disturbing about that event, which is the initial application said, as you noted, that the fbi assessed that steele was the direct source or was a direct source, and on october 14th the drafts changed to the exact opposite. what we found is the fbi had no basis for the first statement, no evidence in their file -- it turned out the first statement was, in fact, the accurate statement. the point is they had no evidence to support that. when they flipped that, they had no evidence to support that either. that's the kind of issue that under the basic woods procedures, the factual accuracy procedures, had someone been doing their job and following up, they would have seen that and found that. of course, had they bothered to ask mr. steele, they might have found out which of the two versions was true. >> maybe they weren't interested in doing their job. question three, chairman graham and i sent our referral to the fbi and doj on january 4, 2018.