the actual issue that he is arguing in that case is that he is immune from anything he did as part of his official acts as president. that argument should not apply to any of the other trials that do not involve things that he did as president of the united states but the supreme court is willing to sign on to this pretty radical argument that presidents are allowed to do crimes, i think that is a sign that they may give trump some other goodies down the road as well. >> lisa, i guess technically, if the supreme court hears his arguments and releases its decision, technically a case might go forward but all the wa procedural matters around jack smith's case mean that it could bump up against the election. is there some date by which the trial couldn't be finished, it becomes too politicized? >> i think that is up to judge.