This first year of trump is going to mean for the Republican Party in the long term, for conservatives . Do they have the same home that they used to, or is the party irreparably changed . I think long term, the chances are high that the Republican Party, it cant recover or is broken apart or this is the beginning of a breaking apart for them. The brand of what it means to be a conservative or conservative republican is kind of lost. And whether conservatives in particular can ever get back to, you know, having a party of their own is hard to know. You have a lot of people like Pete Wayner N david brooks out there saying im a political refugee. Sounds like you wouldnt say that donald trump is conservative. Oh, hes definitively not. Michael steele . No, hes not. Hes not at all. I agree with jon. I think what weve seen at the surface is something thats been going on beneath the surface since reagan left office. And certainly it came to a head during my time as National Chairman with the tea party. Sort of asserting itself. This brand that came out and said we adhere to the constitutional principles that have defined the party and, thus, we will not spend money we do not have. We will not grow the National Debt and all these things and lo and behold in the age of trump, thats exactly what republicans in congress are now doing. To the tune of 1. 5 trillion. 1. 5 trillion. To listen to members of congress over the last few weeks leading up to the passage of this tax bill dismiss out of hand as irrelevant deficits and the concept of deficit spending, as well as the debt to me tells me, to johns point, were in a brandnew era for the party and this is not your mom and daddys Republican Party anymore. Its the party of trump, and you either are going to be in it or outside of it. But there is to get back to pauls point. One thing theyve done in that republicans on the hill will say, okay, this is great, is they are in the process of remaking the judiciary. In terms of the Circuit Courts and which has really longterm
impacts. These are lifetime appointments. I was talking to one person who works close to senator mcconnell. He was like the thing i dont think thats covered enough is weve installed a bunch of justices on the Circuit Court level, and theyre not going to go anywhere whether trump is president or not president. Now there have been some issues with some of the people the white house has sent over to capitol hill and Senator Grassley has had some problems getting a few of these people through. Seemingly totally unqualified. Seemingly unqualified in a situation where its totally, like the wheels are greased to get as many conservative justices up there. But that is a win. And thats a conservative win. Does that keep evangelicals on board . The judiciary is big for evangelicals. Theres a distinction. I would agree with shawna and paul, there are things happening in the Trump Administration that are good for conservatives. Trump, writ large, is radically nonconservative fig are and so have evangelicals proven
themselves to be nonconservative in their appetite for radical change rather than the conservative ideal of slow, incremental preservative change. A little bit at a time. Lets take a look. We have some polling from years end that shows us what this landscape might look like. Democrats just completely in a different position than they have been before. In our own nbc news Wall Street Journal poll, 50 saying that democrats should be control congress. Thats an extraordinary number heading into the midterm elections. It is. I take some exception to that since i had a hand in building the house we currently have. And you realize that you cannot sustain that when the people who are inside the house are tearing up the floor boards and knocking out the windows and putting all kinds of signage on the front lawn that is scaring the hell out of people. I think that is something that the party is going to come to grips with. Mcconnell gets it, certainly, and i think you saw after the
loss in alabama, what was the first thing he did . He made it clear who his target was. Steve bannon. You want to come after us . Were ready. Well come after you. So thats going to be sort of the undercard of the bigger fight that were going to see play out. So the civil war is still going to be the civil war still going, yes. And its being televised every day. Where do the democrats in their vulnerabilities fit into this. If nancy pelosi is still running the show for House Democrats is that something that drags them down or is the sentiment against the president so intense that that doesnt matter . I dont think it matters. It is true theres an argument within the Democratic Party about the importance of chachblgichachblg i changing a generation of leadership. Nancy pelosi is still the best poster child republicans have of why you dont want to elect someone like doug jones to be your senator, but it didnt work because the republican candidate in that case was so much worse and there is an enormous amount
of energy and activism in the Democratic Base. The question i think you have to ask is, is the sort of trump frustration and to some degree the trump dementia thats grasped the democratic grassroots enough to take back the house. Whether or not nancy pelosi is leader doesnt really matter. And if they do take back the house, that brings into question a whole different discussion potentially about impeachment and the ramifications of the russia investigation which we havent even touched on. That still seems destined to dominate the year in the conversation. Potentially as the year has closed, the president has seemed at times to be at peace with where that investigation is, but i mean, i have doubts about whether that holds. I have real doubts about whether that holds depending on the next time we get an email from the special Prosecutors Office saying someone is going to court. Youll have a very hard time not responding to that, especially
as they interview more and more people in his inner circle and as trumps team trumps outside legal team meets more and more with the special Prosecutors Office. But i also think in terms of next year with women and running for congress, some of that energy, and weve seep that there theres a long list of women considering running for congress in a way weve not seen for a long time. That energy between the me, too, situation as well as which i think is almost in some ways a direct reaction to President Trumps election, as well as how everything has gone this year. I think theres some energy that will keep on coming from women. Im curious from you, though, about, do you see the parallels to 2010 for the democrats . Theyre incredible. But the interesting thing is, what i did in looking at the landscape at the time was create a narrative. And so the moniker fire pelosi
was all about i remember that in 2010. We the people matter. You krael this. And the only way to fire pelosi is to do what . You know, hire someone else to take the position of a democrat in congress. But that translated to state races as well. When you look at the state race. Over 760plus State House Races across the country on this one theme. The key thing for me was not targeting barack obama. Because barack obama was not really the root here. And i think that for the democrats, they need to understand it may not be donald trump as the root per se. Maybe in some cases, but theyll have to be able to translate that down to get, as we saw in alabama, republicans to do something that goes against their nature. And that is to vote for a democrat. Jon okay. Good luck with that. Best of luck. Question, though. You have seen democrats approach this in some cases a little differently. I feel like the experimentation with the messaging is in the early phases. There are many in the liberal Democratic Base who are saying absolutely you will not work with trump or say a word about anything positive about him at all. But on the other hand, tim kaine in virginia will say, if you ask him, ill work with the president where i need to. In arizona, Kirsten Cinema is starting to make those arguments. In some cases, ill work with the president. Where do you think that goes. How is the path to the majority potent yelly in figuring out how to embrace President Trump . Alabama is a tough comparison because roy moore was such a carbon copy and accelerated version in some ways of donald trump. And so that would have been a state in which doug jones would have had to talk more about economics but all he could talk about is roy moore. Tim kaine got up on the stage the night Ralph Northum was elected governor in virginia and he talked about trump at the top but the bulk of his five,
tenminute speech was, about weve got to be the party of jobs and the economy. And then ended with hitting trump. And they are very focused on not getting into a food fight on cultural issues with cory stewart, the guy who is running as a trumpian republican there. They want to keep their message focused on jobs message. Thats the sweet spot. And some of these moderate to red states, thats definitely going to have to be the path. If i could real quick its about trump you put your mouth into your facial expression which was pricelessless. The example id offer up would be that special election in virginia in which a transgender woman won. How did she win . She didnt campaign winning against trump and his clear anning an ing anathema with the Gay Community but she wonna jobs, on fixing transportation. Her opponent ran against her Sexual Orientation and background and story. And that, for democrats is that
sweet spot. To your point, jon, where you focus that energy and messaging around something that people identify with every day. Which is why its dangerous if trump comes out with an Infrastructure Bill because hell be handing the democrats something they can agree with him on and agree to work with him on and the republicans are going to be dont vote for that guy because hes a bad guy, but he agrees with the president on this. What do we do . I was saying when doug jones was talking about policy, he was not talking about President Trump all that much in alabama either. Yes, that race is totally weird, and i get tharkt, but he had a mission to keep it as focused on jobs in alabama while also sometimes mentioning roy moore. He stopped doing a lot of National Media and very clearly batoning down the hatchs on the local bread and butter issues. Im excited to see how 2018 transitions into 2020. Were going to pause this conversation here for now. When we come back, ill be joined by the crack nbc news
capitol hill team that i work with every day to get their top five list of what to watch for in congress coming up next year. Kasie d. C. s New Years Eve special is back in just a moment. A lot of water. Medications seem to be the number one cause for dry mouth. Dry mouth can cause increased cavities, bad breath, oral irritation. I like to recommend biotene. Biotene has a full array of products that replenishes the moisture in your mouth. Biotene definitely works. It makes patients so much happier. [heartbeat]
with liberty, we could afford a real babysitter instead of your brother. Hey. Oh. Thats my robe. Is it . You could save Seven Hundred Eighty Two Dollars when liberty stands with you. Liberty mutual insurance. I dont think anyone would confuse him with a wellrespected health care expert. I wouldnt take advice from Charlie Sheen either. Our folks, every now and then, sort of like a free range chicken. They just kind of move off on their own. You realize to Many Americans right now that looks like were giving Lindsay Lohan the keys to the mini bar. Obviously, youd rather have 52 votes than 51 because you can lose an extra free range chicken. Even though its not perfect, im going to vote for it. Ill be on it like a hobo on a ham sandwich. I cannot go down to my overpriced capitol hill grocery this afternoon and choose among about six different types of mayonnaise. How come i cant do that for my kid . It makes me a little bit nervous because of those free
range chickens i talked about. Welcome back to kasie dc. That was the always quotable senator john kennedy. The chickens did come home for republicans and their tax plan. Joining me for our New Years Eve party, some of the most important people i work with every day, capitol hill producer alex moe, frank thorpe and producer on the nbc news capitol hill team, mariana sotomayor. Theyve all brought their top ten things to watch in 2018. For those of us who know you frank thorpe, well be unsurprised to learn that you sent seven because youre an overachiever. And i want to start with your number six. You asked, does the gop Tax Reform Bill become the republican obamacare over the course of the next year . What do you mean by that . Senator mcconnell was asked this after the Senate Passed the bill. And this is a question republicans and democrats are looking at going into 2018. Whether this bill will be able to be hung on republicans the same way that it that the Affordable Care act was hung on democrats. This bill, when it was passed, this bill was more unpopular than obamacare was. And democrats went on to lose several elections. Correct. But republicans look at this in a different way. Senator mcconnell, he thinks of this as an argument they can win. They can go out and sell this. Theyre going to go out and make a concerted effort to sell this thing. You guys have more money in your paychecks. This is different than the idea the government is now in charge of your health care. Now you have money. This is a tangible thing youre bringing home every two weeks in your paycheck. They think they can flip this on democrats. They can look at democrats and point to them and say, sorry. They voted against taking giving you that extra money and if you put democrats in charge in 2018 if you vote them into the majority, they can vote these tax cuts away. Although they do expire in
2025 and most americans are Congress Needs to make sure these become perminent. But this question brings me to, if we can put up alexs top five. Alex covers the house for us specifically. Thats what this house looks at. And i think to franks point and, well, yes, its going to matter a lot in the senate, this question of hough the tax bill plays gets to the heart of your question which is can democrats win back the house . Republicans really needed to pass a Tax Reform Bill to get a win on the board for them going into 2018. But democrats are saying nancy pelosi said herself before the break that, you know, lets see what happens. Let the republicans think that this republican tax plan is going to be good for them because democrats are definitely going to campaign against this. Theyll say youre better off having the democrats in the majority. Democrats to take back the house need to flip about 24 seats. At this point they think its doable when you look at alabama, virginia. They are seeing that people
dont like donald trump very much and theyre going to take that and run with it when it comes to 2018. They seem to be winning the Enthusiasm Gap by a large margin which tipped us off that 2010 was going to be a wave. Democrats want to run against President Trump in 2018 and theyll try to do that. Will republicans try to run against nancy pelosi who some people, even within the caucus want to see stepped down and get a new fresh face in there. Thats how republicans were able to win in 2010. Able to run against pelosi. Very interesting. Mariana, i want to bring your list up now. You have focused quite a bit on reporting on the Intelligence Committee investigations. Of course, on the senate side and also on the house side which, from what we can tell are continuing somewhat into perpetuity. But i want to pull out your second one is, you know, will we start to see reports from these committees. And what is your sense of what
we might learn from the senate Intelligence Committee to start . What are they actually going to tell the American People at the end of the day . It seems like were inching closer to getting some reports. On the senate side i was told by Senator Warner that very early into 2020 so january or february, well see at least a report on how russia intervened in the campaigns and just trying to know about Election Security in general. How secure is the American Public . How secure is the system . Who have they informed about that already and what can we do now going into the midterms which senator blunt pointed out. Some people are going to start voting in march in the primaries. Thats something well see first on the senate side later on. Are we going to see a partisan food fight around how much do you put out in the public on that report do you think . On the senate side, i dont
think so. Both the republicans and the democrats are really wanting to put out at least this one portion about Election Security. I think it will be. The house looking at a complete wrapup of their investigation soon early into 2018. That is looking like it could be a democratic report and a republican report. Lets see, probably two different conclusions on both sides of the chamber but well see. That, of course, is the story of all of our lives. Every day on capitol hill. We have barely scratched the surface of what will be coming up next year. Entitlement reform which paul ryan wants to do. Whether hell even stay as speaker of the house. But we have to leave it there. Thank you so much for taking the time to join us and for everything you do to support me, to support everybody at our Great Network on capitol hill. When we come back on this New Years Eve edition, some of our big interviews from the year gone by. Were back from washington right after this. I saw the change in rich when we moved into the new house. But having his parents over was enlightening. You dont like my lasagna . No, its good. Hmm. Oh. Huh. [ both laugh ] here, blow. Blow on it. You see it, right . Is there a draft in here . Im telling you, its so easy to get Home Insurance on progressive. Com. Progressive cant save you from becoming your parents. But we can save you money when you bundle home and auto. Ryan told some of his closest confidantes hell step down after the midterm elections next year though he and his team deny that. Ryan has said in the past, its a job he didnt really want in the first place. I spoke to speaker ryan in october about his thoughts on President Trump and the divisions within the Republican Party. The president has regularly engaged in disputes with various members bob corker, ben sasse, over the first amendment. Is that helpful to your agenda . Its what he does. We kind of learned to live with it. Weve had our engagements in the past, too. I dont think what im trying to get our members to do is focus on doing our jobs. Were here elected to represent our constituents to advance our principles, pass solutions and thats what were focused on. Did you ever imagine that washington would be the way that it is now under President Trump . I think the country is pretty darn polarized. I think one of the reasons why is because the economy has been
pretty darn flat for a long time and theres a lot of anxiety in america. This is one of the reasons im so focused on this agenda because it will give relief to this anxiety and give people more confidence in their future. Is the president helping with that . Hes crisscrossing the country helping us with tax reform. Do i wish he would tweet less . Of course i do. He knows that. Thats something out of my control and i dont think thats something thats going to change. Hes coming around and helping us sell tax reform. Is he connecting with people . Did this president win wisconsin for the First Time Since 84 and pennsylvania and did he do that by uniting or dividing . You look at where i come from, he united. He brought people into our party, voting for a republican president , voting for a hotly contested u. S. Senate race, and these are democrats that felt like they were overshadowed. We used to call them reagan democrats. Now theyre trump democrats. He did grow and bring to the party and he put together a darn
impressive coalition. He did end up unifying that front. You have said you make it known to him you dont want him to tweet. Youve defend his actions by saying hes new at this. Hell get used to it. You didnt go after him by name after charlottesville. During the campaign you said in the wake of the access Hollywood Tape that you would never defend donald trump, not now and in the future. Ive heard from some critics of you who they are republicans and they dont necessarily recognize the Republican Party under trump and theyre disappointed in you. Thats fine. They can view that however they want. The best thing i can do is hups improve an agenda that improves peoples lives. We had unified government. Its important to make this unified government work. Imagine if we decided just to have some internal food fight and get nothing done for the country. How does that help people get a job or more takehome pay . How does that help relieve the insecurity people have living
paycheck to paycheck . It doesnt. If we want to play some d. C. Game of fighting each other and get nothing done, maybe that would satisfy a few people. But as far as im concerned, im elected to defend the constitution, to represent people in wisconsin, to help run congress, to improve peoples lives and you do that by getting things done and in this unified government we have, we have a tremendous opportunity to get big, good things done. That, to me, is the most important thing i can contribute to. You mentioned internal food fight and your majority which is a nice segue into my question about steve bannon who is quite frankly picking a food fight with a lot of your incumbents in the senate and the house. Are you afraid of what steve bannon may do . I think were going to be fine if we do our work and get our jobs done and pass our policies. I think its is he helping the Republican Party . I dont think its helpful to have internal fights or go after republicans . Whats most helpful is if we all unify around our common goals
and purposes and get an agenda passed. I dont think having these fights are helpful but at the same time, i dont think its going to deter us from doing what were working on right now. Are the messages steve bannon is sending to the Republican Base helpful for the country . To be honest, im not paying that close attention to it. Im a little busy with a day job. I dont even know what you mean when you say messages. Im making sure we get our messages passed. He works for breitbart. I have three stories in my life, death, taxes and attacks from breitbart. Im so used to that that you dont spend time thinking about or worrying about things outside of your control like that. Much more to come. Just ahead, my conversation with senator rand paul. Well talk about the uncivil war thats broken out inside his party. And we continue on this New Years Eve edition of kasie dc. Whats ahead in 2020. Theres a civil war going on inside your party. The president said bob corker could not be elected dog catcher in tennessee. Is that president ial . You know, i think there is a bit of a war going on and to me its interesting because im sort of also at war with my party a lot of times, too. But im at war on sort of Policy Differences and whether we should balance the budget, have spending cuts, and thats a fine place to be. In fact, ive had do you think hes conducting himself im getting there. Im getting there. But when you keep it on policy. So, for example, im opposed the president on major policies this year. On the fake obamacare repeal, obamacare light. Ive opposed him to several bombing in syria, things like that. But we still have a very Good Relationship because i dont attack him personally. What i would say is going on, and its not onesided. Its like when you are a kid and your parents say it takes two to fight. Its a little bit on both sides. On one side theres this high mindedness that theyre going to
condemn the president s character. But in doing so, its sort of like Perfect People can condemn other peoples character. And if i tell you, kasie, i think youre immoral and a thief and a liar, do you think we can have a conversation . We cant do that. And so the thing is, i think we should avoid sort of Character Assassination or condemnation. You can. Youre a pundit. You can say whatever you want about a president. If were working together, id say its a better thing. Im more than happy to go to war with the president on occasion and also support him many times as well on policy. But i try to refrain from making judgment about his character because when im perfect does character not matter for the president . Of course it does. But when my character is perfect is when i can start criticizing other people. So there is people who live in glass houses need to be aware of that. And i think it is a holier than thou thing and theres a lot of it going on on yalls side in
the media as well but its going on with some politicians as well. To tell you the truth, what are the American People more concerned with . They probably think, this is a People Magazine saga that really we should be getting onto policy. They would rather see a debate and discussion on policy. But i would say its both sides. Its not one side or the other. Both sides are engaging in this. And i, frankly, am choosing to be in another place. I feel you still havent answered my question. I gave a really long circuitous description of my position, havent i . Heres the would you conduct yourself this way . I think everybody is different. The president has a unique style. But people have attributes and other things people say its not an attribute. When i look at the president and when i work with the president , i see the glass as half full. Were from the same party. Many things aligned and ive been around the president many, many hours, probably as much as
anybody in the senate, and i choose to engage him on the things that i think we have common ground. So for example, bombing syria, we i disagreed with the bombing in syria. I disagree with a lot of the Military Intervention the president has chosen to do. But i choose not to confront him on that or other particularly things of personality difference. I choose not to engage on that but i choose to find common ground. I love his cabinet and the Supreme Court pick. I love the fact hes gotten rid of more regulations than any other president in recent history, including most of the republicans. Is Mitch Mcconnell a good leader . When we look at like obamacare, i promoted that we should repeal it. And i forced votes on that. Yes, or snow, no, is he a go leader . Im getting there. But on repealing obamacare, he was right there with me. As far as wanting to repeal the whole thing. He also worked with a coalition to be for a bill that i wasnt for. So once again, i oppose mitch
mcconnell sometimes on policy, but i keep it on a level such that i think we have good relations and do i think he does a good job herding the cats that are up here, the disparate, different philosophies, right, left and middle . Its a difficult job. He does a good job with it. Very last question and this is also a yes or no question. Would the country benefit from a republican president ial primary in 2020 . I think no one can stop primaries from happening and there could well be a primary that happens. Before you even get to that, you need to know, is President Trump running for reelection. You wont know that until his second, third year of presidency. At this point, i cant see myself supporting anyone but President Trump because i think hes given us the most conservative cabinet weve seen since reagan. Maybe more conservative than reagan. Weve repealed regulations for the first time in 20 years. A great Supreme Court justice. Im hoping he gives us a couple more if we have retirements. I see the glass as half full. Doesnt mean i agree with him on everything. If we could end the afghan war, thats who i would support. I dont think thats going to be an alternative to President Trump. So i like to accentuate the positive, the things i agree with him on. Still not a yes or no answer but thank you. I think we need a primer. I think its a pretty good answer that we have no idea. You cant answer a question i asked if it would be good for the party. My interview with senator gillibrand whose insistence that al franken resign was a watershed moment among democrats in the senate. Dads dont take sick days. Dads take dayquil severe. The nondrowsy, coughing, aching, fever, sore throat. Stuffy head, no sick days medicine. Plus depreciation. Liberty mutual insurance. This year, new yorks Junior Senator managed to anger both President Trump and the inner circle of her political patrons, the clintons. Earlier this month she called on President Trump to resign because of longstanding allegations of sexual misconduct. He fired back by calling her a lightweight who would do anything for a campaign contribution. In november, she said bill clinton should have resigned the presidency over the Monica Lewinsky scandal and Philippe Reines called her a hypocrite
after accepting the clintons money and endorsements. I asked her about her relationship with the clintons and her fight to stop Sexual Harassment on capitol hill. What is different about the context of congress and politics that makes people so afraid to come out and either name the people that theyre talking about or show their faces in public . Ive talked to probably a dozen women in politics, even as this movement has become so public and none of them want to go on the record. Why do you think that is . I think theyre afraid of retaliation. Why are they more afraid here than i think theyre afraid everywhere. People in hollywood didnt come forward for years and years. People on wall street dont come forward for years and years. I had a girlfriend who just sent me an email that she sent her old boss about all the things he did to her that he never took these claims seriously. And this is 20 years later, 30 years later. Its a moment of reckoning and whats happening in congress is i think young staffers are afraid that their careers will be ruined if they come forward. And so i am calling on my
colleagues to rewrite the rules so if you are being harassed in your office, not only can you do you know where to go because nobody knows where or what the office of compliance is. What do you do when you get there . Whats the process going to be . Do you have to do you have to go through mandatory remediation. They should pay if theres a settlement. It should not come out of the taxpayers dime. Were in a moment that this has sort of changed, that the context has changed over the last 20 years. Youve told the New York Times that bill clinton should have resigned over the lewinsky affair. My point is that the tolerance that we had 25 years ago, what was allowed 25 years ago will not be tolerated today, is not allowed today and that we have to have the kind of oversight and accountability that Society Needs so that we can protect people in the workplace, so people can function without having an unsafe work environment, whether
its in the military or so youre saying President Trump has created an unsafe workplace in the white house . No. Im saying that the conversation were having is very important and the behaviors tolerated a long time ago are not tolerated and, in fact, all of us need to recognize none of us are above this and all of us have to be responsible for how we create a workplace in our own office, for my office, how we do our oversight in congress with providing better oversight over the military, which is our job, with title 9 on college campuses. So we have to do our job. We are all responsible and we all have to understand that time has changed a he with he have to hold people and elective leaders should not be held to the lowest standard. They should be held to the highest standard. Thats why i focus all my efforts of trying to change the rules of the game because they are not fair and not working. So youre saying if bill clinton were there today and the
events were unfolding today i think it would be a very different conversation. We should have a very different conversation about President Trump. Should President Trump resign based on the allegations . I dont want him to be president. But he is president. He got elected. Agreed. So we should now have a conversation that that is not okay and we should not just ignore him. We should be having a much larger conversation about what we expect of our elected leaders and that it should never be this lowest common denominator or boys will be boys. Thats an outrageous statement to be said. Its not okay. We expect much more. Thats why the roy moore debate is on top of everybodys mind. His behavior is disqualifying in the same way to me that the president s behavior was disqualifying. That was my view. Now my job is to try to protect other people. Some people have worked for the clintons over the years that are essentially questioning your
loyalty. There was a very tough tweet that says, the senate voted to keep president William Jefferson clinton but thats not enough for you, senator gillibrand . Interesting strategy for 2020 primaries. Best of luck. What do you say about that . Ridiculous and hes wrong. Bill clinton did very important things for this country but my point is the conversation that were having today and we need to have the highest standards for elected leaders and we have to change whats happening throughout society and we have to allow people to tell their stories. That is what this is all about and that is why the me, too, campaign is as powerful and is as important as it is. When we come back, our Political Panel on what to watch for in the year to come. [hawaiian music playing]
wow, you are busy. Wouldnt it be great if you had investments that worked as hard as you do . Yeah. Introducing essential portfolios. The Automated Investing Solution that lets you focus on your life. Welcome back to kasie dc. Its New Years Eve and almost 2018. Im back with my panel. Before we go, i want to get your sense, what should we be watching for in the year ahead . I think you watch for how republicans triangulate between the narrative that evolved in 2017 around trump, the me, Too Environment and the results of those elections and how they tried desperately to hold on to the house and keep control in the senate. Paul . I set a google alert for the
administrative procedure act because every regulation that the Trump Administration is trying to roll back, they are being sued in court for violating the administrative procedures act which requires taking a bunch of steps and proving its a good idea. Where the courts are the bull work to stop the rollback in the courts. Thats what trumps opponents have to win on. If they lose on that, trump has the authority to roll back the ru rules. And these are particular changes to deal with in the daytoday news environment. Its impossible to follow because were following the tweet of the morning. What are you looking for, john, in 2018 . Politicians who are not going to give simple answers and say they are going to fight the other stide and voters who say its complicated. Ive been disappointed that for the past decade weve had both parties get control and ramped up through without getting the other side involved and its bad for the country and we need to
take that in hand. Do you think thats possible in the new Social Media Environment that were consumed with . I dont know if its possible, but of course its possible in some way. What it is is its necessary. Im not going tounds any of it. And i think im watching what happens with deferred action for childhood arrivals. I think the Daca Question is one that is big on immigration and will come up in 2018. Everyone thinks that its going to get done but didnt get done this year. So i think we have to see how republicans and democrats actually see together on that and see if we find some type of path to legalization for those kids. A lot riding on that. I personally am watching for what happens to the Democratic Party. Do those divisions crack open the way we saw republicans in 2010 . They may have swept in to washington on a wave but it was downhill from there in some