can't deprive a person of liberty without due process of law. and the court interpreted it the right to physical autonomy including the right to end a previability pregnancy. >> so it's all the above? >> well, that's how the court has interpreted the liberty clause for over 100 years in cases going back to myier, griswold, loving, lawrence. >> yeah, but i mean, all of those sort of just come out of lockner. so it's that we've dropped part of it. i understand what you're saying, but what i'm trying to focus on is to lower the level of generality or be more specific. we used to say it was a right to privacy that the court found in the due process, substantive due process clause. okay? or in substantive due process. i'm trying to get you to tell me what are we relying on now?