that the reason the progressive proposals for voting rights were not being passed is because it sbaz hazent been reintroduced since it was struck down but the reason it was able to be struck down is because republicans use the filibuster she is currently supporting. and so, i mentioned that example to show she is kiends of kicking up a storm of dust which we in arizona call a -- you know, vocabulary for aw you at home. but a storm of dust to kind of mystify constituents and people in the country as to her stance on the filibuster and voting rights. you can't have it both ways. you can't claim to support voting rights full throatedly. while you are supporting this measure that is being used in this current time as the most effective cudgel to stop voting rights from being passed and that's what she is trying to do with all of her rhetoric over the past couple weeks. she also told "politico" she continues to support the senate's 60 vote threshold because she thinks it is geeg