetic may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. Alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness may be a sign of a lifethreatening condition. Do not receive botox® cosmetic if you have a skin infection. Side effects may include allergic reactions, injection site pain, headache, eyebrow, eyelid drooping and eyelid swelling. Tell your doctor about your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, and medications including botulinum toxins as these may increase the risk of serious side effects. So, give that just saw a puppy look and whatever that look is. Look like you with fewer lines. Own your look with the one and only botox® cosmetic. With expedia, i saved when i added a hotel to our flight. So even when she grows up, shell never outgrow the memory of our adventure. Unlock savings when you add select hotels to your existing trip. Only with expedia. Select hotels to your existing trip. Itreat them all as if, they are hot and energized. Stay away from any downed wire, call 911 and call pg e right after so we can both respond out and keep the public safe. Ed gets copays as lowlily go to as zero dollars on Medicare Part d prescriptions. Ed gets labels clear as day. And, lily. Lily gets anything she wants. Ed knows he could just have us deliver his prescriptions. But whats the fun in that . Switch to cvs pharmacy. Pg e wants you to plan ahead by mapping out escape routes and preparing a go kit, in case you need to get out quickly. For more information on how to be prepared and keep your family safe, visit pge. Com safety. He spent two of those brutal years in consfinement. He committed suicide two years later. This is crystal mason, she was a felon when she voted in the 2016 president ial election. She was unaware it was illegal for her to cast a ballot. She got five years in prison. This is davis, sentenced to five years of prison for stealing a pair of sneakers. He was charged as an adult even though he was 15 years old when he committed the crime. Davis had no prior criminal record. This is chairman Paul Manafort, he walked into a virginia courtroom yesterday facing the possibility of a 19 to 24 years prison sentence for a number of financial crimes. He was sentenced to 47 months about four years but a judge who says he lived a quote, otherwise, blameless life. Former federal prosecutor ken white called the decision the kind of departure defense lawyers dream of. It is the kind of departure thats far likely to be enjoyed by the person who commits crimes with banks and wires than drugs or guns. Joining me, josh garcin and our Betsy Woodruff and professor at the university of Baltimore School of law, kim whaley. Everyone, thank you so much. Josh, you were there in the courtroom, why such a soft sentence . This was an extended proceeding and a minor correction, he was pushed in the courtroom with a wheelchair with a cane. Hes been complaining of manafort having Health Issues and certainly he was trying to adhere to the judge to put forward sympathetic as he could, basic argument being hell be an old man by the time he gets out of jail and any sentence he got in this case. The judge says that the guidelines here really go far beyond what defendants are typically sentenced to. There are two cases involved with charges of him failing to report Foreign Bank Accounts and not paying his taxes over a fiveyear period. The judge says cases like that defendants get a sentence in the range of 6 to 12 months and some just gets probation. Manafort did make the government go through a trial here. The judge says the sentence he gave him was actually lengthy compares to what other people get under those circumstances. Does he also demand or expects that a person whose been found guilty and is about to be sentenced show some sort of remorse of what he did. That was the interesting aspect of the hearing. Judge aliellis who did the sentencing is known to look for that kind of remorse and when manafort made the statement, he was sitting there in his inmate sort of all green jail guard, it was a fourminute statement out of a threehour long hearing. It was non specific. He thanked his family and apologized to his family and thanked supporter as and the judge. The strongest thing that he said that he recognized it was his conduct that brought him here. What he said about himself was not remotely as strong as the admissions he made in front of the d. C. Judge handling the other case a couple of months ago. The judge says he was surprised manafort have not shown more regret or remorse or indicated that he knew he was breaking the law and it was a mistake for him to do that. The judge went onto say he was not going to hold that against manafort. Betsy, a big cover story about manafort last year. Who he was and what he did and what he dealt with or dealt in. He today writes about the judge saying manafort lived an otherwise blameless life. Here is what he said. A blameless life, he acted with impunity as if the laws never implied to him. He could not find that sentiment within his being. He had devoted his career to normalizing corruption in washington. By the time he was caught, it has become so common place that not even a federal judge could blame him for it. Betsy, you have done a lot of reporting on manafort and who he is, who is Paul Manafort . What are we talking about when hes accused of these sorts of crim crimes . I have been in close contact with dear friends of manafort over the last week or so leading up to or subsequent to his sentencing. They say hes basically a Pretty Simple person. They say to understand Paul Manafort, you have to know one thing. He really loves money and he likes to make as much as possible. He was not scrupulous of how he got it or who he got it from. Thats the organizing principles of his career. He worked for a host of dicta dictators and tyrants across the globe all the way to the philippines who stole billions of dollars from his people. Paul manafort worked for all of those people because they had a lot of money and because they could afford to pay him. That was how he decided what to do with his life and how to use it. What we are seeing is manafort essentially have to pay for a small priece for the fact that e has to break the law to make money. To hide money. Kim, talk to me about the discrepancy in sentencing. We just told a few stories at the top of this segment, you can go online to twitter and see defense attorney tas talking ab their clients of what they got for their cliept ofnt of a less crime. There was a gentleman earlier, five years for stealing a pair of sneakers. Why does that get treated has y harshly than a man committing fraud crimes. This judge has a tremendous amount of discretion for the law of this particular. It costs a lot of money to have an expensive lawyer like mr. Manafort went through. It costs money to make bail. People who are poor, we talk about innocent until proven guilty, poor people cant make bail sit in jail even when there is no crime proved against them. Number three, statistically that her sentencing falls disproportionately on people of color. That should not come as a huge surprise to viewers given a lot of the sort of racial tension that come to the floor of this presidency and in particular. This judge of his choice of words, he led a blameless life was a poor choice as betsy suggested. It sends a wrong message in an era where we need accountability for the rule of law. This is the man of District Of Columbia proceedings who tampered of witnesses and pulled out of his plea deal and showed contempt for thinks process. Thats the same kind of contempt that the United States are showing for the roule of law an the fbi. I hope that we do not have to worry about all elections would be mindful of those constitutional principles. It shows the two different criminal Justice System we have, one for the wealthy and one more everybody else. Josh and kim and betsy, everyone, thank you very much. Thank you. The entire Democratic Party is watching for joe biden to see if hes running for president. Some potential 2020 candidates are not waiting for him to make up his mind. Our first read put it, it started to clear one lane, the white male moderate leading lane but what it has not done is scare off anyone else. And an array for this potential candidates, every word matters, past or present. Joining me secretary of state and spokesperson for Hillary Clinton, phillip. Gentlemen, okay, joe biden, if he gets into the race, hell be the front runner, can we safely assume what hell be the front runner. Although if i am joe bide den, i would not want to be called that. Yes, hell be the front runner. I think hes very aware of what that means. I think joe biden is making a sober decision without having any insights into him or his world. If you are joe biden, you know you may win, tharts a heavy decision. But, it can be a grueling for eight years and that becomes ten years. A healthy decision, i dont know what it is based on, i think we all are pretty sure hes going to run and when he does is hes going to make a real impact. Lets talk about what could be a real problem. Bidens baggage has been out there for a long time. The last election, oh, biden may put his foot in his mouth and hes a liable. We are seeing some of those liabilities coming out in recent days that as it comes clear that biden may be running. His past positions and he said this is in 1965, i do not buy the concept popular in the 60s which says we have suppressed black men for 300 years and the white men are far ahead in the race. We must give a black man a head start or hold the white man back. Yes. This stuff has been out there before in this particular race so this 2020 race with these candidates, how is stuff like that going to fly . Not well. Even as a male, i know that. Hillary clinton paid dearly, africanamerican males regarding to her comments she made in the 1990 about super predators. It is a very potent tensecond video thats a potent tensecond quote. It is interesting to watch it unfold. It is not just idea logical but it is gender and race. Castro booker and gillibrand and gabbard and there is no white male among them. And bernie sanders. This may not only be the year of women but the year of monot man. You look at anyone who has not run, cuomo or landry, these guys are all white male. People on the sideline, beto. They may be looking at the field and say i dont want to jump into that. There was a time when bill clinton got into the race in october. You are telling me there is going to be a broker convention the other day. There are two things. Biden is a 29 and in 2008, 2007 at this time, rudy giuliani, waycro was 30 . It is better to get 30 than to have 5 and right now if you are looking at the race, biden comes in and it is him and sanders at the top of the heat. That means theyre targets and people come down on them. It is terrible in politics to have an immensely record. Do republicans have an easier time with bidens history like that . No. I think if you look at the field as it stands, you think solely of the general election. The person in the field does not stand who does have a best shot taking down donald trump is joe biden. That does not mean somebody else would not. Does he go back and inspire potentially of trump. Does he inspire female voters or inspire voters who have not participated in a way that another democratic candidate might. He has to try. The one thing that democratic nominee breaking every promise and achieving nothing he promised, if you voted for donald trump because you did not like Hillary Clinton or her trade positions or because you like donald trump because hes going to build a wall. If you are a sane, rational person, you are going to look at his list of promises and say boy, is this guy a failure . I dont think the word easy comes into play whether it is biden beating trump or trump beating biden. To johns point, if you talk to a lot of democrats, the election is tomorrow, the general election is tomorrow. Whos best suited to be donald trump . Hes got to get through the primaries and hes got a lot of repair work to do. The gaps are done. John and phillip, thank you. Thank you, katy. Good one. Up next. Chell Chelsea Manning is back in jail. Stay with us. Nning is back in j. Stay with us if youre turning 65, you may be learning about medicare and supplemental insurance. Medicare is great, but it doesnt cover everything. Only about 80 of your part b medicare costs. A Medicare SupplementInsurance Plan may help cover some of the rest. Learn how an aarp Medicare SupplementInsurance Plan, insured by Unitedhealthcare Insurance Company might be the right choice for you. A free decision guide is a great place to start. Call today to request yours. So what makes an aarp Medicare Supplement plan unique . These are the only Medicare Supplement plans endorsed by aarp because they meet aarps high standards of quality and service. Youre also getting the great features that any Medicare Supplement plan provides. You may choose any doctor that accepts medicare patients. You can even visit a specialist. With this type of plan there are no networks or referrals needed. Also, a Medicare Supplement plan. Goes with you when you travel anywhere in the u. S. Call today for a free guide. Do you love me . I can really move do you love me . Im in the groove now do you love me . Do you love me now that i can dance . Applebees 3 course meal. Now thats eatin good in the neighborhood. Army whistle blowing Chelsea Manning is back in jail. She refused to answer questions about wikileaks. The judge says she will stay in jail until she answers the questions or the grand jury ends. She leaked a trove of records in 2010. Today outside of court she decided not to answer questions today. I gave an enormous amount of testimony in this case and i see no reason to go oever the same thing again. Ken, i have two questions for you, first what is going on and the second one is an extension of what is going on, what is going on with this trooifl or investigation, what is happening here . These are related. Clearly there is a sealed case, an investigation going on, a grand jury investigation, and the government wants Chelsea Mannings testimony and it is baffling decision by her and her lawyers. She doesnt really have a legal leg to stand on. They will throw you in jail until you comply. Youre at the mercy of the court unless you change your mind. More importantly for the country and the significance of all of this the fraederal government appears to be making a case against wikileaks. Have we seen any clues from the this Court District about what they are looking into. I know there was a sealed indictment that we have not seen, but there was also a mistaken redaction that we were able to see. This was the first confirmation. There had been rumors about this case but this was a defactor confirmation that it existed. He made a cut and pacer ror ist. He used language about why the particular case should be sealed and it was due to the sophistication of the defendant and the publicity around the case, keep confident fact that assange has been charged. This was either a charge and the charges have not been filed or he has been charged under seal in the Eastern District of virginia. Let me keep reeding on that. The second mention is an affidavit and arrest warrant that the order needs to remain sealed until he is arrest in connection with the case. It is presupposing that he will be arrested at some point. Yes, unless this is a draft. It presents a lot of interesting issues because of the Obama Administration resisting, we believe, going down a path of trying to charge assange. They are considered too close to a journali isistic organization. When they published the material that she leaked, it was a huge story, they published the stories and they learned a lot about how the government did business. It seems clear that wikileaks does not resemble a journalistic organization and it is more like a hostile organization, and so there seems to be more of an appetite in the Trump Administration to charge them with crimes. Interesting and we will see if at some point this relates to the special councils investigation. A journalist was ready to be awarded for her work until it wasnt. One more thing is next. It wasnt one more thing is next so why wouldnt you take something for the most important part of you. Your brain. With an ingredient originally discovered in jellyfish, prevagen has been shown in Clinical Trials to improve shortterm memory. Prevagen. Healthier brain. Better life. Ive always been amazed and still going for my best, even though i live with a higher risk of stroke due to afib not caused by a heart valve problem. So if theres a better treatment than warfarin. I want that too. Eliquis. Eliquis is proven to reduce stroke risk better than warfarin. Plus has significantly less major bleeding than warfarin. Eliquis is fdaapproved and has both. Whats next . Reeling in a nice one. Dont stop taking eliquis unless your doctor tells you to, as stopping increases your risk of having a stroke. Eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. Dont take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. While taking eliquis, you may bruise more easily and it may take longer than usual for any bleeding to stop. Seek immediate medical care for sudden sign of bleeding, like unusual bruising. Eliquis may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. Tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures. Eliquis, the number one cardiologistprescribed blood thinner. Ask your doctor if eliquis is whats next for you. One more thing before we go, the u. S. State department want today reward one woman before fer work and the they did not. They canceled her award over her krit schism of president trump. She was set to receive the women of courage award. She had Death Threats and she has been threatened for her work and she did it long before the 2016 american election. Secretary of state mike pompeo would have presented her with the award in washington himself. According to the policy, those o e familiar with the internal deliberations says she was frequently criticizing donald trump on social media. That will wrap things up for me this hour on International Womens day, no less. Go to a lot of these award ceremonies, and the award is for being critical and speaking for those that cant. Speaking truth to power, its not to comfort the afflicted. It is so wonderful when government is part of that, right . I get it, your job is to be critical of us and that is something that were not in agreement with these days, our government and media are not in agreement with that. Donald trump wants a protector in the attorney generals office, and he wants his press to be he loves that Vladimir Putin has such a high approval rating. Thats because you cant criticize Vladimir Putin in russia. He loves the same thing for kim jong un, his people love him. Look at the coverage he gets from north korea media. The freedom t