say they're unfairly targeted. every rule -- would be silly. that can possibly be the law. so, in the end, i think that there is so much breath to this ruling that i think the justice department has to reconsider the qualification of what in the world she was thinking and what she meant. but, in the absence of, that i think that this is a real, real mistake. >> all interesting. do you remember part three? >> part three was the practical consequences. and so, i think that the justice department has two possibilities here. one, they could try to live with the special master's and i guess names will be submitted in the few days. and, the judge did say in the last page of the order, this is just, a quote, brief process. if it is a brief pause for a special master, that's one thing. the problem is, she hasn't actually told the special master what the task. as she, said whether these documents are protected by privilege. but the supreme court said,