becomes aware of a noncompliant abortion and they suffer the sort of same extreme emotional harm, that would ground an article iii injury for purposes of texas law. that would be sufficient to satisfy the texas article iii-style screen, that addresses some of my friends on the other side's concerns about an unlimited set of lawsuits or that anyone could possibly bring an sb-8 action. congress passes laws all time that don't expressly require that individuals show, for example, their own personal injury or traceability or redressability, but nonetheless, this court says, those are fundamental requirements of article iii, and the texas supreme court traces that same requirement to its own constitutional analog, the open courts provision. >> but i -- forgive me, but i don't recall an outrage injury. what would that be? you said extreme outrage, that would be the injury. >> the injury would be akin to a one suffered in a tort of outrage, where someone witnesses something that that essentially they find to be so extreme and