mr. castor, do you remember anywhere in this 299-page report that makes reference to the fact that when the whistle-blower started this inquiry, he or she did so by making statements under penalty of perjury that were neither true or correct in writing and then did so again verbally? >> i don't remember that. >> after the inspector general testified on. and did not disclose their prior contacts or communications with one another, the whistle-blower contacted the inspector general to explain why he or she made statementshe under penalty of perjury in writing and verbally that were not true, correct, and accurate? mr. acastor, is that communication from the whistle-blower to the inspector general to explain prior inconsistent statements reflected anywhere in theco 299-page report? >> no. >> on october 2nd, chairman