here's the thing, philosophically the democrats and the caucus have a variety of perspectives. i've argued, for example, let's restore the filibuster. if you have the leverage that comes from slowing things down, you have to be on the floor giving speeches. it's a public act. you did it in front of america and america can weigh in. are you heroes or are you bums. i argued that we should imply the two speech rule that has been in our rule since we were founded as a senate ask still in our rules today on final passage. these are using traditional rules of the senate but essentially applying them to the question of final passage of a bill. and that's the challenge. we never get to final passage now because always an amendment pending. so, that would be a beautiful thing. and i think it meets what my colleagues say when they say they don't want to get rid of 60 votes. well, there's two possible meanings to that. one, they want everything to be passed by 60 votes.