more methodically versus other people who might make decisions more on gut feeling than on facts. but it strikes me as a jury that although as david said we have not really met a lot up close, we have weeded out everybody who is identified by themselves biased against donald trump and with this 42 question series of questions, i think this is about as good as these lawyers are going to get in terms of understanding what these jurors are all about. there is always the opportunity for someone to be less than truthful or misleading and hiding a bias that they may have, but i think this is the best we're going to do. so far i think this jury seems just fine. >> yeah, and what about the fact that there are three attorneys on there? is that unusual? >> it is very unusual. as a lawyer myself, when i pick a jury, i often would excuse lawyers from the jury because what i worried about wasn't that they were going to rule for me