here is the problem, david, that was the exact prosecution case in the george zimmerman trial that george zimmerman chased a 17-year-old boy walking around with iced tea and candy for his brother and followed him and said there was crimes in the neighborhood, i was worried and chased him down. the police said don't chase him. he did. because the teenager defends himself and says i'm in fear for my life, shoots him. that's the same case and zimmerman walked. in america, the absurd can work if you are a certain kind of person. your thoughts? >> joy, that's right. what stands out to me more when we compare to the zimmerman trial is not just the facts and arguments but the composition of the jury. >> correct. >> that's what actually worries me. now, she did a lot of things right that we didn't see in the rittenhouse trial and the first one is she walked the jury down through the charge. basically explaining here is how you vote on each charge. here is a reason why. that was critical. she did two things that were