you have to understand the ig's methodology. i think it's the appropriate methodology for an inspector general. he starts with limited information. he can only talk to people essential there as employees.'s information, but his approach is if i get an explanation from the people that i'm investigating not unreasonable on its face, i will accept it as long as there's not contradictory testimonial or documentary evidence. it's a deferential standard, in other words. all he said is people gave me an explanation, i didn't find anything to contradict it, so i don't have a basis for saying there was improper motive, but he hasn't decided the issue of improper motive. >> have you? >> no. >> you have outlined a newspaper better, and so does the inspector general, with problems on how the fbi handled the