fiona hill and the like and we know that millions and millions of americans were glued to that testimony this week, is there some risk at getting parnas involved in this? >> it may be what he has to say is true and what the reporting is true, but a couple of problems with it. one is if congress or the southern district of new york were interested in this information, his lawyer wouldn't need to be tweeting about this and having public discussions about it. it seems they're having some public pressure to get them to bite on this information, and it seems they're reluctant to bite either because they believe it not to be credible or it may be they just don't want to go down this road not at this moment. maybe focus on devin nunes at this moment is distraction. the testimony has been very focused. we've heard two weeks of very compelling witness testimony, and to now go down another