this is an unenameerated fundamental right and the voters, whatever they've said is irrelevant because we, five members of the supreme court, are going to decide what the law of the land should be and anybody who disagrees with us will be labelled a bigot or be accused of discrimination, even if their believes happen to flow from sincerely held religious conviction, like that of a marriage between man and woman. you've already said you see why this is a concern. >> i see why it is a concern and although the supreme court is not bound, in the sense of having to apply prior precedent, there is starry desisis in our system and there's standards in that world that the supreme court applies when it it's asked to -- sorry.