for him if he did something that he's not proud of because you avoid liability or even smearing your reputation. i thought the weakest point today was the question of whether sondland was really telling the truth about burisma where he says i just thought it was by burisma and the 2016 election. did he not read the "new york times" front page article where giuliani is touting why he is going to ukraine? where he says i am going and it is an investigation of hunter biden that i am going in pursuit of. the idea that that's something that no one followed and is this is the ambassador toed e.e. >> he also made repeated claims that ukraine was in the portfolio from the go. but he missed the one article about donald trump's personal lawyer that was on the front page of the "new york times" heading to, oh, wait for it, ukraine. fox news by the way. and even if you missed that,