spoke to fill that space. we also, however, have reporting front your colleague, greg miller, who says this, officials describe the discrepancy cited by vindman as minimal and of limited significance to investigators, even vindman didn't ascribe any sinister motive to the changes he saw that were not incorporated into the d. phil, do we have two things that are true, a dpocumet with discrepancies that may not be earth-shattering in their nature in what was left out? >> that's right, brian. while the discrepancies may not be earth-shattering, they are notable. and the ellipses that were left in fact summary, the rough transcript, were very notable. he they raised suspicions when the white house released that document several weeks ago, and that will continue now because while windy filled in some of those gaps before congress today talking about the mention of burisma by the ukrainian president as well as trump's