Democrats applaud the killing of an american enemy, but warn of the consequences. Donald trump seems to have no plan. He seems to have no strategy. And take on each other. Bernie sanders hits joe biden for his baggage and biden responses. Ill take to elizabeth warren. And imeachment fight, the senate two leaders clash over the senate trial to come. Theyve done enough damage. It is the senate turn now to render sober judgment. Welcome to sunday. Its meet the press. Announcer from nbc news in washington, the longest running show in television history, this is meet the press with chuck todd. Well, a good sunday morning and happy new year to everyone. President trump begins 2020 facing three challenges, impeachment, an emboldened north korea and most urgently iran where a week of hostilities that included iranianbacked militants laying siege to the u. S. Embassy in baghdad ended with the u. S. Killing iranes chief security and intelligence commander, general Qasem Soleimani. This has been the deepest crisis with iran since the seizure of 52 american hostages in 1979. Iran has promised a harsh revenge at a time and place of its choosing. The u. S. Is sending even more troops into the region, while urging american citizens to get out of iraq. And President Trump is warning that the u. S. Has targeted 52 iranian sites in case iran does retaliate. U. S. Officials are warning an attack in the homeland may come with little or no warning. Less immediate is the impact in a number of other areas for President Trump. In 2012 he accused then president obama of then somehow seeking war with iran as a way to help his reelection chances. Well, thursdays strike could be seen as an effort to overshadow impeachment. It has. And help the president in november. We dont know. In the democratic race, could this now mean joe bidens Foreign Policy experience becomes a bigger asset or could Bernie Sanders benefit from his consistent opposition to overseas conflicts. How will voters react to President Trump escalating tensions in the middle east given that he as a candidate promised to pull america out of endless middle east conflicts. We begin our coverage in iraq with our chief Foreign CorrespondentRichard Engle who is in the Northern City of irbil. Youre in iraq but i want to go to the other side of that border, to iran. From our reporting what youve gathered, the mood in iran two weeks ago, they had domestic political issues. They were divided in that country. How divided do they seem today . Reporter a lot less divided. A couple of weeks ago there were violent protests in the streets of tehran and many other cities with people saying the government should change, should even be overthrown. Now young people in tehran, old people in tehran are uniting behind the government in a way that they havent been in a very long time. If the u. S. Wanted to isolate the regime, if President Trump wanted to put the regime on the ropes, it seems to have done just the opposite. The Immediate Impact could be an iraq we know the parliament in iraq is meeting today and the future of u. S. Forces in iraq could be at stake here. Is it possible that taking out soleimani while something that Many American leaders have wanted to see happen, is the cost going to be america getting kicked out of iraq . Reporter its possible. There are many particularly shiite leaders in this country who plan to ask for just that. They will say that the u. S. Presence is no longer constructive, its no longer helpful and its time for the americans to leave. But that comes with an enormous cost. The last time that iraq effectively kicked out the United States and made it impossible for u. S. Troops to stay here with the status of forces agreement, the country basically collapsed into civil war. Based on your reporting and assessments, what does an iranian retaliation look like . Is it conventional . Is it asymmetrical . Reporter most likely asymmetrical. Why Qasem Soleimani is so popular is he built an outer layer of armor that protected the iranian homeland. A network of shia militia groups, hezbollah in lebanon, shia militias in iraq, also alliances in syria, and that outer network is now angry, mobilized and could be directed to carry out attacks. Could those attacks be in the persian gulf against shipping lanes . Already the uk is sending two more warships to protect british shipping interests in the persian gulf. So i think you would likely see some sort of asymmetrical attack through these proxies. But the problem is the u. S. Doesnt fight with proxies. The u. S. Would likely see this kind of attack and respond with conventional weapons and then were in a shooting war. Very quickly reporter we will see. But there is a lot of risk right now if iran responds. Youve covered a lot of problems in the middle east. How much deja vu are you having . Reporter when i saw the 82nd airborne getting the packs and heading back to the region and there was a rocket attack into the green zone. Im once again here on a rooftop in iraq talking about militias and troops coming into the region, i thought, wow, we are back in 2007 at the peak of the violence when the u. S. Was fighting on multiple fronts against isis. It was al qaeda then, now its isis and against shia militias and iran and iraq back in play. Who knew we wanted those days to come back. Richard engle reporting for us in iraq. Richard, thank you very much. Joining me now is the secretary of state, mike pompeo. Secretary pompeo, welcome back to meet the press, sir. Good morning, chuck, its good to be with you this morning. Let me start with the shooting the strike against soleimani, the killing of him. Hes been a threat to the United States, to u. S. Interests for years. Why now . Why was it urgent this week . Chuck, youve captured it. Weve all known about Qasem Soleimani for a long time. Hes been a terrorist. Hes a designated terrorist. Hes someone whos inflicted many deaths on americans, over 600 in iraq and countless other places. He was even connected to what happened in beirut so many years ago. You would know this too, chuck. This was different. Weve seen recent deaths, recent killing. On december 27th a strike, an operation conducted by hezbollah, orchestrated by soleimani himself killed an american. We could see he was continuing down this path, that there were in fact plots that he was working on that were aimed directly at significant harm to american interests throughout the region, not just in iraq. President trump made the decision this was the time to stop this rain of terror from the sky, who was the glue, who put this all together, who was the irgc leader for a couple of decades and put so much pain and suffering on the American People and frankly the people in the region too. Hundreds of thousands of deaths in syria, millions displaced in syria. A bad guy, it was time to take him out. Why are you confident that they have already promoted his deputy, the ayatollah has already basically, you know, pumped this guy up, his replacement. Why are you convinced if there is an imminent operational attack getting put together against american interests, why are you convinced that taken out soleimani has done anything to stop it . We would have been culpably negligent had we not taken this action. The American People would have said we werent doing the right thing to protect and defend american lives . Is it that imminent . Was it so imminent and so big it would have been seen as that kind of negligence . We made the right decision. Theres lots of intelligence. Some of it is out in the public. The death of the american december 27th. We had intelligence on a go forward basis of risk as well. The president made the right decision. We will reduce risk. Is there still risk of attack . Of course there is. Were doing everything we can to make sure we take that down and protect american lives. When the president laid out his National Security strategy three years ago, this is all in the context of a larger american strategy to create peace and stability in the middle east. A key element is taking down Qasem Soleimani who has been a destabilizing force in the region for so long. Okay. So was the justification that hes been this destabilizing force in the region or was the justification this imminent threat . Chuck, its never one thing. Youve been at this a long time. Its never one thing, one instance. Its a collective. Its a full Situational Awareness of risk and analysis. I am confident and the Intelligence Community presented us a set of facts that made clear that the risk from doing nothing exceeded the risk of taking the action that we took. And we made the right decision. We protected and defended the American People. President trump has said repeatedly as he tweeted again last night we will take all actions necessary to preserve and protect america. Can you confidently say america is safer today . Absolutely. How do you square that statement with the fact that were bringing youre advising american citizens essentially to leave the region, particularly iraq. We have the Homeland Security department bracing americans for cyber attacks, saying that we know the iranians have been through our infrastructure. It is likely to happen and there wont be a warning from it. It doesnt sound like were safer today after this. Yeah, chuck, were definitely safer today. 100 certainty that america is safer today. Then why did we put out that warning after the soleimani we do expect retaliations against american citizens now, correct . Chuck, youre concentrating on the second and the moment. President trump is focused deeply on keeping americans safe over the long haul. Preserving and protecting, defending america is the mission that we have. It may be that theres a little noise here in the interim that the iranians make the choice to respond. I hope that they dont. President trump has made clear what we will do in response if they do, that our response will be decisive and vigorous just as it has been so far. But were going to take all actions necessary, not only in iraq but throughout the region to protect americans, american citizens as well as my diplomats and Service Members who are serving overseas. Were always going to do the right thing to protect america. I am confident that the decision we made to take down this terrorist, this designated terrorist who had inflicted so much harm over such an extended period was the right course of action to reduce risk to america. During the state Department Briefing on friday, the aides there was a lot of confidence being expressed without a lot of evidence that you thought the iranians arent going to they likely wont retaliate. Why do you think they wont . Why do you have this potential confidence they may not retaliate . Chuck, were prepared for everything. Im not going to get in the game of predictions. We have intelligence, lots of reconnaissance, good observation of whats taking place. What were doing is preparing for all possible courses of actions that the Iranian Regime may take and we are driving, we are driving a strategy that we have had in place now for three years diplomatic, economic, now military, to convince the Iranian Regime to simply behave like a normal nation and to raise the cost if they inflict harm on america if they do. You just went through what weve been going through the last three years. The fact that youve had to go to military, doesnt that tell you that sanctions havent worked and the maximum Pressure Campaign is not working . Just the opposite, chuck. We suffered from eight years of iranian support from america. We gave them billions of dollars. We gave them resources. We allowed countries to trade with them, to build up their economy. What we are now having to correct for is the Enormous Economic activity that took place during that Iranian Nuclear deal that President Trump rightly got out of in may of 2018. Its taken a little time and will continue to take time but we are going to restore deterrents. We had seen hundreds of thousands killed in syria, millions had to depart the region. Weve seen lebanese hezbollah, hamas, the pij in gaza strip, all of these terror organizations, the shia militias which we are challenged to push back against, all underwritten by american policy in the Obama Administration. Weve filmed the switch. Were draining those resources and going to protect america and keep American People safe. Im curious, how do we get out of a cycle of escalating violence. The president tweeted we have targeted 52 iranian sites representing the 52 american hostages taken back in 1979. And he said to iran those targets and iran itself well hit very fast, very hard, even noted there were cultural sites being targeted. Is that is that already being lined up at the pentagon . We have our response ready for whatever iran we have target sites here, these 52 target sites . Can you confirm that . Chuck, the American People should know that we have prepared for this, that we are ready. Were going to target cultural that our responses are lawful and that the president will take every action necessary to respond should iran decide to escalate. We hope that they dont. Weve communicated clearly and crisply as to what we have as an expectation and communicated clearly and chris crisply what we will do if they do so. What do you tell the families that have americans held hostage by this Iranian Regime. What do you tell americans who have been working with you at the state department, those families who probably look at this and think, okay, whatever progress we were making, no more progress. Is that what these families have to prepare for, that maybe their loved ones will be there longer, not shorter . I love these families. They are suffering greatly. Theyre suffering from the very Iranian Regime were seeking to counter. Most of these folks were taken during the previous administration. It was a policy that was designed to guarantee that the Iranian Regime would have power, authority, capacity to take americans and other westerners too. Those families should know that we built out a coalition, were patrolling the straits of hormuz with that coalition, theres an air Defense Strategy attached to the coalition and we have multiple countries now to sanction them. We have built a strategy to put america in place where the Iranian Regime will no longer threaten american hostages. We have worked diligently to get those held in iran back. We had one returned just within the last several weeks. We continue to work on that process, to get every american held anywhere in the world, including by the kleptocrats in iran to returning our hostages. We will never give up on that mission. Last question. If targeting soleimani is not regime change, then what are we advocating, if not regime change . As i said before, we clearly stated our strategy for three years. We want the regime to change its behavior. Ultimately the leadership in iran will be determined by the iranian people. We saw the protests. I am confident we will continue to see protests. They werent protesting against america. They werent protesting saying death to america. They were demanding that the i iranian leadership behaves in a way to take care of the iranian people. I am confident that well continue to support the iranian people in their quest for freedom. Secretary pompeo, i have to leave it there. Thank you for coming on. I appreciate it. Joining me now is the vice chair. Senate intelligence committee, democrat mark warner of virginia. Senator warner, welcome back to meet the press. Thank you, chuck. Youre one of the few democratic lawmakers that has been briefed after the fact. After the fact. Nobody other than Lindsey Graham may have gotten a briefing before the fact. I want to focus on this threat. You heard what the secretary of state said there. Youve been briefed about what this threat was. How imminent does it seem and is it any different than what soleimani has been doing over the last decade . I accept the notion there was a real threat. The question of how imminent is something that i need more information on. Lets step back for a moment and look at whats happened. America always has to be strong, but also smart. Strong in the sense that we always need to protect our people and our interests and soleimani was a bad guy, theres no question about that. But we also have to be smart. Theres three things that i didnt hear from the secretary and i have not heard from the administration. First, over the last month, weve seen across the region great pushback against iran, not only in iran itself from the people protesting against the regime, in lebanon where people were on the streets saying too much iranian influence, in iraq even where people were protesting against the iranianbacked militias. That antiiranian effort now seems to have transformed as weve seen the images over the last 24 hours into antiamerican. Its a rallying force not only within iran but even in iraq where we may be now asked to leave. By the way, theres breaking news. The Prime Minister of iraq is recommending that. Again, how does that make us stronger . Secondly, there is usually a congressional consulting process. Its both constitutionally required, but its also important because, one, you potentially get members of congress to buy in ahead of time and, two, they may ask that hard question thats not asked in an insular group. Three, you consult your allies, because we dont want to go at this alone. What weve already seen by not consulting particularly with our nato allies, weve seen that the nato forces in iraq have already stopped training the iraqi troops. That again does not make us stronger. How do we get out of this now . The reason i say this, its sort of its broken. Soleimani has been killed. The iranians are going to retaliate. Can you imagine us not retaliating against that retaliation . And would that be prudent . Again, soleimani, taking him out was a big thing. This is one of the top three leaders in iran. Thinking through all those consequences, if you take this action, thats what i want to hear from the administration that i have not heard so far. I know the secretary of state is trying in his own words to deescalate. Im not sure the president by his kind of taunting tweets is necessarily trying to deescalate. Im not sure how we will be seen as both stronger and smarter if we have our iraqi allies asking us to leave, if our nato allies dont feel like theyre going to be informed before we take this kind of action, and frankly if the people in the region that were against the Iranian Regime all across the region are now rallying against america. Lets say theres a democratic president coming next. How does the next Administration Iran is not going to deal with any American Administration for a while. Theyre not going to trust anything. It feels like were going to get backed into a military conflict whether we like it or not. I hope and pray thats not the case. How we get a path off this in a way where you can bring the American People, you can bring allies, you can bring people in the region, those are the questions that i think we all, democrats and republicans, need to ask the administration this week. I know diplomacy is never supposed its never too late for diplomacy, but with this Iranian Regime is it . Well, there was a reason why under regime under administrations democratic and republican alike in the past, president obama, both president bushes, president clinton, you go through that process of working with your allies, you go with the process of consulting with congress, you dont always get it right but you try to be strong and smart. Taking out soleimani may have some shortterm benefit but the smartness in terms of in the region with our allies and bringing along the American People, i think the jury is really out on that. Let me ask you a question for any of these senators right now. Theres supposed to be an impeachment trial at some point. Weve got this situation with iran. What should be the focus of congress right now . I think congress has to do both of our constitutional responsibilities. One, protect the American People and be a coequal branch of government with the administration to make sure we keep americans safe. Secondly, we also have to take on the responsibility of whats going to come over at some point from the house and thats to conduct a full and fair trial. You said at some point. Should Speaker Pelosi send these over tomorrow . I think i still have hopes that as we all step up and take that oath to be impartial jurors that there can be agreement amongst the senators, all of our colleagues, that we ought to make sure we get the facts. Part of the facts ought to be lets make sure we hear from people with direct knowledge of what happened in the case of the situation with ukraine. Weve seen already in the last couple weeks over the holidays where information has trickled out with additional documents. Why wouldnt we want to have that information before we hear this could actually exonerate the president , but youve got to be able to have that information and these individuals come forward. Right. Do you still advise do you think the speaker should withhold the articles until she gets some assurances on what the trial looks like . I still think when the senators come back and take that oath to be impartial jurors, that well find a path to get the information we need to have that full and fair trial. I want to get this behind us but weve got to have the information. Do you think this is a good strategy or not . Im going to let the speaker decide. I will also say i think the seriousness of this, particularly when weve got these issues involving iran and the protection of americans at stake, i hope well all take a deep breath and say lets go through this in a full, orderly, responsible process. Thats going to require frankly access to some of these own documents and some of the president s own men have a chance to tell their story. Mark warner, thanks for coming on and sharing your views. Happy new year, sir. Thank you, chuck. When we come back, the rising tensions with iran have added quite the wrinkle to the president ial candidate. Up next, democratic candidate elizabeth warren. Is is my body. Proof i can fight moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Proof i can fight psoriatic arthritis. With humira. Proof of less joint pain. And clearer skin in psa. Humira targets and blocks a source of inflammation that contributes to joint pain and irreversible damage. Humira can lower your ability to fight infections. Serious and sometimes fatal infections, including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. Tell your doctor if youve been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if youve had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flulike symptoms or sores. Dont start humira if you have an infection. Humira is proven to help relieve pain, stop further joint damage,. And clear skin in psa. Want more proof . Ask your rheumatologist about humira. Want more proof . I must admit. I had a few good tricks to help hide my bladder leak pad. Like the old tunic tug. You know it, right . But i dont have to, with always discreet. I couldnt believe the difference. Its less bulky. And it really protects. Watch this. The super absorbent core turns liquid and odor to gel, and locks it away. So i have nothing to hide. Always discreet. For bladder leaks. Welcome back. Perhaps no one has had a more up and down run for the democratic nomination than elizabeth warren. The senator from massachusetts started the race in single digits. After strong debate performances, shes near the top of some national polls. Since then warren has slipped a bit into third place nationally behind biden and sanders, though not very far behind. After coming under attack for how realistic her plans are. Joining me now from dubuque, iowa, is elizabeth warren. Senator warren, what are we, 29 days from caucus day, right . Thats right. Everyone counts. Everyone counts and every hour and second counts. Before i get to the campaign, i want to ask you about the situation in iran, what the secretary of state claimed. He said not acting, not taking soleimani out, that it the consequences would have been worse than not acting. So far from what youve learned, what do you believe was the right call here . Look, we are not safer because donald trump had soleimani killed. We are much closer to the edge of war. The question is why now . Why not a month ago . Why not a month from now . And the Administration Simply cant keep its story straight. It points in all Different Directions. The last time we saw this was this past summer over ukraine. When people started asking questions about what had happened on the phone call between donald trump and the president of ukraine and why aid to ukraine had been stopped, the administration did the same thing, they pointed in all Different Directions and give a whole lot of different answers. Of course what it turned out to be is that donald trump was doing what donald trump does, and that is he was advancing his own personal political interests. And i think do you think thats happening here . I think the question people reasonably ask is next week donald trump faces the start potentially of an impeachment trial. And why now . I think people are starting to ask why now did he do this . Why not delay and why this one is so dangerous is that he is truly taking us right to the edge of war. And that is something that puts us at risk, it puts the middle east at risk, it puts the entire world at risk. Look, you brought up the impeachment trial. Youre right, two weeks ago if youd asked me what would this show have been about, i would assume we would have within previewing that trial that might have been starting tomorrow or tuesday. It is not now. It sounds like you believe you want to investigate and find out if this is a motivation . Well, i think that people are asking why this moment . You know, as i said, the administration cant keep its story straight, and in the case of ukraine, it was all about protecting Donald Trumps skin. We know that donald trump was very upset about this upcoming impeachment trial. But look what hes doing now. He is taking us to the edge of war. Weve been at war for 20 years in the middle east. And now hes talking about expanding that war. This has been something that has cost thousands of american lives. It has cost us enormously in many ways, both at home and around the world. And at the same time look what its done to the middle east. Millions of people who have been killed, who have been injured, who have been displaced. The job of the president is to keep us safer. The job of the president is not to move us to the edge of war. Let me turn to the campaign. You came out in favor, surprised some people, you came out in favor, somewhat reluctantly in the way you put it out there, for usmca, nafta 2. 0. Heres what you said about it a year ago. Let me play that. Trumps deal wont stop the serious and ongoing harm nafta causes american workers. It wont stop outsourcing. It wont raise wages, and it wont create jobs. What changed in your mind . The deal. Democrats got in and negotiated a very different deal than we had a year ago. I really want to give credit to people like Jan Schakowsky who got the whole giveaway to the drug industry pulled out and rosa delaura, sherrod brown, who made sure we had Worker Protection in the deal. This is not a great arrangement, its a better its an improvement over where nafta stands right now. Look at the box the president has put us in with farmers. Farmers have just had their legs taken out from under them in one trade war after another that donald trump has initiated on his own. Farmers need help, they are in real trouble and they get some help from this arrangement. Same thing with workers. Workers are in trouble, they need some help. As you know, senator sanders still is against this deal. Using similar rhetoric that you have. Let me ask it this way, you have backed off a bit on your medicare for all plans, meaning you want to let the public sort of get traction on it first. Youve reversed course a bit here on nafta from where you were to where you are now. What should voters take away from this about you . I want to be practical on the trade deal. If we can get some improvement for our farmers who are suffering, if we can get some improvement in enforcement for our workers, then i want to see us do that. And then as president i want to see us negotiate very different kind of trade deal. And the kind of trade deal that we should be negotiating is one that starts with the fact that everybody wants access to americas market. That means we should be using that leverage to raise Environmental Standards all around the world, to raise labor standards around the world. We should negotiate for a better deal, not just to back out of this box, but we should also provide relief right now to the farmers who are suffering, to the workers who are suffering. Thats how i see it. I see the same kind of thing on health care. We need to make improvement. You know what ill do on day one as president . Ill defend the Affordable Care act against the sabotage of the Trump Administration and ill reduce the cost of prescription drugs that have been jacked up by the pharmaceutical industry. Ill reduce the cost of epipens and insulin and hiv aids drugs. The president has the authority to do that all by herself. Doesnt need congress. Thats what im going to do. I want to get as much relief to as many people as quickly as we can. I think that ought to be the job of the president of the United States. Senator elizabeth warren, democrat from massachusetts coming to us from iowa, thanks for coming on and sharing your views. Stay safe on the trail. Thank you for having me here. You got it. When we come back, the growing tensions with iran, impeachment, the democratic race. Hows that for a 2020 kickoff . The panel is next. An save you t. In fact, if you had a dollar for every time they said it, youd have a lot of dollars. Which makes it hard to believe, especially coming from a talking lizard. Pip, pip, cheerio look, all i, dennis quaid, know is that esurance is built to save you dollars without skimping on service. And when they save, you save. The only way to know how much is to get a quote. Chances are youll save time, paperwork, and yes, dollars. When insurance is affordable, its surprisingly painless. Welcome back. The panel is here. Former Homeland Security secretary jeh johnson, Betsy Woodruff swan, host of kasie d. C. , kasie hunt, your first appearance since having a child. Thanks for having me. And the former governor of north carolina, pat mccrory. Im going to start with a Little Campaign rhetoric from candidate donald trump. Take a listen. The current strategy of toppling regimes with no plan for what to do the day after only produces power vacuums that are filled simply by terrorists. Enough endless war, its time to have a real plan for victory. They have dragged us into foreign wars that make us less safe. All right. I want to get into the substance in a minute. Pat mccrory, ill start with that political does the president have a potential longterm political box he may be in now with iran and that he may have he may end up in a war, whether he likes it or not . Well, any president dealing with the middle east is put into this situation throughout my lifetime. But the fact of the matter is theres a lot of hypocrisy. One u. S. Senator just two weeks ago called the president and our country impotent because of not responding to the attack against our embassy. And yet when the president killed a terrorist who was hiding behind the iranian flag but he was really a terrorist who was only 15 miles away from our embassy, hes then called by Democratic Leaders incompetent, unstable, act of war, terrorist. Just verbal attacks by our Democratic Leaders. And thats making him more weak because i think the democrats at this point in time went too far in their rhetoric in making our country weaker in responding now to the iranians possible counterattack. Are you implying that the president overresponded because of these democratic attacks . No. No, im saying the president when he did respond, now the democrats have made these very personal attacks. In fact they could almost be speaking points for the Iranian Regime. We cant make our president the villain in this. We can disagree with our president. I have no problem with that. But i think the democrats are playing this wrong at the same time. Whats the appetite on capitol hill here, both sides of the aisle . Well, i think for the republicans, the challenge here is they do not want to be seen not defending this president , so even if they have reservations, they are holding back those reservations. The republicans ive talked to behind the scenes are focused on making the argument that this was legal, that this was a lawful attack, that it was that this man was a terrorist. I think the distinction that you made about the flag is the important one from a legal perspective. Was this person an actor of the iranian state. The secretary of state kept saying the word terrorist, terrorist, terrorist over again and that wasnt an accident. Weve got a counselor over here. You heard this from mark warner, this is a tricky line to walk. You know, they have to see the intelligence, most of them havent. I thought the fact that warner was willing to acknowledge that there was a threat. He said, okay, i buy that, is telling. Now, the question, of course, is it imminent or not. But for this president from a political perspective, i mean do you want democrats a month out from iowa to be talking about how we shouldnt be going after iran . Betsy, it did seem as if the secretary of state did back off a little bit on how imminent this threat was. Thats right. What he didnt say but whats important to know in the context of how the administration thinks about iran is the way the president s advisers who supported this iran move are making the case for it behind the scenes. Theyre saying, look, obviously its not proportional to kill a military commander in response to the killing of a u. S. Civilian. They know theyre vaulting multiple steps up the escalatory ladder. Whether or not that bet pays off is very much up in the air, we dont know. But its a dramatic change from the prior administration. Jeh, before you were Homeland Security secretary you were counselor at the defense department. Right. Explain for viewers why does mike pompeo keep saying terrorist . There is a legal reason he keeps saying terrorist, isnt it . No, not necessarily. Okay. If you believe everything that our government is saying about general soleimani, he was a lawful military objective and the president under his Constitutional Authority as commander in chief had ample domestic Legal Authority to take him out without an additional congressional authorization. Whether he was a terrorist or a general in a military force that was engaged in armed attacks against our people, he was a lawful military objective, but thats not the only question here. For a very long time the bush administration, the Obama Administration had been engaged in what we refer to now as shadow warfare with the iranian government. Last thursday night was what we refer to as a decapitation strike where weve taken out a very highprofile member of the iranian government. That is a provocative, in your face act, where you kill a Senior Member of the iranian government and say, yes, i did it. I hope this administration has carefully considered the second and third effects of that. One very plain second order effect which any foreign officer could predict is the reaction in iraq with the growing shia political influence in that country. Right. We face the very real prospect that the Iraqi Government will want us out of the country. One piece of feedback i got at the Charlotte Airport last night from some citizens is what took us so long. This guy was only 15 miles, only 15 miles from the embassy that was attacked just days earlier. And i think people are now going, wait a minute, this guy was they keep using the term proxy. This guy was running proxy. Now, that means he was running terrorist groups under, again, being protected by the flag of iran. And i think he was walk this general was walking a fine line and a rather arrogant line. Nobody is arguing that this man was a good actor on the world stage. No, im arguing that he wasnt just iranian. Was the risk of taking him out worth it for americans . What are the implications. Thats a fair question and we dont know the answer to that and wont know for maybe a long time. We might know pretty fast, though, because the response from the iraqis is currently under way in parliament in baghdad. Its front of minds to american intel and defense officials exactly whats happening in this 24hour period. When they gave a briefing classified behind closed doors to senate staff on friday, there was an extensive discussion, according to my sources familiar with the briefing, specifically about how the Iraqi Parliament was responding and how to dissuade them from voting to push out u. S. Troops. Jeh johnson, very quickly, your former department put out a very alarming alert last night. It was very candid. The iranians ability to cyber attack us. Could they temporarily cripple cities . We have to prepare for that very distinct possibility. The National Threat advisory put out last night said that the iranian government could strike with little or no notice on a moments notice, and that hezbollah has demonstrated the capability and intent to strike the homeland. Thats a very candid statement. And they put that statement out after the soleimani attack. When we come back, the 2020 census gets to determine which states gain or lose house seats and, therefore, electoral votes. How both parties see promise and peril in the new battleground map that is coming. Thats next. Welcome back. Data download time. 2020 isnt just a president ial election year, its also a census year. And this is what is going to determine how many electoral votes each state gets. We already have a pretty good sense of where things are headed. First, the losers. The firm Election Data Services found these ten states are likely to lose a house seat and, therefore, an Electoral College vote after 2020. Five states that went republican in 2016 and five that went democratic. All right, tie game so far. There are some clear winners here. All of these states are gaining one electoral vote after the census is done. Three of them are red straits in 2016, two of them blue. But the biggest winners, perennial battleground state florida, will get two electoral voters. Theyll be sitting at 31. And then theres texas gaining the most with three. That means texas will have a whopping 41 electoral votes in 2024. A Huge Development in a red state where democratic changes are inching it toward swing state status. 72 electoral votes just for florida and texas. Throw in california and you get the picture. If texas is in play, it would mean not a whole new map but a whole new battlefield. When we come back, 29, thats the number of days left before the iowa caucuses. What . Parked it right there. Male voice what did i tell you, boys . Tonight we eat like kings chuckling youre a genius, gordon brake hit the brake uh, which ones the brake . crash, bottles smashing stop stop stooop brakes squealing whats happening . What . Theres a half of cheesesteak back there. With geico, the savings keep on going. Just like this sequel. 15 minutes could save you 15 or more on car insurance. Raccoon i got the cheesesteak remember, you have out the hilton app. Can the hilton app help us win . Hey, heywere all winners with the hilton price match guarantee, alright . Man, you guys are adorable alright, lets go find your coach, come on book with the hilton app. Expect better. Expect hilton. There is a president ial race taking place in 29 days. Betsy, quickly on elizabeth warrens interview, i thought it was interesting that she decided to go right there with iran. And impeachment. That she saw them connected. The wag the dog allegations are not a surprise but its significant for her to suggest the president engaged in this strike for underhanded motives. One thing warren rivals noticed and staffers to campaigns flagged this, she basically pull out two different statements on the death of soleimani. First, terrible person. The next day, called it an assassination, a term in this case has significant legal weight. Her rival campaigns are pointing to that and saying its an example of her struggling to try to keep both ends of the Democratic Party happy. I want to put up an example. Bernie is going on the attack a little bit on biden over Foreign Policy, a lot of baggage that joe takes into a campaign, referring to in this case the iraq war vote. Also yesterday went out of beat buttigieg in a fundraising email. I want to focus on sanders v. Biden. I thet iran backdrop presents an interesting contrast. We dont know if voters are going to say, steadyhand joe biden, or how about the guy who was always against the interventions here . I dont think we know how democratic voters are going to react. Talking to sources about this question yesterday, inside the campaigns, and i think it really depends on who youre trying to talk to. If youre joe biden, youre thinking about swing voters who like the strong posture, essentially, you go with the steady hand. That is the entire argument behind their whole campaign right now. A return to a more normal version of this. I think the question is going to be, how much do the base voters remember and think through iraq as a motivating factor . That was what swept obama into office in 2008. I think the question is, are people kind of past that . Or are they seeing that in this kind of context and are willing to make a bet on Bernie Sanders over it . The establishment of the Democratic Party in the Foreign Policy community, not popular with the base of the Democratic Party either. Bidens positions and bernies positions are different for a reason. Yes, and Foreign Policy as you know does not typically loom large in an election in a primary debate. Put it did in 07, 8, because of that iraq war vote. Obama was on record opposing the iraq war at the time. Democratic primary voters, as i think kasey has said, focused on, whos going to be stable, whos going to be thoughtful, versus somebody to is completely dovish. Whos going to be careful about getting us into another armed conflict. Its not, whos the most bullish and whos the biggest sabre rattler. Pat, the wag the dog hit on the president , how concerned should he be about that perception . Were split, half the country doesnt believe what comes out of president s mouth. Im more concerned about not the politics but our condition tree. Our countrys got to have wum voice. Its the type of criticism and the accusations isnt this on the president . Didnt he bring this upon himself . Because he doesnt choose to speak with one voice. No, i think theres always a tweet old tweets of donald trump, citizen donald trump in 2012. This is what he said about iran and barack obama. He said, watch out, president obama will attack iran to save face. The point being theres always a tweet, theres always a way where candidate trump behaved in a way hes now upset that people behave against him. Today we have president ial candidates on the democratic side signing pledges theyll never into a longterm war. This happens in every political campaign. Until you get to office, you dont know really what youre going to confront. Two names were not talking about that i saw millions of dollars worths of ads for, stier and bloomberg, stayer, spending millions showing us pick us of him glowing up, i dont know where hes going. Bloomberg, interesting seeing miss ads. Im glad you hes bringing up a whole issue of health care in new york city. I found that very interesting. See if that gets legs. I was struck too. Like, what . Tom steyer . And bloomberg, i dont know how von ders will wonder about this in a month. I came back to a president ial field after four months that looks considerably different than september. I will say that when you look at the actual process and chuck, you know this better than anybody there have been campaigns in the past that have tried to skip the first four states, gotten in late. Rudy giuliani knows this. That strategy has not worked in the past. People will say, you look at winning a democratic nomination, there are not very many bloomberg, biden districts out there. Thats the part ive never understood for bloomberg, how does he win . The second mayor thats running this term. Thank you, thats all for today. What a way to kick off 2020. Thank you for watching. Well be back next week. This is going to be an incredibly important month, let alone year in american politics. If its sunday, its meet the press. Meet the press. Go to hilton instead of a travel site and youll experience a whole new range of emotions like. The relaxing feeling of knowing youre getting the best price. And the magic power of unlocking your room with your phone. I can read minds too. Really . Book at hilton. Com and get the hilton price match guarantee. We have centuries of examples where the checks and balances of the constitution have worked. The framers designed the constitution for moments like this. We arent supposed to give a pass to a team, were supposed to think for ourselves. Thats why weve fought the revolution, thats why weve struggled to again and again and again make real those promises. I go, what are these things anyway . He says, theyre these little falcons. He goes, they watch over the dead, jimmy. He goes, they do. What if someone asked you to risk your life . What if i get shanked, what if i get killed. To go undercover into one of the countrys most dangerous prisons. Once they stepped out the door, i was on my own. To help catch a killer. She had such a zest for life. Young girls were being murdered