they were accepted crimes. that is, even the democrats on that judiciary committee agreed that bill clinton had committed perjury. that's on the record. and a federal judge later said it was perjury. in the case of nixon, the crimes were established. no one seriously disagreed with those crimes. now, johnson's the outlier because johnson w's was a trap door crime. they basically created a crime knowing that johnson wanted to replace secretary of war stanton and johnson did, because they had serious trouble in the cabinet. so they created a trap door crime, waited for him to fire the secretary of war, and then they impeached him. but there's no question he committed the crime. it's just the underlying statute was unconstitutional. so i would caution you not only about bribery but also obstruction. i'm sorry, ranking member. >> you're doing a good job.