>> i want to ask you a question and i understand the sensitivities to evidence. but even this week in the contempt referral for mr. navorro what was presented by the commit tee is evidence that you have much of the navorro story and the defiance of the subpoena is more than a stunt and less than a fult blockade of information. he did an interview with ari melber. my question is, how complete is the story telling that you are in possession of now? >> what i would say is that for everyone the committee approached it is best to get the information directly from that person and people have made public statements. part of the argument is how can he claim privilege about something that he's gone on