i think it was about free speech. so i want to ask you a few questions about it. and maybe you could describe it to me, if your memory serves you, but it seems to me that the argument that you were a part of, i think that you, you joined with a couple of others. it seemed as if the argument was because the pro-life protesters were threatening to -- threatening endangered women, attempting to enter the clinic. i'm not necessarily saying that you put those words in the brief, but they were in there, and they were a hostile, noisy crowd in the face of protesters. now, am i correct that a part of the argument was because they were noisy, in-your-face protesters they needed to be a little bit further away than people who were pro-choice advocates? because as i understand it, i think the underlying law in