him to the plot to falsify records is another matter altogether. his lawyers will likely argue he was oblivious and that michael cohen handled the specifics. david, is it difficult to prove this case? would a jury believed that cohen decided to dip into his home equity to give money to stormy daniels? >> i don't think it's difficult to prove this legally. and here's why. the rule for the prosecution's office is you don't bring a high profile case in that you expect to lose. he has shown this to others and they've assured him that he can legally approve this case. it's whether or not the jury gets distracted when they hear this evidence. they really need to play this straight. this is what you and i were talking about in the last segment about prior bad acts. you have two lawyers and an