fundraising email by a low level staffer. it was not an off the cuff answer on a tarmac. it was not a campaign speech at a rally where he goes off the teleprompter, playing to the crowd. this was the considered argument of the lawyer for the man who wants to wield the office of the presidency again. thankfully, the three judges seemed appropriately skeptical of trump's arguments. >> all of your other arguments seem to fall away. your separation of powers arguments fall away. your policy arguments fall away. if you concede that a president can be criminally prosecuted under some circumstances. >> even under clinton, where there's a deal cut, under president nixon, where there's a pardon given, there's an assumption that you could be prosecuted, because why enter into those particular acts? >> i think it's paradoxical to say that his constitutional