denial until proof says otherwise. i think, call it a victory for civilian casualty watchers that the pentagon came forth with this information, but hopefully not harbinger for things to come in the future. >> kevin, your experience covering the pentagon, certainly more than i have, the statement or statements from officials suggest they want to look at accountability going forward and whether or not procedures or processes should change as a result of this. how likely to see any accountability within the military ranks, within the strike cell that carried this out. it seemed that general mckenzie defended intelligence gathering process, acknowledging context of the moment as you said, but didn't necessarily say there was a problem with the way the intelligence was gathered or analyzed to lead one to be held accountable. >> these are tricky. usually there's a report, some