on the case, in a way that -- either against the doj, or ultimately in its favor. one way or the other. judge cannon's ruling, should this issue come up, which it likely will, will be very insightful. >> bradley, last question to you, we know at least two incidents are alleged in this indictment, about donald trump showing classified information to people who did not have the security clearances. but no charge with him for the crime of dissemination of and the defense information. is that because there just wasn't evidence of that that the doj had to be able to charge him with that particular offense? >> yes, i think that was a bit of a bridge too far, given factual allegations, as we see them right now in the indictment, i don't think they quite had enough of a case to make on that front. nor do they really need to. the factual details that we have about donald trump showing off the documents. the staffer, the political committee, showing it off to the ghost writers, assuming they had the document there, we