And im pissed because my daughter, im not going to see again. I want to feel safe at school. You know, senior year and junior year are big years for me, when i turned my academics around, started connecting with teachers and i started actually enjoying school. And now i dont know how im going to step foot on that place again. Speaker at the teacher would have a concealed come on then. They would go for special training, and they would be there, and he would no longer have a gun free zone. Gun free zone to a maniac, because they are all cowards. A gun free zone is, lets go and unless a attack because bullets arent coming back at us. Tucker you feel for those kids and their families. Mi seems likely a political matter that some some of gun control may be coming. The white house has signaled support for stricter background checks and bump stocks. Thats not close to what many on the left are demanding. You saw some of those demands today at widely demands today at widely televised rallies in florida. Some of those in attendance were from the high school in parkland. Thats understandable. Peoplele become political activates all the time in response to tragedies. Response to tragedies. Thats their right. Nobody ought to attack them for it. We are certainly not attacking them. We never would. We assume they have the best motives. Most of us have the best motives. Almost everybody is against school shootings. The question is what do you do about them . E now, if you watch a lot of cable news, you know that the answer is simple. You simply stop taking money from the nra and do you something about guns. Not anything specific, just something. But, first, you have to defeat the evil conservatives who love school massacres. Once do you that the violence will go away like magic. Thats what the demagogues on the other channels are telling you. They use the traumatized children of parkland as a human shield. Ask them what they are calling for, ask them to describe these policies, it will supposedly fix everything. And these childless news anchors screech that you are attacking the children. Its funny, every january, thousands of other children come to washington for the march on life. Like the kids from parkland, they are against killing. Some of them have had abortions. A few of them have survived abortions. F do the media hold these kids up as the last word on theia subject . Do they attack anyone who t questions them . Please, a lot of news outlets dont even bother to cover that march at all. All kids at any march, just like all americans, have a right to talk. And to do so in public to give their opinions anywhere, including on television. Unlike many on the left, we support that right unequivocally in every case. But the rest of us also have a right to add our voices to the conversation. We have an obligation to do that. Because we all have a staken in this countrys laws. Then the truth is, this is a remarkably complicated subject. Thats why we havent fixed it yet. Any answer has to balance our need for safety with respect for the civil rights of individuals and acknowledgment that this is a constitutional republic. Its not the set of morning joe. For example, pretty much everybody agrees that everybody with Mental Illness should not have firearms. That sounds simple. What do you with more than 400,000 iraq and afghanistan vets who have received a diagnosis of ptsd . Thats a mental disorder. Should they lose their rights to gun ownership because they were injured by war . Ip all of a sudden its not so simple. Or how about domestic abusers . Nobody thinks they should have guns. We dont, obviously. What if they havent been convicted of anything yet . Can you strip rights fromen somebody who is legally innocent . And if you take their gun rights away, how about their Voting Rights or free speech rights . Were not sure of the answers to those. But were positive they are real questions. They need to be debated and considered by smart people, sincerely trying to make the country better. The media screechers are not helping. They are telling us its aot simple fix as long as youth care enough. Thats a lie and theyre using children to tell that lie. Spare us. Were for the children. Were not for you. Congressman jim hines is a democrat who represents connecticut and he joins us tonight. Congressman, unlike a lot of people have you been specific about what you want. I admire that. You were on cnn on monday and im quoting now, we want to be no different from canada or australia or great britain. So, in australia, and you hear this a lot from the left, 650,000 guns were confiscated from citizens. And thats what you are calling for. Who would do that . Who would take those guns in this country . No. Thats not what im calling for, tucker. Australia is a pretty good example because after the massacre of 35 of its citizens in port arthur in 1996, they implemented a whole series. I dont usually agree with you, tucker, you are right. This is a complicatedd problem that wont gett solved certainly by the media on either side, but it will get sold either time not perfectly by lots of measures some of which were tried by australia. Australia doesnt have a Second Amendment. They are not the best example. We do know if weekend gethe universal background check, no matter where you buy a gun, you get a background check. We do know if you could find a way, and i admit that it is complicated with rights, to make sure that people with temporary restraining orders, temporarily give up their weapons. If you could do a whole bunch of those things, there is no question that, like australia, we could see our gun violence in this country plummet. Tucker there is a question about that. We dont actually know. We had the assault weapons ban of 1994. It seemed like it would reduce killings and it didnt. We know that conclusively. You are never quite sure what the effect is. You twice pointed to australia as a model for gun policy here. So what specifically about australia again, a country that confiscated its citizens guns by the hundreds of thousands what did they do . You keep using the word confiscation. Tucker they did, thats a fact. Its also a fact that they instituted a mandatory waiting period for the purchase of a gun. It is also a fact that they instituted a universal background check. Two things that we dont have in this country that might be considered constitutional. So you can leave the confiscation behind because thats not what anybody is talking about. B tucker that was the essence of what they did. You are not allowed to own a gun in australia except under circumstances where the government says you have got a right to. Same with great britain. You pointed to great britain. In great britain, you are not allowed to own a gun. You have to prove that you should be allowed to have one. E. Are you calling for that . No. Im not. In both of those countries, in the absence of a Second Amendment, you are right. You have to show a cause. A reason to have a gun. We have a Second Amendment in this country, which you may be surprised to hear i support. Shi so tucker doesnt sound like it. Require the citizens you can say that as much as you want, tucker, thats not true. U tucker im saying that in response to what you said. Uc what im calling for what the president im not usuallyt in the habit of praising the president , what the president has said he is willing to consider. Things like tightening up the background checks. Things like restrictions on Technology Like bump stocks. Nobody is calling for confiscation or for everything they do in australia or great britain. Tucker just to be clear, dont paint me as a demagogue. You just said this two days ago on cnn. You pointed specifically to a country that got rid ofyo gun violence because they got rid of guns. I think its a fair question to ask when you point to australia, why are you not calling for confiscation, because thats the core thing they did . First of all australia did not get rid of guns. Still a lot of guns in australia. Plenty of guns in canada and plenty of guns in the united kingdom. These are countries that are different than other own. No, they did not get rid of guns in any one of those countries. You keep talking about australia. I never called for confiscation. Tucker you were the one talking about australia, not me. Those country also have universal gun registration. Australia is a good model in one way which was that after a tragedy 35 people dead in port arthur. Eo they got together, the Prime Minister and six states got together and said lets pass a package of gun safety changes that will reduce violence. Now, not all of those changes would apply in the United States and im not calling for that. Tucker like taking them away by force from the population. T. Let me ask you this again, can you keep say that but thats not whatme anybody is calling for. Tucker im sorry. I know a lot about this and that was the whole point of the bill. You must know that, too. No, that was a part of the bill that im not calling for and frankly almost nobody is calling for confiscation. Tucker let me ask you this, those countries all have universal gun registration. You own a gun, you have to register with the government. Are you for that . You know, they actually canceled the universal gun registration in australia because they felt that it was more of a burden on legal gun owners. Tucker are you for it was the question. No. Im not necessarily for it in the United States. I am for everybody having a background check. I am for people with temporary restraining orders temporarily giving up their guns. Tr o i am for a limit on the size of the magazine that you can use. Things that we have done here in the state of connecticut which have been constitutional. And have not resulted in peoples Second Amendment rights being violated in connecticut. Tucker i was wonderingng this. You work up on capitol hill surrounded by armed guards. Do you think they have too many guns and do you believe that their magazines holdma too many rounds and if not why not . To tucker, nice try. Youre not going to get me to say tucker its a sincere question, they protect you. You feel safe with a lot of people with high capacity magazines but im not allowed to have them in my house to protect my family . Why . Explain it slowly, so i can explain understand it. Thats an absurd argument. But i will explain it. I would be perfectly happy with the general public having the same firearms that the Capital Police have if the general public were like Capital Police required to undergo a criminal check, required to recertify themselves every single year for the use of those t firearms, and personally accountable and professionally accountable for how they are used. Un if you are willing to put all those restrictions on the general publics right to own firearms, which is what police have and marines have, sign me up. Tucker let me ask you one last question. Nice try, my friend. Tucker some of us confused by the details you endorsed the most recent iteration of the assault weapons ban. I have asked this question of a lot of lawmakers. E in it, it would ban rifles that have something called a barrel shroud. Those would be illegal . What is a burial shroud andld wy would you ban it . A barrel shroud, as you probably know because you have you talked to other guests about it, covering on the barrel of a gun that allowed you to hold that gun when the barrel has overheated because of multiple rounds being fired. Tucker thats right. R so we agree on that. Im not all that worked up over barrel shrouds and not interested in saying that an assault weapon ban will solve our problems. I happen to support a ban on technology that allows you to get squeeze off 20 or 30 rounds in a minute or two. Tucker why would youn support the bill that would have banned that and pistol t grips and folding stocks andnd bayonet lugs and all these things that are irrelevant . It makes you seem not serious if you support Something Like that. You know, lots of states have passed assault weaponss ban. I heard you talking about the desire of the populist earlier. Lots of states, including my state of connecticut, assault weapon ban. The number of people who die in this country as a result of assault weapons, though they make the headlines, that is a relatively small percentage. Tucker im aware of that. Nonetheless, i dont want people to have guns thatat allow them and most Police Officers dont want them to have guns that allow them to squeeze off 20 to 30 rounds very rapidly without reloading. Look, you asked about barrel shrouds tucker im sorry, congressman, i think i letet you unpack it all and i appreciate your willingness l to come on and explain your views on this. Thank you very much. Okay. Thank you, tucker. Tucker Rachel Campos duffy is a Fox News Contributor and she joins us tonight. Rachel, thanks for coming on. Thanks for having me, tucker. Tucker you talked to these politicians about what just happened last week in parkland. The story is at least in part about the failures of the government, of the fbi, of local police, but really the federal authorities to respond to a lot of warning signs, consistent warningho signs. L should we surprised government officials just ignore that and the solution is always taking rights away from people who never do anything wrong and never Holding Account to people who did which is the fbi in this case . Why dont they mention that . Its a great point. I also say this to you. I come at this on two very personal points of view. Al one is im a military brat who was raised overseas. And the buses that i was on had armed security. The schools i went to were fortified and i felt very safe. So, when i hear that part of the conversation, that we should be fortifying our schools, thats somethingg the federal government could do, state governments could do that, as well. And im 100 percent for that. Im also the wife of a congressman, as you know this year, we had a Bernie Sanders volunteer who shot up a bunch of republican congressmen on a baseball field. And the only reason we didnt have a mass execution of those congressman on that field is because Steve Scalise happened to be part of that baseball team. By the way, he was going to leave five minutes after the shooter came. Had he left there, would not have been he has a detail of Capital Policemen. H he is the only one. He and leadership. So had he not been there, we would have had a massacre on that baseball field. So, you brought up an excellent point in that in your discussion with the congressman from connecticut, which is that Nancy Pelosian and many politicians have security. Why arent we securing our schools and why arentcu people allowed to take responsibility for their own security . Nd tucker because, in the end, you know, if there is a real disaster and i have seen it firsthand a couple of times, the cops leave. I i they have families, too. They are not going to protect you. I have seen it. You have got to protect yourself or you are not going to be protected. Ar why are we allowing blow hard from the congress to try to strip our ability to t protect ourselves . I dont understand. Well, we shouldnt. As citizens, what we should do is expand the conversation. Cs very dynamic. Its very complicated. Its about fortifying our schools. Listen, adam lanzas mom, before he killed her, after he shot up the children in newtown, she wanted to have him committed. And after that massacre in newtown, many parents came forward and said im scared of my mentally ill child who has had violent tendencies and they cant get those children committed. So theres a problem there. Tucker for sure. Theres another problem, tucker, that people dont want to talk about, that iseo that we have a family crises in this country. There are broken homes, broken families. There is moral crises. And we have families in schools that really, frankly a culture, thats unwilling to talk about right from wrong. Tucker you are right. Thats also a part of the problem that hollywood and the left is unwilling to talk about. Tucker yeah. Turns out of the Nuclear Family worked pretty well. We should have thought about this before we destroyed it rachel, thank you very much. Great to see you. Thank you, tucker. Tucker rogue judges are determined to impose their will on this country, regardless of what the law says, regardless of what voters think. Whats the solution to that . Is there one . Thats next. keyboard sounds dear freshpet, tank was overweight and had no energy. Until freshpet. Put the puppy back in my dog. They have businesses to run they have passions to pursue how do they avoid trips to the post office . Stamps. Com mail letters ship packages all the Amazing Services of the post office right on your computer get a 4 week trial plus 100 in extras including postage and a digital scale go to stamps. Com tv and never go to the post office again when this guy got a flat tire go to stamps. Com tv and never go to in the middle of the night. Hold on dad. Liberty did what . Yeah, Liberty Mutual 24hour roadside assistance helped him to fix his flat so he could get home safely. My dad says our insurance doesnt have that. Dont worry i know what a lug wrench is, dad. Is this a lug wrench . Maybe . You can leave worry behind when liberty stands with you™. Liberty stands with you™. Liberty mutual insurance. Tucker youve heard a lot about our failing institutions on this program. We now know the fbi is riddled with incompetent partisan hacks. Tucker youve heard ant lot about our failing institutions on this program. We now know the fbi is riddled with incompetent partisan hacks. The Intelligence Community seems to exist mostly to spy on you, and leak information about politicians it dislikes. E your state and local governments are full of bureaucrats who are paid more to deliver less every year. And then retire with a fat pension in their 50s. Academia, meanwhile, is apparently dominated by lazy mediocrity at this more interested in political activism than teaching. There is a lot of rot in our halls of power but our federal courts may be the most decayed institution of all. Though they receive very little attention. Under the last two administrations, the courts increasingly have come to see themselves not as interpreters of the law, their constitutional role, but as the countrys main policymakers. Consider for example whats been happening with daca. Now as a factual matter, it is indisputable that any president has the authority to end daca. The program was a creation from whole cloth of the Obama Administration. Lo it has no legal basis actual federal law says that Illegal Immigrants should be deported from this country, not be given work permits. The Obama Administration simply chose to ignore that law, setting the right of prosecutorial discretion. Now, the argument could be valid, theoretically, though we are skeptical. Ho here is what we know. If obama can choose to ignore the law, it is obvious the Trump Administration has the right to enforce the law. The law passed by congress. And, yet, left wing judges disagree. Several have ruled already it is somehow illegal to end daca. Their justification for this is legally ludicrous. Last month San FranciscoDistrict Court judge william blocked the end of daca nationwide. He said getting rid of it was, arbitrary and capricious. As part of his ruling, he asserted daca should h continue because it was, in the public interest. . In other words, the judge likes the program, therefore, ending it is illegal. Last week another judge,ge judge nicholas garifus in new york, ruled daca cant be eliminated because the administration has not provided a valid reason for eliminating it, as if following the law were not enough. Not the first bizarre ruling from that judge. Om in 2010, garafus ordered the new York Fire Department use racial quotas for hiring rather than merit to achieve goals he had in mind results were immediate. Injuries went up. Dropout surged from 10 to 24 . Later reversal in Appeals Court said his bias was so obvious and severe that parts of the case had to beo assigned to a new judge, yet, of course, he is still on the bench. He and a lot of judges like him. In michigan, a judge has blocked the deportation of convicted iraqi criminals ind this country citing the alleged danger they would face if they returned to their own country. In new york a judge releaseded illegal immigrant criminal prior to deportation claiming he had a constitutional right to say goodbye. In florida a judge blocked the deportation of nearly 100 somalis because of the conditions on the airplane that would fly them home. For real, that happened. D. This is commonplace now. In the name of progressive resistance to the president , anything can be declaredst unconstitutional and is. For example, its been settled law pretty much forever that a president has the power to exclude foreigners from the country based on security concerns. But in the past year, multiple judges have ignored this and struck down theav administrations travel bans. Some have taken the legally meaningless position that the bans were unconstitutional because of things trump said on thetu campaign trail. Judge james wynn of the Fourth Circuit compared theju president s travel ban to fdrs internment of the japanese, american citizens of japanese descent, during the second world war. Thats not legal analysis. Its political punditry. Get that man a cnn contract. For more than 200 years the u. S. Military determined who could serve in uniform based in part on which medicalco conditions might negatively affect a persons ability to fight wars. There are a lot of them. That makes sense, of course, its no longer the law, thanks to judges. In his final months in office, president obama declared the military must admit transgendered soldiers regardless of the effect ont military readiness. That was a political decision obviously. Thanks to activist judges it is now a constitutional right somehow. A judge in maryland and ruled it unconstitutional to bar transgender volunteers from service. The ruling went on to order the government to cover gender reassignment surgery at taxpayer expense. These judges are not interpreting the law, much less enforcing it. They are inventing the law. They reject the core idea of democracy, which is aac country whose policies are determined by its citizens. Its voters. A the judges are in control, no matter what you want or who you voted for. Increasingly, the elected branches of government are irrelevant. This is especially true in the issues of immigration. In the 1980s, limited amnesty for farm workers was supposed to end in 1988. F the courts ruled it had to be extended further. Thousands of additional people were given amnesty they werent supposed to receive. Lawmakers were ignored. 1990s, california voters overwhelmingly passed proposition 187 that denied state social services to i people here illegally. Courts gutted that law without even allowing it to take effect and now californias entire middle class is fleeing the state illegal immigration made it a dystopia suited for the poor and very rich. Thats exactly what the voters didnt want but the judges didnt care. How long before some judge on the ninth circuit have the illegal aliens can vote in our elections because well, just because. Some laugh but its coming. In a constitutional republic, judges are essential. Their job is to restrain politicians have from trampling our core governing principles. By core governing principles we mean ones written in the constitution not in the New York Times editorial page or at the base of the statue of liberty. Our system has worked well a for hundreds of years but its breaking apart. Its breaking apart because of judicial integrity. There isnt enough of that. If you find yourself arguing the constitution does not contain the right to keep and bear arms but does contain a right to abortion, you are lying. Thats not a difference of interpretation, its dishonesty. One is in the text. One is not. Right now this is happening almost exclusively on the n left. Its not hard to imagine conservatives doing it too. Why wouldnt they after a while . Ti what happens when republican appointed judges start striking down laws a Democratic Congress passed on taxes, abortion you name it, simply because theyim dont like them. The the judiciary will lose whatever honor it once had. It will become a political weapon that has happened in a lot of countries, its a disaster a lot of times. Judges who misuse their power ought to be called to account. They are not gods. They are government t officials who work for us. When they are corrupt or dishonest, they ought to face the same criticism as politicians or bureaucrats. Abraham lincoln accused the High Court Justice of plotting to increase slavery. He was right. K the administration points out judicial malfeasance and there is a loft it, the ruling class responds with howls, thats attack on democracy, they say. I find these attacks on the judiciary absolutely abhorrent and unacceptable. I will be honest, i dont understand language like that, we dont have socalled judges, we dont have socalled senators, we dont have socalled president s. Socalled judge, is it appropriate for the president to be questioning the legitimacy of a federal judge in that way . Doesnt that undermine the separation of powers and the constitution written right next door . U tucker they are lying to you as they always do. Its not antidemocratic to demand the publics views should fundamentally shape Public Policy. Thats the essence of democracy itself. Jonathan turley is a particularly distinguished professor at George WashingtonUniversity Law school. And he joins us tonight. Professor, thanks for coming on. Thanks. Tucker thats kind of the essence of the whole t debate, is to what extent should Public Policy be guided by the publics viewsc in a democracy . And obviously there are mediating structures, congress, judiciary, executive. Basically if you get too far from what the public wants its not democracy. We live in a representative democracy. You elect people to make decisions for you. You hopefully wont have too much of a disconnect at the end of the day between the policies being pursued ultimately those laws have to be written by people who are political representatives. Tucker exactly. And that means that thete courts must retain a fairly narrow role in this system, otherwise the system doesnt work. Madison created a system by which factional interests would sort of roll around between the legislative and executive branch in congress. Out of that would come the majoritarian compromise. We work out our differences. C that system only works if there is no alternative to that system. O if you start to make i decisions, for example, in the courts that are really political decisions, it takes the madisonian system off line. And thats what has given us the stability. You have countries like france that went through constitutions with almost a seasonal regulator. And they were very unstable. Ours has been stable. You can say a lot of things about problems that we have, but were still here. We have gone through incredible pressures and periods. And were still here. And its largely due to the fact that we all have sort of skin in the game. N we all know that if we respect the political system, that its worth working for change. Ng tucker i agree with that completely. I have always believed in our system and i want to believe in it. Te but if you have judges who clearly arent even making au good faith effort to pretend that their decisions correspond to the text in the constitution, dont theem rest of us have a right to Say Something about that . Well, i think that there is no problem of criticizing the courts. Every president in modern times has taken the courts to task. And they have all pledged to change the courts on the left or the right. Thats a natural part of the process. There are times when yous. Cross the line. Tucker i agree. The president s criticism of the ethnicity of that one judge crossed the line. Tucker i hated that. I agree with you, i hated that. That doesnt mean that if a judge doesnt see the right to bear arms, which is written explicitly in the bill of rights but somehow imagines the right to abortion which is nowhere to be found. We take that for granted but its very common. Doesnt that raise the question, like, what . Where does that come from . I think the people of good faith can disagree on these issues. I think issues of the Second Amendment, abortion, these are all penumbral issues. The Second Amendment is expressed in terms off abortion the court refers to as a right. We can disagree about those things and do it civilly. There is no problem with citizens or president saying thats just not what the law says. Thats not what we created as a free people. Tucker were in charge. George stephanopoulos does not like it though if you say that keep that in mind if you dare. Professor, thank you. Thank you. Tucker we have terrifying new numbers about the growth of ms13, which is actually real despite what they tell you. Its in fact americas deadliest gang. We have got the numbers next. Rs are pretty much the same. But while some push High Commission investment products, Fisher Investments avoids them. Some advisers have hidden and layered fees. Fisher investments never does. And while some advisers are happy to earn commissions from you whether you do well or not, Fisher Investments fees are structured so we do better when you do better. Maybe thats why most of our clients come from other money managers. Fisher investments. Clearly better money management. Today, a focus on innovation in the Southern Tier is helping build the new new york. Starting with advanced manufacturing that brings big ideas to life. And cuttingedge Transportation Development to connect those ideas to the world. Along with urban redevelopment projects worthy of the worlds top talent. All across new york state, were building the new new york. To grow your business with us in new york state visit esd. Ny. Gov. Tucker we brought you sad news on this program a couple of times how Many American cities seem to resemble slums. You may have trouble visualizing what that means and this is for you. After last Nights Program we were sent this picture by a viewer who lives and works in the city of San Francisco. It shows the sidewalk outside his office litteredit with by our count more than 30 syringes and other drug paraphernalia. This is not in some abandoned lot or freeway overpass. N its right outside the offices of spotify, a Top Tech Company in downtown San Francisco. Its right across the street from we work and one block away from zen rez and three blocks from tech giants twitter and uber. Some of the Richest Companies and richest city in the United States and their employees work in a circus of trash and drugs. The question is, do elites even care . And the answer is, no, they dont. U. S. Cities arent just plagued by homeless drug addicts but also by deadly Central American gangs. Its not propaganda. Er its real. New numbers out about the extent of ms13, thats the primarily el salvadoriante gang that has become the deadliest organized crime ring in the country. Jessica joins us with those numbers. Thanks for coming on. Im glad to be with you. Tucker so ms13, despite, it sounds like, efforts from the federal government, is metastasizing, is that what the numbersro show . It is. Some people have been dismissive of all theow attention to this gang, butee it has rebuilt itself. Its not a homegrown gang. It was formed by people who came from Central America decades ago illegally. So that was a failure in border security. But, i. C. E. And other Law Enforcement agencies were able to stifle it for a while there. But in recent years, its really rebounded because of this it took advantage of this surge of unaccompanied minors thats been going on for several years and also u u the lack of immigrationng enforcement. So they have come back with a vengeance and this is not just petty gang violence, nuisance crimes. Were talking murders. Hundreds of murders that ms13 members have been arrested for. And its a scourge in a number of communities. Tucker give us a sense of their scale. We think of ms13 being in california, washington, maybe chicago. It has spread, though. Tell us what that looksti like. At a certain point in time, the gang decided to almost open up franchises around the country. Places like long island, boston, charlotte, north carolina. As you said, the suburbs of washington, d. C, because this is a gang thats controlled from el salvador and the cliques in the United States do send money back too el salvador to help support the whole gang. At a certain point in time, the leaders put pressure on the members in the United States to kick it up a notch and start doing more and bring in more people from Central America. Recruit more from these kids who recently arrived. They do extortion, home invasions, sex trafficking, prostitution. And murder to prove themselves to each other and to intimidate others in the community. And we found that they were active in 22 states just in the last few years and concentrated, as i said, inn those areas that experienced o a lot of the illegal arrivals from Central America. En tucker right. Its urban, its rural as well and some places that have never had these this kind of a gang presence before. And its difficult for them. Tucker we should point out that the victims arehe almost even in sanctuary. Tucker victims arer almost all immigrants. Something that immigrant right advocates ignore. Ironically. Jessica, thanks for coming on and telling us that i appreciate it. Thank you. Tucker the Companies Google and twitter, two of the Biggest Companies in the world, are once again working to silence free speech online. That story next. Copd makes it hard to breathe. So to breathe better, i go with anoro. Go your own way copd tries to say, go this way. I say, ill go my own way with anoro. Go your own way oncedaily anoro contains two medicines called bronchodilators, that Work Together to significantly improve lung function all day and all night. Anoro is not for asthma. It contains a type of medicine that increases risk of death in people with asthma. The risk is unknown in copd. Anoro wont replace rescue inhalers for sudden symptoms and should not be used more than once a day. Tell your doctor if you have a heart condition, high blood pressure, glaucoma, prostate, bladder, or urinary problems. These may worsen with anoro. Call your doctor if you have worsened breathing, chest pain, mouth or tongue swelling, problems urinating, vision changes, or eye pain while taking anoro. Ask your doctor about anoro. Go your own way get your first prescription free at anoro. Com. When it comes to travel, i sweat the details. Late checkout. Downalternative pillows. And of course, price. Tripadvisor helps you book a. Hotel without breaking a sweat. Because we now instantly. Search over 200 booking sites. To find you the lowest price. On the hotel you want. Dont sweat your booking. Tripadvisor. The latest reviews. The lowest prices. Tucker we have talked a lot on this show and we are going to talk a lot more about the growth of the power of Big Tech Companies and how they are now a farow bigger threat to your Civil Liberties than the federal government ever was. Now the head of a socialas Media Network says that google is censoring his company. How . Bill otman is the cocreator of mind. Com and he joins us in the studio. Thanks for coming on. Thanks for having me. Tu f tucker google is trying to censor your company, how . We got banned from advertising platform, probably caught up in their outofcontrol algorithms which basically bann companies with key words with no rationality. Tucker just for perspective, im not overstating it when i say, if you are banned from googles ad platform, it can be debt for a company . It can. It has actually killed tons of countries and content on youtube demonetized pretty serious. Tucker they have the power to snuff out a youngr company. Why did they do this to you, do you think . T did you do something wrong . Probably some key word that got caught up in algorithms but its actually a symptom of a bigger problem of censorship algorithm happening on all of the major networks. Ap we are actually building ourur own ad network to battle this and completely transparent on the block chain so that everyone can see whats happening with our system. Completely open sourced. Anyone can inspect it, peer review it this is how things have to be. It cant be proprietary. Tucker it cant. One thing the news consuming public doesnt understand almost all news you read online is controlled byan google and facebook because they control 90 of the ads. Ol they are in charge. They own all the news sources, in effect. And when you go to peoples websites who host google, google ads is spying on you through those websites. By putting google ads on website, you are becoming an agent of google. Thats why we needic freedombased ad platforms to emerge which dont spy on people by default. Tucker so you are challenging one of the most complete monopolies inos american life. Why would they let you do that . Its not about them letting us do that. Decentralization. Open sourced. Block chain, transparent social networks are emerging and there is really nothing they can do about it. Hopefully they will transform. Thats what you can hope. Tucker so you think that they have this power, the federal government has done nothing about it, they have a monopoly basically over all digital information. And the federal government refuses to reign it in for whatever reason. You think you could provide an alternative to that . You can free up the system from their control. Yeah. I mean, its happening, free open sourced, decentralized networks are rising up. Tucker whats it going to be called . I mean, its going to be a network of networks. The next big network is probably not going to be a centralized site. Its going to be a multitudees of networks interoperating so it cant get censored. Tucker you think thiss will radically disempower google and facebook. I think this move will for sure. Tucker hire body guards. Just kidding. Godspeed. We will be rooting for you. That would be transformative in ways people dont understand. W we are definitely on your side. Thanks, tucker. Tucker cnns antitrump hysteria is dropping the network to remarkably new lows. Cant wait to show you the latest next. If yor crohns symptoms are holding you back, and your Current Treatment hasnt worked well enough, it may be time for a change. Ask your doctor about entyvio, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohns. Entyvio works at the site of inflammation in the gi tract and is clinically proven to help many patients achieve both symptom relief and remission. Infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen during or after treatment. Entyvio may increase risk of infection, which can be serious. Pml, a rare, serious, potentially fatal brain infection caused by a virus may be possible. This condition has not been reported with entyvio. Tell your doctor if you have an infection, experience frequent infections or have flulike symptoms or sores. Liver problems can occur with entyvio. If your uc or crohns treatment isnt working for you, ask your gastroenterologist about entyvio. Entyvio. Relief and remission within reach. Dawn is serving up dinner for a whole town that table was like. So big can one bottle of new dawn clean all the dishes . We did it 6,000 dishes a drop of dawn and grease is gone. Tucke tucker cnn has been so completely over the top in its coverage of this administration that those of us who remember it from 20 years ago or who in my case who used to work there stare slack jaw at the screen really, can this be happening . Last night even farther than normal editorialized in its chyrons, the script at the bottom of the screen twice. First, in the situation room one kyron Read White House repeats false claim is he tougher on russia than obama. As if thats an objective claim. Meanwhile, on up front with erin burnett, its clear russian meddling had nog impact followed by in parenthesis, no, its not. [laughs] Fact Checking their own chyron. Joe concha writes for the hill has a facial twitch and joins us tonight; joe,ha chyrons, we should be fair to wolf blitzer who does try hard to keep it straight, they dont write the chyrons, but like nobody saw that and said thats too far, we cant do that. Oh, no, obviously that was a decision in the control room, tucker. And same with erin burnett. I have been on her show an d hundred times. I respect her professionally. I think she does a good job. They dont have any decision as far as those chyrons. Afterwards they can read the criticism and say hey, guys, its my face thats on the screen. Im the only one thats going to get criticism for it but and an end to it, chyrons we are seeing below our screen right now. Editorial opinion show like yours, its fine like your newspaper. You go to your editorial page and thats fine. But on news programs, thats something that plays into the narrative if you are cnn that you are the opposition party, that you are leading the resistance against the Trump Campaign and not serve as an objective News Organization now, whats a factual chryon . For instance like, today in new york, new york experienced record high temperatures inn central park. Thats a fact. F billy graham dies at age 99. Thats a fact. When you have breaking News White House repeats trumps false claim as he said, that subjective, and that is the opinion. Senior counselor for military and Defense Affairs for senator tom cotton and john noonan is no relation to danny noon none i want to make that clear. Respectively please tell your producer not to do this you cant appoint yourself arbiters in the debate. Ater debate the merit of each administrations policies, thats perfectly fine. This isnt putting your finger on the scale, thatsle i think that sums it nicely. Tucker the term chyron is the banner at the bottom of the screen. A headline. Tucker that the host is not aware of. Have you noticed this all day, these cable news anchors, most of whom as far as i know are childless, lecturing the rest of us about how we dont love the children if we dont agree with them on a very specific political issue, guns . Li have you ever seen the press preachier than it was today . I remember on the gay marriage rulings a couple years ago a side was taken. It was a side that Many Americans agreed with. But you cant do that, right . And the problem is now, its not a matter of, okay, i think the age to buy guns should be raised to 21 and no, i think it shouldnt and heres why. Its always, you know what . You are a bad person. K you want children to die as a result. D and, you know, we saw it on the conservative side as well on the liberal side as far as people saying that these children are actors. Actually being coached. Please, i mean, i had a friend that had a daughter in that School Hiding in the closet and the emotion is real. I would never doubt these kids in terms of their sentiment around it. This they are not being coached, tucker. Tucker because we are not liberals, we believe in free speech. Joe, thank you so much. Good to see you. Tucker up next, we bid farewell to the great billy graham. With big dreams. We came with big appetites. With expedia one click gives you access to discounts on thousands of hotels, cars and things to do. Like the Garland Hotel for 40 off. Everything you need to go. Expedia its league night . saved money on motorcycle insurance with geico goin up the country. Bowl without me. Frank. im going to get nachos. Snack bars closed. Gah ah, ah ah. Im goin up the country, baby dont you wanna go . Im goin up the country, baby dont you wanna go . Geico motorcycle, great rates for great rides. Tucker the great Evangelist Billy Graham died a he was 99 years old. There are a lot of remarkable things about grahams life. Maybe the most strikeli something this within living memory a fairly Orthodox Christian became a National Celebrity in this country. Graham ministered to t president s and actors and captains of industry, all of whom were proud to talk to him in public. Graham didnt become rich and famous by promoting b selfactualization or selling real estate advice or staging walks over hotli coals. He never said one time you go girl. He basically just preached the bible. In the america of the time that was enough. People stopped him on the street to shake his hand. We live in a different country now. But billy graham never changed. In an age when virtually every one of our leadersrs seems hollow and craven, l graham spent almost a century here without disgracing himself. Thats a life welllived. Billy graham, rest in peace. We are confident he will. Amazingly, the hour has slipped through our fingers like sand through an hourglass. That is it for us tonight. Tune in every night to the show that the is sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness and groupthink, all of which are everywhere these days, but we continue forward with your help. Good night from washington. Have a great night, well see you tomorrow, sean hannity is next. [cheers and applause] sean how we doing . Sean hello, cpac how are you all doing . [cheers and applause] sean wow. First night of cpac. Grab a seat. We have great guests, you will have a great time